Search

The hamstring tendon is the most commonly used autograft material in reconstructive surgeries of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Younger patients have worse surgical outcomes, with a higher risk of re-rupture. We hypothesized that age-related changes in hamstring tendon properties affect the tendon's propensity to rupture when used as an autograft in ACL reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to compare hamstring tendon samples obtained from people aged 20 years or younger to samples obtained from older people.Superfluous hamstring tendon material was collected from 13 young donors (aged 16-20 years) and 17 older donors undergoing ACL reconstructive surgery. Sections of the tendon samples were used for biomechanical testing, structural analysis of collagen fibrils by electron microscopy, and global analysis of gene expression by microarrays.We found that tendon samples from the older group had lower Young's modulus than the younger group (P = 0.015), whereas the stress to failure was similar in the two groups. We found no difference in the average diameter of collagen fibrils between the two groups. Microarray analysis identified 162 differentially expressed genes (fold change ≥ 1.5, P 0.05), with overrepresentation of several biological processes, including regulation of adhesion, migration, inflammation, and differentiation (fold enrichment 2.0, false discovery rate P 0.05).The hamstring tendon from younger people has higher stiffness than tendon from older people, and the profile of gene expression in tendon varies with age. These differences may negatively affect the performance of the hamstring tendon in ACL reconstructions in younger people.

Background The appropriate age at which to perform reverse shoulder arthroplasty is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty between younger and older patients. Methods Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between January 2000 and December 2019 were identified from New Zealand Joint Registry records. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to age at the time of surgery: < 55 years and ≥ 55 years. These two groups were then compared with regard to baseline characteristics, indications for surgery, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score and American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES). Results A total of 5518 primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases were identified, with 75 patients < 55 years at the time of surgery (range: 34–54 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.36 years (range: 0.11–13.37 years) in the younger cohort and 3.10 years (range: 0.01–16.22 years) in the older patient cohort. Indications for surgery differed significantly between the two groups, with younger patients having higher rates of inflammatory arthritis ( p Conclusion Our early results suggest that younger patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate high implant retention rates, comparable to older patients. Longer-term patient-reported outcomes in younger patients are required to guide appropriate patient selection for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Background: Alternative grafts are needed to improve the healing of bone non-union. Here, we assessed a bovine bone product which retains the inorganic and organic components of bone, as an alternative bone graft.Methods: Bovine bone matrix proteins (BBMPs) were isolated from bovine bone particulates (BBPs) and tested in vitro. Primary rat osteoblast viability, differentiation, and mineralisation were assessed with alamarBlue®, real-time PCR, and von Kossa staining assays, respectively. Osteoclast formation was assessed in primary murine bone marrow cultures with TRAP staining.Human osteoblast growth and differentiation in the presence of BBPs was evaluated in 3D collagen gels in vitro using alamarBlue® and real-time PCR, respectively. The efficacy of BBPs as an alternative bone graft was tested in a rat critical-size calvarial defect model, with histology scored at 4 and 12 weeks post-surgery.Results: In vitro, the highest concentration of BBMPs increased mineral deposition five-fold compared to the untreated control group (P P P However, the BBPs had no effect on primary human osteoblasts in vitro, and in vivo, no difference was found in healing between the BBP-treated group and the untreated control group.Conclusions: Overall, despite the positive effects of the BBMPs on the cells of the bone, the bovine bone product as a whole did not enhance bone healing. Finding a way to harness the positive effect of these BBMPs would provide a clear benefit for healing bone non-union.

Study Design A systematic review of bone dust as an autologous bone graft to encourage osseous fusion. Objective To identify and review studies that report on the therapeutic potential of bone dust. The research question was structured as follows: populations —animal and human sources of bone dust harvested using burrs; interventions —autologous bone dust compared with other clinically utilized bone graft options; outcomes assessed —(1) in vitro cell viability, cell differentiation, and osteogenic potential and (2) clinical efficacy in the form of fusion rates as assessed using plain radiographs; study designs —in vitro, preclinical in vivo and clinical studies investigating the therapeutic potential of bone dust, harvested by burring, are included in this systematic review. Summary of Background Data Little is known about the efficacy of bone dust, generated during burring of local bone in spine surgery, as a bone graft to encourage osseous union. Methods A systematic search was conducted in Medline, PubMed, OVID, Scopus, and Cochrane library. The following key words were used: bone dust , bone burring , bone paste , bone pate . Results A total of 285 studies were reviewed. Fourteen articles were identified as relevant for inclusion in this systematic review. Current evidence suggests that bone dust retains osteogenic properties, but limited information is available regarding the osteoinductive potential of bone dust. Conclusion Bone dust represents a free source of autologous bone, which can be easily collected during the time of surgery and used as an augment to aid osseous fusion. Further research is required to evaluate the osteoinductive potential of bone dust. The retained growth factors in bone dust may potentially induce local osteoprogenitor cells to proliferate and mineralize to form new bone.