Search

Emerging evidence on substituting cannabis for more harmful drugs has led to cannabis becoming a novel harm-reduction strategy for combating the current drug poisoning crisis. However, the authorization of medical cannabis as part of a harm-reduction approach and recovery strategy has significant implementation barriers rooted in longstanding stigma towards cannabis. Through a multi-discipline collaboration of Canadian clinicians and academic researchers, we highlighted stigma barriers and opportunities to address these barriers to elicit improved delivery of medical cannabis as a harm-reduction therapy within existing therapeutic frameworks. Evidence from existing literature and real-world experiences converged on three key themes related to stigma barriers: (1) Lack of medical cannabis education within the healthcare community, (2) lack of consensus and coordination among harm-reduction services and (3) access to medical cannabis. We highlight potential solutions to these issues, including improved healthcare education, better coordination between care teams and suggestions for improving access. Through this discussion, we hope to contribute to reducing the stigma around using medical cannabis as a harm-reduction strategy for individuals with a substance use disorder and consider new perspectives in policy development surrounding recovery services., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate the longitudinal association between periods of homelessness and progression through the HIV cascade of care among people who use drugs (PWUD) with universal access to no-cost HIV treatment and care., Design: Prospective cohort study., Methods: Data were analysed from the ACCESS study, including systematic HIV clinical monitoring and a confidential linkage to comprehensive antiretroviral therapy (ART) dispensation records. We used cumulative link mixed-effects models to estimate the longitudinal relationship between periods of homelessness and progression though the HIV cascade of care., Results: Between 2005 and 2019, 947 people living with HIV were enrolled in the ACCESS study and 304 (32.1%) reported being homeless at baseline. Homelessness was negatively associated with overall progression through the HIV cascade of care [adjusted partial proportional odds ratio (APPO) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.63]. Homelessness was significantly associated with lower odds of progressing to each subsequent stage of the HIV care cascade, with the exception of initial linkage to care., Conclusions: Homelessness was associated with a 44% decrease in the odds of overall progression through the HIV cascade of care, and a 41-54% decrease in the odds of receiving ART, being adherent to ART and achieving viral load suppression. These findings support calls for the integration of services to address intersecting challenges of HIV, substance use and homelessness among marginalized populations such as PWUD., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Evidence-based medicine has consistently prized the epistemological value of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) owing to their methodological advantages over alternative designs such as observational studies. However, there are limitations to RCTs that hinder their ability to study chronic and dynamic conditions such as substance use and addiction. For these conditions, observational studies may provide superior evidence based on methodological and practical strengths. Assuming epistemic superiority of RCTs has led to an inappropriate devaluation of other study designs and the findings they support, including support for harm reduction services, especially needle exchange programs and supervised injection facilities. The value offered by observational studies should be reflected in evidence-based medicine by allowing more flexibility in evidence hierarchies that presume methodological superiority of RCTs. Despite the popularity of evidence ranking systems and hierarchies, nothing should replace critical appraisal of study methodology and examining the suitability of applying a given study design to a specific research question., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: HIV-positive people who use illicit drugs (PWUD) experience elevated rates of HIV-associated morbidity and mortality compared with members of other key affected populations. Although suboptimal levels of access and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) are common among HIV-positive PWUD, there is a need for studies investigating the possible biological impacts of noninjection illicit drug use among people living with HIV in real-world settings., Methods: We accessed data from the ACCESS study, an ongoing prospective cohort of illicit drug users with systematic HIV viral load monitoring in a setting with universal care and ART dispensation records. We used multivariable generalized linear mixed models to estimate the longitudinal associations between noninjection use of crack cocaine, powder cocaine, opioids, methamphetamine, cannabis and alcohol on plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load, adjusted for ART exposure and relevant confounders., Results: Between 2005 and 2018, 843 individuals from the ACCESS cohort were included and contributed to 8698 interviews. At baseline, the mean age was 43 years, 566 (67%) reported male sex and 659 (78%) used crack cocaine in the previous 6 months. In multivariable models adjusted for ART exposure, only crack cocaine use in the last 6 months was found to be significantly associated with higher HIV viral load., Conclusion: We observed significantly higher HIV viral load during periods of crack cocaine use independent of ART exposure. Our findings support further research to investigate the possible biological mechanisms of this effect.