Search

Axillary and inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) are performed in metastatic skin tumors with several local complications, such as lymphorrhea, lymphoceles, and lymphedema. The purpose of this study is to determine whether negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) applied as a preventive measure could improve outcomes.A monocentric study included patients who underwent axillary or inguinal LND from May 2010 to March 2020, with a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Patients were divided into two groups: the conventional wound care (CWC) and the NPWT groups. Patients were systematically reviewed at D7, D30, and at 1 year postoperative, and data regarding lymphorrhea, lymphoceles, and lymphedema were collected.A total of 109 axillary and inguinal LND were performed. NPWT was applied on 68 LND and CWC on 41 LND. The variables, diabetes, smoking, gender, associated treatments, and primary pathology (melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or Merkel tumors) were similar in both groups. Analyses have shown a significant difference in the rate of scar disunion during the first month between the two groups (p=0.045 between D1 and D7; p=0.011 between D8 and D30), as well as the presence of lymphorrhea (p=0.000 between D1 and D7; p=0.002 between D8 and D30). The rate of lymphoedema was significantly reduced in the NPWT group versus CWC (p=0.000 between D8 and D30; p=0.034 between D31 and 1 year).NPWT reduces local complications (scar disunion, lymphorrhea, and lymphedema) during the first year following LND in the management of node metastatic skin tumors.

Background The use of surgical clips for athermal dissection of the lateral prostatic pedicles and ligation during pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) while performing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been the gold standard. Clips are used to prevent thermal injury of the unmyelinated nerve fibers and lymphceles, respectively. Objective To compare oncological and functional outcomes of a new technique of clipless, lateral pedicle control and PLND with RARP with bipolar energy (RARP-bi) versus the standard RARP technique with clips (RARP-c). Design, setting, and participants A retrospective study was conducted among 338 men who underwent RARP between July 2018 and March 2020. Surgical procedure RARP-c versus RARP-bi. Measurements We prospectively collected data and retrospectively compared demographic, clinicopathological, and functional outcome data. Urinary as well as sexual function was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index for Clinical Practice, and complications were assessed using Clavien-Dindo grading. Multivariable regression modeling was used to examine whether the technical approach of RARP-bi versus RARP-c was associated with positive surgical margins (PSMs) or sexual and urinary function scores. Results and limitations A total of 144 (43%) and 194 (57%) men underwent RARP-bi and RARP-c, respectively. Overall, there were no differences in functional and oncological outcomes between the two approaches. On multivariable regression analysis, the RARP-bi technique was not associated with significant differences in PSMs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6–1.8; p = 0.9), sexual function (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.1–1.5; p = 0.8), or urinary function (OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2–1.4; p = 0.2). The overall 30-d complication rates (12% vs 16%, p = 0.5) and bladder neck contracture rates (2.1% vs 3.6%, p = 0.5) were similar between the two groups. There was no difference in lymphocele complications (1.4% vs 0.52%, p = 0.58). All complications were of Clavien-Dindo grade I–II. Conclusions Despite the concerns for an increased risk of nerve injury secondary to the use of bipolar energy for prostatic pedicle dissection, we demonstrate that this technique is oncologically and functionally similar to the standard approach with surgical clips. There was no difference in complications or lymphocele formation for techniques with versus without clips. Patient summary We describe a modified technique for prostatic pedicle dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, which utilizes bipolar energy and is associated with shorter operative time, without compromising functional or oncological outcomes.

Background: Lymphocele is a common complication after kidney transplantation, which does not require treatment unless it is symptomatic. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical symptoms, treatment choices, and success of different treatment methods of symptomatic lymphocele. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 168 patients who had kidney transplantation between January 2012 and January 2020. Patients with decreased kidney functions due to lymphocele formation during the clinical follow-up were included in the study. External drainage catheter was placed in all patients, except one. In case of treatment failure with external drainage, laparoscopic fenestration guided by intraperitoneal ultrasonography was performed. Clinical symptoms and success rates of treatments were evaluated. Results: Symptomatic lymphocele requiring interventional treatment was detected in 15 (8.9%) of 168 renal transplant patients. All of the symptomatic lymphocele cases had increased serum creatinine levels, whereas 10 had decreased urine volume, 4 had abdominal discomfort, and 2 had ipsilateral lower extremity edema. External drainage catheter was placed as the first-line treatment in 13 patients. In 6 cases, due to treatment failure with external drainage and in 2 patients as a first-choice treatment, laparoscopic fenestration was performed. No lymphocele recurrence was observed during follow-up. Conclusion: Among various methods defined in the treatment of lymphocele, use of laparoscopic fenestration is increasing because of its high success rate and advantages over other methods. Intraperitoneal ultrasound-guided laparoscopic fenestration is a useful and safe method that can be performed as a first-choice treatment since it eliminates the risk of organ injury or bleeding.

Background: An ocular adnexal apocrine adenocarcinoma (OAAA) is an extremely rare, but potentially aggressive and life-threatening tumor with ill-defined management based only on recommendations from a limited number of reported cases. The development of cervical lymphocele following neck dissection is a very rare complication, but one with well established methods for prevention and treatment. Here we describe a previously unreported case of salvage surgery including neck dissection for OAAA in addition to an emergence of cervical lymphocele. A literature review of current knowledge on both pathological conditions is included. Methods and Results: A 58-year-old man suffering from OAAA, previously treated with multiple eye-sparing excisions and adjuvant proton therapy, underwent salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence of the tumor. A partial orbitectomy with orbital exenteration, primary reconstruction and left-sided neck dissection was performed. The procedure was complicated by a cervical lymphocele resolved after the surgical therapy. The patient remained disease-free during the one-year follow-up. Conclusion: OAAA is a locally aggressive tumor with potential to local or distant metastatic spread. Whole-body staging, regular clinico-radiological follow-up and stage-dependent therapy with surgery as the first-choice treatment is required. A cervical lymphocele as a complication of especially left-sided neck dissection is managed with a conservative or surgical therapy according to the level of lymph leakage, extent and localization of lesions, presence of local or systemic disorders and the period from primary surgery.

OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an effective surgical modality for many lumbar degenerative pathologies, but a rare and infrequently reported complication is postoperative lymphocele. The goals of the present study were to review a large consecutive series of patients who underwent ALIF at a high-volume institution, estimate the rate of lymphocele occurrence after ALIF, and investigate the outcomes of patients who developed lymphocele after ALIF. METHODS A retrospective review of the electronic medical record was completed, identifying all patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent at a minimum a single-level ALIF from 2012 through 2019. Postoperative spinal and abdominal images, as well as radiologist reports, were reviewed for mention of lymphocele. Clinical data were collected and reported. RESULTS A total of 1322 patients underwent a minimum 1-level ALIF. Of these patients, 937 (70.9%) had either postoperative abdominal or lumbar spine images, and the resulting lymphocele incidence was 2.1% (20/937 patients). The mean ± SD age was 67 ± 10.9 years, and the male/female ratio was 1:1. Patients with lymphocele were significantly older than those without lymphocele (66.9 vs 58.9 years, p = 0.006). In addition, patients with lymphocele had a greater number of mean levels fused (2.5 vs 1.8, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have undergone ALIF at L2–4 (95.0% vs 66.4%, p = 0.007) than patients without lymphocele. On subsequent multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.12, p = 0.013), BMI (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.18, p = 0.021), and number of levels fused (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.05–3.14, p = 0.032) were independent prognosticators of postoperative lymphocele development. Patients with symptomatic lymphocele were successfully treated with either interventional radiology (IR) drainage and/or sclerosis therapy and achieved radiographic resolution. The mean ± SD length of hospital stay was 9.1 ± 5.2 days. Ten patients (50%) were postoperatively discharged to a rehabilitation center: 8 patients (40%) were discharged to home, 1 (5%) to a skilled nursing facility, and 1 (5%) to a long-term acute care facility. CONCLUSIONS After ALIF, 2.1% of patients were diagnosed with radiographically identified postoperative lymphocele and had risk factors such as increased age, BMI, and number of levels fused. Most patients presented within 1 month postoperatively, and their clinical presentations included abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and/or wound complications. Of note, 25% of identified lymphoceles were discovered incidentally. Patients with symptomatic lymphocele were successfully treated with either IR drainage and/or sclerosis therapy and achieved radiographic resolution.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of lymphatic embolization (LE) in decreasing catheter output and dwell time in iatrogenic lymphoceles after percutaneous catheter drainage. Materials and Methods Retrospective review of patients who underwent intranodal lymphangiography (INL) with or without LE for management of iatrogenic lymphoceles between January 2017 and November 2020 was performed. Twenty consecutive patients (16 men and 4 women; median age, 60.5 years) underwent a total of 22 INLs and 18 LEs for 15 pelvic and 5 retroperitoneal lymphoceles. Lymphatic leaks were identified in 19/22 (86.4%) of the INLs. Three patients underwent INL only because a leak was not identified or was identified into an asymptomatic lymphocele. One patient underwent repeat INL and LE after persistent high catheter output, and 1 patient underwent repeat INL with LE after the initial INL did not identify a leak. Catheter output was assessed until catheter removal, and changes in output before and after the procedure were reported. The patients were followed up for 2–30 months, and procedural complications were reported. Results The median catheter output before the procedure was 210 mL/day (50–1,200 mL/day), which decreased to a median of 20 mL/day (0–520 mL/day) 3 days after the procedure, with a median output decrease of 160 mL (0–900 mL). The median time between INL with LE and catheter removal was 6 days, with no recurrence requiring redrainage. Four patients experienced minor complications of low-grade fever (n = 2) and lower limb edema (n = 2). Conclusions Lymphangiogram and LE are safe and effective methods for the management of lymphoceles.

Lymphoceles often occur within several weeks or even months after surgery. Mostly asymptomatic and therefore undiagnosed, they may be self-healing without any treatment. A small percentage of postoperative lymphoceles are symptomatic with significant pain, infection, or compression of vital structures, thus requiring intervention. Many different treatment options are described in the literature, like drainage with or without sclerotherapy, embolization of lymph vessels, and surgical approaches with laparoscopy or laparotomy. Inspired by reports stating that postoperative suction drainage can prevent the formation of lymphoceles, we developed a simple protocol for vacuum-assisted drainage of symptomatic lymphoceles, which proved to be successful and which we would therefore like to present.Between 2008 and 2020, 35 patients with symptomatic postoperative lymphoceles were treated with vacuum-assisted suction drainage (in total 39 lymphoceles). The surgery that caused lymphocele formation had been performed between 8 and 572 days before. All lymphoceles were diagnosed based on biochemical and cytologic findings in aspirated fluid. The clinical and imaging data were collected and retrospectively analyzed.In total, 43 suction drainage catheters were inserted under CT guidance. The technical success rate was 100 %. One patient died of severe preexisting pulmonary embolism, sepsis, and poor conditions (non-procedure-related death). In 94.8 % of symptomatic lymphoceles, healing and total disappearance could be achieved. 4 lymphoceles had a relapse or dislocation of the drainage catheter and needed a second drainage procedure. Two lymphoceles needed further surgery. The complication rate of the procedure was 4.6 % (2/43, minor complications). The median indwelling time of a suction drainage catheter was 8-9 days (range: 1-30 days).The positive effects of negative pressure therapy in local wound therapy have been investigated for a long time. These positive effects also seem to have an impact on suction drainage of symptomatic lymphoceles with a high cure rate.· Suction drainage of lymphoceles is an easy and successful method to cure symptomatic lymphoceles at various locations.. · We believe this to be due to the induction of cavity collapse and surface adherence.. · In most cases rapid clinical improvement could be obtained..· Franke M, Saager C, Kröger J et al. Vacuum-Assisted Suction Drainage as a Successful Treatment Option for Postoperative Symptomatic Lymphoceles. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 384 - 390.ZIEL: Lymphozelen können innerhalb von Wochen oder sogar Monaten nach chirurgischen Eingriffen auftreten. Bleiben diese asymptomatisch, werden sie meist nicht diagnostiziert und heilen von selbst aus. Ein kleiner Prozentsatz der postoperativen Lymphozelen wird jedoch symptomatisch mit Schmerzen, Infektionszeichen oder Kompression von benachbarten Strukturen, was eine Therapie erfordert. Viele verschiedene Behandlungsmethoden sind in der Literatur beschrieben, wie Drainageeinlage mit oder ohne Sklerotherapie, Embolisation von Lymphgefäßen oder chirurgische Operation mit Laparoskopie oder Laparotomie. Inspiriert durch Berichte über postoperative Saugdrainagen, die eine Ausbildung von Lymphozelen verhindern, haben wir ein einfaches Protokoll für eine Vakuum-assistierte Saugdrainage von symptomatischen Lymphozelen entwickelt, welches sich bei uns bewährt hat. Dieses Protokoll möchten wir im Rahmen dieser Studie vorstellen.Von 2008–2020 wurden 35 Patienten mit symptomatischen postoperativen Lymphozelen mit unserer Vakuum-assistierten Saugdrainage behandelt (insgesamt 39 Lymphozelen). Ein vorangegangener chirurgischer Eingriff fand zwischen 8 und 572 Tage zuvor statt. Die Diagnose wurde durch eine Untersuchung des Aspirats biochemisch und zytologisch bestätigt. Die klinischen Daten und Bilddaten wurden gesammelt und retrospektiv analysiert.Insgesamt wurden 43 Saugdrainagen unter CT-Kontrolle eingebracht. Der technische Erfolg lag bei 100 %. Ein Patient starb leider aufgrund einer vorbestehenden Lungenarterienembolie, einer Sepsis und einem schlechten Allgemeinzustand. Bei 94,8 % der Lymphozelen konnte eine komplette Ausheilung erreicht werden. Vier Lymphozelen benötigten eine zweite Drainage aufgrund eines Rezidivs oder einer Drainagedislokation. Zwei Lymphozelen wurden letztendlich bei fehlender Ausheilung operiert. Die Komplikationsrate der Prozedur betrug 4,6 % (minor complications). Die mittlere Einliegedauer der Drainagen betrug 8–9 Tage.Die positiven Effekte der Unterdrucktherapie in lokalen Wunden sind schon seit Langem untersucht. Diese positiven Effekte scheinen auch bei der Saugdrainage von symptomatischen Lymphozelen zu einer hohen Ausheilungsrate zu führen.· Die Saugdrainage ist eine einfache und schnelle Methode zur Ausheilung von symptomatischen Lymphozelen in verschiedenen Körperlokalisationen.. · Wir glauben, dass dies durch die Kollabierung der Lymphozele und Verkleben der Lymphozelenwand zustande kommt.. · In den meisten Fällen konnte durch unsere Methode ein schnelles Abklingen der Beschwerden erreicht werden..

The tumors affecting the thigh region are complex to manage, requiring a patient-tailored and multidisciplinary approach. Because of their aggressiveness, soft tissue sarcomas (STS) often grow very quickly and they must be removed before they might cause major impairments. A safe margin excision may lead to large defects that require a surgical reconstruction with either free or pedicled flaps. Another relevant aspect, which is gaining more and more attention in the last few years, regards the lymphatic complications that commonly occur after these procedures. The thigh region anatomically accommodates the major lymphatics responsible for the whole leg drainage, and these vessels are often inevitably compromised during the tumor removal. For this reason, plastic surgeons should take into account not only to the aesthetic and functional result, but they should also try to prevent lymphatic sequelae such as lymphocele and lymphedema. The purpose of this report is to describe the potential of a pedicled SCIP flap, used as a lymphatic interpositional flap, in order to restore the lymphatic drainage of the thigh after a major impairment. A 57-year-old patient presenting a thigh sarcoma received a surgical excision leaving a 35 cm × 25 cm defect affecting the anterior compartment. To fulfill all these concerns, a lymphatic interpositional SCIP flap was performed, in pedicled and chimeric fashion. It allowed to completely bury a large (35 cm × 16 cm) soft tissue island, preserving a smaller (5 cm × 4 cm) skin paddle to monitor the whole flap survival. Moreover, the lymphatic issue was faced by preserving the lymphatic vessels running into the flap and moving them into the affected area in order to enhance the lymphatic neo-angiogenesis and offering an additional pattern for lymph drainage. Post-operative course was uneventful and at 9 months follow up the reconstructive result was successful with no signs of lymphatic sequelae. Therefore, we believe that the SCIP flap might be a promising solution for small-to-moderate size thigh defect reconstructions since it is able to satisfy all the typical requirements of this delicate region.

Kidney transplant is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, kidney transplant is not exempt from postoperative complications. One of the most frequent urological complications is lymphocele, which can appearin up to 20% of patients. Lymphocele most often appears during the first month after surgery. However, its appearance after the first yearis completely infrequent. Here, we report a case of a giant idiopathic lymphocele 18 years after kidney transplant and its resolution with lymphatic embolization.The patient, a 34-year-old man who received a deceased-donor kidney transplant in 2002, had presented with no complications until the lymphocele was diagnosed. The lymphocele presented as a voluminous organ-compressing mass. A percutaneous drainage was placed, and 3600 cm3 of lymphatic fluidwere drained.Afterthat, 800 cm3 continued to leak every day. An intranodal lymphography and lymphatic embolization with Lipiodol Ultra-Fluide (Guerbet Australia) were performed, owing to the high amount of leakage. At 50 days after embolization, an ultrasonograph showed no fluid collections, so the percutaneous catheter was removed. In most patients, the treatment ofthe lymphocele after kidney transplant is frequently conservative. However,for patients whose situation cannot be resolved spontaneously, there are few therapeutic choices. As described here, intranodal lymphatic embolization is a mini-invasive option, with a success rate of up to 80%, and should be offered as the first approach.

Seromas are a common and unavoidable complication following lymphadenectomy, and often become clinically significant with superseded infection requiring re-admission for prompt intervention. However, there is no consensus as to whether a formal surgical incision and drainage (ID), ultrasound (US)-guided aspiration or intravenous (IV) antibiotics alone is the most efficacious method of managing an infected seroma, the investigation of which formed the rationale for this study.This retrospective cohort study included a consecutive series of patients readmitted for infected seroma following a lymphadenectomy for melanoma at Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust (LTHT) from 2006 to 2017. Details on management, length of hospital stay, length of follow-up and number of clinical appointments required were examined.Seventy-one cases of infected seroma were identified from the cohort of 1691 lymphadenectomies. Initially, 21 patients (29.5%) were managed by IV antibiotics alone (failure rate of 52.4%); 18 (25.4%) with US-guided aspiration (failure rate 27.8%) and 32 (45.1%) with surgical ID, which was 100% effective. Ultimately, 62.5% of the cohort required surgical management. Patients who underwent surgical ID were discharged significantly faster following the procedure (3 versus 5 days for US-guided aspiration, p = 0.002) and spent fewer days in hospital overall (p = 0.022). The overall average cost was comparable across the three treatment groups.Surgical management seemed preferential to conservative approaches in terms of efficacy and was not significantly more expensive overall; but carries anaesthetic risk. There may be a clinically significant difference in outcome depending on management; however, more evidence is required to investigate this.

Some reports in the literature describe lymphocele formation in up to half of patients following pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), with 1-2% requ...

Background. Bladder cancer is very common and real problem in oncourology. The main treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy (RC). RC with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) may be associated with an increased risk of developing lymphatic complications such as lymphedema, prolonged lymphorrhea, and the formation of lymphocele.Objective: to compare the efficiency of clips and surgical instruments for preventing the development of lymphatic complications during PLND at the time of RC.Materials and methods. From January 2016 to October 2020 at the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University on the basis of N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1 were performed 60 RC with PLND. All patients were divided into two groups. The 1st group included patients who underwent the sealing of lymphatic vessels using titanium/polymer clips (n = 30). In the 2nd group the sealing was performed using ultrasonic/bipolar instruments (n = 30). All operations were performed by one surgeon. The study used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results. The overall percentage of lymphatic complications was 29 (48.3 %) out of 60 patients. Out of them 7 (11.7 %) patients developed symptomatic lymphocele, and 3 (5.0 %) developed asymptomatic lymphocele, prolonged lymphorrhea was observed in 17 (28.3 %) patients, lymphedema of the lower extremities or genitals in 2 (3.3 %). The percentage of lymphatic complications in the 1st group was 66.7 % (n = 20), and in the 2nd group - 30.0 % (n = 9) (p = 0.004). In multivariate analysis the statistical significance was (p = 0.014), a high odds ratio (6.83; 95 % confidence interval 1.48-31.49) was observed with sealing of lymphatic vessels with clips, while a low odds ratio (0.14; 95 % confidence interval 0.03-0.67) was found with electrosurgical instruments.Conclusion. The use of ultrasonic or bipolar electrosurgical instruments can be an effective method for preventing the development of lymphatic complications during PLND at the time of RC.

Introduction. Lymphocele is a relatively common complication following lymphadenectomy of the inguinal lymph nodes; however, it is less common after open inguinal hernia repair. Postoperative lymphocele is usually caused by unrecognized injury to lymphatic vessels during surgical dissection and commonly requires reoperation to ligate the leaking lymphatics. Angiomyomatous hamaromas are rare lymphatic formations of unknown cause that can be treated with aspiration, sclerotherapy, and drain placement, but surgical intervention is often required. This finding is associated with replacement of parenchymal lymph tissue with vascular and smooth muscle cells. Case Report. The authors report the case of a 59-year-old African American male who underwent open inguinal hernia repair and was found to have incidentally an angiomyomatous hamartoma, which was excised but complicated with a postoperative lymphocele. The patient was successfully treated with the aid of negative pressure wound therapy. Conclusions. Negative pressure wound therapy has rarely been used to treat postoperative lymphocele. To the authors’ knowledge, this case is the first to document use of negative pressure wound therapy for lymphocele following angiomyomatous hamartoma excision.

Background Lymph node dissection(LND) remains the gold standard in the staging and treatment of locally advanced penile cancer(PC) 1 . Objective To describe our initial experience with a new minimally invasive inguinal and pelvic single-access laparoscopic approach 2 ,for performing LND in PC, first described in Urology by our group in 2015 3 : the Pelvic and Inguinal Single Access(PISA) technique (Fig. 1). Material Between 2015 and 2018, 10 consecutive patients with different PC stages and indication of inguinal LND (cN0 and ≥pT1G3 or cN1/cN2) 1 were operated by means of the PISA technique (Table 1). Intraoperative frozen section(FS) 4 analysis was carried out routinely and if ≥2 inguinal nodes(pN2) or extracapsular nodal extension(pN3) are detected 1 , 5 , ipsilateral pelvic LND was performed sequentially as a single-stage procedure and using the same surgical incisions. If this condition occurs bilaterally in the inguinal LND, the pelvic LND will be bilateral. The video shows the PISA technique in a step-by-step. Instrumental requirements: 30°laparoscopy optic, monopolar scissors,Ligasure (Covidien Surgical,Minneapolis,MN,USA) vascular sealant, extraction-bag, bipolar forceps and 5-mm endo-clip(Hem-o-lok)are required. Results Intraoperative and postsurgical variables are shown in Table 2. Inguinal LND was bilateral in all cases. Pelvic LND was required in 40% of patients. Total operative time was 120-170 minutes. Median estimated blood loss(EBL) was 66(30-100)cc, but no blood transfusion was required. No intraoperative complications were noted. 40% of patients had postoperative complications (10% major complication- symptomatic inguinal lymphocele). Median lenght of hospital stay(LOS)was 5.8(3-10) days. Median inguinal drain removal was 4.7 days. The pathological analysis outcomes are shown in Table 3. Mean number of lymph nodes removed by inguinal LND was 10.25(8-14). Conclusion PISA technique allow a minimally invasive inguinal and pelvic LND using the same set of incisions and carry it out in the same surgical procedure. PISA technique in PC LND seems to be safe, with a low rate of major complications and preserving oncological efficacy.

An ongoing debate concerns the need for routine placement of prophylactic intra-abdominal drains following kidney transplantation.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Aim: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether such an approach brings any advantages in the prevention of perirenal transplant fluid collection, surgical site infection, lymphocele, hematoma, urinoma, wound dehiscence, graft loss, and need for reoperation.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Methods: We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of non-randomized studies of intervention comparing drained and drain-free adult renal graft recipients regarding perirenal transplant fluid collection and other wound complications. ROBINS-I tool and funnel plot asymmetry analysis were used to assess the risk of bias.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Results: Five studies at moderate to critical risk of bias were included. A total of 2094 renal graft recipients were evaluated. Our analysis revealed no significant differences between drained and drain-free patients regarding perirenal transplant fluid collection (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.17; I 2 = 72%), surgical site infection (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.11-24.88; I 2 = 80%), lymphocele (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.02-15.27; I 2 = 0%), hematoma (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12-3.99; I 2 = 71%), and wound dehiscence (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.21-2.70; I 2 = 0%). There was insufficient data concerning urinoma, graft loss, and need for reoperation.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Conclusions: The available evidence is weak. Our findings show that the use of intra-abdominal drains after kidney transplantation seems to have neither beneficial nor harmful effects on perirenal transplant fluid collection and other wound complications. The present study does not support the routine placement of surgical drains after kidney transplantation.lt;igt;In this systematic review and meta-analysis we summarize the most up-to-date evidence for and against the routine use of intra-abdominal drain following renal transplantation.lt;/igt.

A 64-year old man had developed a giant mediastinal lymphocele after undergoing esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The thoracic duct was embolized with six micro-coils, followed by embolization using a 1:3 mixture of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) and ethiodized oil. Resolution of the lymphocele was achieved within 5 days after embolization. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first reported case of thoracic duct embolization for the treatment of mediastinal lymphocele.

Relevance. Retroperitoneal lymphocele is one of the most common complications in renal transplant recipients.Objective. To improve the results of treatment of kidney transplant recipients with retroperitoneal lymphocele by using a modern diagnostic and treatment algorithmMaterials and methods. Materials and methods: From June 2018 to March 2021 at the State Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin, Moscow performed 174 kidney transplants from a posthumous donor. The accumulation of lymph in the retroperitoneal space was recorded in 24 patients, which amounted to 13.7%. Indications for surgical correction were found in 16 patients, which amounted to 9.1%. Computed tomography in 10 patients (62.5%) showed a wide adherence of the lymphocele cavity to the parietal peritoneum; peritoneum, the complexity of the planned laparoscopic surgery was assessed as high. These patients underwent laparoscopic peritoneal fenestration with ultrasound navigation. In 2 patients (12.5%), lymphocele adherence to the peritoneum was not revealed; these patients underwent open surgery.Results. Results: No relapses of lymphocele were detected after surgery. Mortality was not recorded. In the group of patients who underwent laparoscopic peritoneal fenestration with predictable low complexity, one postoperative complication was diagnosed – migration of the loop of the small intestine into the lymphocele cavity with subsequent infringement. The duration of hospitalization with laparoscopic intervention was 2.1 ± 0.43 (2–3) days, with open one it was 8.45 ± 3.25 (7–12) (p = 0.001).Conclusion. The use of a modern diagnostic and treatment algorithm can improve the results of treatment of kidney transplant recipients with retroperitoneal lymphocele.

Postoperative lymphorrhea can occur after different surgical procedures and may prolong the hospital stay due to the need for specific treatment. In this work, the therapeutic significance of the radiological management of postoperative lymphorrhea was assessed and illustrated. A standardized search of the literature was performed in PubMed applying the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term “lymphangiography.” For the review, the inclusion criterion was “studies with original data on Lipiodol-based Conventional Lymphangiography (CL) with subsequent Percutaneous Lymphatic Intervention (PLI).” Different exclusion criteria were defined (e.g., studies with

Introduction Despite recent advances, lymphoceles are the most frequent complications following renal transplantation (RT), with an incidence of 0.6% to 51%. In this study, we present risk factors, treatments, and outcomes for lymphoceles after RT at our center. Material and Methods Since January 2018, 461 RTs were performed at our center. Nine recipients were excluded. The remaining 452 RTs were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: a lymphocele group (n = 29) and a nonlymphocele group (n = 423). Lymphoceles were diagnosed by ultrasound. Statistical analyses were made using the SPSS 15 software program. Results Twenty-nine (6.4%) of the 452 recipients developed lymphoceles. Seven of these 29 (24.1%) recipients were asymptomatic. The most common symptom was hydronephrosis (34.4%). Percutaneous drainage was performed in 21 recipients; sclerotherapy with percutaneous drainage was used in the remaining 8. In 5 (17.2%) recipients, there was a recurrence of lymphoceles. There were significant differences with respect to age (50-65 years; P = .016), use of a drainage catheter (P = .044), and polycystic kidney diseases (P = .049). Conclusion Lymphoceles can be treated successfully using the percutaneous drainage technique alone or in combination with povidone iodine. Drainage use, polycystic kidney disease, and age (50-65 years) were established as risk factors for lymphocele development.

CONTEXT Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) yields the most accurate staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa), although it can be associated with morbidity. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the impact of PLND extent on perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing RP. A new PLND-related complication assessment tool is proposed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) was conducted. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to yield studies discussing perioperative complications following RP and PLND. The extent of PLND was classified according to the European Association of Urology PCa guidelines. Studies were categorized according to the extent of PLND. Intra- and postoperative complications were classified as "strongly," "likely," or "unlikely" related to PLND. Anatomical site of perioperative complications was recorded. A cumulative meta-analysis of comparative studies was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our search generated 3645 papers, with 176 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Details of 77 303 patients were analyzed. Of these studies, 84 (47.7%), combining data on 28 428 patients, described intraoperative complications as an outcome of interest. Overall, 534 (1.8%) patients reported one or more intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were reported in 151 (85.7%) studies, combining data on 73 629 patients. Overall, 10 401 (14.1%) patients reported one or more postoperative complication. The most reported postoperative complication strongly related to PLND was lymphocele (90.6%). The pooled meta-analysis revealed that RP���+���limited PLND/standard PLND had a significantly decreased risk of experiencing any intraoperative complication (risk ratio [RR]: 0.55; p���=��� 0.01) and postoperative complication strongly related to PLND (RR: 0.46; p���=���

Background ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) is an established way to enlarge the donor pool around the world. Comparability of long-term success and complications to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABOc-KT) are still under debate. Methods We evaluated all patients with a living donor kidney transplantation performed between April 1, 2004, and March 31, 2019. Results A total of 137 ABOi-KT and 346 ABOc-KT were analyzed. We excluded 4 ABOi-KT recipients and 178 ABOc-KT recipients with cyclosporine A–based immunosuppression or without basiliximab induction. Three patients of the ABOi-KT cohort and 6 patients of the ABOc-KT cohort were lost to follow-up and therefore excluded. The patient characteristics were comparable except for the higher age of transplant recipients in the ABOc-KT cohort and longer follow-up of the ABOi-KT cohort. The mean estimated 15-year recipient survival was 89% in the ABOi-KT cohort and 91% in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .39). Mean estimated graft survival was 71% in the ABOi-KT cohort and 87% in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .68). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) measured in the last follow-up was 51 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the ABOi-KT cohort and 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the ABOc-KT cohort (P = .36). The incidence for antibody-mediated rejection, T cell–mediated rejections, and infectious complications requiring hospitalization was not different between the cohorts. In the ABOi-KT cohort, we found significantly more lymphoceles and consequent surgical revision procedures. Conclusions At our center, ABOi-KT has as good long-term results as ABOc-KT in terms of patient survival, graft survival, and complications, with the exception of increased lymphocele formation.

Lymphocele results either due to trauma to lymphatic vessels or following a vein graft harvest (as observed in 10–16% of patients). When a lymphocele persists despite conservative treatment, patients may be subjected to undue distress. We report a case of successful treatment of an intractable lymphocele––which had been refractory to conservative treatment including stretch bandage, drainage and local injection for two years––after a great saphenous vein harvest, through lymphatic venous anastomosis (LVA). The lymphocele resolved shortly after LVA without any adverse effect. LVA can be a useful and minimally invasive alternative treatment for lymphocele after harvesting the great saphenous vein.

The role of sclerotherapy for vascular lesions of the head and neck is well established. However, the efficacy of sclerotherapy for benign cystic lesions of the head and neck is less clear. The objective of this review is to determine the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy for benign cystic lesions of the head and neck.PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase.The PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Systems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) were followed for this systematic review. Studies of patients with benign head and neck cystic masses treated primarily with sclerotherapy were included. Thirty-two studies met criteria for inclusion.A total of 474 cases of sclerotherapy were reviewed. Agents comprised OK-432, ethanol, doxycycline, tetracycline, and bleomycin. Lesions in the analysis were ranula, thyroglossal duct cyst, branchial cleft cyst, benign lymphoepithelial cyst, parotid cyst, thoracic duct cyst, and unspecified lateral neck cyst. A total of 287 patients (60.5%) had a complete response; 132 (27.9%) had a partial response; and 55 (11.6%) had no response. OK-432 was the most widely utilized agent, with a higher rate of complete response than that of ethanol (62.0% vs 39.4%,Sclerotherapy appears to be a safe and efficacious option for benign cystic lesions if malignancy is reliably excluded. Efficacy rates are comparable to those of sclerotherapy for vascular malformations. The rate of serious complications is low, with 1 incident of airway edema reported in the literature.