Search

Thirty-two (16 males and 16 females) healthy young beagles were randomly divided into four groups of eight. The control group remained untreated. Torasemide (ISEMID ® , Ceva Santé Animale) was orally administered, once daily, at 0.5 mg/kg from Days 1-5 then 0.25 mg/kg to Day 182, and at three times and five times this dosing regimen in two additional groups. Treated animals (predominantly at the higher dose levels) showed dryness of the oral mucosa, evidence of diuresis, decreased diet consumption, decreased bodyweight gain over the first 3 weeks, increased water consumption, increases in erythrocytes count, haemoglobin, calcium and magnesium, decrease in chloride, phosphorus, potassium and sodium, increases in urine pH, decreases in urine specific gravity and increases in serum aldosterone concentrations. Plasma concentrations of torasemide increased in a dose-dependent manner and showed no evidence of accumulation. There were also changes to electrocardiogram patterns and the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the kidney and adrenal glands, but these changes were almost exclusively confined to the over-dosed groups. In conclusion, torasemide was found to be safe when administered to dogs at 0.25 mg/kg once daily for 26 weeks, and any changes were consistent with its known diuretic effects., (© 2021 CEVA. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on mortality of torsemide and a combination of loop diuretics (furosemide + torsemide) in contemporary practice in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).We investigated patients with HF in the Heart Failure Center of Fuwai Hospital from 2009 to 2013 who were discharged on furosemide, torsemide, or a combination of the 2 drugs. Using inverse probability weighting (IPW) to account for nonrandom selection of diuretic strategies, we assessed the association between different diuretic strategies and mortality.Among 956 patients, 19.7% (n = 188) received furosemide, 36.6% (n = 350) torsemide, and 43.7% (n = 418) the combination therapy. The torsemide-treated and combination-treated patients had worse heart function and higher furosemide equivalent. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that the combination group had worse outcomes (all-cause HR = 2.044, P = 0.008; CV HR = 1.988, P = 0.011), while torsemide was associated with an outcome (all-cause HR = 1.640, P = 0.078; CV HR = 1.509, P = 0.147) similar to that of furosemide. After IPW, torsemide was associated with a nominally lower mortality compared with furosemide (all-cause HR = 0.738, P = 0.222; CV HR = 0.667, P = 0.110), and the association between the combination treatment and increased mortality was no longer statistically significant (all-cause HR = 1.207, P = 0.470;CV HR = 1.174, P = 0.540).We found that torsemide and the combination strategy had similar outcomes when compared with furosemide. However, considering the lack of diuretic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted with the aim of exploring the effect on mortality of different diuretic treatments, prospective trials are needed to investigate the effect of different diuretic strategies in chronic HF.

Background: Diuretic treatment is the mainstay for management of congestive heart failure in horses, and its use has been restricted to injectable medications because no currently data supports the use of PO administered loop diuretics., Objectives: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of PO administered torsemide and, determine if PO administered torsemide, could be used as an alternative to injectable diuretics in the horse., Animals: Six healthy adult mares., Methods: A 2-phase, prospective study, that consisted of pharmacokinetic profiling of a single dose (6 mg/kg PO) and pharmacodynamic effects of long-term torsemide administration (2 mg/kg PO q12h) for 6 days in healthy horses., Results: Pharmacokinetic analysis identified a peak concentration (C max ) of 10.14 µg/mL (range, 6.79-14.69 µg/mL) and elimination half-life (T 1/2 ) 9.2 hours (range, 8.4-10.4 hours). The area under the plasma drug concentration over time curve (AUC) was 80.7 µg × h/mL (range, 56.5-117.2 µg × h/mL). A statistically significant increase in urine volume and decrease in urine specific gravity were found from day 0 (baseline) to day 6 (P < .0001). Significant alterations in biochemical variables included hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypochloremia, and increased serum creatinine concentration. Mean arterial blood pressure significantly decreased on day 6 (57.7 ± 8.8 mm Hg, P = .001) as compared with baseline (78 ± 6.1 mm Hg). Serum aldosterone concentrations significantly increased after 6 days of torsemide administration (P = .0006)., Conclusions and Clinical Importance: PO administered torsemide (4 mg/kg/day) successfully reached therapeutic concentrations in blood, induced clinically relevant diuresis, and resulted in moderate pre-renal azotemia and electrolyte disturbances., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.)

The aim of this work was to investigate the use of torasemide as a highly sensitive indicator substance and to develop a formulation thereof for establishing quantitative relationships between hot-melt extrusion process conditions and critical quality attributes (CQAs). Using solid-state characterization techniques and a 10 mm lab-scale co-rotating twin-screw extruder, we studied torasemide in a Soluplus® (SOL)-polyethylene glycol 1500 (PEG 1500) matrix, and developed and characterized a formulation which was used as a process indicator to study thermal- and hydrolysis-induced degradation, as well as residual crystallinity. We found that torasemide first dissolved into the matrix and then degraded. Based on this mechanism, extrudates with measurable levels of degradation and residual crystallinity were produced, depending strongly on the main barrel and die temperature and residence time applied. In addition, we found that 10% w/w PEG 1500 as plasticizer resulted in the widest operating space with the widest range of measurable residual crystallinity and degradant levels. Torasemide as an indicator substance behaves like a challenging-to-process API, only with higher sensitivity and more pronounced effects, e.g., degradation and residual crystallinity. Application of a model formulation containing torasemide will enhance the understanding of the dynamic environment inside an extruder and elucidate the cumulative thermal and hydrolysis effects of the extrusion process. The use of such a formulation will also facilitate rational process development and scaling by establishing clear links between process conditions and CQAs.

Background: Torsemide use for congestive heart failure (CHF) has been reported, but prescription frequency is unknown. Commercially available tablet sizes in North America limit dosing precision, indicating a need to evaluate its strength and stability in suspension., Objectives: To determine the frequency of torsemide prescriptions and to determine a beyond use date (BUD) of a compounded suspension of torsemide for oral administration stored under 2 temperature conditions for 90 days., Animals: No animals used., Methods: Pharmacy records were retrospectively reviewed for torsemide and furosemide prescriptions from 2008 to 2015 at 2 veterinary referral centers. After preliminary strength testing, compounded torsemide suspension (5 mg/mL) for oral administration was prepared using torsemide tablets suspended in OraPlus:OraSweet 1:1, buffered to a pH of 8.3 and stored at refrigeration (2-8°C) and room temperature (20-25°C) in 2 oz amber plastic bottles. Samples were analyzed by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) on days 0, 14, 30, 60, and 90., Results: Prescriptions for torsemide increased from 2008 to 2015. Analysis of the torsemide 5 mg/mL suspension for oral administration at each time point met United States Pharmacopeia (USP) requirements for torsemide content of 90-110% of label claim. The average strength at 90 days decreased to 92 ± 3% at 2-8°C and 95 ± 2% at 20-25°C. Stability testing did not detect unknown impurities., Conclusions: Increasing torsemide use warrants availability of a validated and stable compounded formulation. Our results support the assignment of a 90-day BUD for torsemide 5 mg/mL suspension for oral administration compounded in OraPlus:Sweet 1:1 buffered to a pH of 8.3., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.)

Background: Furosemide is the only loop diuretic recommended by the ACVIM consensus guidelines for treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) in dogs related to degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD). Torasemide is another potent loop diuretic with a longer half-life and a higher bioavailability., Objectives: (1) To demonstrate that torasemide given once a day (q24h) is noninferior to furosemide given twice a day (q12h) for treating dogs with CHF; (2) and to compare the effect of the 2 drugs on the time to reach a composite cardiac endpoint "spontaneous cardiac death, euthanasia due to heart failure or CHF class worsening.", Animals: A total of 366 dogs with CHF attributable to DMVD., Methods: Analysis of 2 prospective randomized single-blinded reference-controlled trials was performed. Dogs orally received either torasemide q24h (n = 180) or furosemide q12h (n = 186) in addition to standard CHF therapy over 3 months. The primary efficacy criterion was the percentage of dogs with treatment success assessed in each study. The time to reach the composite cardiac endpoint was used as secondary criterion in the overall population., Results: Torasemide was noninferior to furosemide (P torasemide  - P furosemide  = +7%; 95% CI [-8%; +22%] and P torasemide  - P furosemide  = +1%; 95% CI [-12%; +14%], respectively, in Study 1 and Study 2). Torasemide (median dose = 0.24 mg/kg/d q24h; range = 0.10-0.69 mg/kg/d) was associated with a 2-fold reduction in the risk of reaching the composite cardiac endpoint (adjusted HR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.27-0.82; P = 0.0077) as compared with furosemide (median dose = 1.39 mg/kg q12h; range = 0.70-6.30 mg/kg q12h)., Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Torasemide q24h is an effective oral diuretic in dogs with CHF., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.)

Mass spectrometry tools (HRMS/LC-HRMS, MS n , and/or on-line H/D exchange) were employed to establish mass fragmentation pattern of torasemide and to characterize its degradation products. During collision-induced dissociation, multiple rearrangement processes and unusual losses of sulfur (S), sulfanyl (HS), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), sulphinic acid radical (HSO 2 ), sulfur monoxide (SO), carbon monoxide (CO), formyl radical (CHO) and C 5 H 3 NOS were observed. The same were successfully explained by study of energy profiles, established by application of density functional theory (DFT)., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Loop diuretics are highly natriuretic but their short duration of action permits postdiuretic sodium retention, which limits salt loss unless dietary salt is severely restricted. We tested the hypothesis that a more prolonged duration of action would enhance salt loss., Methods and Results: Ten healthy participants were crossed over between 20 mg of oral immediate-release or extended-release (ER) torsemide while consuming a fixed diet with 300 mmol·d -1 of Na + . Compared with immediate-release, plasma torsemide after ER was 59% lower at 1 to 3 hours but 97% higher at 8 to 10 hours as a result of a >3-fold prolongation of time to maximal plasma concentrations. The relationship of natriuresis to log torsemide excretion showed marked hysteresis, but participants spent twice as long with effective concentrations of torsemide after ER, thereby enhancing diuretic efficiency. Compared with immediate-release, ER torsemide did not reduce creatinine clearance and increased fluid (1634±385 versus 728±445 mL, P <0.02) and Na + output (98±15 versus 42±17 mmol, P <0.05) despite an 18% reduction in exposure. Neither formulation increased K + excretion., Conclusions: Torsemide ER prolongs urine drug levels, thereby increasing the time spent with effective drug concentrations, reduces postdiuretic Na + retention, and moderates a fall in glomerular filtration rate. It caused significant Na + loss even during very high salt intake. Thus, a short duration of action limits salt loss with loop diuretics. These conclusions warrant testing in subjects with edema and heart failure., (© 2017 The Authors and Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) involves fluid retention and volume overload, leading to impaired cardiac function. In these conditions, diuretic agents are most commonly used to treat edema and thereby reducing the volume load on the failing heart. There are several other beneficial effects of diuretics apart from their action on urinary excretion., Methods: To identify the effects of diuretic agents on adverse cardiac remodeling in CHF, this study was carried out, where we have compared the effects of torasemide and spironolactone in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy induced by porcine cardiac myosin-mediated experimental autoimmune myocarditis., Results: Cardiac protein expression levels of inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and fibrosis markers were upregulated in the hearts of CHF rats, while treatment with either torasemide or spironolactone has downregulated their expression. The effect produced by spironolactone on cardiac fibrosis markers was comparably lesser than torasemide. Further, immunohistochemical analysis and histopathological studies have provided evidence to confirm the beneficial effects of these drugs on adverse cardiac remodeling in rats with CHF., Conclusion: Torasemide treatment has benefits against adverse cardiac remodeling in CHF rats, which was better than the protection offered by spironolactone., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background According to drug interaction databases, torsemide may potentiate the effects of warfarin. Evidence for this drug-drug interaction, however, is conflicting and the clinical significance is unknown. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of torsemide initiation on warfarin dosage requirements. Setting This study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System in San Diego, California. Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Veterans Affairs data from patients who were converted from bumetanide to torsemide between March 2014 and July 2014. Patients were also prescribed and taking warfarin during the observation period. Warfarin dosage requirements were evaluated to determine if any changes occurred within the first 3 months of starting torsemide. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the average weekly warfarin dose before and after torsemide initiation. Results Eighteen patients met study inclusion criteria. The weekly warfarin dose before and after initiation of torsemide was not significantly different (34 ± 15 and 34 ± 13 mg, p > 0.05). Of those eighteen patients, only two experienced elevations in INR that required a decrease in warfarin dosage after torsemide initiation. Between those two patients, dosage reductions ranged from 5.3 to 18%. Conclusion These results indicated that most patients did not require any warfarin dosage adjustments after torsemide was initiated. The potential for interaction, however, still exists. While empiric warfarin dosage adjustments are not recommended when initiating torsemide, increased monitoring is warranted to minimize the risk of adverse effects.

The present study planed to develop new fast dissolving tablets (FDTs) of torsemide. Solid dispersions (SDs) of torsemide and sorbitol (3:1) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) k25 were prepared. The prepared SDs were evaluated for in-vitro dissolution. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry for SDs revealed no drug/excipient interactions and transformation of torsemide to the amorphous form. Torsemide/sorbitol SD was selected for formulation of torsemide FDTs by direct compression method. Box-Bhenken factorial design was employed to design 15 formulations using croscarmellose sodium and crospovidone at different concentrations. The response surface methodology was used to analyze the effect of changing these concentrations (independent variables) on disintegration time (Y 1 ), percentage friability (Y 2 ), and amount torsemide released at 10 min. The physical mixtures of torsemide and the used excipients were evaluated for angle of repose, Hausner's ratio, and Carr's index. The prepared FDTs tablets were evaluated for wetting and disintegration time, weight variation, drug content, percentage friability, thickness, hardness, and in vitro release. Based on the in-vitro results and factorial design characterization, F10 and F7 were selected for bioavailability studies following administration to Albino New Zealand rabbits. They showed significantly higher C max and (AUC 0-12 ) and shorter T max than those obtained after administration of the corresponding ordinary commercial Torseretic ® tablets. Stability study was conducted for F10 that showed good stability upon storage at 30°C/75% RH and 40°C/75% RH for 3 months.

Cardiac fibrosis is the major hallmark of adverse cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure (CHF) and its therapeutic targeting might help against cardiac dysfunction during chronic conditions. Diuretic agents are potentially useful in these cases, but their effects on the cardiac fibrosis pathogenesis are yet to be identified. This study was designed to identify and compare the effects of diuretic drugs torasemide and furosemide on cardiac fibrosis in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy induced by porcine cardiac myosin mediated experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Gap junction proteins, connexin-43 and N-cadherin, expressions were downregulated in the hearts of CHF rats, while torasemide treatment has upregulated their expression. Western blotting and immunohistochemical analysis for various cardiac fibrosis related proteins as well as histopathological studies have shown that both drugs have potential anti-fibrotic effects. Among them, torasemide has superior efficacy in offering protection against adverse cardiac remodeling in the selected rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy. In conclusion, torasemide treatment has potential anti-fibrotic effect in the hearts of CHF rats, possibly via improving the gap junction proteins expression and thereby improving the cell-cell interaction in the heart. © 2016 BioFactors, 43(2):187-194, 2017., (© 2016 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.)

Background: Approximately 50% of heart failure patients are readmitted to hospital within 6 months, owing to deterioration of their condition. Thus, symptomatic treatment of heart failure requires significant improvement. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of torasemide and furosemide on biochemical parameters of haemodynamic and neurohormonal compensation, myocardial remodelling, clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure., Methods: This is a multicentre, randomized, open, blinded endpoint phase-IV trial. The study includes 120 heart failure patients in NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class II-IV, treated with optimal heart failure therapy, with indications for use of loop diuretics. At enrolment, patients are stable, with a fixed dose of loop diuretics. Patients are randomized to treatment with furosemide or torasemide (randomization 1:1). After randomization, the current fixed dose of furosemide is continued or is replaced by an equipotential dose of torasemide (4:1). The study consists of two control visits (3 and 6 months after enrolment) with minimal follow-up of 6 months. Assessment involves clinical examination, Quality of Life Questionnaire, laboratory tests, echocardiography, electrocardiography, 24 h Holter-electrocardiography monitoring, 6 -min walk test and assessment of fluid retention. Any need for dose adjustment is assessed during the observation. The primary objective is to compare the effects of torasemide and furosemide on clinical and biochemical parameters of haemodynamic and neurohormonal compensation and myocardial remodelling. Secondary objectives include monitoring of: changes in signs and symptoms of heart failure, NYHA functional class, quality of life, dosage changes, rate of readmissions and mortality., Discussion: Despite decades of the diuretic's history, knowledge about diuretic therapy is still unsatisfactory. The most widely used diuretic, furosemide, has a stormy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and is associated with a high risk of mortality and hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Reports are very encouraging and suggest beneficial effects of torasemide. Hence, there is a need for further studies of the overall effect of torasemide, compared with furosemide. This can translate into improved quality of life and better prognosis of patients with heart failure., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942109 . Registered on 24 August 2013.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling approach was used to determine a dosage regimen which maximizes diuretic efficiency of torasemide in dogs. Kinetic profiles of plasma concentration, torasemide excretion rate in urine (TERU) and diuresis were investigated in 10 dogs after single oral administrations at 3 dose levels, 0.2, 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg, and an intravenous injection of 0.2 mg/kg. Endogenous regulation was evidenced by a proteresis loop between TERU and diuresis. To describe the diuresis-time profile, TERU served as input into a turnover model with inhibition of loss of response, extended by a moderator acting on both loss and production of response. Estimated maximum inhibition of loss of response, I max , was 0.984 showing that torasemide is an efficacious diuretic able to suppress almost total water reabsorption. A TERU 50, value producing half of I max , of 1.45 μg/kg/h was estimated from the model. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were used to simulate the torasemide dose-effect relationship after oral administration. Model predictions were in good agreement with diuresis measured in a validation study conducted in 10 dogs, which were administered oral doses of 0.15, 0.4, 0.75, 1.5 and 4.5 mg/kg for 5 days. Finally, oral dose associated with the highest daily diuretic efficiency was predicted to be 0.1 mg/kg., (© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Furosemide is the most commonly used loop diuretic in patients with heart failure (HF) despite data suggesting potential pharmacologic and antifibrotic benefits with torsemide. We investigated patients with HF in Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure who were discharged on either torsemide or furosemide. Using inverse probability weighting to account for the nonrandom selection of diuretic, we assessed the relation between choice of diuretic at discharge with 30-day mortality or HF hospitalization and 180-day mortality. Of 7,141 patients in the trial, 4,177 patients were included in this analysis, of which 87% (n = 3,620) received furosemide and 13% (n = 557) received torsemide. Torsemide-treated patients had lower ejection fraction and blood pressure and higher creatinine and natriuretic peptide level compared with furosemide. Torsemide was associated with similar outcomes on unadjusted analysis and nominally lower events on adjusted analysis (30-day mortality/HF hospitalization odds ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.29, p = 0.55 and 180-day mortality hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.19, p = 0.37). In conclusion, these data are hypothesis-generating and randomized comparative effectiveness trials are needed to investigate the optimal diuretic choice., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Genetic variation in the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and torsemide due to polymorphisms in CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and OATP1B1 has been extensively studied. However, it is still unknown how much of the variation in pharmacokinetics of these two clinically important drugs in total is due to genetic factors. Metoprolol and torsemide were intravenously administered to 44 monozygotic and 14 dizygotic twin pairs. Metoprolol area under the curve (AUC) varied 4.7-fold and torsemide AUC 3.5-fold. A very high fraction of AUC variations, 91% of metoprolol and 86% of torsemide, were found to be due to additive genetic effects. However, known genetic variants of CYP2D6, -2C9, and OATP1B1 explained only 39%, 2%, and 39% of that variation, respectively. Comparable results for genetically explained variation in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have been found for other substrates of these enzymes earlier. These findings indicate that a substantial fraction of the heritable variability in the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and torsemide remains to be elucidated., (© 2015 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Aim: The authors assessed the comparative effectiveness of torsemide versus furosemide in the PROTECT trial., Methods: The authors assessed the relationship between loop diuretic at discharge and death or cardiovascular/renal hospitalization within 30 days, and death through 150 days postdischarge using inverse probability weighting., Results: Out of 1004 patients, 83.5% received furosemide and 16.5% torsemide. Torsemide patients had higher blood urea nitrogen, and more in-hospital worsening heart failure. Following adjustment, torsemide was associated with similar 30-day outcomes compared with furosemide (p = 0.93), but remained associated with increased 150-day death (hazard ratio: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.40-3.66; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Patients treated with torsemide had features of greater disease severity, similar 30-day outcomes but increased 150-day mortality. Prospective randomized trials are needed to investigate the effect of torsemide versus furosemide.

Purpose: Diuretics are the primary treatment for the management of chronic heart failure (HF) symptoms and for the improvement of acute HF symptoms. The rate of delivery to the site of action has been suggested to affect diuretic pharmacodynamics. The main objective of this clinical trial was to explore whether a prolonged release tablet formulation of torasemide (torasemide-PR) was more natriuretically efficient in patients with chronic HF compared to immediate-release furosemide (furosemide-IR) after a single-dose administration. Moreover, the pharmacokinetics of torasemide-PR, furosemide-IR, and torasemide-IR were assessed in chronic HF patients as well as urine pharmacodynamics., Methods: Randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, crossover, and single-dose Phase I clinical trial with three experimental periods. Torasemide-PR and furosemide-IR were administered as a single dose in a crossover fashion for the first two periods, and torasemide-IR 10 mg was administered for the third period. Blood and urine samples were collected at fixed timepoints. The primary endpoint was the natriuretic efficiency after administration of torasemide-PR and furosemide-IR, defined as the ratio between the average drug-induced natriuresis and the average drug recovered in urine over 24 hours., Results: Ten patients were included and nine completed the study. Here, we present the results from nine patients. Torasemide-PR was more natriuretically efficient than furosemide-IR (0.096 ± 0.03 mmol/μg vs 0.015 ± 0.0007 mmol/μg; P < 0.0001). Mictional urgency was lower and more delayed with torasemide-PR than with furosemide-IR., Conclusion: In a study with a limited sample size, our results suggest that 10 mg of torasemide-PR is more natriuretically efficient than 40 mg of furosemide-IR after single-dose administration in patients with chronic HF over a 24-hour collection period. Further studies are necessary to evaluate potential pharmacodynamic differences between torasemide formulations and to assess its impact on clinical therapeutics.

Loop diuretics are used for fluid control in patients with heart failure. Furosemide and torasemide may exert differential effects on myocardial fibrosis. Here, we studied the effects of torasemide and furosemide on atrial fibrosis and remodeling during atrial fibrillation. In primary neonatal cardiac fibroblasts, torasemide (50μM, 24h) but not furosemide (50μM, 24h) reduced the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF; 65±6%) and the pro-fibrotic miR-21 (44±23%), as well as the expression of lysyl oxidase (LOX; 57±8%), a regulator of collagen crosslinking. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) expression and activity were not altered. Torasemide but not furosemide inhibited human aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) activity in transfected lung fibroblasts (V79MZ cells) by 75±1.8%. The selective CYP11B2 inhibitor SL242 mimicked the torasemide effects. Mice with cardiac overexpression of Rac1 GTPase (RacET), which develop atrial fibrosis and spontaneous AF with aging, were treated long-term (8months) with torasemide (10mg/kg/day), furosemide (40mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Treatment with torasemide but not furosemide prevented atrial fibrosis in RacET as well as the up-regulation of CTGF, LOX, and miR-2, whereas MR expression and activity remained unaffected. These effects correlated with a reduced prevalence of atrial fibrillation (33% RacET+Tora vs. 80% RacET). Torasemide but not furosemide inhibits CYP11B2 activity and reduces the expression of CTGF, LOX, and miR-21. These effects are associated with prevention of atrial fibrosis and a reduced prevalence of atrial fibrillation in mice., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Furosemide has historically been the primary loop diuretic in heart failure patients despite data suggesting potential advantages with torsemide. We used the Duke Echocardiography Lab Database to investigate patients admitted with heart failure to Duke Hospital from 2000 to 2010 who were discharged on either torsemide or furosemide. We described baseline characteristics based on discharge diuretic and assessed the relationship with all-cause mortality through 5 years. Of 4580 patients, 86% (n = 3955) received furosemide and 14% (n = 625) received torsemide. Patients receiving torsemide were more likely to be female and had more comorbidities compared with furosemide-treated patients. Survival was worse in torsemide-treated patients [5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival of 41.4% (95% CI: 36.7-46.0) vs. 51.5% (95% CI: 49.8-53.1)]. After risk adjustment, torsemide use was no longer associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.16; 95% CI: 0.98-1.38; P = 0.0864). Prospective trials are needed to investigate the effect of torsemide versus furosemide because of the potential for residual confounding.

Many objections were raised to breath-alcohol analysis upon its introduction in the field of traffic law enforcement in Germany, but in the meantime this issue has become less relevant in forensic routine work. In the present case, the defending lawyer claimed that the ethanol concentration in the blood and hence in the breath of his client, which was 0.35 mg/l according to the Dräger Alcotest 7110® Evidential and thus above the legal limit of 0.25 mg/l, had been changed by diuretics taken 4 hours before the breath alcohol test, viz. 10 mg of torasemide, a loop diuretic, and 50 mg of spironolactone, a competitive aldosterone antagonist. According to the literature, the maximum urinary output in healthy subjects within the first 4 hours after 10 mg torasemide was 1450 ml. In patients suffering from heart failure, the urinary volume was reduced by a factor of 2.5-3; after chronic intake of torasemide, water loss did not differ from placebo. Spironolactone, which acts on the distal tubule, has little effect on urinary output. In a publication, the loss of water in excess within 24 hours was 90 ml. Co-administration of 100 mg spironolactone and 20 mg furosemide, which roughly compares to 10 mg torasemide, resulted in a mean urinary volume of 1566 ml within the first 4 hours. In terms of the reported case and provided that no compensatory fluid had been taken, a purely theoretical maximum shift of 0.007 mg/ may occur in the breath-alcohol concentration due to the smaller distribution volume even considering maximum urinary excretion values. On the other hand, already mild levels of dehydration may be associated with negative symptoms affecting driving ability.

Purpose: Empagliflozin is a potent, selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thiazide or loop diuretics are commonly prescribed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study investigated potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between empagliflozin and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or torasemide (TOR)., Methods: This was an open-label, crossover study. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to receive empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days and either HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 4 days followed by HCTZ 25 mg once daily plus empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days or TOR 5 mg once daily for 4 days followed by TOR 5 mg once daily plus empagliflozin once daily for 5 days in 1 of 4 sequences, with at least a 7-day washout period between treatments. Pharmacokinetic parameters of empagliflozin, HCTZ, and TOR were assessed and standard bioequivalence criteria (80%-125%) were applied. Tolerability assessments included the frequency of adverse events and an investigator assessment of global tolerability., Findings: Mean (SD) age of the 22 patients treated was 54.0 (8.1) years and body mass index was 27.1 (3.7) kg/m(2). Coadministration of empagliflozin with HCTZ or TOR had no effect on exposure to empagliflozin, HCTZ, or TOR. Geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for empagliflozin AUC over a uniform dosing interval and Cmax at steady state were 107.1% (90% CI, 97.1-118.1) and 102.8% (90% CI, 88.6-119.3), respectively, when coadministered with HCTZ versus administration alone, and 107.8% (90% CI, 100.1-116.1) and 107.5% (90% CI, 97.9-118.0), respectively, when coadministered with TOR versus administration alone. For HCTZ, the geometric mean ratios for AUC over a uniform dosing interval and Cmax at steady state were 96.3% (90% CI, 89.1-104.0) and 101.8% (90% CI, 88.6-116.9), respectively, and for TOR were 101.4% (90% CI, 99.1-103.9) and 104.4% (90% CI, 93.8-116.3), respectively, for combined treatment versus administration alone. The pharmacokinetic profiles of empagliflozin, HCTZ, and TOR were similar after administration alone and in combination. Global tolerability was good for all patients after each treatment, and no severe or serious adverse events were reported., Implications: No pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction was observed between empagliflozin and HCTZ or TOR. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01276288., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

A sensitive, accurate, precise and rapid HPLC-PDA method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of torasemide and spironolactone in human plasma using Design of experiments. Central composite design was used to optimize the method using content of acetonitrile, concentration of buffer and pH of mobile phase as independent variables, while the retention factor of spironolactone, resolution between torasemide and phenobarbitone; and retention time of phenobarbitone were chosen as dependent variables. The chromatographic separation was achieved on Phenomenex C(18) column and the mobile phase comprising 20 mM potassium dihydrogen ortho phosphate buffer (pH-3.2) and acetonitrile in 82.5:17.5 v/v pumped at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min(-1). The method was validated according to USFDA guidelines in terms of selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery and stability. The limit of quantitation values were 80 and 50 ng mL(-1) for torasemide and spironolactone respectively. Furthermore, the sensitivity and simplicity of the method suggests the validity of method for routine clinical studies.

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of arrhythmia and their relationship with the severity and prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to investigate the therapeutic effect of torasemide versus furosemide on CHF and incidence of arrhythmia. DCM patients with NYHA cardiac function II-IV were continuously monitored using a 24-h dynamic electrocardiogram (Holter), and arrhythmia incidence was analyzed by computer automatic analysis combined with manual assessment. In total, 125 participants were evenly divided into two groups: torasemide group which received 10 mg oral torasemide once daily) and regular anti-heart failure treatment (N=65), and furosemide group which received torasemide (20 mg once daily orally) and regular antiheart failure treatment (N=60). Another 60 normal healthy persons served as the normal control group. Incidence and severity of arrhythmia increased when degree of CHF was elevated. Size of left atrium was related to atrial fibrillation and size of left ventricle was related to malignant arrhythmia. At 3 months after treatment, cardiac function in both groups improved and incidence and severity of arrhythmia in both groups were reduced. However, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher in the torasemide group than in the furosemide group, while incidence of arrhythmia was lower in the torasemide group. Arrhythmias frequently occurred in patients with DCM and HF. Type of cardiac arrhythmia is closely related to ventricular enlargement and cardiac function grade. Torasemide is better for improving cardiac function to reduce arrhythmia and CHF compared to furosemide.

Nephropathy is one of the complications of diabetes mellitus in human and experimental animals. There are various pathological renal remodeling processes leading to diabetic nephropathy because of the chronic hyperglycemia during diabetes mellitus. Various reports suggest the involvement of oxidative stress, inflammation and fibrosis during this progression. As antihypertensive drugs are reported to provide renoprotection in various animal models and clinical studies, we have carried out this study to identify the effect of torasemide, a loop diuretic, against streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy and compare with furosemide. Here we have performed the measurement of blood and urine parameters and renal protein expression levels for measuring the disease severity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats treated torasemide or furosemide and compared with the vehicle treated rats. Furosemide treatment significantly increased the urinary protein excretion when compared with the normal rats. Torasemide treatment has reduced the expression of mineralocorticoid receptor and oxidative stress marker p67phox levels with improved mRNA levels of heme oxygenase-1 in the kidneys. In addition, torasemide treated diabetic rats showed significantly reduced expression of renal fibrosis related proteins when compared with the vehicle treated diabetic rats. Although furosemide treatment has produced improvement, its effects are comparably less than that of torasemide. Thus with the present results, we can suggest that torasemide treatment can improve the diabetic kidney disease in this rat model and which is superior to furosemide against renal fibrotic remodeling., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We included into this study 21 patients with a cardiovascular disease and effort dyspnea of at least one month duration. In accordance with result of tissue Doppler echocardiography all patients were divided in 2 groups: 14 patients with confirmed chronic heart failure (CHF) and 7 patients without CHF. All patients performed 6-minute walk test before and one day after receiving 5 mg of torasemide. In the group of patients with CHF 6-minute walk distance after torasemide increased by 52 m, in the group of patients without CHF this distance was reduced by 16 m. Test with torasemide can be used for differential diagnosis of dyspnea in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Increase of 6-minute walk distance one day after 5 mg of torasemide by 15 meters or more evidence in favor of cardiac origin of dyspnea with a sensitivity of 89%. The lack of increment 6-minute walk distance give evidence against heart failure as a cause of dyspnea with a specificity of 82%.

Aim: To investigate the effect of loop diuretics with different elimination half-lives on natriuresis (NU) changes in patients with hypertensive disease (HD) and chronic heart failure (CHF)., Subjects and Methods: Fifty-six patients who had signs of progressive CHF and needed diuretic therapy were selected from a group of the patients who had participated in our previous study of the types of natriuretic curves. They all received torasemide SR or torasemide IR., Results: It has been shown that the type of a natriuretic curve may be variable in the patients. In the toracemide IR group, NU worsens more frequently and earlier than in the toracemide SR group (p < 0.05). The type of the curve is associated with elevated Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP) levels, its transition from one to another type, and the duration of HD to the greatest degree. It has been found that the longer history of HD is, the higher effect of angiotensin II is. The probability of transition of the natriuretic curve from type 3 to 2 is 83.93% (odds ratio 11.667) from type 2 to 1 is 92.86% (odds ratio 120.00)., Conclusion: With time and altered NU, there is a significant deterioration of sodium excretion, and an increase in THP excretion, which is a marker for progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and angiotensin II activity increases, which gives proof to the necessity of monitoring NU.

A novel fluorescence quenching method for the determination of torasemide (TOR) with some dihalogenated fluorescein dyes as fluorescence probes was developed. In acidulous medium, TOR could interact with some dihalogenated fluorescein dyes such as dichlorofluorescein (DCF), dibromofluorescein (DBF) and diiodofluorescein (DIF) to form binary complexes, which could lead to fluorescence quenching of above dihalogenated fluorescein dyes. The maximum fluorescence emission wavelengths were located at 532 nm (TOR-DCF), 535 nm (TOR-DBF) and 554 nm (TOR-DIF). The relative fluorescence intensities (ΔF=F0-F) were proportional to the concentration of TOR in certain ranges. The detection limits were 4.8 ng mL(-1) for TOR-DCF system, 9.8 ng mL(-1) for TOR-DBF system and 35.1 ng mL(-1) for TOR-DIF system. The optimum reaction conditions, influencing factors were studied; and the effect of coexisting substances was investigated owing to the highest sensitivity of TOR-DCF system. In addition, the reaction mechanism, composition and structure of the complex were discussed by quantum chemical calculation and Job's method. The fluorescence quenching of dihalogenated fluorescein dyes by TOR was a static quenching process judging from the effect of temperature and the Stern-Volmer plots. The method was satisfactorily applied to the determination of TOR in tablets and human urine samples., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aldosterone binds to the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and exerts pleiotropic effects beyond enhancing renal sodium reabsorption. Excessive mineralocorticoid signaling is deleterious during the evolution of cardiac failure, as evidenced by the benefits provided by adding MR antagonists (MRA) to standard care in humans. In animal models of cardiovascular diseases, MRA reduce cardiac fibrosis. Interestingly diuretics such as torasemide also appear efficient to improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, through several mechanisms. Among them, it has been suggested that torasemide could block aldosterone binding to the MR. To evaluate whether torasemide acts as a MRA in cardiomyocytes, we compared its effects with a classic MRA such as spironolactone. We monitored ligand-induced nuclear translocation of MR-GFP and MR transactivation activity in the cardiac-like cell line H9C2 using a reporter gene assay and known endogenous aldosterone-regulated cardiac genes. Torasemide did not modify MR nuclear translocation. Aldosterone-induced MR transactivation activity was reduced by the MRA spironolactone, not by torasemide. Spironolactone blocked the induction by aldosterone of endogenous MR-responsive genes (Sgk-1, PAI-1, Orosomucoid-1, Rgs-2, Serpina-3, Tenascin-X), while torasemide was ineffective. These results show that torasemide is not an MR antagonist; its association with MRA in heart failure may however be beneficial, through actions on complementary pathways.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of torsemide on warfarin therapy in humans and rats., Methods: For the animal study, rats were orally dosed with warfarin (0.13 mg/kg, control group) or warfarin (0.13 mg/kg) with torsemide (2 mg/kg, low dose group and 10 mg/kg, high dose group). The pharmacodynamic response of warfarin was assessed by measuring the international normalized ratio (INR) for 5 consecutive days following drug administration. For the human study, 191 patients on warfarin with mechanical heart valves were followed up retrospectively. The stable dose was calculated as the mean dose in INR levels of 2-3 for 3 consecutive times., Key Findings: In the animal study, the INR, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ) of (S)-warfarin in the high dose group were significantly higher than in other groups (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, Cmax and AUC0-∞ of (R)-warfarin in the high and low dose groups were higher, whereas the volume of distribution/bioavailability and clearance/bioavailability were significantly lower (P < 0.05). In the univariate analysis of the clinical study, diuretics significantly lowered stable warfarin doses (P = 0.016) (5.07 ± 1.78 mg/day vs 5.77 ± 1.81 mg/day). After controlling confounding variables, the effects of diuretics were found to lower the warfarin dose by 0.464 mg., Conclusions: It was concluded that warfarin dose needs to be lowered when it is used concomitantly with diuretics., (© 2013 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.)

Contrast Induced Acute Kidney Injury (CI-AKI), due to the use of contrast media in radiographic procedures, is the leading cause of acute renal failure in hospitalized patients, and is associated with prolonged in-hospital stay and increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. However only peri-procedural hydration is now used universally as its preventive strategy. Some studies indicates that renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is possibly responsible for the development of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity through mediating abnormalities of renal perfusion and other mechanisms. And torasemide, known as loop diuretics, could inhibit RAAS through its anti-aldosteronergic function. Therefore, speculation about torasemide's prevention of CI-AKI could be firmly made. Intravenously administrated torasemide would be promising as a future prophylactic agent, possibly in combination with other strategies such as adequate peri-procedural hydration and other renal protective agents, in the prevention of CI-AKI. In this context, we review the background and the role of RAAS on the development of CI-AKI, and discuss the pharmacologic individuality of torasemide on RAAS and torasemide's preventive effect on CI-AKI.

The possible antifibrotic effect of torasemide used for the treatment of model chronic heart failure (CHF) has been studied in rats aged 12 months with developed postinfarction cardiosclerosis (PICS). The antifibrotic effect was evaluated of the course of torasemide administration in a daily dose of 0.13 mg/kg. A comparative analysis showed that torasemide did not affect the state of connective tissues in cardiac muscles of both intact rats and those with PICS. It was concluded that manifestations of the antifibrotic effect of torasemide can be related to the nosological form of CHF.

Furosemide is the most widely prescribed loop diuretic in the setting of systolic heart failure (HF), yet torsemide has been shown to have less inter- and intra-individual variation in bioavailability and a longer duration of action compared with furosemide. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing torsemide versus furosemide in patients with systolic HF using OVID MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica (Embase), Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar was performed. Extracted data included study design, sample characteristics, intervention, outcomes and control for potential confounding factors. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to compute summary risk ratios for HF and cardiovascular (CV) readmission outcomes. Two randomized trials comparing furosemide with torsemide in 471 patients with systolic HF were identified. Compared to furosemide, torsemide significantly reduced total HF readmissions (relative risk [RR]: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.61, p < 0.0001) and HF readmissions (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.33-0.84, p = 0.008) as well as CV readmissions (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98, p = 0.03) in patients with "at least 1 readmission." Moreover, compared with furosemide, torsemide caused a 14% reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.86 [0.53-1.39], p = 0.54). Compared with furosemide, torsemide significantly reduces HF and CV-related hospital readmissions in systolic HF. Furthermore, torsemide is associated with a trend in reducing all-cause mortality.

Complete evaluation of chromatographic behavior and establishment of optimal experimental conditions for determination of torasemide and its four impurities are determined by experimental design. Fractional factorial and 3(n) full factorial design were employed for efficient and rapid optimization of liquid chromatography-ultraviolet and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods. Separation is achieved on a Zorbax SB C(18) analytical column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) with mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium formate (pH 2.5 with formic acid) in gradient mode. The flow rate is 1 mL min(-1), the temperature of the column is 25 °C and UV detection is performed at 290 nm. The efficiency of ionization in electrospray ionization is higher than in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mode; therefore, it is further used for analysis of torasemide and its impurities. Both methods meet all validation criteria. The calibration curves show high linearity with the coefficients of correlation (r) greater than 0.9982. The obtained recovery values (95.78-104.92%) and relative standard deviation values (0.12-5.56%) indicate good accuracy and precision. Lower limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) values are obtained with the LC-MS method, indicating higher sensitivity of the proposed method., (© The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Diuretic therapy reduces preload and relieves congestion secondary to cardiac dysfunction. Torsemide (torasemide) is a loop diuretic with longer duration of action, decreased susceptibility to diuretic resistance, and adjunctive aldosterone antagonist properties compared with furosemide. We hypothesized that torsemide would be well tolerated and no less effective than furosemide at diuresis, control of clinical signs, and maintenance of quality of life (QOL) in dogs with congestive heart failure (CHF)., Animals, Materials and Methods: Seven client-owned dogs with stable CHF receiving twice daily oral furosemide and adjunctive medications. Utilizing a double-blinded, randomized, crossover design, dogs were administered either oral furosemide at their current dose or an equivalent oral dose of torsemide (1/10 of the daily furosemide dose divided into twice daily dosing) on day 0. Crossover occurred at day 7 and the study ended on day 14. Clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and QOL variables were evaluated on days 0, 7 and 14., Results: No dogs developed recurrent CHF during the study. Mean furosemide dose on day 0 was 5.13 mg/kg/day (range 2.8-9.6). Following torsemide treatment, creatinine (P = 0.020), urea nitrogen (P = 0.013), phosphorus (P = 0.032), albumin (P = 0.019), carbon dioxide (P = 0.015) and anion gap (P = 0.005) were significantly increased, and urine specific gravity (P = 0.004) and chloride (P = 0.021) were significantly decreased compared with furosemide dosing. No differences in QOL were found., Conclusions: Results indicate that torsemide is equivalent to furosemide at controlling clinical signs of CHF in dogs and is likely to achieve greater diuresis vs. furosemide. Larger clinical trials evaluating torsemide as a first or second-line loop diuretic for congestive heart failure in dogs are warranted., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Diuretics are a mainstay of therapy in dogs with heart failure. In dogs with advanced heart failure, moderate to high doses of loop diuretics such as furosemide are used with diminishing effects as profound activation of neuroendocrine systems promote signs of congestive heart failure. The loop diuretic torsemide has several characteristics that make it suitable for treatment of advanced heart failure including longer half-life, increased potency of diuretic action, and anti-aldosterone effects. This case report details the administration of torsemide in 3 dogs with advanced heart failure and apparent furosemide resistance., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In pH 0.6-1.1 HCl-NaAc buffer solution, torasemide (TOR) reacted with TP to form a 3:1 ion-association complexes. As a result, not only the absorption spectra were changed, but also the intensities of resonance Rayleigh scattering (RRS), second-order scattering (SOS) and frequency doubling scattering (FDS) were enhanced greatly. The maximum RRS, SOS and FDS wavelengths were located at 370, 333, 776 nm, respectively. Under given conditions, the intensities of RRS, SOS and FDS were all directly proportional to the concentration of TOR. The detection limits of RRS, SOS and FDS were 0.7173 ng mL(-1), 7.007 ng mL(-1) and 10.90 ng mL(-1). The optimum conditions and the effects of coexisting substances on the reaction were investigated. The results showed that the method had good selectivity. Therefore, a highly sensitive, simple and quick method has been developed for the determination of TOR. The method can be applied satisfactorily to the determination of TOR in tablets and urine samples., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The pharmacologic modification of the synthesis and deposition of fibrillar collagen in the myocardium may have effects on the cardiac function, clinical status, and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). Serum procollagen type I carboxyterminal peptide (PICP) is a biochemical marker of collagen type I fibers synthesis and myocardial deposition., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of both the prolonged-release (PR) formulation of torasemide (torasemide-PR) and furosemide on myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive patients with chronic HF., Methods: This was a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, open-label study with blinded evaluation of data (PROBE: Prospective Randomized Open-label Blinded End points). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with torasemide-PR (n = 77) or furosemide (n = 78), while receiving the best standard chronic HF treatment. Effects of torasemide-PR and furosemide on myocardial fibrosis were assessed through PICP serum levels. Twenty-eight patients discontinued prematurely from the study, 14 in each treatment group., Results: One hundred fifty-five patients were randomized, 58.1% of whom were male. Mean (SD) age of the patients was 68.1 (11.4) years in the torasemide-PR group and 69.3 (9.8) years in the furosemide group. At baseline, 96.1% of patients in the torasemide-PR group and 89.7% in the furosemide group had NYHA class II HF. Most patients in both treatment groups presented with preserved ejection fraction (EF >40%). No differences were found in PICP serum levels at the end of the study between patients treated with torasemide-PR and patients treated with furosemide (P = 0.75). Adjusted difference (95% CI) for baseline concentration between both treatment groups was -1.2 (-8.9 to 6.4)., Conclusions: In hypertensive patients with mild and clinically stable HF, long-term administration of either torasemide-PR or furosemide was not associated with significant effects on myocardial fibrosis, as assessed by serum PICP. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00409942., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Torasemide is a loop diuretic and has been used for the treatment of both acute and chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) and arterial hypertension (AH). Torasemide is similar to other loop diuretics in terms of its mechanism of diuretic action. It has higher bioavailability (&gt;80%) and a longer elimination half-life (3 to 4 hours) than furosemide. In the treatment of CHF torasemide (5 to 20 mg/day) has been shown to be an effective diuretic. Non-diuretic dosages (2.5 to 5 mg/day) of torasemide have been used to treat essential AH, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. When used in these dosages, torasemide lowers diastolic blood pressure to below 90mm Hg in 70 to 80% of patients. Antihypertensive efficacy of torasemide is similar to that of thiazides and related compounds. Thus low-dose torasemide constitutes an alternative to thiazides in the treatment of essential AH.

A simple RP-ultra-performance LC method was developed and validated for determination of impurities related to torsemide tablets. The rapid method provided adequate separation of all known related impurities and degradation products. Separation was achieved on a Zorbax SB-C18 column (50 x 4.6 mm id, 1.8 microm particle size) with binary gradient elution, and detection was performed at 288 nm. The drug product was subjected to oxidative, hydrolytic, photolytic, and thermal stress conditions to prove the specificity of the proposed method. The linearity and recovery were investigated for known impurities in the range of 0.025 to 1.0%, with respect to the drug concentration in the prepared sample. The linearity of the calibration curve for each of the impurities and torsemide was found to be very good (r2 > 0.999). Relative response factors for each of the known impurities were established by the slope ratio method from the linearity study.

Aims: Diuretics, when used to treat congestion in patients with chronic heart failure, improve symptoms and, perhaps, prognosis but little information is available to guide their use in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) who are not congested. Chronic diuretic therapy causes persistent and potentially harmful neuroendocrine activation. Alternatively, in patients in whom neuroendocrine activation is blocked with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and beta-blockers, diuretics may be beneficial by decreasing preload and afterload and preventing congestion. We aimed to assess the effect of the loop diuretic, torasemide on quality of life, and surrogate markers of prognosis when given to patients with LVSD who were not clinically congested and who were optimally treated with ACE-inhibitors (or angiotensin receptor antagonists) and beta-blockers., Methods and Results: Thirty patients with stable LVSD who had no clinically detectable fluid overload were randomized to receive either torasemide 5 mg daily or placebo for 3 months (Phase A), and after a washout phase of 2 months, cross-over was performed for 3 months (Phase B). Diuretic therapy did not cause significant change in peak VO(2), mean N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, or measures of quality of life compared with placebo. Diuretic therapy did however lead to significant fall in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and increase in plasma renin levels compared with placebo., Conclusion: Diuretic therapy with torasemide is not superior to placebo in improving peak VO(2) or reducing NT-proBNP levels in patients with left ventricular dysfunction who are not clinically congested.