Search

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 and the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated based upon indirect evidence such as elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels and their with the degree of hemodynamic impairment. The advent of specific of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists has provided the opportunity not only to directly evaluate its pathophysiological role but also to assess its potential role as a new approach to heart failure therapy. This brief review summarizes the evidence linking endothelin-1 to the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure and the clinical results obtained in patients during acute, intravenous and more prolonged, oral administration with bosentan, a mixed ET(A)/ET(B)-receptor antagonist. Bosentan acutely and during short-term oral therapy markedly improved hemodynamics in patients in addition to standard heart failure therapy, including an ACE-inhibitor. These effects were associated with a reduced responsiveness of the renin-angiotensin system to diuretic therapy and reduced basal plasma aldosterone levels. Although the hemodynamic and neurohumoral profile of short-term bosentan therapy looks promising for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure appropriate trials will have to be performed to document clinical benefit during long-term therapy. Finally, the question remains open whether mixed endothelin-1 receptor antagonists like bosentan will have similar effects as compared to antagonists which block the ET(A) receptor only.

We studied acute (day 1) and long-term (day 14) effects of endothelin (ET) receptor blockade with the mixed ET(A/B) antagonist bosentan (1 g twice daily; n = 18) or placebo (n = 12) on plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone in 30 patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and digoxin. Hormones were determined before and 3 hours after morning doses of diuretics and digoxin and the double-blind study drug, respectively, on days 1 and 14. On day 1, angiotensin II increased from 16.1+/-17.9 to 27.6+/-5.6 ng/L (p <0.05) with bosentan and similarly with placebo (15.5+/-9.3 and 36.0+/-49.1 ng/L, p = 0.06) after the morning dose of diuretics and digoxin. Aldosterone tended to increase from 322+/-239 to 362+/-254 pmol/L (bosentan) and from 271+/-70 to 297+/-136 pmol/L (placebo). On day 14, before drug intake, angiotensin II was unchanged compared with day 1 in both groups. However, aldosterone was lower than on day 1 with bosentan (213+/-124 vs. 322+/-239 pmol/L, p<0.05) and remained below baseline values 3 hours after drug intake, whereas it was unchanged with placebo. Thus, short-term ET(A/B) receptor antagonism decreases basal aldosterone secretion independently of angiotensin II, suggesting that ET participates in the regulation of aldosterone in patients already treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor with growth promoting and mitogenic properties associated with various cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and has been found to be an important protagonist in congestive heart failure (CHF). The introduction of ET-1 receptor antagonists into the arena of clinical research has amplified our understanding of the ET system: the first human trials with acute and chronic inhibition of the ET system have shown promising results and confirm the findings from experimental models. The availability of oral compounds such as bosentan has raised the hope that these novel drugs might become a new therapeutic class of agents for the treatment of CVD and, in particular, of CHF. The question, however, remains whether the beneficial effects observed so far in patients with CHF go beyond simple hemodynamic improvements and whether these compounds improve long-term survival in these patients.

Background: The vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) is important for increased vascular tone in patients with chronic heart failure, but the effects of endothelin-receptor blockade in addition to conventional triple therapy are unknown., Methods and Results: Thirty-six men (mean age+/-SD, 55+/-8 years) with symptomatic heart failure (NYHA class III; left ventricular ejection fraction, 22.4+/-4.5%) despite treatment with diuretics, digoxin, and ACE inhibitors received, in a double-blind and randomized fashion, either additional oral bosentan (1.0 g BID; n=24) or placebo (n=12) over 2 weeks. Hemodynamic and hormonal (plasma ET-1, norepinephrine, renin activity, and angiotensin II) measurements were obtained before and repeatedly for 24 hours after administration of bosentan on days 1 and 14. Bosentan was discontinued in 1 patient with symptomatic hypotension, and 2 patients (bosentan group) declined hemodynamic investigations on day 14. Compared with placebo, bosentan on day 1 significantly decreased mean arterial pressure (difference from baseline over 12 hours [95% CIs], -13.9% [-16.0% to -11.7%]), pulmonary artery mean (-12.9% [-17. 4% to -8.3%]) and capillary wedge (-14.5% [-20.5% to -8.5%]) pressures, and right atrial pressure (-20.2% [-29.4% to -11.0%]). Cardiac output increased (15.1% [10.7% to 19.7%]), but heart rate was unchanged. Both systemic (-24.2% [-28.1% to -20.3%]) and pulmonary (-19.9% [-28.4% to -11.4%]) vascular resistance were reduced. After 2 weeks, cardiac output had further increased (by 15. 2% [10.8% to 19.6%]) and systemic (-9.3% [-12.3% to -6.4%]) and pulmonary (-9.7% [-16.3% to -3.1%]) vascular resistances further decreased compared with day 1. Heart rate remained unchanged. Plasma ET-1 levels increased after bosentan, but baseline levels of the other hormones were unchanged., Conclusions: Additional short-term oral endothelin-receptor antagonist therapy improved systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics in heart failure patients who were symptomatic with standard triple-drug therapy. Further investigations are warranted to characterize the effects of long-term endothelin-receptor antagonist therapy on symptoms, morbidity, and mortality in such patients.

In recent years, evidence from various animals experiments has accumulated that emphasizes the role of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular diseases, including congestive heart failure. The recent advent of potent antagonists of this system now allows the assessment of the involvement of endothelin-1 in the maintenance of vascular tone in animals and humans. We report hemodynamic data from two trails in patients with chronic severe congestive heart failure (i.e., reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of < 30%, elevated resting pulmonary capillary wedged pressure > 15 mmHg, and/or reduced cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2 or less) who were treated with the mixed endothelin-type A and type B-receptor antagonist bosentan. In the first study, the acute effect of bosentan (300 mg, intravenous) on hemodynamics and neurohormones was investigated. Bosentan was well tolerated and significantly improved impaired hemodynamics due to systemic and venous vasodilation. In the second, trial, bosentan was given orally (0.5 g bid) for 14 days, in addition to conventional triple treatment for congestive heart failure, including digitalis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics. Cardiac hemodynamics were monitored during the first 24 hours of treatment, and measurements were repeated during the last day of bosentan therapy. Bosentan was well tolerated in these patients as well, and hemodynamic measures were compatible with an additional effect of bosentan after 2 weeks. However, there was a slight increase in heart rate as well. Our result underline the importance of endogenously generated endothelin-1 in congestive heart failure and suggest a potential benefit of endothelin antagonism in such patients. However, long-term studies are needed to establish whether chronic endothelin antagonism has beneficial clinical effects and is capable of improving survival and/or symptoms in severe heart failure patients who remain symptomatic despite standard triple therapy.