Search

Background: The surgical procedure for laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) is not standardized. Some published studies show the superiority of ileocolic anastomosis (IIA), but the evidence so far is insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the potential advantages in postoperative recovery and safety of IIA in LRC. Methods: A total of 114 patients who underwent LRC with IIA (n = 58) or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (EIA, n = 56) between January 2019 and September 2021 were enrolled. We collected certain factors as clinical features, intraoperative characteristics, oncological outcomes, postoperative recovery, and short-term outcomes. Our primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal (GI) function recovery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications within 30 days, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay. Results: Faster GI recovery and less postoperative pain were observed in patients with IIA compared to EIA [time to first flatus: (2.4 ± 0.7) vs (2.8 ± 1.0) days, p < 0.01; time to liquid intake: (3.5 ± 0.7) vs (4.0 ± 1.1) days, p = 0.01; postoperative visual analogue scale score: (3.9 ± 1.0) vs (4.3 ± 0.6), p = 0.02]. No significant differences were detected in oncological outcomes or postoperative complications. IIA, rather than EIA, tended to be performed in patients with higher body mass index [(23.93 ± 3.52) vs (22.36 ± 2.87) kg/m2, p = 0.01]. Conclusions: IIA is associated with faster GI function recovery and less postoperative pain and may be more favorable for obese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the application value of 4K high definition (HD) in laparoscopic gastrectomy by comparing the short-term outcomes and subjective perception with three-dimensional (3D) and HD vision systems. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted between September 2018 and February 2019; a total of 87 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy were enrolled and divided into three groups in terms of different type of vision system used for surgery: 4K, 3D, and HD. Demographic and clinicopathological data as well as short-term outcomes were collected and analyzed. A questionnaire survey was completed by the team of surgeons to evaluate the subjective perception of different vision systems. Results: There was no significant difference in gender, body mass index, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and history of abdominal surgery, tumor location as well as type of operation, and anastomosis between the 4K, 3D, and HD groups. All patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy without conversion to laparotomy. There was no difference between the three groups regarding operation time (4K versus 3D versus two-dimensional (2D), 183.60 ± 52.5 versus 189.69 ± 69.87 versus 211.00 0 ± 49.33, P = .145) and estimated blood loss (4K versus 3D versus 2D, 123.60 ± 119.51 versus 150.62 ± 105.46 versus 129.00 ± 103.57, P = .602), no difference was found in time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay between the three groups. No significant difference was found in postoperative complications between the three groups. As for pathological results, there was no difference in tumor size and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. In 4K group, the number of lymph node harvested was 32.60 ± 10.28, no difference was found compared with that of 3D (29.81 ± 8.94) and HD groups (27.69 ± 10.96). The score of group 3D was the lowest concerning asthenopia and motion sickness. On the contrary, 3D group achieved the highest score in topographical orientation and depth description. 4K group was graded the highest in terms of control co-ordination of visual angle, visual acuity, radiance, resolution ratio and frames, and refresh rate. HD group was graded significantly lower in sense of control compared with that of 4K and 3D group. No significant difference was found in color resolution and contrast. Conclusions: In conclusion, the short-term effect of 4K HD laparoscopic system is comparable with that of HD and 3D laparoscopy, whereas 4K could reduce adverse effect than traditional instrument and improve quality of surgery. The Clinical Trial Registration number is NCT01441336. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate feasibility of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with pelvic peritoneum closure (LAPR-PPC) for lower rectal cancer. Methods: LAPR-PPC has been used for lower rectal cancer in our institution since 2014. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the data from 86 patients who underwent LAPR-PPC and compared with the data from 96 patients who underwent laparoscopic APR without PPC (LAPR) from January 2013 to December 2018. Results: The rate of perineal surgical site infection (SSI) (18.75% (18/96) vs. 5.81% (5/86), p < 0.01), delayed (> 4 weeks) perineal healing (12.50% (12/96) vs. 3.49% (3/86), p = 0.027), ileus (7.29% (7/96) vs 1.16% (1/86), p = 0.044), and postoperative perineal hernia (PPH, 5.21% (5/96) vs. 0% (0/86), p = 0.032) were significantly lower in LAPR-PPC group than LAPR group. The patients in LAPR-PPC group had shorter hospitalization time (21.32 ± 11.95 days vs. 13.93 ± 11.51 days, p < 0.01). Conclusions: PPC procedure enabled the reduction in perineal wound complications, ileus, PPH, and consequently shortened hospitalization time. LAPR-PPC is beneficial for the patients with lower rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the safety and feasibility of the completely medial access by page-turning approach (CMAP) for laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy.Methods: In this retrospective study, the data from 72 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy with CMAP were analyzed and compared with data from 124 patients who underwent the conventional medial approach performed by the same surgical team from September 2011 to March 2017.Result: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) was achieved in 67 of 72 patients (93.1%) with laparoscopic CMAP. The average operation time, blood loss, and specimen length was 135.9 ± 28.3 min, 63.2 ± 32.2 ml, and 23.9 ± 4.7 cm, respectively. The number of lymph nodes harvested was 20.6 ± 7.7, the time-to-flatus was 2.5 ± 0.8 days, the time-to-fluid intake was 3.2 ± 0.8 days, and the average hospital stay was 8.9 ± 4.7 days. No intra-operative complications occurred in this study. The vessel-related complication and total post-operative complication rate was 2.78% (2/72) and 6.94% (5/72), respectively.Conclusions: Laparoscopic CMAP was an alternative approach for CME in laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy, which was proved safe and feasible for right colon cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]