Search

Purpose: The number of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) removal has increased throughout the years. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes in patients undergoing LAGB removal with or without further bariatric surgery.Materials and Methods: Data prospectively collected from consecutive patients undergoing LAGB removal from 2008 to 2016 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Obesity-related comorbidities, complications, and body mass index (BMI) before removal and at 1-year follow-up were evaluated.Results: A total of 156 patients were included in the study. Seventy-six patients had further surgery (SURG group): 55 underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and 21 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Eighty patients underwent only LAGB removal (No-SURG group). The mean BMI was lower in the No-SURG group (33.9 vs 36.3 kg/m2, p = 0.0055). Reasons for removal were different in the two groups: dysphagia, frequent vomiting, and LAGB-related complications requiring urgent treatment occurred more commonly in the No-SURG group (p < 0.05): 71.3 vs 51.3%, 67.5% vs. 38.2%, 28.8% vs. 6.6%, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, 96.3% of No-SURG patients regained weight after LAGB removal; two (2.5%) patients showed new-onset comorbidities, four (5%) needed adjustments in pharmacological therapy, and four (5%) complained from persistence of GERD symptoms. Additional surgery provided significant weight loss: the mean %TWL was 23.7% after LSGs and 27.2% after LRYGBs.Conclusions: LAGB is associated with a high rate of reoperation. Further bariatric surgery after LAGB removal should be considered due to weight regain, persistence of GERD symptoms, and new-onset comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although vertical banded gastroplasty is rarely performed at present, most bariatric surgery departments continue to follow up patients who underwent this procedure in the past few decades. In view of this, it is advisable for bariatric and general surgeons to know how to diagnose the very rare event of the development of a gastric cancer after this restrictive procedure. In this report, 2 cases of gastric cancer occurring years after vertical banded gastroplasty are presented, and clinical presentation and diagnostic difficulties are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Because the number of patients with a previous bariatric procedure continues to rise, it is advisable for bariatric surgeons to know how to manage the rare event of the development of an esophagogastric cancer. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of all reported cases of esophagogastric cancers after bariatric surgery. Methods: Systematic review of English and French written literature in MEDLINE and EMBASE database. Results: Globally, 28 articles describing 33 patients were retrieved. Neoplasms were diagnosed at a mean of 8.5 years after bariatric surgery (range 2 months–29 years). There were 11 esophageal and 22 gastric cancers; although adenocarcinoma represented most cases (90.6%), a tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade atypia, an intramural gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the gastric fundus were also reported. Node involvement was reported in 14 cases, and distal metastases in 5. The most frequently reported symptoms were dysphagia and food intolerance, vomiting, epigastric pain, and weight loss. Surgery was performed in 28 patients, although 4 underwent only chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and 1 received palliative care. Reported mortality rate was 48.1%. Conclusions: To date, it is not possible to quantify the incidence of esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery because of the paucity of reported data. Nevertheless, because the main concern is the delay in diagnosis, it is of critical importance to carefully evaluate any new or modified upper digestive tract symptom occurring during bariatric surgery follow-up. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The gastric outlet represents a critical point of laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG): the diameter and the material used to calibrate the gastric outlet are essential for long-term success. We present the results of our initial clinical experience with the Proring band, a new calibrating device specifically designed to calibrate LVBG outlet. Between February and April 2004, 13 LVBG were performed using the Proring band. There were 12 women and one man; their mean age was 44 years; mean preoperative weight was 118.8 kg; mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.4 kg/m². The immediate postoperative course was uneventful in all cases. In the follow-up 10 patients out of 13 (76.9%) presented a sudden or progressive food intolerance. Five patients were immediately reoperated by laparoscopic approach and five underwent endoscopic dilatation with initial clinical improvement; early recurrence of symptoms despite further dilatations occurred in four out of five cases. These four patients were then reoperated. Therefore a total of nine (69.2%) patients underwent a laparoscopic reoperation with Proring band removal and its replacement with a polypropylene band. In seven cases an intraoperative endoscopic dilatation was associated with the laparoscopic procedure. Outcome was successful in all cases, with discharge after two days. The results of our experience using the Proring band are unsatisfactory, showing 76.9% with outlet stenosis and 69.2% with reoperations. These data compare negatively with our previous experience on more than 900 VBG procedures using polypropylene mesh. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]