Search

Introduction To describe laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port simple nephrectomy for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney. Case presentation Case 1: a 58-year-old female with fever was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography demonstrated a markedly atrophic right kidney and mild hydronephrosis. Case 2: a 64-year-old male with a history of several intra-abdominal surgeries visited our hospital with a complaint of left back pain and fever. Computed tomography demonstrated left marked hydronephrosis, thinning of renal parenchyma, and duplicated inferior vena cava. After antibiotic treatment, transperitoneal reduced port simple nephrectomy and retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy were performed in Case 1 and 2, respectively, because the function of the affected kidney was almost lost on renography. Although adhesion was slightly noted around the renal hilum in Case 1, neither conversion to laparotomy nor placement of additional ports was needed. Conclusion Laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port simple nephrectomy for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney may be options for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

In the field of minimally invasive surgery, there is a constant drive to devise and execute the most minimally invasive surgeries possible. By the very nature of laparoscopy and robotic surgery, what one can accomplish with several ports of a given size will invariably be studied and attempted with fewer ports and with ports of smaller sizes. After researching the literature, we were not able to find any single port hysterectomies performed through a port size of smaller than 15 mm. We were able to perform, described here, a technique for performing laparoscopic hysterectomy through a single port of only 11 mm in diameter. We illustrate the technique in the accompanying video and believe the technique to be safe and reproducible.

Objective: The objective of the study is to compare the intra- and post-operative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in mature cystic teratoma (MCT) of the ovary. Methods: We reviewed 254 patients who underwent surgery (cystectomy) for ovarian MCT from March 1, 2014, to August 31, 2016. During the study period, 216 patients underwent LESS and 38 patients underwent CLS. The outcome measures included operation time, estimated blood loss, changing hemoglobin (Hb) level, postoperative pain, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 24. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in age, body mass index, sexual experience, cyst size, operative time, adhesiolysis, preoperative Hb, Hb changes, postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale), hospital days, and complications between the two groups. In emergent situation, the frequency of CLS was high as three cases (7.9%) versus one case (0.5%, P = 0.007) with LESS. As the year progressed, the frequency of LESS increased. There were one case of re-operation for bleeding control and transfusion, one case of postoperative peritonitis and transfusion, and one case of postoperative transfusion in LESS. During LESS, additional port(s) was/were created in 13 cases (6.0%, P = 0.249). Conclusions: LESS is not inferior to CLS in MCT surgery, and LESS is useful for the surgery of MCT. Our study demonstrates that LESS confers feasibility, convenience, and safety regarding cystectomy of MCT.

Currently, over 80% of radical prostatectomies have been performed with the da Vinci Surgical System. In order to improve the aesthetic outlook and decrease the morbidity of the operation, the new da Vinci Single Port (SP) system was developed in 2018. However, one major problem is the SP system is still not available in most countries. We aim to present our initial experience and show the safety and feasibility of the single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LESS-RP) using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. From June 2017 to January 2020, 120 patients with localized prostate cancer (stage T1–T3b) at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital were included in this study. We describe our technique and report our initial results of LESS-RP using the da Vinci Si robotic system. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative patient variables were recorded. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-free survival was also analyzed. A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age of patients was 68 years (IQR 63–71), with a median body mass index of 25 kg/m2 (IQR 23–27). The median PSA value before operation was 10.7 ng/mL (IQR 7.9–21.1). The median setup time for creat-ing the extraperitoneal space and ports document was 25 min (IQR 18–34). The median robotic console time and operation time were 135 min (IQR 110–161) and 225 min (IQR 197–274), respectively. Median blood loss was 365 mL (IQR 200–600). There were 11 (9.2%) patients who experienced complications (Clavien–Dindo classification Gr II). The me-dian catheter duration was 8 days (IQR 7–9), with a median of 10 days (IQR 7–11) of hospital stay. The PSA free-survival rate was 86% at a median 19 months (IQR 6–28) of follow up. Robotic radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform system is safe and feasible, with acceptable outcomes.

To describe the evolution of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) performed with the daVinci Single-Site Platform® and a home-made multiport aimed to overcome classical drawbacks of LESS, still present with this platform. Between 09/2015 and 06/2017 12 patients underwent R-LESS RP for clinical localized prostate cancer. Following a “phase 1 (development-stage)” innovation, development, exploration, assessment, long-term study (IDEAL) framework, different solutions were drawn to overcome drawbacks of daVinci Single-Site Platform®, included 3 (A, B, and C) multi-ports developed and evaluated in term of advantages/drawbacks concerning ergonomy. The end points of this study were: feasibility, safety, efficacy, by reporting rational description of multiports configuration, demographics, perioperative variables, functional and oncological results. Semi-flexible robotic 5-mm needle-holder instead of Maryland forceps, 30° lenses up and barbed-suture allowed overcoming limits of robotic-platform. Multiport-C (GelPOINT Advanced-Access® and an extra 8-mm robotic trocar outside the multiport) showed the best compromise to ensure both surgeon and bed-side assistant to reproduce a standard robotic procedure. No conversion to either standard robotic or open technique or intraoperative complications occur in any case. Two patients experienced “high-grade” Clavien-Dindo complications. After 12.4 months follow-up, all patients were continent without any sign of biochemical relapse and among 5 preoperative potent patients submitted to nerve-sparing dissection, 4 reported good erectile-function. R-LESS-RP is feasible and safe in the hands of experienced minimally-invasive surgeons. Do date, we recommend a hybrid solution with a home-made multiport and use of an additional standard robotic trocar which allows the use endowrist® technology instruments.

Background: Unilateral renal tumor cryoablation and contralateral radical nephrectomy of bilateral renal tumors were performed by transumbilical three-dimensional (3D) multichannel laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery, in an attempt to verify the feasibility and safety of the procedure, sum up the operational experience, and evaluate the surgical outcome. Case Presentation: This was a 47-year-old female patient with a body mass index of 27.34 kg/m2 without backache, low back pain, hematuria, urinary urgency, frequent urination, dysuria, and other symptoms. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the kidney on admission showed four masses in the left kidney and two masses in the right kidney. Preoperative serum creatinine (SCr) was 87 μmol/L. Operation was performed under general anesthesia by first laying the patient in a left lateral position. A 2-cm longitudinal transumbilical skin incision was made to expose the right kidney for complete dissection of the two tumors. First, puncture biopsy was performed, and then two freeze–thaw cryoablation cycles for the two tumors were performed. At last, the patient was laid in a right lateral position for radical nephrectomy of the left kidney. The operative duration, cryoablation time, and estimated blood loss were 200 minutes, 40 minutes, and 100 mL, respectively. Postoperative pathological examination revealed clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. The right glomerular filtration rate tested was 42.36 mL/minute and SCr was 131 μmol/L at day 5 after surgery. There was no evidence of contrast enhancement at the cryoablative region as shown by renal contrasted CT scan performed 4 days after surgery and renal contrasted MRI scan performed 6 weeks after surgery, indicating that there was no tumor remnant or recurrence. Conclusion: Our preliminary experience shows that the treatment of bilateral renal tumors with unilateral renal tumor cryoablation and contralateral radical nephrectomy by transumbilical 3D LESS is safe, feasible, and effective. It may prove to be a viable option for patients with significant comorbidities and an insensitive treatment intention.

Background Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and minilaparoscopy (ML) represent the evolution of laparoscopy for the treatment of urologic diseases. Objective To describe the technique and report the surgical outcomes of minilaparoendoscopic single-site dismembered pyeloplasty (MILESS-DP), a new technique overcoming the technical limitations of LESS and ML, and equally combining the advantages of both these surgical procedures. Design, setting, and participants Twenty consecutive patients underwent MILESS-DP for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Surgical procedure The SILS port was inserted through a transumbilical incision and two 3-mm trocars were inserted in the ipsilateral midclavicular line. The sequence of steps of MILESS-DP is comparable to standard laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Measurements The end points of this study were: (1) feasibility; (2) safety; (3) efficacy; and (4) cosmesis, evaluated using a body image questionnaire. Results and limitations All patients were symptomatic (100%) and three (15%) had concomitant kidney stones. (1) Feasibility: a conversion to either standard laparoscopic technique or open technique did not occur in any case. Median operative time was 147.3min (interquartile range [IQR]: 110–195min); (2) safety: no intraoperative complications were reported. Only in two patients (10%), a urinoma was postoperatively identified and conservatively treated with an ureteral stent. The median difference in post- and preoperative creatinine and haemoglobin was +0.55mg/dl and -0.76mg/dl (IQR: -0.20/-1.20mg/dl); (3) efficacy: the median postoperative hospital stay was 4.4 d (IQR: 4–9 d). The overall success rate was 95% at the follow-up; (4) cosmesis: all patients were enthusiastic with the appearance of the scars; the median body image score and the median cosmesis score were 19.95 (IQR 19–20) and 23.95 (IQR 23–24), respectively. The limitations of this study are the limited series and short follow-up. Conclusions Our phase 2a studies demonstrate that MILESS-DP is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent cosmetic outcomes and short-term clinical outcomes in the hands of a surgical team with experience in laparoscopy. Patient summary Minilaparoscopy using 3-mm instruments and laparoendoscopic single-site using a single abdominal incision, still present several technical drawbacks which limit their reproducibility in urology. In order to overcome these technical limitations and equally combining the advantages of both these surgical procedures, we ideated a hybrid technique which we defined minilaparoendoscopic single-site. This study aims to demonstrate that minilaparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent cosmetic outcomes and short-term clinical outcomes in the hands of a surgical team with experience in mini-invasive surgery.

Background Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) is performed routinely in our department as an alternative to a conventional laparoscopic approach. Objectives The aim of this study was to report our surgical results and follow-up outcome after SPSG. Setting Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hopitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, France. Methods Data from consecutive patients who underwent SPSG in our institution between August 2010 and July 2015 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with more than 1-year follow-up were included in our analysis for weight loss and co-morbidity. Results A total of 1000 patients underwent SPSG during the study period. Median body mass index was 42.6 kg/m² (range: 33.8–84.6 kg/m²). Median operative time was 112 minutes (range: 50–360 min) and decreased over the years. Completion of the procedure required introduction of an extraport in 78 patients (7.8%). Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were .1% and 8.1%, respectively. Relaparoscopy and/or endoscopic treatment were required to treat intra-abdominal bleeding in 24 patients (2.4%) and staple-line leakage in 28 patients (2.8%). Five hundred forty-six patients were considered for 1-year follow-up evaluation. Mean excess weight loss was 69% after 1 year and 62.2% after 2 years. Incisional hernia from the trocar site occurred in 20 (3.7%) patients. Conclusion Sleeve gastrectomy can be routinely performed using a single-incision laparoscopic technique with equivalent outcomes of surgical morbidity and weight loss compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. Prospective comparative studies are necessary to assess the potential benefits of this minimally-invasive approach.

The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the effect of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. End points were time, errors, and preference. Twenty-six participants were enrolled in the study, and these were divided into Beginners and Experts, in exercises either with a 2-dimensional or a 3D system. The 4 phantom exercises were chosen from the E-BLUS-European Training in Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills from the American Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) system. A postexercise questionnaire was delivered. Statistical analyses using SPSS 22.0 for Windows yielded a 1-way analysis of variance. There was a significant positive impact of 3D imaging on experts' performance: faster exercise completion with fewer errors. The majority reported improved performance with the 3D system (86%, Beginners; 100%, Experts). 3D systems for laparoscopy would likely increase experts' performance for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and improve comfort during difficult procedures., (undefined), info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Background. Usually laparoscopy is performed by means of a 2-dimensional (2D) image system and multiport approach. To overcome the lack of depth perception, new 3-dimensional (3D) systems are arising with the added advantage of providing stereoscopic vision. To further reduce surgery-related trauma, there are new minimally invasive surgical techniques being developed, such as LESS (laparoendoscopic single-site) surgery. The aim of this study was to compare 2D and 3D laparoscopic systems in LESS surgical procedures. Materials and Methods. All participants were selected from different levels of experience in laparoscopic surgery10 novices, 7 intermediates, and 10 experts were included. None of the participants had had previous experience in LESS surgery. Participants were chosen randomly to begin their experience with either the 2D or 3D laparoscopic system. The exercise consisted of performing an ex vivo pork cholecystectomy through a SILS port with the assistance of a fixed distance laparoscope. Errors, time, and participants' preference were recorded. Statistical analysis of time and errors between groups was conducted with a Student's t test (using independent samples) and the Mann-Whitney test. Results. In all 3 groups, the average time with the 2D system was significantly reduced after having used the 3D system (P < .05). In the postexercise questionnaire, two thirds of participants showed a preference for using the 3D system. Conclusion. This study suggests that the 3D system may improve the learning curve and that learning from the 3D system is transferable to the 2D environment. Additionally, the majority of participants prefer 3D equipment.

Introduction: To analyze the most recent temporal trends in the adoption of urologic laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS), to identify the perceived limitations associated with its decline, and to determine factors that might revive the role of LESS in the field of minimally invasive urologic surgery. Materials and Methods: A 15 question survey was created and sent to members of the Endourological Society in September 2016. Only members who performed LESS procedures in practice were asked to respond. Results: In total, 106 urologists responded to the survey. Most of the respondents were from the United States (35%) and worked in an academic hospital (84.9%). Standard LESS was the most popular approach (78.1%), while 14.3% used robotics and 7.6% used both. 2009 marked the most popular year to perform the initial (27.6%) and the majority (20%) of LESS procedures. The most common LESS procedure was a radical/simple nephrectomy (51%) followed by pyeloplasty (17.3%). In the past 12 months, 60% of respondents had performed no LESS procedures. Compared to conventional laparoscopy respondents only believed cosmesis to be better, however, this enthusiasm waned over time. Worsening shifts in enthusiasm for LESS also occurred with patient desire, marketability, cost, safety, and robotic adaptability. The highest rated factor to help LESS regain popularity was a new robotic platform. Conclusion: The decline of LESS is apparent, with few urologists continuing to perform procedures attributed to multiple factors. The availability of a purpose-built robotic platform and better instrumentation might translate into a renewed future interest of LESS.

Purpose To assess the safety and effectiveness of LESS compared to conventional hysterectomy. Methods The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the MOOSE guideline, and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Different databases were searched up to 4th of August 2016. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing LESS to the conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy were considered for inclusion. Results Of the 668 unique articles, 23 were found relevant. We investigated safety by analyzing the complication rate and found no significant differences between both groups [OR 0.94 (0.61, 1.44), I 2 = 19%]. We assessed effectiveness by analyzing conversion risk, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. For conversion rates to laparotomy, no differences were identified [OR 1.60 (0.40, 6.38), I 2 = 45%]. In 3.5% of the cases in the LESS group, an additional port was needed during LESS. For postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction, some of the included studies reported favorable results for LESS, but the clinical relevance was non-significant. Concerning secondary outcomes, only a difference in operative time was found in favor of the conventional group [MD 11.3 min (5.45–17.17), I 2 = 89%]. The quality of evidence for our primary outcomes was low or very low due to the study designs and lack of power for the specified outcomes. Therefore, caution is urged when interpreting the results. Conclusion The single-port technique for benign hysterectomy is feasible, safe, and equally effective compared to the conventional technique. No clinically relevant advantages were identified, and as no data on cost effectiveness are available, there are currently not enough valid arguments to broadly implement LESS for hysterectomy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives To assess the feasibility, operative morbidity and oncological outcome of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) radical cystectomy. Patients and methods Ten patients with clinical stage T1–T2 bladder cancer underwent a LESS radical cystectomy. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 64.8 (8.6) years and their mean body mass index was 25.9 (2.7) kg/m2. The procedure was done via a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port using a rigid 5-mm 30° long-shaft laparoscope in addition to the two working instruments. A 7-cm Pfannenstiel incision was made to remove the specimens and to allow the creation of an ileal neobladder with hand assistance. Results In eight patients the LESS radical cystectomy was completed as scheduled, with the other two requiring a conversion, one to an open procedure due to locally advanced disease, and the other to conventional laparoscopy due to gas leakage. The mean (SD) operative duration was 236 (49) min, with a mean estimated blood loss of 575 (113) mL, and a mean hospital stay of 5.5 (0.7) days. No postoperative analgesic medications were prescribed and patients returned to normal activity after a mean (SD) of 17.6 (2.6) days. The pathological examination showed negative surgical margins for the bladder specimens, with a mean (SD) of 14 (1.9) lymph nodes retrieved. Seven patients were cancer-free within a mean (SD, range) follow-up of 37 (6, 29–44) months. Conclusions LESS radical cystectomy is technically feasible, with a favourable course and convalescence, and it has an acceptable oncological outcome.

This is to describe a case of a morbidly obese (BMI = 40) female with retrocaval ureter treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. A JJ stent was positioned. A 2 cm umbilical access was created. A single port platform was positioned. The entire ureter was mobilized posterior to the vena cava and transected where the dilated portion ended. The distal ureter was repositioned lateral to the inferior vena cava. Anastomosis was done. A 3 mm trocar was used to assist suturing. At 4-month follow-up, CT revealed no evidence of obstruction of the right kidney and the patient was symptomless. Although challenging, in a morbidly obese patient, LESS repair for retrocaval ureter is feasible.

Background and Objectives: To compare our initial experience in laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometriomas performed through an umbilical incision using a single 3-channel port and flexible laparoscopic instrumentation versus traditional laparoscopy. Methods: This study was conducted in 3 tertiary care referral centers. Since September 2009, we have performed laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in 24 patients diagnosed with ovarian endometriomas. A control group of patients with similar diagnoses who underwent traditional operative laparoscopy during the same period was included (n = 28). In the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery group, a multichannel port was inserted into the peritoneum through a 1.5- to 2.0-cm umbilical incision. Results: Patients in the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery group were significantly older (P = .04) and had a higher body mass index (P = .005). Both groups were comparable regarding history of abdominal surgery, lateral pelvic side wall involvement, and cul-de-sac involvement. After we controlled for age and body mass index, the size of the resected endometriomas, duration of surgery, and amount of operative blood loss were comparable in both groups. When required, an additional 5-mm port was inserted in the right or left lower quadrant in the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery group to allow the use of a third instrument for additional tissue retraction or manipulation (10 of 24 patients, 41.6%). However, adhesiolysis was performed more frequently in the conventional laparoscopy group. The duration of hospital stay was

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic extraperitoneal single site (EESS) inguinal hernia repair and compare it outcomes with the conventional totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. Background : TEP inguinal hernia repair is a widely accepted alternative to conventional open technique with several perioperative advantages. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery (LESS) is an emerging approach and has been reported for a number of surgical procedures with superior aesthetic results but other advantages need to be proven. Patients and Methods : Thirty-eight uncomplicated inguinal hernias were repaired by EESS approach between January 2010 and January 2011. All procedures were performed through a 25 cm infraumbilical incision using the Alexis wound retractor attached to a surgical glove and three trocars. Body mass index, age, operative time, blood loss, complications, conversion rate, analgesia requirement, hospital stay, return to normal activities and patient satisfaction with aesthetic results were analysed and compared with the last 38 matched-pair group of patients who underwent a conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair by the same surgeon. Results: All procedures were performed successfully with no conversion. In both unilateral and bilateral EESS inguinal repairs, the mean operative time was longer than conventional TEP (55± 20 vs. 40± 15 min, P = 0.049 and 70± 15 vs. 55± 10 min, P = 0.014). Aesthetic result was superior in the EESS group (2.88± 0.43 vs. 2.79± 0.51, P = 0.042). There was no difference between the two approaches regarding blood loss, complications, hospital stay, time until returns to normal activities and analgesic requirement. Conclusion: EESS inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective, with superior cosmetic results in the treatment of uncomplicated inguinal hernias. Other advantages of this new technique still need to be proven.

Not available

Objectives During the last decade endoscopic surgical procedures have been constantly evolving. The latest innovation in ultra-minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the percutaneous technology (Percuvance™ Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), Teleflex Inc., USA). We compared surgical outcome of hysterectomy, in a retrospective cohort study using the most recent MIS techniques as single-site (LESS) surgery, 3mm laparoscopy (MiniLPS) and percutaneous system (PSS) with standard laparoscopy (LPS). Study design This is a matched retrospective cohort study. Endometrial Hyperplasia/Early stage endometrial cancer or benign pathology were the indication for surgery. Data of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between May 2013 and April 2016 using PSS, LPS, MiniLPS, and LESS were collected and compared. Results The characteristics of each group were similar. The median Operative time (OT) was significantly longer in LESS compared to all other groups (120min [range 55–165] in LESS, 91min [range 60–180] in MiniLPS, 70min [range 55–230] in LPS and 65 [range 40–180] in PSS; p=0.0001). No significant differences among the 4 groups were observed in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy, and intra e post-operative complications. Statistically significant differences were recorded in median VAS 24h (2 [range 0–3] in PSS, 2 [range 0–3] in MiniLPS, 3 [range 2–5] in LESS and 2 [range 1–5] in LPS; p=0.0001). The average time of discharge was (1day [range 1–3] in PSS, 1day [range 1–2] in MiniLPS, 1days [range 1–2] in LESS and 1day [range 1–3] in LPS; p=0.99). Conclusions Data show that the effort to minimize the impact of surgical invasiveness can be feasible and could improve the advantages, not only in terms of aesthetic outcomes, even if the differences among the endoscopic approaches have not a relevant clinical impact. The technology innovations like PSS maintain the same triangulation between instruments as standard LPS with an evident decrease of the invasiveness thanks to reduced instruments size, even if the lack of suitability of bipolar energy, that require a multifunction instrument, remain a limit of these instruments.

The objective was to give a general overview of common complications and rates reported in the current literature during performance of a variety of urologic procedures using laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery or LESS. A search of published reports using Pubmed and MEDLINE was performed with the following search terms: laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, LESS or laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery complications within the date range of 2005--2011. Studies that were deemed appropriate and relevant to the current symposium were chosen for review. Overall complication rates were reported as ranging between 10% and 25%. In general, reconstructive procedures had consistently higher rates of complications than their extirpative/ablative counterparts (27% vs. 8%). There remain insufficient data to comment on differences in the rates or types of complications related to variations in the approach (transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal), site of surgery (upper tract vs. lower tract) or specific technique used (instruments, access devices, robotic platforms, etc.). Complication rates associated with LESS in urology appear only slightly higher than with conventional laparoscopy. However, with proper patient selection and careful application of these techniques, proofs of concept and technical feasibility have been shown in several series. There continues to be a need for more standardization of the technique and reporting as well as more collaborative efforts to fully address questions of safety and efficacy of these new procedures.

The learning curve for laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery was found to be definable, short, and safe., Background and Objectives: This study of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease was undertaken to determine the “learning curve” for implementing LESS fundoplication. Methods: One hundred patients, 38% men, with a median age of 61 years and median body mass index of 26 kg/m2, underwent LESS fundoplications. The operative times, placement of additional trocars, conversions to “open” operations, and complications were compared among patient quartiles to establish a learning curve. Median data are reported. Results: The median operative times and complications did not differ among 25-patient cohorts. Additional trocars were placed in 27% of patients, 67% of whom were in the first 25-patient cohort. Patients undergoing LESS fundoplication had a dramatic relief in the frequency and severity of all symptoms of reflux across all cohorts equally (P < .05), particularly for heartburn and regurgitation, without causing dysphagia. Conclusion: LESS fundoplication ameliorates symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease without apparent scarring. Notably, few operations required additional trocars after the first 25-patient cohort. Patient selection became more inclusive (eg, more “redo” fundoplications) with increasing experience, whereas operative times and complications remained relatively unchanged. The learning curve of LESS fundoplication is definable, short, and safe. We believe that patients will seek LESS fundoplication because of the efficacy and superior cosmetic outcomes; surgeons will need to meet this demand.

The authors found that laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a reusable platform was feasible for various urologic entities, yielding favorable cosmetic and functional results., Background and Objectives: Many disposable platforms have been applied in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Besides technical issues, cost is one of the limiting factors for its widespread acceptance. The current study describes the first completely reusable LESS-platform. Methods: We performed LESS-procedures in 52 patients including nephrectomy (18), adrenalectomy (2), partial nephrectomy (3), pyeloplasty (4), renal cyst ablation (4), pelvic lymphadenectomy (15), and lymphocele ablation (6). All procedures were conducted using a novel reusable single-port device (X-Cone, Karl-Storz) with a simplified set of instruments. We obtained perioperative and demographic data, including a visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and a complication reporting system based on Clavien grading. Results: Mean age was 50.04 y. Conversion to standard laparoscopy was necessary in 3 cases and addition of a needlescopic instrument in 6 cases. There was no open conversion. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 3 (Clavien II in 2 and III in 1) cases. Mean operative time was 110, 90, and 89 min, and hospital stay was 4.9, 3.1, and 3.6 d for nephrectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and pyeloplasty, respectively. Mean VAS was 2.13, 1.07, and 1.5 while blood loss was 81.3 mL, 25.67 mL, and 17.5 mL, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 15 (range, 8 to 21). Conclusions: A completely reusable LESS-platform is applicable to various uses in urology, yielding favorable functional and cosmetic results. Reusable materials are useful to reduce the cost of LESS, further increasing its acceptance. LESS with a completely reusable platform is more cost effective than standard laparoscopy.

Simplifi ed transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy. Technique and surgical results in 100 patients Background: The use of transumbilical approach for sleeve gastrectomy has been recently reported, using different technique variations. Aim: To report the technique and surgical results of a transumbilical approach simplifi ed sleeve gastrectomy, using rigid instruments. Material and Methods: Ninety four women and six men, selected by a multidisciplinary team, underwent transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy. The opera- tive technique involved a transumbilical incision, introduction of a SILS ® or GelPoint ® multiport, and a 5mm metallic accessory trocar laterally in the left fl ank. Rigid instruments were used in all patients. The greater curvature was dissected from 4-5 cm above the pylorus to the angle of His. Gastric transection was completed with a stapler, and calibrated with a 36 French tube advanced through the pylorus. Hemostasis of the staple line was carried out with metallic clips. A barium swallow was performed in ten randomly chosen patients, confi rming the correct tubular shape of the stomach. Results: Body mass index of operated patients ranged from 30 to 43 kg/m 2 . Mean operative time was 56.4 ± 16.7 minutes. During the early postoperative period, two patients had a hemoperitoneum, one had an antral leak and one had an intestinal perforation. No conversion to conventional laparoscopy or open technique was required. No patient died. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 ± 0.5 days. The cosmetic result was satisfactory for all patients. Conclusions: Transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with the reported technique. The insertion of an accessory 5mm trocar in the left fl ank simplifi es the procedure, allowing the use of rigid instruments.

In recent years, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has gained greater interest and diffusion for the treatment of gallstones. This critical review aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LESS cholecystectomy versus the 3-port technique (TPT) through a comparative analysis of 5 parameters: mean operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion to open, conversion to the 4-trocar technique and postoperative hospital stay. The authors performed a systematic search of the medical literature through a search of PubMed and Ovid EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were as follows: publication date between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010; English or Italian language; human participants and series of 20 operations or more. There were 5 manuscripts meeting the inclusion criteria for TPT and 23 for LESS. Only one prospective randomized controlled trial comparing TPT and LESS was identified. Operative time is significantly longer in the single-incision group. Complications and conversion rates to the 4-port technique are higher in LESS. Postoperative hospital stay is similar in the 2 groups. Rate of conversion to open is higher in TPT. Despite the number of publications on LESS cholecystectomy, the vast majority of data available in the literature are from small case series without any comparative data. Although LESS cholecystectomy is a fashionable technique there are few data available for an evidence-based determination as to the real benefits of this technique. Well-designed comparative studies are suggested to validate the clinical benefits and ensure that there are no new complications or added costs associated with the new technique.

KEYWORDSLaparoendoscopicsingle-site surgery;LESS;Complication;Review;UrologyABBREVIATIONSLESS, laparoendo-scopic single-sitesurgery; CL, conven-tional laparoscopyAbstract Objective: To comprehensively review current reports on the complica-tions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), introduced recently into urol-ogy as an option for treating various urological pathologies.Methods: We reviewed previous reports to August 2011 using Medline, focusingon LESS in urology, with special interest in the complications, evaluating those dur-ing and after surgery, as well as conversions to reduced-port laparoscopy, conven-tional laparoscopy and open surgery.Results: There are increasing reports of LESS in urology, with expanding indica-tions. Complication rates both during and after surgery are low and related mostlyto the technical difficulty and dexterity with the currently available instruments.Overall, intraoperative complications were reported by 11 published studies, whilepostoperative complications were reported by 15. Although the overall conversionrates to open surgery and conventional laparoscopy were low, the incidence ofreduced-port laparoscopy was significantly higher.Conclusions: Although there are expanding indications for LESS in urology, therisk of complications is low. This might be related to the fact that LESS is stillrestricted to experienced laparoscopic surgeons, and to the criteria for selectingpatients.a 2012 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.

This report suggests that laparoscopic single-site pyeloplasty of uteropelvic junction obstruction associated with horseshoe kidney is feasible, safe, and effective in select patients., Background and Objective: Pyeloplasty in horseshoe kidneys can be challenging due to aberrant vasculature, renal malrotation, and ectopic location. Fewer than 20 cases of minimally invasive (MIS) pyeloplasty in horseshoe kidneys have been reported in the literature to date. We herein report the first 2 cases of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in horseshoe kidneys. Methods: Two patients with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys were treated with an Anderson-Hynes LESS pyeloplasty. This was performed using three 5-mm trocars through a single umbilical incision, plus an accessory 3-mm port at the anterior axillary line to facilitate suturing and subsequent drain placement. Results: Both patients had BMI

Introducción: La cirugía laparoendoscópica por puerto único (LESS) con incisión transumbilical empleando instrumental laparoscópico convencional es una alternativa atractiva para la realización de ureterolitotomía de cálculo ureteral con tratamiento endourológico fallido. Materiales y métodos: Una mujer de 29 años se presenta con dolor crónico en la zona lumbar derecha y un cálculo impactado de 1,2cm, localizado en el punto de transición del uréter abdominal al pélvico. Una ureteroscopia semirrígida no consigue fragmentar la piedra y no se dispone de litotricia por ondas de choque. Se inserta catéter ureteral doble J anteriormente a la intervención. Realizamos una ureterolitotomía laparoscópica con incisión única transumbilical. Se insertan tres trócares convencionales en una incisión umbilical semicircular, se desprende el colon derecho y se identifica el úreter. Se extrae el cálculo y la incisión ureteral se cierra con suturas intracorporales. Resultados: Se completa con éxito la ureterolitotomía con todos los pasos operatorios realizados transumbilicalmente. La duración de la intervención fue de 180 minutos. No se empleó ningún instrumento articulado o arqueado. La pérdida de sangre estimada fue de menos de 50ml. No hubo ninguna complicación interoperatoria o postoperatoria relacionada con la incisión. La estancia en el hospital fue de 24 horas y se observó un aspecto sin cicatriz el día 15 postoperatorio. Conclusión: La ureterolitotomía laparoscópica con incisión única transumbilical es viable y segura. Este abordaje ofrece ventajas cosméticas inherentes y pocas molestias postoperatorias. Se requiere de experiencia adicional e investigación continuada. Introduction: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) using transumbilical access and conventional laparoscopic instruments is a very attractive alternative to perform ureterolithotomy for ureteral stone with failed endourological management. Material and method: A 29-year-old woman presented with chronic right lumbar pain and a 1.2cm impacted calculus localized at transition of abdominal to pelvic ureter. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy had failed to fragment the stone and shockwave lithotripsy was not available. Double-J ureteral catheter had been inserted preoperatively. We performed a transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Three conventional trocars were inserted in a single semi-circular umbilical incision. Right colon was detached and the ureter was identified. Calculus was extracted and the ureteral incision was closed with intracorporal sutures. Results: Ureterolithotomy was successfully completed, with all the operative steps performed transumbically. Operative time was 180minutes. No single-port device or articulating and bent instruments were utilized. Estimated blood loss was less than 50mL. No intraoperative, access-related and postoperative complications took place. The duration of hospitalization was 24hours and scarless appearance was observed on postoperative day 15. Conclusion: Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is feasible and safe. This approach offers an inherent cosmetic advantage and few postoperative discomfort. Additional experience and continued investigation are warranted.

Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represent novel approaches in urological surgery. To perform a review of the literature in order describe the current status of LESS and NOTES in Urology. References for this manuscript were obtained by performing a review of the available literature in PubMed from 01-01-02 to 15-05-09. Search terms included single port, single site, NOTES, LESS and single incision. A total of 412 manuscripts were initially identified. Out of these, 64 manuscripts were selected based in their urological content. The manuscript features subheadings for experimental and clinical studies, as NOTES-LESS is a new surgical technique and its future evolution will probably rely in initial verified feasibility. A subheading for reviews presents information regarding common language and consensus for the techniques. The issue of complications published in clinical series and the future needs of NOTES-LESS, are also presented.

Aim: To present a novel technique of a laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) distal pancreatic resection via the umbilicus with use of the QuadPort TM Access System. Material and methods: The technique of distal pancreatic resection through a 30 mm longitudinal incision in the umbilicus is described. Medial to lateral approach of pancreas preparation using a harmonic scalpel and regular laparoscopic instruments is applied. The described technique was successfully applied in a 26-year-old female patient with tumour of the pancreatic body and tail (90/41/27 mm). Pancreatectomy was followed by splenectomy due to infiltration of the splenic vessels. Results: Total operative time was 160 min. Blood loss was 800 ml. Initial wound size was 30 mm. Splenic vein and artery infiltration forced augmentation of the wound to 80 mm. The patient required only per request medication. Peristalsis returned spontaneously on the first postoperative day. Hospital stay was 4 days. There were no early perioperative complications. The patient required readmission due to electrolyte imbalance 7 weeks after the operation. Conclusions: The proposed operative technique of single incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is difficult and challenging. Nonetheless, the authors proved that it is safe and feasible when performed by an experienced laparoscopic team.

Background Findings have shown that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is feasible and reproducible. The authors have pioneered a two-trocar SILC technique at the University of Texas Southwestern. Their results for 100 patients are presented. Methods From January 2008 to March 2009, 100 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease underwent SILC through a 1.5- to 2-cm umbilical incision using a two-port (5-mm) technique. For nearly all the patients, a 30° angled scope was used. The gallbladder was retracted, with two or three sutures placed along the gallbladder. These sutures were either fixated internally or placed through the abdominal wall to obtain a critical view of Calot’s triangle. The SILC procedure was performed using standard technique with 5-mm reticulating or conventional laparoscopic instruments. The cystic duct and artery were well visualized, clipped, and divided. Cholecystectomy was completed with electrocautery, and the specimen was retrieved through the umbilical incision. Results In this series, 80 women (85%) and 15 men (15%) with an average age of 33.8 years (range, 17–66 years) underwent SILC. Their mean BMI was 29.8 kg/m2 (range, 17–42.5 kg/m2), and 39% of these patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 50.8 min (range, 23–120 min). The mean estimated blood loss was 22.3 ml (range, 5–125 ml), and 5% of the patients had an intraoperative cholangiogram. There were no conversions of the SILC technique. A two-trocar technique was feasible for 87% of the patients. For the remaining patients, either a three-channel port or three individual trocars were required. A SILC technique was used for 5% of the patients to manage acute cholecystitis or gallstone pancreatitis. Conclusion The SILC technique with a two-trocar technique is safe, feasible, and reproducible. The operating times are reasonable and can be lessened with experience. Even complex cases can be managed with this technique. Excellent exposure of the critical view was obtained in all cases. The SILC procedure is becoming the standard of care for most of the authors’ elective patients with gallbladder disease. Clinical trials are warranted before the SILC technique is adopted universally.