1. Oncological safety of submental island flap for reconstruction of pathologically node-negative and node-positive T1-2 oral squamous cell carcinoma-related defects: A retrospective study and comparison of outcomes.
- Author
-
Wang J, Tan Y, Shen Y, Lv M, Li J, and Sun J
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Floor pathology, Mouth Floor surgery, Mouth Neoplasms mortality, Mouth Neoplasms pathology, Neck Dissection methods, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Salvage Therapy, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck mortality, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck pathology, Survival Analysis, Tongue Neoplasms mortality, Tongue Neoplasms pathology, Tongue Neoplasms surgery, Treatment Outcome, Graft Survival, Mouth Neoplasms surgery, Surgical Flaps adverse effects
- Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the oncological safety and reliability of the submental island flap (SIF) technique in patients with pathologically node-negative (pN0) and node-positive (pN+) T1-2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing surgical tumor resection and concurrent SIF reconstruction., Patients and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed patients with pN0 and pN+ T1-2 OSCC who underwent tumor resection and defect reconstruction with SIF from April 2008 to September 2016, focusing on flap viability, patterns and predictors of locoregional failure, salvage treatments, and oncologic prognosis., Results: Of 160 patients with primary T1-2 OSCC, 33 were pN+ and 127 were pN0. All SIFs beside two were successful (98.75%). During follow-up, 18 patients experienced locoregional tumor relapse, of which 14 were pN0 and four were pN+. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 88.73% vs. 86.93% for the pN0 and pN+ groups, respectively (p = .847). The pN + patients had poorer prognosis than pN0 patients (5-year overall survival, 66.35% vs. 91.10% respectively [p = .005]; disease-specific survival, 74.87% vs. 91.88% respectively [p = .016]). Multivariate analyses indicated there was no independent predictor for locoregional recurrence, but pN+ was predictive for poor prognosis (p = .03)., Conclusion: SIF is a reliable flap for the reconstruction of OSCC-related small- and medium-sized soft tissue defect. With careful neck dissection and appropriate postoperative adjuvant treatment, the application of SIF did not increase the risk of locoregional tumor recurrence in patients with pN+ T1-2 OSCC compared with those with pN0 T1-2 OSCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF