Search

Therapists' intense negative emotional responses regarding suicidal patients raise questions about therapists' willingness to treat them; however, this issue has yet to be investigated. The aim of the current study is to examine to what extent the severity of suicidality of a hypothetical patient will influence therapists' willingness to treat and the likelihood of their referring out. Mental health professionals (N = 249) completed a questionnaire that presented a vignette of a hypothetical patient referred for psychological treatment. The vignette contained a manipulation of the severity of suicidality levels of the referred patient, with two randomly assigned conditions: suicidal or depressive symptoms. Participants were then asked about their willingness to treat the hypothetical patient. Our results showed that willingness to treat was significantly lower and the likelihood of referring out was significantly higher among therapists in the suicidal patient condition, relative to the depressive patient condition. Longer professional seniority and previous training in suicide prevention moderated these effects. Our findings highlighted therapists' reluctance, especially among young practitioners, to treat suicidal patients, an inclination that may have a critical impact on patient suicidal outcomes. Findings reinforced the need for specific training on suicide prevention in the mental health curriculum.

This article examines suicide prevention among children in India's “suicide capital” of Kerala to interrogate the ways temporalization practices inform the cultivation of ethical, life-avowing subjects in late capitalism. As economic liberalization and migration expand consumer aspiration in Kerala, mental health experts link the quickening of material gratification in middle-class parenting to the production of insatiable, maladjusted, and impulsively suicidal children. Experiences of accelerated time through consumption in “modern” Kerala parenting practice reflect ideas about the threats of globalization that are informed both by national economic shifts and by nostalgia for the state's communist and developmentalist histories, suggesting that late capitalism's time–space compression is not a universalist phenomenon so much as one that is unevenly experienced through regionally specific renderings of the past. I demonstrate how experts position the Malayali child as uniquely vulnerable to the fatal dangers of immediate gratification, and thus exhort parents to retemporalize children through didactic games built around the deferral of desires for everyday consumer items. Teaching children how to wait as a pleasurable and explicitly antisuicidal way of being reveals anxieties, contestations, and contradictions concerning what ought to constitute “quality” investment in children as temporal subjects of late capitalism. The article concludes by bringing efforts to save elite lives into conversation with suicide prevention among migrants to draw out the ways distinct vulnerabilities and conditions of precarity situate waiting subjects in radically different ways against the prospect of self-destruction.