Search

Encephalopathy is part of the clinical triad of Susac syndrome, but a detailed understanding of the neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric profile of this condition is lacking. Existing literature indicates that cognitive deficits range in severity from subtle to profound. Executive function and short-term recall are affected frequently. Psychiatric manifestations may be absent or may include anxiety, mood disorders or psychosis. If psychiatric phenomena develop during the disease course, it can be hard to disentangle whether symptoms directly relate to the pathology of Susac syndrome or are secondary to treatment-related side effects. In this article, we review what is known about the cognitive and psychiatric morbidity of Susac syndrome and identify areas where knowledge is deficient. Importantly, we also provide a framework for future research, arguing that better phenotyping, understanding of pathophysiology, evaluation of treatments on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes, and longitudinal data capture are vital to improving patient outcomes., (© 2024. Crown.)

Background and Purpose: Susac syndrome (SuS) is an inflammatory condition of the brain, eye and ear. Diagnosis can be challenging, and misdiagnosis is common., Methods: This is a retrospective review of the medical records of 32 adult patients from an Australasian cohort of SuS patients., Results: An alternative diagnosis prior to SuS was made in 30 patients (94%) with seven patients receiving two or more diagnoses. The median time to diagnosis of SuS was 3 months (range 0.5-100 months). The commonest misdiagnoses were migraine in 10 patients (31%), cerebral vasculitis in six (19%), multiple sclerosis in five (16%) and stroke in five (16%). Twenty-two patients were treated for alternative diagnoses, 10 of whom had further clinical manifestations prior to SuS diagnosis. At presentation seven patients (22%) met criteria for definite SuS, 19 (59%) for probable SuS and six (19%) for possible SuS. Six patients (19%) presented with brain-eye-ear involvement, 14 with brain-ear (44%), six with brain-eye (19%) and six (19%) with only brain involvement. In patients with the complete triad of symptoms the median delay to diagnosis was 3 months (range 1-9 months) compared to 5.25 months (range 0.5-100 months) for patients with encephalopathy and ocular symptoms at presentation., Conclusions: Susac syndrome patients are frequently misdiagnosed at initial presentation, despite many having symptoms or radiological features that are red flags for the diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can lead to patient morbidity. The varied ways in which SuS can present, and clinician failure to consider or recognize SuS, appear to be the main factors leading to misdiagnosis., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: We characterised the clinical and neuro-otological characteristics of patients with Susac syndrome., Methods: The medical records of 30 patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed for details of their clinical presentation and course, neuro-otological symptoms, investigation results including audiology and vestibular function tests, treatment and outcomes., Results: Our findings demonstrate that 29 of our 30 patients with Susac syndrome developed neuro-otological symptoms such as hearing loss, disequilibrium, tinnitus or vertigo during their disease course. Hearing loss was the most common neuro-otological symptom occurring in 93% of patients. A rising configuration of low-frequency greater than the high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss was the most characteristic finding on audiological testing (37% of reviewed audiograms). Disproportionately poor speech discrimination was identified in 20% of cases, and one case demonstrated a retrocochlear pattern on electrophysiological testing. Four patients required hearing aids and a further two patients required a cochlear implant due to severe hearing loss. Two out of two treated patients had improvements in hearing after the prompt administration of corticosteroids, indicating the potential for recoverable hearing loss if relapses are treated early. Effects on vestibular function were variable in ten patients who were tested, with most showing preservation of function despite significant hearing loss., Conclusions: Neuro-otological symptoms in Susac syndrome are almost universal. In the correct clinical context, a rising configuration of low to high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss should prompt consideration of Susac syndrome. Treatment of inner ear symptoms in Susac syndrome requires further research as early immunotherapy may be beneficial.

Neuroinflammation is often associated with blood-brain-barrier dysfunction, which contributes to neurological tissue damage. Here, we reveal the pathophysiology of Susac syndrome (SuS), an enigmatic neuroinflammatory disease with central nervous system (CNS) endotheliopathy. By investigating immune cells from the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and CNS of SuS patients, we demonstrate oligoclonal expansion of terminally differentiated activated cytotoxic CD8 + T cells (CTLs). Neuropathological data derived from both SuS patients and a newly-developed transgenic mouse model recapitulating the disease indicate that CTLs adhere to CNS microvessels in distinct areas and polarize granzyme B, which most likely results in the observed endothelial cell injury and microhemorrhages. Blocking T-cell adhesion by anti-α4 integrin-intervention ameliorates the disease in the preclinical model. Similarly, disease severity decreases in four SuS patients treated with natalizumab along with other therapy. Our study identifies CD8 + T-cell-mediated endotheliopathy as a key disease mechanism in SuS and highlights therapeutic opportunities.

Susac's syndrome is considered a rare differential diagnosis in the work-up of suspected multiple sclerosis. Over the last decade or so, significant advances in our understanding of Susac's syndrome mean that it can now be readily distinguished from multiple sclerosis in the majority of cases with a careful history and close attention to MR imaging. Supporting investigations such as CSF examination, fluorescein angiogram, visual field perimetry and audiology often yield important clues. In milder cases, however, diagnostic uncertainty can exist, and forme frustes of the disease are recognised. In this article, we discuss the clinical features of Susac's syndrome with emphasis on the findings and investigations that help to differentiate it from MS.

Susac's syndrome is the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss (Susac 1994) [1]. It occurs predominantly in young females and is believed to be an immune-mediated endotheliopathy of small vessels of the brain, retina and cochlea (Neumayer et al. 2009) [2]. Early, aggressive, and sustained immunosuppressive therapy has been recommended for Susac's syndrome and anecdotal evidence has suggested a therapeutic role for monoclonal antibodies (Rennebohm et al. 2008, Lee and Amezcua 2009) [3,4]. We report a case of Susac's syndrome in which the patient improved immediately after tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition with the monoclonal antibody, infliximab., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)