Search

We present a comparison of atmospheric transport models that simulate carbonyl sulfide (COS). This is part II of the ongoing Atmospheric Transport Model Inter‐comparison Project (TransCom–COS). Differently from part I, we focus on seven model intercomparison by transporting two recent COS inversions of NOAA surface data within TM5‐4DVAR and LMDz models. The main goals of TransCom‐COS part II are (a) to compare the COS simulations using the two sets of optimized fluxes with simulations that use a control scenario (part I) and (b) to evaluate the simulated tropospheric COS abundance with aircraft‐based observations from various sources. The output of the seven transport models are grouped in terms of their vertical mixing strength: strong and weak mixing. The results indicate that all transport models capture the meridional distribution of COS at the surface well. Model simulations generally match the aircraft campaigns HIAPER Pole‐To‐Pole Observations (HIPPO) and Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom). Comparisons to HIPPO and ATom demonstrate a gap between observed and modeled COS over the Pacific Ocean at 0–40°N, indicating a potential missing source in the free troposphere. The effects of seasonal continental COS uptake by the biosphere, observed on HIPPO and ATom over oceans, is well reproduced by the simulations. We found that the strength of the vertical mixing within the column as represented in the various atmospheric transport models explains much of the model to model differences. We also found that weak‐mixing models transporting the optimized flux derived from the strong‐mixing TM5 model show a too strong seasonal cycle at high latitudes. Plain Language Summary: Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is a significant sulfur‐containing trace gas in the atmosphere, which makes it important for studying climate change. One of the reasons it is worth investigating is because plants take up COS in a similar way as CO2 during photosynthesis. However, the atmospheric sources and sinks of COS are not well understood. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the state‐of‐the‐art optimized surface COS fluxes from the inverse models TM5‐4DVAR and LMDz, and then seven atmospheric transport models were used to simulate COS mole fractions by transporting the optimized fluxes under the TransCom‐COS protocol. The results showed good agreement between the simulated COS and COS observations on independent platforms. The study also revealed that COS drawdown due to plant uptake can be observed over Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. However, discrepancies between the model simulations and observations were mainly found in free troposphere, emphasizing the need for further investigation into COS chemistry and model transport differences. These findings provide important reference for further investigation of COS global distribution and budget analysis. Key Points: Simulations in seven models propagating optimized carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes derived from two inversions agree with independent observationsSimulated and observed COS drawdowns are captured in boundary layer over the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans due to plant uptake over landsWeak vertical mixing models using fluxes optimized from the fast‐mixing TM5 model overestimate the COS seasonal amplitude at high latitudes [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gross primary production (GPP) by boreal forests is highly sensitive to environmental changes. However, GPP simulated by land surface models (LSMs) remains highly uncertain due to the lack of direct photosynthesis observations at large scales. Carbonyl sulfide (COS) has emerged as a promising proxy to improve the representation of GPP in LSMs. Because COS is absorbed by vegetation following the same diffusion pathway as CO2 during photosynthesis and not emitted back to the atmosphere, incorporating a mechanistic representation of vegetation COS uptake in LSMs allows using COS observations to refine GPP representation. Here, we perform ecosystem COS flux and GPP data assimilations to constrain the COS‐ and GPP‐related parameters in the ORCHIDEE LSM for boreal evergreen needleleaf forests (BorENF). Assimilating ecosystem COS fluxes at Hyytiälä forest increases the simulated net ecosystem COS uptake by 14%. This increase largely results from changes in the internal conductance to COS, highlighting the need to improve the representation of COS internal diffusion and consumption. Moreover, joint assimilation of ecosystem COS flux and GPP at Hyytiälä improves the simulated latent heat flux, contrary to the GPP‐only data assimilation, which fails to do so. Finally, we scaled this assimilation framework up to the boreal region and find that the joint assimilation of COS at Hyytiälä and GPP fluxes at 10 BorENF sites increases the modeled vegetation COS uptake up to 18%, but not GPP. Therefore, this study encourages the use of COS flux observations to inform GPP and latent heat flux representations in LSMs. Plain Language Summary: Carbon uptake by boreal forests is highly sensitive to environmental changes. There is large uncertainty about how much carbon dioxide (CO2) boreal forests absorb through photosynthesis, as represented by land surface models. Carbonyl sulfide (COS), a trace gas that tracks photosynthesis, can help improve the representation of simulated plant CO2 uptake because COS and CO2 share a common pathway during leaf uptake. Using a mechanistic model of biospheric COS processes implemented in the ORCHIDEE land surface model, we assimilated ecosystem COS flux and plant CO2 uptake measured at Hyytiälä boreal forest. We find that this joint assimilation improves the simulated plant CO2 uptake, as well as transpiration because of the strong link between COS, CO2 and H2O fluxes through stomatal diffusion. Scaling up this assimilation framework to evergreen needleleaf boreal forests, we find that assimilating ecosystem COS flux and plant CO2 uptake data increases the vegetation COS uptake for this biome, but not plant CO2 uptake. Our results imply that COS has the potential to constrain both plant carbon uptake and transpiration in land surface models, which should be further investigated, especially during drought events. Key Points: Jointly assimilating ecosystem carbonyl sulfide (COS) flux and gross primary production data improves both simulated plant carbon uptake and transpirationAssimilating ecosystem COS flux does not increase gross primary production (GPP) over boreal evergreen needleleaf forests, in contrast with previous inversion studiesCOS flux observations help to identify misrepresentation of the sensitivity of GPP to droughts in models [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a comparison of atmospheric transport model (ATM) simulations for carbonyl sulfide (COS), within the framework of the atmospheric tracer transport model intercomparison project "TransCom‐COS." Seven ATMs participated in the experiment and provided simulations of COS mixing ratios over the years 2010–2018, using state‐of‐the‐art surface fluxes for various components of the COS budget: biospheric sink, oceanic source, sources from fire and industry. The main goal of TransCom‐COS is to investigate the impact of the transport uncertainty and emission distribution in simulating the spatio‐temporal variability of tropospheric COS mixing ratios. A control case with seasonal surface fluxes of COS was constructed. The results indicate that the COS mixing ratios are underestimated by at least 50 parts per trillion (ppt) in the tropics, pointing to a missing tropical source. In summer, the mixing ratios are overestimated by at least 50 ppt above 40°N, pointing to a likely missing sink in the high northern latitudes. Regarding the latitudinal profile, the model spread is greater than 60 ppt above 40°N in boreal summer. Regarding the seasonal amplitude, the model spread reaches 50 ppt at 6 out of 15 sites, compared to an observed seasonal amplitude of 100 ppt. All models simulated a too late minimum by at least 2–3 months at two high northern‐latitude sites, likely owing to errors in the seasonal cycle in the ocean emissions. This study highlighted the shortcomings in the COS global budget that need to be resolved before using COS as a photosynthesis tracer. Plain Language Summary: In this study, we evaluate the state‐of‐the‐art fluxes for various components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) budget: biospheric sink, oceanic source, sources from fire and industry. A control case with seasonal surface fluxes of COS was constructed. Seven atmospheric transport models provided simulations of COS mixing ratios. Then, the simulated mixing ratios were evaluated against atmospheric measurements at several surface sites. Results show that all models fail to capture the observed latitudinal distribution and that the model spread is small compared to the model‐observation mismatch. In summer, the overestimated mixing ratios above 40°N point to a likely missing sink in the high northern latitudes. The underestimated mixing ratios in the tropics point to a missing tropical source. This study highlighted the shortcomings in the COS global budget that need to be resolved before using COS as a photosynthesis tracer. Key Points: The model‐observation mismatch suggests there is a missing source in the tropics and a missing sink in the high northern latitude in summerAt northern latitude sites, the model spread in seasonal amplitude reaches 50 ppt compared to a mean seasonal amplitude of about 100 pptThe diurnal rectifier effect is small, decreasing the seasonal amplitude by up to 20% at continental sites [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) was monitored at the GIF site (France) from August 2014 to November 2021. A significant decreasing trend in the seasonal cycle amplitude (SCA) of the COS was observed for the first time in the Northern Hemisphere (−27 ppt over 6 years). The lowest SCA was recorded in 2021 (80 ppt vs. 107 ppt in 2015). The trend in the SCA results revealed a steeper decline in the spring maximum than in that of the autumn minimum (−49 ppt vs. −10 ppt over 6 years, respectively). These negative trends were qualitatively consistent with those in the tropospheric COS put forward by the NDACC network of ground-based FTIR instruments, which were attributed to a slowing in the rate of COS anthropogenic emissions. Simulations using the ORCHIDEE land-surface model showed that a decrease in COS lowers the uptake of this gas by plants. Our observations suggest the existence of a causal relationship between the decline in the SCA and that in the tropospheric COS, implying that the temporal variations in the COS SCA over Western Europe are essentially driven by plant uptake. However, the transport by the LMDz 3-D model of surface fluxes for each component of the COS budget failed to reproduce this feature at GIF, pointing to a likely misrepresentation of the marine and anthropogenic fluxes in the footprint of this station. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Land surface modellers need measurable proxies to constrain the quantity of carbon dioxide (CO 2) assimilated by continental plants through photosynthesis, known as gross primary production (GPP). Carbonyl sulfide (COS), which is taken up by leaves through their stomates and then hydrolysed by photosynthetic enzymes, is a candidate GPP proxy. A former study with the ORCHIDEE land surface model used a fixed ratio of COS uptake to CO 2 uptake normalised to respective ambient concentrations for each vegetation type (leaf relative uptake, LRU) to compute vegetation COS fluxes from GPP. The LRU approach is known to have limited accuracy since the LRU ratio changes with variables such as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR): while CO 2 uptake slows under low light, COS uptake is not light limited. However, the LRU approach has been popular for COS–GPP proxy studies because of its ease of application and apparent low contribution to uncertainty for regional-scale applications. In this study we refined the COS–GPP relationship and implemented in ORCHIDEE a mechanistic model that describes COS uptake by continental vegetation. We compared the simulated COS fluxes against measured hourly COS fluxes at two sites and studied the model behaviour and links with environmental drivers. We performed simulations at a global scale, and we estimated the global COS uptake by vegetation to be - 756 Gg S yr -1 , in the middle range of former studies (- 490 to - 1335 Gg S yr -1). Based on monthly mean fluxes simulated by the mechanistic approach in ORCHIDEE, we derived new LRU values for the different vegetation types, ranging between 0.92 and 1.72, close to recently published averages for observed values of 1.21 for C 4 and 1.68 for C 3 plants. We transported the COS using the monthly vegetation COS fluxes derived from both the mechanistic and the LRU approaches, and we evaluated the simulated COS concentrations at NOAA sites. Although the mechanistic approach was more appropriate when comparing to high-temporal-resolution COS flux measurements, both approaches gave similar results when transporting with monthly COS fluxes and evaluating COS concentrations at stations. In our study, uncertainties between these two approaches are of secondary importance compared to the uncertainties in the COS global budget, which are currently a limiting factor to the potential of COS concentrations to constrain GPP simulated by land surface models on the global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Land surface modelers need measurable proxies to constrain the quantity of carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilated by continental plants through photosynthesis, known as Gross Primary Production (GPP). Carbonyl sulfide (COS), which is taken up by leaves through their stomates and then hydrolysed by photosynthetic enzymes, is a candidate GPP proxy. A former study with the ORCHIDEE land surface model used a fixed ratio of COS uptake to CO2 uptake normalized to respective ambient concentrations for each vegetation type (Leaf Relative Uptake, LRU). COS leaf fluxes were then computed from GPP, and the resulting concentrations were transported with an atmospheric model which included all other known COS fluxes as inputs. Modelled COS concentrations could then be compared to COS measurements from the NOAA air sampling tower network. The LRU approach is known to have limited accuracy since the LRU ratio changes with variables such as Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR): while CO2 uptake slows under low light, COS uptake is not light limited. However, the LRU approach has been popular for COS-GPP proxy studies because of its ease of application and apparent low contribution to uncertainty for regional scale applications. In this study we refined the COS-GPP relationship and implemented in ORCHIDEE a mechanistic model that describes COS uptake by continental vegetation. We compared the simulated COS fluxes against measured hourly COS fluxes at two sites, and studied the model behaviour and links with environmental drivers. We performed simulations at global scale, and estimated the global COS uptake by vegetation to be -756 Gg S yr-1, in the middle range of former studies (-490 to -1335 Gg S yr-1 ). Based on the mechanistic approach in ORCHIDEE, we derived new LRU values for the different vegetation types, ranging between 0.92 and 1.72, close to recently published averages for observed values of 1.21 for C4 and 1.68 for C3 plants. We transported the COS using the monthly vegetation COS fluxes derived from both the mechanistic and the LRU approaches, and evaluated the simulated COS concentrations at NOAA sites. Although the mechanistic approach was more appropriate when comparing to high-temporal-resolution COS flux measurements, both approaches gave similar results when transporting with monthly COS fluxes and evaluating COS concentrations at stations. In our study, uncertainties between these two approaches are of second importance as compared to the uncertainties in the COS global budget, which are currently a limiting factor to the potential of COS concentrations to constrain GPP simulated by land surface models on the global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]