1. Locally recurrent rectal cancer: oncological outcomes with different treatment strategies in two tertiary referral units
- Author
-
Stefi Nordkamp, Eva L. K. Voogt, Desley M. G. I. van Zoggel, Anna Martling, Torbjörn Holm, Gabriella Jansson Palmer, Chikako Suzuki, Joost Nederend, Miranda Kusters, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Harm J. T. Rutten, Henrik Iversen, Surgery, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life, and RS: GROW - R2 - Basic and Translational Cancer Biology
- Subjects
EXCISION ,Treatment Outcome ,SURGERY ,Rectal Neoplasms ,MANAGEMENT ,Humans ,CHEMOTHERAPY ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,Referral and Consultation ,REIRRADIATION ,CHEMORADIOTHERAPY ,PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Background The optimal treatment for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate different treatment strategies in two leading tertiary referral hospitals in Europe. Methods All patients who underwent curative surgery for LRRC between January 2003 and December 2017 in Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (CHE), or Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (KAR), were studied retrospectively. Available MRIs were reviewed to obtain a uniform staging for optimal comparison of both cohorts. The main outcomes studied were overall survival (OS), local re-recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results In total, 377 patients were included, of whom 126 and 251 patients came from KAR and CHE respectively. At 5 years, the LRFS rate was 62.3 per cent in KAR versus 42.3 per cent in CHE (P = 0.017), whereas OS and MFS were similar. A clear surgical resection margin (R0) was the strongest prognostic factor for survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.23 (95 per cent c.i. 1.74 to 2.86; P < 0.001), 3.96 (2.87 to 5.47; P < 0.001), and 2.00 (1.48 to 2.69; P < 0.001) for OS, LRFS, and MFS respectively. KAR performed more extensive operations, resulting in more R0 resections than in CHE (76.2 versus 61.4 per cent; P = 0.004), whereas CHE relied more on neoadjuvant treatment and intraoperative radiotherapy, to reduce the morbidity of multivisceral resections (P < 0.001). Conclusion In radiotherapy-naive patients, neoadjuvant full-course chemoradiation confers the best oncological outcome. However, neoadjuvant therapy does not diminish the need for extended radical surgery to increase R0 resection rates.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF