Search

Objective: This first prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to compare short-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy (RA-MP) with open middle pancreatectomy (OMP).Background: RA-MP is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique for benign or borderline tumors in the pancreatic neck or body. Its short-term effectiveness and safety remain unknown, compared to OMP.Methods: Patients eligible for MP from August 2011 to November 2015 were randomized into the RA-MP or OMP group. The primary endpoint was length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints were intraoperative parameters, and postoperative and recovery variables.Results: A total of 100 patients were included into the study to analyze primary and secondary endpoints. Demographic characteristics and pathological parameters were similar in both groups. Furthermore, LOS was significantly shorter (15.6 vs. 21.7 days, P = 0.002), median operative time was reduced (160 vs. 193 min, P = 0.002), median blood loss was lower (50 vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001), rate of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was lower (18 vs. 36.0 %, P = 0.043), nutritional status recovery was better, off-bed return to activity was expedited (3.1 vs. 4.6 days, P < 0.001), and resumption of bowel movement was faster (3.5 vs. 5.0 days, P < 0.001) in the RA-MP group, compared to the OMP group.Conclusion: RA-MP was associated with significantly shorter LOS, reduced operative time, blood loss and clinical POPF rate, and expedited postoperative recovery, compared to OMP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spleen preservation (SP) is beneficial for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy of benign and borderline tumors; however, the conventional laparoscopy approach (C-LDP) is less effective in controlling splenic vessel bleeding. The benefits of the robotic-assisted approach (RA-LDP) in SP have not been clearly described. This study aimed to evaluate whether a robotic approach could improve SP rate and effectiveness/safety profile of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP).Methods: Matched for scheduled SP, age, sex, ASA classification, tumor size, tumor location, and pathological type, 69 patients undergoing RA-LDP and 50 undergoing C-LDP between January 2005 and May 2014 were included. Main outcome measures included SP rate, operative time (OT), blood loss, transfusion frequency, morbidity, postoperative hospital stay (PHS), and oncologic safety.Results: Among matched patients scheduled for SP, RA-LDP was associated with significantly higher overall (95.7 vs. 39.4%) and Kimura SP rates (72.3 vs. 21.2%), shorter OT (median 120 vs. 200 min), less blood loss (median 100 vs. 300 mL), lower transfusion frequency (2.1 vs. 18.2%), and shorter mean PHS (10.2 vs. 14.5 days). Among matched patients scheduled for splenectomy, RA-LDP was associated with similar OT, blood loss, transfusion frequency, and PHS. The two approaches were similar in overall morbidity, frequency of pancreatic fistula, and oncologic outcome among patients undergoing splenectomy for malignant tumors.Conclusions: RA-LDP was associated with a significantly better SP rate and reduced OT, blood loss, transfusion requirement, and PHS for patients undergoing SP compared to C-LDP, but offered less benefits for patients undergoing splenectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a novel minimally invasive surgery technique, and its effectiveness and safety remain unknown in patients with borderline malignant or malignant diseases. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RLPD versus open PD (OPD).Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2013, 180 eligible patients were prospectively hospitalized for elective RLPD (n = 60) or OPD (n = 120). They were matched for tumor location, tumor type, tumor size, ASA classification, age, and sex. The main outcome measures included demographics, intraoperative variables, morbidity, postoperative recovery, and mid-term evaluation.Results: Over the study period, the RLPD group had a significantly longer but decreasing operative time (median 410 vs. 323 min; P < 0.001), less blood loss (median 400 vs. 500 mL; P = 0.005), better nutritional status recovery, expedited off-bed return to activity (3.2 vs. 4.8 d; P < 0.001), faster resumption of bowel movement (3.6 vs. 5.2 d; P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (20 vs. 25 d; P = 0.002) compared to the OPD group. The two groups had similar surgical morbidities and mortality as well as R0 resection rate and number of lymph nodes resected. Among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the two groups had similar overall and disease-free survival (ACTRN12614000299606).Conclusions: This first largest, prospective matched study demonstrated that for treating selected borderline and malignant pathologies, RLPD was associated with a significant learning curve effect and expedited postoperative recovery, but had a surgical and oncological safety profile similar to OPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The only potentially curative option for patients with gallbladder cancer is radical resection. This is the first report that describes the successful application of a minimally invasive, robot-assisted radical resection, including lymphadenectomy, in five gallbladder cancer patients. Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent radical resection of gallbladder cancer via the da Vinci robotic surgical system in the Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgical Department of the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, China, between March 2010 and July 2011 were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Robot-assisted radical resection was successful in all five patients. The mean number of excised lymph nodes was 9 (range = 3-11), mean operative time was 200 min (range = 120-300 min), mean intraoperative blood loss was 210 ml (range = 50-400 ml), and mean length of hospital stay was 7.4 days (range = 7-8 days). All patients were discharged with no reported complications. Mean postoperative follow-up was 11 months (range = 1-17 months). One patient died due to tumor recurrence 10 months postsurgically, but there was no recurrence in the remaining four patients during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Robot-assisted radical resection for gallbladder cancer is both feasible and safe. Compared to laparoscopic surgery, the robotic surgery system is better suited for subtle dissection in a narrow, deep space. This is advantageous for both the removal of lymph nodes near the pancreas and hepatoduodenal ligament and the skeletonization of the hepatoduodenal ligament, the hepatic artery, and the celiac axis. The long-term outcome and direct comparisons to laparotomy in a larger patient cohort are needed to provide more clinical data supporting the superiority of this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]