Search

Introduction: The COVID‐19 pandemic caused rapid implementation of telehealth for melanoma follow‐up care in Australia. This study explores Australian melanoma patients and clinicians' level of satisfaction with telehealth. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted across three specialist melanoma centres in Sydney, Australia. Melanoma patients (all stages) and clinicians completed mixed methods surveys seeking socio‐demographic and clinical information and questionnaires to assess satisfaction with telehealth. Additionally, patients completed measures of quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence and trust in their oncologist. Patients and clinicians provided open‐ended responses to qualitative questions about their perceptions of telehealth. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients and 13 clinicians responded to surveys. Telephone was used by 109 (95%) patients and 11 (85%) clinicians. Fifty‐seven (50%) patients and nine (69%) clinicians preferred face‐to‐face consultations, 38 (33%) patients and 3 (23%) clinicians preferred a combination of face‐to‐face and telehealth consultations. Five (4%) patients and nil clinicians preferred telehealth consultations. Patients diagnosed with early‐stage melanoma, using telehealth for the first time, who have lower trust in their oncologist, and having higher care delivery, communication and supportive care concerns were likely to report lower satisfaction with telehealth. Open‐ended responses were consistent between patients and clinicians, who reported safety, convenience and improved access to care as major benefits, while identifying personal, interpersonal, clinical and system‐related disadvantages. Discussion: While telehealth has been widely implemented during COVID‐19, the benefits identified by patients and clinicians may extend past the pandemic. Telehealth may be considered for use in conjunction with face‐to‐face consultations to provide melanoma follow‐up care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We conducted a systematic review and evidence gap mapping to explore the existing supportive care interventions and their impact on well‐being outcomes for melanoma patients and caregivers. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Index Medicus, CINAHL, Lilacs, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) and PsycINFO in December 2022, including interventional studies assessing the effectiveness of any supportive care intervention among melanoma patients and/or their caregivers. Findings: Twenty studies were included in this review. These studies consisted of randomised controlled trials (n = 11, 55%), pre‐post studies (n = 7, 35%) and quasi‐experimental trials (n = 2, 10%). All studies originated from high‐income countries and focused primarily on melanoma patients, with no studies identified that focused solely on caregivers. Educational interventions were the most common (n = 7, 35%), followed by psychoeducational interventions (n = 6, 30%) and psychotherapeutic interventions (n = 4, 20%). Nearly all included studies (n = 18, 90%) reported a positive effect of the intervention on the primary outcome of interest; however, most studies (n = 17, 85%) were judged to be at moderate or high risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity of study designs, intervention characteristics and outcome measures, meta‐analysis was not conducted. Implications: Supportive care interventions have positive impacts on melanoma patient well‐being outcomes, while being acceptable and feasible to conduct. More research is needed regarding supportive care interventions for melanoma caregivers. Future research should focus on eliminating sources of bias through rigorous methodology, with the development of standardised outcome measures for psychosocial outcomes to facilitate future meta‐analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]