Search

ObjectiveThe WHO declared SARS-CoV-2 a pandemic on 11th March 2020 prompting a rapid change to surgical practice. This study focuses on how the management of ureteric colic has adapted in a major tertiary referral unit during the peak of the pandemic so that lessons be can be learned in case a second wave occurs. Materials and MethodsWe compared admission rates and treatment patterns against national and European guidelines in 20 weeks, divided into pre- and peri-pandemic. ResultsA total of 72 patients were admitted during the study period. 64% (46/72) were admitted pre-pandemic. 22% (10/46) of these were septic (5 stented, 5 nephrostomized) while 20% (9/46) were managed conservatively. 59% (27/46) of pre-pandemic admissions were suitable for active treatment, of which 48% (13/27) received definitive treatment (11 ureteroscopy (URS), 2 shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)) all within 48 hours of admis-sion. 52% (14/27) had temporising procedures (11 stented, 3 nephrostomized) and underwent definitive treatment within 63 days.Of the total patients, 36% (26/72) were admitted peri-pandemic. 23% (6/26) were septic (1 stent, 5 nephrostomized), while 31% (8/26) were managed conservatively. 46% (12/26) were suitable for active treatment. 75% (9/12) received definitive treatment (4 URS, 5 SWL) of which 33% (4/12) within 48 hours and the remaining treated and stone free within 12 days. 25% (3/12) had temporising procedures (2 stented, 1 nephrostomized), with the definitive treatment provided within 17 days. ConclusionUreteric colic admissions were reduced by almost half during the pandemic. There has been increased primary treatment with a reduction in temporising procedures and time to receiving definitive treatment. In the ‘new normal,’ lessons learned must be carried forward to maintain high rates of definitive treatments.

Purpose There is a lack of data on the natural history of asymptomatic intra-renal calculi. In this study we investigate stone related events (SREs) in patients with untreated intra-renal calculi. We also investigate predictive factors for SREs. Materials and Methods All patients diagnosed with an asymptomatic intra-renal calculus on CT KUB managed conservatively with interval imaging for ≥6 months were included. Patients were evaluated for any stone related event. The rate of event according to calculus size, location and number of calculi was also analysed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant predictors for SREs. Results In total, 266 renal units from 177 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean stone size was 4.44mm (range of 1-25mm). Duration of follow-up was 43.78 ± 26.86 months (range 6-106 months). The overall rate of SRE's including intervention (n=80) and spontaneous stone passage following ureteric colic (n= 40) was 45.1% (n=120/266). Stones >5mm were more likely to lead to an event compared to stones ≤5mm (OR: 2.94; p=0.01). Inter-polar stones and stones located in multiple calyces were more likely to cause a SRE than lower pole stones (OR: 2.05; p=0.05 and OR:2.29; p=0.03 respectively). Conclusion In this large series of patients with asymptomatic intra-renal calculi, the incidence of a spontaneous SRE was 45.1% after 41 months. Stone size and stone location were significant predictors for stone related event. Information from this study will enable urologists to accurately risk stratify patients with asymptomatic renal stones.

Introduction The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) released guidance in 2018 regarding the optimum management of acute ureteric colic: a condition which can present as a surgical emergency. Our aim was to review the current practice at our hospital in diagnosing and managing acute ureteric colic and ultimately, implement sustainable change to address any areas of limitations. Method The following data was retrospectively collected for of all patients admitted with acute ureteric colic: investigations performed, medications administered, details of surgical intervention and follow-up. 1st Cycle: March 2017 to February 2018. Intervention: Teaching sessions delivered to staff (including doctors and nurses) in the A&E and urology department. 2nd Cycle: January 2019 to December 2019. Results 268 patients presented to A&E with ureteric colic – 18% increase from previous year. On admission: 60.4% of patients had serum calcium checked, 97.7% had a CT KUB performed within 24 hours and 67.2% were given NSAIDs; this is a 20.4%, 0.4% and 5.2% increase from the previous year, respectively. Only 31.3% of patients had an acute surgical intervention. The average wait time for clinic follow-up was reduced to 41 days following departmental education, but only 26.4% of patients were seen within the BAUS advised 4-week timeframe. Conclusions Re-audit showed distinct improvement in the management of acute ureteric colic. Thus, departmental education strategies have had a positive impact. It is recommended that the reservation of one daily elective theatre slot for an emergency operation and a computerised clinic booking system will further optimise our management in line with BAUS guidance.

Aim To assess how many patients had a non-contrast CT as first-line investigation for suspected renal colic, and how this was affected by the release of the 2019 NICE guidelines. A secondary aim was to assess the proportion of patients who had CT KUBs that demonstrated a ureteric calculus. Method CT KUB scans performed over two separate 3 month periods were identified. These reflected periods of time before and after the new NICE guidelines. Electronic records were used to assess if the patients had an ultrasound performed as the initial diagnostic investigation, instead of a CT scan. The results of the scans were reviewed to identify if a ureteric or renal calculus had been positively identified. Results In the period before the new guidelines, 61 patients were scanned. 4 had an ultrasound to assess for a stone prior to a CT. All of these patients were medical inpatients. None of the ultrasounds diagnosed a stone. 22/61 patients had CT-proven stones (36%) In the period after the new guidelines, 79 patients were scanned. 12 had an ultrasound to assess for a stone prior to a CT. 8 were medical patients, 3 were surgical and 1 was gynaecological. 1 ultrasound diagnosed a stone. 28/79 patients had CT-proven stones (35.4%) Conclusions The release of new guidelines did not improved compliance with suggested imaging pathways. This clearly demonstrates an area for improvement. It is also worth noting that only 1/3 of referrals with suspected renal colic did actually have a stone, which has implications for specialty referral pathways.

BACKGROUND ESWL is suitable for stones smaller than 2 cm situated in upper and middle calyx. The routine insertion of DJ stents during ESWL of renal calculi is controversial. Some studies support the role of DJ stents in facilitating stone passage and preventing renal colic whereas other reports claim that stent causes significant lower urinary tract symptoms, hematuria, urinary tract infection and can even lower the stone-free rate. METHODS This is a prospective study conducted among 81 patients each in stented and non stented group who underwent ESWL for renal calculus. The primary outcome measured was stone fragmentation .The secondary outcomes measured were renal colic, urinary tract infection, steinstrasse and stent related LUTS. RESULTS Stone fragmentation rates in stented and non-stented groups were 91.4% and 86.4% respectively (p-value > 0.05). Ureteric colic in the stented group was only 14.8% but 45.7% in the non-stented group had ureteric colic (p-value

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical, fiscal and environmental impact of a specialist-led acute ureteric colic virtual clinic (VC) pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with uncomplicated acute ureteric colic, referred to a single tertiary centre, were prospectively entered into the study over a 4-year period (January 2015-December 2018). Inclusion criteria were: low-dose non-contrast computed tomography of kidneys, ureters and bladder; white blood cell count

This chapter summarizes the results of the SUSPEND trial, a methodologically rigorous three-armed randomized controlled trial of medical expulsive therapy in the form of the alpha-blocker tamsulosin or the calcium channel blocker nifedipine versus placebo. The mean stone size in all three groups was comparable and three-quarters of the stones were 5 mm or less. It was a “negative trial” that failed to demonstrate a substantial benefit from the widely established practice of treating patients with small ureteral stones with medical expulsive therapy. Serious adverse events were very infrequent.

These guidelines have been developed by the British Association of Urological Surgeons to give a framework to clinicians, based primarily in the UK, for the management of patients presenting acutely with ureteric colic. They have been developed by consensus with reference to the American Urological Association/Endourological Society guidelines on the surgical management of stones and the European Association of Urology guidelines on urolithiasis, and adapted to the logistics of those practicing within the National Health Service. Grades of recommendation and levels of evidence are based upon the system adopted by the European Association of Urology.

Patients with ureteric calculi usually present with ipsilateral “loin to groin” pain. Rarely ureteric colic may present with contralateral pain, which is referred to as “mirror pain”. We report the case notes of a rare presentation of contralateral ureteric colic or “mirror pain” secondary to a ureteric calculus. A comprehensive literature review was also conducted. “Mirror pain” or contralateral ureteric colic is rare. Urologists should be aware of this unusual clinical presentation and appreciate that upper urinary tract calculi can cause pain on the contralateral side.

Acute flank pain is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED), and imaging studies play an important role in establishing an accurate diagnosis. Computed Tomography of Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder (CT KUB) has surpassed all other imaging modalities to become the gold standard in detection of ureteric calculi. The purpose of this study is to identify the range and management of alternative diagnoses established by CT KUB in patients with suspected ureteric colic. Two hundred and fifteen consecutive CT KUB examinations ordered in the ED of a tertiary-care centre for suspected ureteric colic were retrospectively reviewed. This comprised of 134 male (62.3%) and 81 female (37.7%) patients with a mean age of 53 years old. The positive detection rate for ureteric calculi in males was 43.3% compared to a lower rate for females of 29.6% (p < 0.05). Almost two-thirds of patients were discharged following CT KUB imaging, and admission rates were significantly higher in those with alternative radiological findings (p < 0.04) Alternative radiological findings occurred in 72 patients (33.5%), including 15 patients (7.0%) who had clinically important alternative pathology. The rate of clinically important alternative findings was significantly higher in males than females, 9.7% versus 2.5% respectively (p = 0.04). Surgical intervention was more common in patients with alternative radiological findings classified as gastrointestinal (18.2%) compared to non-gastrointestinal (3.6%), however this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). In conclusion, significant alternative pathology was identified using CT KUB in 7% of patients with suspected ureteric colic. The low rates of detection of ureteric calculi and significant alternative pathology in female patients suggests a more thorough clinical assessment is warranted to improve their management, prior to ordering investigations with exposure to radiation.

Introduction and objectives: Admissions for ureteric colic are relatively common, with up to 80% of stones passing spontaneously. In patients with refractory pain, drainage with stenting, percutaneous nephrostomy or stone removal can be performed. Due to the financial restrictions of the NHS, it is paramount to ensure patients are receiving optimal cost-effective care. We present a cost effectiveness analysis between primary ureteric stenting and emergency ureteroscopic stone removal in patients with refractory pain secondary to acute ureteric calculi. Methods: Fifty patients were analysed who underwent either primary ureteric stenting or emergency ureteroscopic stone removal in our institution. Each group contained 25 consecutive patients. The primary outcomes compared were: time to stone-free status, number of hospital re-admissions, and overall cost of treatment until stone free. Results: Both stenting ( n=25) and ureteroscopic stone removal ( n=25) groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, stone size and location. The hospital re-admission rate secondary to stone-specific issues was significantly lower in the ureteroscopy group, two versus 20. Patients became stone free significantly quicker in the ureteroscopy group (2.5 days vs. 61.9 days). The total overall cost until being declared stone free was significantly lower in the ureteroscopy group (£3104 vs. £4041, P⩽0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights that those patients undergoing ureteric stenting take significantly longer to become stone free, leading to increased hospital re-admissions, potentially increased morbidity and inevitably greater cost implications. We advocate that primary ureteroscopic stone removal should be consider instead of ureteric stenting in patients with ongoing, painful ureteric colic.

Result: One hundred ninety-five procedures were performed on 167 patients. One hundred twenty-seven (65.1%) procedures were urgent and 68 (34.9%) were elective. The cohort included 131 males and 36 females with a mean age of 41.5 years, a range of 19 to 74. One hundred fortynine (76.4%) procedures were performed on male patients, while 46 (23.5%) were performed on female patients. The mean stone size for patients undergoing urgent URS was 7.7 mm and 8.3 mm for elective procedures; approximately one-third of patients had more than one stone. Eighty-one stones in the urgent group were distally located; fifty-seven were in the elective group. The most common indication for urgent URS was pain refractory to injectable analgesia. LASER was used in 182 (93.3%) procedures, 179 (91.7%) procedures were urgent. Seventeen (8.7%) complications were documented for urgent URS and 8 (4.1%) for elective cases, no statistical significance, P value = 0.74.

Background It has been reported that three criteria (size of calculus ≥6 mm, visual analogue scale pain score at discharge ≥2 cm and location above mid-ureter; the Papa criteria) were sensitive for predicting patients who require intervention (surgery or lithotripsy) within 28 days of index emergency department (ED) visit for ureteric colic. It was suggested that absence of these criteria identified a group for whom early follow-up may not be needed. No validation has been reported. We aimed to validate these criteria. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients with clinical presentation of ureteric colic and radiologically proven renal tract stones. Data collected included demographics, clinical features, features of the stone, imaging results and 28-day outcome. Outcome of interest was performance of the Papa criteria for prediction of urological intervention by clinical performance analysis. We also undertook a post hoc analysis to identify predictors of urological intervention for the group overall and for the subgroup discharged from ED. Results Two hundred and twenty-four patients were studied (median age 49, 79% male) with 75 (33%) requiring urological intervention within 28 days. The presence of any of the Papa criteria had sensitivity for urological intervention of 83.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71.2–91.9%) with specificity of 47.7% (95% CI 38.9–56.6%), positive predictive value of 40.9% (95% CI 31.9–50.4%) and negative predictive value of 87.3% (95% CI 76.8–93.7%). Nine patients with no Papa criteria had intervention: 12.7% (95% CI 6.8–22.4%). Conclusion The Papa criteria are not sufficiently accurate to determine which patients require intervention or a subgroup who do not need specialist urological follow-up.

Background: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) became the first line in the treatment of ureteric stone after failure of conservative treatment because of its safety, simplicity and effectiveness. It is not invasive procedure and can be done on outpatient basis without anesthesia and with few complications which is most probably temporary and treatable. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ESWL in treatment of ureteric stone in Iraq. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 Iraqi patients with ureteric stones were participated in this prospective observational study in which patients scheduled for ESWL treatment for a period of 6 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) Group 1: 52 patients with proximal ureteric stone; 2) Group 2: including 60 patients with distal ureteric stone. Preoperatively all patient underwent bowel preparation and were asked to fast for 8 hours before the procedure. Results: The age ranged between 22 and 55 with mean of 42 (SD = 5) years. Around 46% had proximal ureteric stone and the rest were in distal ureter. Around 44% needed one session and 40% needed two sessions to be stone-free respectively. In regards to associated symptoms, 74% had ureteric colic, 3% haematuria, 43% microhematuria and 12% UTI. Mild hydronephrosis was found in 90% of the cases and 30 reported had previous intervention. Success rate was 90%. Conclusions: ESWL is safe and effective in treatment of ureteric stone with few complications and must be regarded first choice after conservative treatment in a patient with uncomplicated ureteric stone.

Objective To analyse the outcomes of emergency ureteroscopy (URS) cases performed in Auckland City Hospital. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all emergency URS procedures performed at Auckland City Hospital between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2011. Data on patients, stones and procedures were collected and analysed. Emergency URS failure was defined as fragments >3 mm or the need for a repeat procedure. Results A total of 499 URS procedures were identified. Of these 394 (79%) were emergency procedures. The mean (sd; range) patient age was 48 (16; 13–88) years. In all, 83% of emergency URS cases had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 1 or 2, 25% of stones were >9 mm, with a mean (sd) size of 8 (4) mm, and 285 procedures (72%) were successful. These patients were younger (47 vs 51 years), were more likely to have an ASA score of 1 (103 patients in the successful treatment group vs 26 in the failed treatment group), had smaller stones (7 vs 9 mm) and were more likely to have distal stones (P < 0.05). A total of 20 complications (5%) were recorded including six false passages and three mucosal injuries, one of which required radiological intervention, and 50 patients (13%) re-presented, for pain (76%), bleeding (10%) or infection (14%). Conclusion We showed that emergency URS is a feasible approach for the routine management of acute ureteric colic with a low complications rate. A subgroup of younger, healthier patients may benefit the most from the procedure.

Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is one of the most common conservative modality of treatment offered by general practitioners for ureteric colic and calculi. In many occasions, such treatment may have beneficial effect, but might be counter-productive, if offered inappropriately. We report a case of unilateral pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with a large, redundant, extra renal pelvis that was misinterpreted in ultrasonography as hydroureteronephrosis. The dilatation was assumed to be due to ureteric calculus and hence treated with MET, that resulted in forniceal rupture and urinoma. The aim of this article is to highlight the possible catastrophe that can result as a result of inappropriate administration of MET, especially in those patients treated based on empirical diagnosis of ureteric colic.

Ureteric colic is a common presentation to acute emergency services. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic is a non-contrast computer tomography of the kidneys ureters and bladder (CT KUB). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used as first-line analgesia, with studies showing that there is no role for steroid or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. There is emerging evidence that a high body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor. The drugs used to facilitate stone passage are known as medical expulsive therapy (MET). The most evaluated being alpha-blockers. The Spontaneous Urinary Stone Passage Enabled by Drugs (SUSPEND) trial was designed to evaluate the use of MET (tamsulosin and nifedipine). This trial showed that there was no difference with MET and placebo for the spontaneous passage of ureteric stones. There is an emerging role for the use of primary ureteroscopy in the management of non-infective ureteric stones.

A 58-year-old gentleman presented with right side ureteric colic for six months duration. He had undergone an extended pyelolithotomy for a pelviureteric junction calculus 10 years back and he had defaulted follow up. His X-ray KUB revealed a large renal calculus with a calcified feeding tube, along with a large bladder calculus with encrustation of the tube in the bladder. Cystolitholapaxy was performed for the bladder calculus, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed and the renal calculus along with the calcified feeding tube was removed. At the end of the procedure, the patient was left with only a single incision of 2cm length.

A case of a 45-year old woman with an ovarian dermoid cyst causing ureteric colic secondary to distal ureteral obstruction is reported. The dermoid cyst was observed on computed tomography to be adjacent to and compressing the distal left ureter and this was confirmed at surgical exploration. Following oophorectomy, the patient's symptoms completely resolved and the excised ovarian cyst was confirmed on pathological evaluation to be a dermoid cyst. This appears to be the first reported case of ureteral obstruction caused by an ovarian dermoid cyst in the English medical literature.

Renal (ureteric) colic is a common surgical emergency. It is usually caused by calculi obstructing the ureter, but about 15% of patients have other causes, e.g. extrinsic compression, intramural neoplasia or an anatomical abnormality. This review will focus on calculus-related renal or ureteric colic, its assessment and subsequent management.

Objective: The factors associated with a successful outcome for the treatment of urinary lithiasis are well described. We reviewed current methods of imaging utilised in stone treatment planning, with specific reference to their ability to identify predictors of outcome. Methods: A literature search for articles concerning the investigation and management of patients with urolithiasis was conducted through PubMed ( www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/ ). In addition a hand search of the abstract books from the most recent major urological conferences was performed to identify data of interest that have so far been presented in abstract form only. Results: Non-contrast computed tomography is superior in terms of diagnostic efficacy, with sensitivity and specificity approaching 100%. The intravenous urogram and contrast CT with 3-dimensional reconstruction provide the best anatomical detail. Conclusion: Although non-contrast helical computed tomography is the most sensitive investigation for suspected ureteric colic, the anatomical and functional information afforded by intravenous urography remains important for treatment planning in some patients.

Aortic aneurysms are very rare in Middle East unlike Europe and America. Therefore, this pathology is very likely to be missed in acute presentation to the Emergency Medicine Department. We present a case of leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm mimicking right ureteric colic, which was missed in the initial assessment.

The first of the two articles in this section examines the dynamic rates of arterial delivery and renal drainage in patients whose renogram showed a Homsy sign, using optimised computer compartmental modelling. The author found that the standard model was unlikely to be correct, and that the Homsy sign was probably an artefact seen in patients with impeded urinary drainage. In the second, the authors from Budapest studied the effect of drotaverine in patients with ureteric colic; it was of significant help in this condition. OBJECTIVE To estimate the dynamic rates of arterial delivery and renal drainage in renograms with the Homsy sign, using optimized computed compartmental modelling. METHODS Eleven F−15 renograms and one F+15 renogram (using 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine) with the Homsy sign were studied, with 26 controls. Compartmental models were constructed for each renogram using components (blood, renal, bladder) linked by variables (arterial rate, drainage rate). Each model was optimized using the Marquadt least-squares method to numerical data from the time-activity curves (TACs). The model renal component at sample points along the TAC was minimized and the corresponding drainage rates calculated. RESULTS The models were optimized, with a mean (range) r2 of 0.811 (0.68–0.88). There were continuous low drainage rates for all type 4 renograms, with no quadrupling of the flow rate, as predicted by the standard model. CONCLUSION The standard model is unlikely to be correct and the Homsy sign is probably an artefact seen in patients with impeded urinary drainage. Computer modelling of individual renograms is feasible and can provide useful insights into the pathophysiology of renal uptake and drainage.

A 22 year old female came with clinical picture of left sided ureteric colic. On investigation she was found to have a left sided ureteric stone and multiple bladder stones. Xray KUB confirmed the diagnosis (Figure 1a). She was admitted and was started on tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily while she was planned for intravenous urography. On day 2 of admission she passed 2 stones of size 13 mm and one stone of size 15 mm. Thereafter conservative treatment was continued and on day 5 she passed two stones of 15 mm and a stone of 22 mm (Figure 1b and 1c). X-ray KUB was repeated which showed no radio opaque shadow (Figure 1d). As per the guidelines of American Urology Association [1], patients with ureteral stones >10 mm could be observed or treated with MET, in most cases such stones will require surgical treatment. No recommendation can be made for spontaneous passage (with or without medical therapy) for patients with large stones. For stones more than 10 mm conservative management alone is insufficient [2]. Several studies have studied the effects of medical expulsive therapy but in stones not larger than 15 mm [3]. We are astonished by the results of conservative management in this case and want to know the view of your readers for the likely reason and whether to give medical therapy in all patients with larger stones before planning for any surgical intervention.

Özet:Akut apandisit, erken cerrahi müdahale ile tedavi edilen, düşük mortalite ve morbiditeye sahip, sık ğörülen cerrahi bir durumdur. Ancak, bazı hastalarda tanıda ğecikmelere ve artmış komplikasyonlara neden olan atipik semptomlar ve fıziksel bulgular bulunabilir. Atipik prezantasyon, apendiksin atipik yerleşimi ile ilgili olabilir. Sağ üst kadran ağrısı ile prezente olan asendan retroçekal apandisit, klinik olarak akut safra kesesi, karaciğer, safra yolları, sağ böbrek ve sağ üriner sistem yollarına ait akut patolojilerle karışabilir. Biz, ilk etapta klinik tanısı sağ üreter taşı olan akut sağ üst kadran ağrısı ile prezante olan retroçekal apandisit olğusunu sunuyoruz. Ultrason ve bilğisayarlı tomoğrafı incelemeleri sonrası, pararenal yerleşimli retroçekal apandisit ve retroperitonda inflamasyon tanısı konuldu. Cerrahi bulğular apandisitin varlığını ve retroperitoneal uzanımını doğruladı., Acute appendicitis is a common surgical condition that is usually managed with early surgery, and is associated with low morbidity and mortality. However, some patients may have atypical symptoms and physical findings that may lead to a delay in diagnosis and increased complications. Atypical presentation may be related to the position of the appendix. Ascending retrocecal appendicitis presenting with right upper abdominal pain may be clinically indistinguishable from acute pathologies in the gallbladder, liver, biliary tree, right kidney and right urinary tract. We here report a case of retrocecal appendicitis presented with acute right upper abdominal pain of which the clinical diagnosis at presentation was right ureteric colic. After the application of ultrasound and computed tomography examinations, pararenal located retrocecal appendicitis and inflammation in the retroperitoneum was diagnosed. Surgical findings confirmed the presence of appendicitis and its retroperitoneal extensions.

A significant proportion of emergency urological admissions are comprised of ureteric colic presenting as loin pain. A variety of alternative pathologies present in this manner and should be considered during systematic assessment. We report the case of a patient admitted with severe unilateral back and flank pain after strenuous deadlift exercise. Clinical examination and subsequent investigation following a significant delay demonstrated acute paraspinal compartment syndrome (PCS) after an initial misdiagnosis of ureteric colic. The patient was managed conservatively. We review the current literature surrounding the rare diagnosis of PCS and discuss the management options.

Introduction: This retrospective study investigates the role of the emergency ureteroscopic (URS) approach in the definitive treatment of ureteric stones.Methods: We reviewed all patients admitted for ureteric stones from May 2003 to December 2010. Those who underwent URS stone treatment were selected and stratified into emergency (EMG) and elective groups (ELG). Emergency URS is defined as URS being performed within 24 hours of admission to the emergency room. The main indication for emergency treatment was refractory ureteric colic in spite of narcotic analgesia. Both groups were statistically compared in terms of their patient-, stone- and outcome-related variables. The overall success rate was defined by the clearance of the stone and/or presence of residual fragments (

Most ureteral stones can be observed with reasonable expectation of uneventful stone passage. When an active ureteral stone treatment is warranted, the best procedure to choose is dependent on several factors, besides stone size and location, including operators' experience, patients' preference, available equipment and related costs. Placement of double-J stent or nephrostomy tube represents the classical procedures performed in a renal colic due to acute ureteral obstruction when the conservative drug therapy does not resolve the symptoms. These maneuvers are usually followed by ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, which currently represent the mainstay of treatment for ureteral stones. In this review paper a literature search was performed to identify reports dealing with emergency management of renal colic due to ureteral stones. The main aspects related to this debated issue are analyzed and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option are carefully discussed.

The diagnostic approach to ureteric colic has changed due to the introduction of new radiological imaging such as non-contrast CT. The role of intravenous urography, which is regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of ureteric colic, is being challenged by CT, which has become the first-line investigation in a number of centres. The management of ureteric colic has also changed. The role of medical treatment has expanded beyond symptomatic control to attempt to target some of the factors in stone retention and thereby improve the likelihood of spontaneous stone expulsion.

Commentary on: Pickard R, Starr K, MacLennan G, et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:341–9.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3] Ureteral stones are a common painful condition often requiring medical care, although treatment is usually symptomatic as most stones pass within 6 weeks.1 ,2 Failed expectant management, obstruction and infection are the most common reasons for intervention. Therapies that facilitate stone passage will thereby reduce the symptom duration, need for intervention and probability of complications. Ureteric smooth muscle relaxants have been studied as potential medical expulsive therapies (MET) and the most recent systematic review advocates their use. However, the high risks of selection, allocation and ascertainment bias in the included trials and the inexplicit and subjective primary outcome resulted in high heterogeneity.3 This … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DLancet%26rft.volume%253D386%26rft.spage%253D341%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252FS0140-6736%252815%252960933-3%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F25998582%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60933-3&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=25998582&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F20%2F5%2F171.atom

Background: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) has been available for endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi since 1960, but the large probe size and concerns regarding safety had previously restricted its use to the treatment of bladder calculi. However, recent refinements have made it particularly suitable for the treatment of ureteric calculi. Methods: The authors report their initial experience using EHL in conjunction with mini-ureteroscopy in the treatment of 94 ureteric calculi in 89 patients. The size of the calculi ranged from 3 to 19 mm in diameter, with a mean of 8.2 mm. The mean operating time was 29 min, ranging from 10 to 120 min. Results: A complete fragmentation rate of 91.5% of the calculi was achieved. There were no major complications and a low incidence of minor complications: haematuria (2.2%), urinary tract infection (3.4%) and postoperative ureteric colic (2.2%). There were four cases of minor ureteric perforations (4.5%); all were successfully treated using conservative measures. Conclusions: It is concluded that EHL is a safe and effective method of treating ureteric calculi.

Background Patients presenting in the emergency room with flank pain suggestive of acute ureteric colic may have alternative underlying conditions mimicking ureteric stones. An early diagnosis and appropriate treatment for other causes of flank pain is important. The majority of centers around the world are increasingly using un-enhanced helical CT (UHCT) for evaluation of ureteric colic. This study was conducted to determine the incidence and spectrum of significant incidental diagnoses established or suggested on UHCT performed for suspected renal/ureteric colic. Methods Urologist and radiologist reviewed 233 consecutive UHCT, performed for suspected renal/ureteral colic along with assessment of the medical records. Radiological diagnoses of clinical entities not suspected otherwise were analyzed. All other relevant radiological, biochemical and serological investigations and per-operative findings were also noted. Results Ureteral calculi were identified in 148 examinations (64%), findings of recent passage of calculi in 10 (4%) and no calculus in 75 examinations (32%). Overall the incidental findings (additional or alternative diagnosis) were found in 28 (12%) CT scans. Twenty (71%) of these diagnoses were confirmed by per-operative findings, biopsy, and other radiological and biochemical investigations or on clinical follow up. Conclusion A wide spectrum of significant incidental diagnoses can be identified on UHCT performed for suspected renal/ureteral colic. In the present series of 233 consecutive CT examinations, the incidence of incidental diagnosis was 12%.

Objective: To determine whether patients with proven ureteric calculi on IVU require repeat IVU after resolution of symptoms and passage of calculus on plain X–ray. Methodology: IVU reports for a 12–month period were obtained and notes and X–rays of those patients with ureteric calculi were reviewed. Presentation, management and subsequent imaging after resolution of symptoms were determined for each patient. All X–rays were reviewed by a uroradiologist. Results: Fifty–eight patients were investigated for the study. All initial IVUs showed upper tract dilation or obstruction. Forty–three eventually passed their calculi spontaneously and of these, 18 had KUB, all of which showed passage of the calculus and 25 had repeat IVU, 22 of which were normal. The 3 abnormal IVUs showed persisting calculi which were visible on the plain film. Fifteen patients required surgical intervention and all had repeat IVU, of which 5 were abnormal. Conclusion: This study suggests that following resolution of symptoms due to ureteric colic, patients who pass their calculi spontaneously can be followed up by KUB. Only those with persistent calculi on KUB or those who have had surgical intervention require repeat IVU.

Objective: To develop a cost-effective plan for the accurate diagnosis of urinary stone patients presenting with ureteric colic based on an assortment of investigations which are less invasive and more economical than intravenous urography (IVU). Patients and Methods: 143 consecutive emergency patients presenting with ureteric colic were admitted to hospital and prospectively studied by history recording, physical examination, laboratory tests and imaging procedures according to a preset format. Significant association of the final diagnosis of urinary stones (which was made by actual stone retrieval) with various diagnostic variables obtained from the results of investigation (including IVU) was statistically studied using bivariate correlation and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Algorithms for reaching an accurate diagnosis of urinary tract stones were formulated using the most significant diagnostic variables and the accuracy of each of those plans was compared with that of emergency IVU. Results: 18 patients were excluded for various reasons. Of the remaining 125 patients 82 (66%) were confirmed as having urinary stones. A positive IVU had the strongest correlation with the final diagnosis of urinary tract stones. Other findings associated with eventual stone retrieval in a descending order of significance were: calcular sonographic features; radio-opacities on a plain abdominal film of the kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB), and microhaematuria. Based on these findings two algorithms could be formulated to reach as accurate a diagnosis as possible. Algorithm A in which an initial ultrasound is mandatory had a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 88% and an overall accuracy of 88% for urinary stone detection compared with 91, 77, and 86%, respectively, for algorithm B in which ultrasonography was employed selectively after initial KUB and urinalysis for microhaematuria. This compares with 94, 79, and 89%, respectively, for IVU. Conclusion: Both plans are viable alternatives which could replace routine emergency IVU.

A 34 year old man visits his general practitioner with a short history of intermittent severe pain radiating from his right loin to right groin. He is unable to get comfortable and is also complaining of urinary frequency and occasional urgency. His temperature is normal. A urine dipstick test shows only non-visible haematuria. The initial diagnosis is suspected renal/ureteric colic secondary to a stone. Important features to explore in the history include