Search

Methanogens often inhabit sulfidic environments that favor the precipitation of transition metals such as iron (Fe) as metal sulfides, including mackinawite (FeS) and pyrite (FeS 2 ). These metal sulfides have historically been considered biologically unavailable. Nonetheless, methanogens are commonly cultivated with sulfide (HS - ) as a sulfur source, a condition that would be expected to favor metal precipitation and thus limit metal availability. Recent studies have shown that methanogens can access Fe and sulfur (S) from FeS and FeS 2 to sustain growth. As such, medium supplied with FeS 2 should lead to higher availability of transition metals when compared to medium supplied with HS - . Here, we examined how transition metal availability under sulfidic (i.e., cells provided with HS - as sole S source) versus non-sulfidic (cells provided with FeS 2 as sole S source) conditions impact the metalloproteome of Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro. To achieve this, we employed size exclusion chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and shotgun proteomics. Significant changes were observed in the composition and abundance of iron, cobalt, nickel, zinc, and molybdenum proteins. Among the differences were alterations in the stoichiometry and abundance of multisubunit protein complexes involved in methanogenesis and electron transport chains. Our data suggest that M. barkeri utilizes the minimal iron-sulfur cluster complex and canonical cysteine biosynthesis proteins when grown on FeS 2 but uses the canonical Suf pathway in conjunction with the tRNA-Sep cysteine pathway for iron-sulfur cluster and cysteine biosynthesis under sulfidic growth conditions.IMPORTANCEProteins that catalyze biochemical reactions often require transition metals that can have a high affinity for sulfur, another required element for life. Thus, the availability of metals and sulfur are intertwined and can have large impacts on an organismismal biochemistry. Methanogens often occupy anoxic, sulfide-rich (euxinic) environments that favor the precipitation of transition metals as metal sulfides, thereby creating presumed metal limitation. Recently, several methanogens have been shown to acquire iron and sulfur from pyrite, an abundant iron-sulfide mineral that was traditionally considered to be unavailable to biology. The work presented here provides new insights into the distribution of metalloproteins, and metal uptake of Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro grown under euxinic or pyritic growth conditions. Thorough characterizations of this methanogen under different metal and sulfur conditions increase our understanding of the influence of metal availability on methanogens, and presumably other anaerobes, that inhabit euxinic environments., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Pyrite (FeS 2 ) is the most abundant iron sulfide mineral in Earth's crust. Until recently, FeS 2 has been considered a sink for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) at low temperature in the absence of oxygen or oxidative weathering, making these elements unavailable to biology. However, anaerobic methanogens can transfer electrons extracellularly to reduce FeS 2 via direct contact with the mineral. Reduction of FeS 2 occurs through a multistep process that generates aqueous sulfide (HS - ) and FeS 2 -associated pyrrhotite (Fe 1-x S). Subsequent dissolution of Fe 1-x S provides Fe(II) (aq) , but not HS - , that rapidly complexes with HS - (aq) generated from FeS 2 reduction to form soluble iron sulfur clusters [nFeS (aq) ]. Cells assimilate nFeS (aq) to meet Fe/S nutritional demands by mobilizing and hyperaccumulating Fe and S from FeS 2 . As such, reductive dissolution of FeS 2 by methanogens has important implications for element cycling in anoxic habitats, both today and in the geologic past., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests No interests are declared., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The formation and fate of pyrite (FeS 2 ) modulates global iron, sulfur, carbon, and oxygen biogeochemical cycles and has done so since early in Earth's geological history. A longstanding paradigm is that FeS 2 is stable at low temperature and is unavailable to microorganisms in the absence of oxygen and oxidative weathering. Here, we show that methanogens can catalyze the reductive dissolution of FeS 2 at low temperature (≤38 °C) and utilize dissolution products to meet cellular iron and sulfur demands associated with the biosynthesis of simple and complex co-factors. Direct access to FeS 2 is required to catalyze its reduction and/or to assimilate iron monosulfide that likely forms through coupled reductive dissolution and precipitation, consistent with close associations observed between cells and FeS 2 . These findings demonstrate that FeS 2 is bioavailable to anaerobic methanogens and can be mobilized in low temperature anoxic environments. Given that methanogens evolved at least 3.46 Gya, these data indicate that the microbial contribution to the iron and sulfur cycles in ancient and contemporary anoxic environments may be more complex and robust than previously recognized, with impacts on the sources and sinks of iron and sulfur and other bio-essential and thiophilic elements such as nickel and cobalt., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Methanogens have a high demand for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S); however, little is known of how they acquire, deploy, and store these elements and how this, in turn, affects their physiology. Methanogens were recently shown to reduce pyrite (FeS 2 ), generating aqueous iron sulfide (FeS aq ) clusters that are likely assimilated as a source of Fe and S. Here, we compared the phenotypes of Methanococcus voltae grown with FeS 2 or ferrous iron [Fe(II)] and sulfide (HS - ). FeS 2 -grown cells are 33% smaller yet have 193% more Fe than Fe(II)/HS - -grown cells. Whole-cell electron paramagnetic resonance revealed similar distributions of paramagnetic Fe, although FeS 2 -grown cells showed a broad spectral feature attributed to intracellular thioferrate-like nanoparticles. Differential proteomic analyses showed similar expression of core methanogenesis enzymes, indicating that Fe and S source does not substantively alter the energy metabolism of cells. However, a homolog of the Fe(II) transporter FeoB and its putative transcriptional regulator DtxR were up-expressed in FeS 2 -grown cells, suggesting that cells sense Fe(II) limitation. Two homologs of IssA, a protein putatively involved in coordinating thioferrate nanoparticles, were also up-expressed in FeS 2 -grown cells. We interpret these data to indicate that, in FeS 2 -grown cells, DtxR cannot sense Fe(II) and therefore cannot downregulate FeoB. We suggest this is due to the transport of Fe(II) complexed with sulfide (FeS aq ), leading to excess Fe that is sequestered by IssA as a thioferrate-like species. This model provides a framework for the design of targeted experiments aimed at further characterizing Fe acquisition and homeostasis in M. voltae and other methanogens. IMPORTANCE FeS 2 is the most abundant sulfide mineral in the Earth's crust and is common in environments inhabited by methanogenic archaea. FeS 2 can be reduced by methanogens, yielding aqueous FeS aq clusters that are thought to be a source of Fe and S. Here, we show that growth of Methanococcus voltae on FeS 2 results in smaller cell size and higher Fe content per cell, with Fe likely stored intracellularly as thioferrate-like nanoparticles. Fe(II) transporters and storage proteins were upregulated in FeS 2 -grown cells. These responses are interpreted to result from cells incorrectly sensing Fe(II) limitation due to assimilation of Fe(II) as FeS aq . These findings have implications for our understanding of how Fe/S availability influences methanogen physiology and the biogeochemical cycling of these elements.