Search

OBJECTIVES To determine whether Hounsfield units (HUs) measured on perioperative computed tomographic scans are associated with radiographic outcomes and reoperations after femoral neck fracture fixation. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Level I trauma center. PATIENTS One hundred fourteen patients age ≥18 years, who presented to a Level I trauma center, and who underwent surgical fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fracture and had perioperative computed tomographic scans and adequate follow-up. INTERVENTION None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Screw penetration, femoral neck shortening >5 mm, and revision surgery. RESULTS A median follow-up was 23 months. An HU measurement of the femoral head was significantly associated with screw penetration and femoral neck shortening but not revision surgery. Patients with middle femoral head HU measurements

Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the utility of the levator scapulae motor nerve (LSN) as a donor nerve for brachial plexus nerve transfer. We hypothesized that the LSN could be transferred to the suprascapular nerve (SSN) or long thoracic nerve (LTN) with a reliable tension-free coaptation and appropriate donor-to-recipient axon count ratio. Methods Twelve brachial plexus dissections were performed on 6 adult cadavers, bilaterally. We identified the LSN, spinal accessory nerve (SAN), SSN, and LTN. Each nerve was prepared for transfer and nerve redundancies were calculated. Cross-sections of each nerve were examined histologically, and axons counted. We transferred the LSN to target first the SSN and then the LTN, in a tension-free coaptation. For reference, we transferred the distal SAN to target the SSN and LTN and compared transfer parameters. Results Three cadavers demonstrated 2 LSN branches supplying the levator scapulae. The axon count ratio of donor-to-recipient nerve was 1:4.0 (LSN:SSN) and 1:2.1 (LSN:LTN) for a single LSN branch and 1:3.0 (LSN:SSN) and 1:1.6 (LSN:LTN) when 2 LSN branches were available. Comparatively, the axon count ratio of donor-to-recipient nerve was 1:2.5 and 1:1.3 for the SAN to the SSN and the LTN, respectively. The mean redundancy from the LSN to the SSN and the LTN was 1.7 cm (SD, 3.1 cm) and 2.9 cm (SD, 2.8 cm), and the redundancy from the SAN to the SSN and the LTN was 4.5 (SD, 0.7 cm) and 0.75 cm (SD, 1.0 cm). Conclusions These data support the use of the LSN as a potential donor for direct nerve transfer to the SSN and LTN, given its adequate redundancy and size match. Clinical relevance The LSN should be considered as an alternative nerve donor source for brachial plexus reconstruction, especially in 5-level injuries with scarce donor nerves. If used in lieu of the SAN during primary nerve reconstruction, trapezius tendon transfer for improved external rotation would be enabled.

The transepicondylar axis (TEA) is often used as a surrogate for the flexion-extension axis, ie, the axis around which the tibia moves in space, because of a belief that both axes lie perpendicular to the mechanical axis. However, studies suggest the cylindrical axis (CA), defined as a line equidistant from contact points on the medial and lateral condylar surfaces from 10(o) to 120(o) flexion, more closely approximates the axis around which the tibia moves in space.We examined the TEA and CA angles relative to mechanical axes to determine whether one more consistently and closely approximates the surgical goal of orthogonality to the mechanical axis.Three-dimensional (3-D) models were reconstructed from CT scans of five cadaver limbs. Three observers repeated three measurement sets to locate the TEA, CA, and femoral mechanical and tibial mechanical axes. Angles of the TEA and CA relative to the mechanical axes were calculated in two-dimensions (2-D) and as 3-D projections and compared for differences in magnitude and variance.Angles between CA and the mechanical axes were closer to 90° than the TEA in 2-D (92° versus 94° for the femur, 93° versus 94° for the tibia) and 3-D (88° versus 87° for the femur, 88° versus 86° for the tibia). Variance of the TEA was higher than the CA in 2-D.The CA forms angles more orthogonal to the mechanical axes of the thigh and leg than the TEA.Although we found a consistently greater deviation of the TEA from the mechanical axis than the CA with small differences, future studies will need to determine whether these differences are biomechanically or clinically important.