Search

Objective The aim of the study was to determine the Minimal Important Change (MIC) values and Meaningful Change (MCV) values for the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Standard Error of Measurement (s. e. m.) of the PASDAS. Methods The routine practice data for 544 patients with PsA was available for analysis. An anchor-based method using linear regression analyses was used to determine the MICs and MCVs for the PASDAS. With this anchor-based method, we compared changes in the PASDAS score with an external reference (anchor). The anchor question inquired whether the patient's well-being had changed since their previous visit. It consisted of a 7-point Likert scale (range: very much improved to very much deteriorated). Interperiod correlation matrix analysis was performed to determine the s. e. m. Results The overall MIC and MCV for the PASDAS were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.79) and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.46), respectively. Results for improvement and deterioration were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.83) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.93) for the MIC, respectively, and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.48) and 1.42 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.64) for the MCV, respectively. The s. e. m. was determined at 0.81. Conclusion The MIC for the PASDAS is a tool for physicians treating patients with PsA enabling them to give context to the patient's perspective of disease activity, while the MCV might aid the use of the PASDAS in PsA clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To assess sex differences in disease activity parameters and health-related quality of life in PsA, and to assess whether determinants associated with not reaching treatment target differed between men and women. Methods Routine practice data of 855 PsA patients, who were all tightly monitored and treated, was used. Sex differences including, but not limited to, PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), skin/nail disease, SF-12 PCS/MCS, and inflammatory back pain (IBP) were assessed. Multivariate analyses were used to examine determinants associated with not reaching treatment target (PASDAS ≤ 3.2) in men and women. Results Women had worse scores for—among others—swollen and tender joints, CRP, enthesitis and function (all P < 0.001). Higher PASDAS scores were found for women [3.5  (1.5)] than men [2.7  (1.5), P < 0.001]. Likewise, women were more often not at PASDAS treatment target (OR = 2.03, P < 0.001). No difference in current medication use was found. Nail disease, IBP, number of DMARDs used (past and current), and BMI were associated with not reaching treatment target in the overall sample. For women, but not men, BMI was associated with not reaching PASDAS low disease activity (LDA) (OR between 2.41 and 3.43, P < 0.001). Conclusions Women with PsA in a tightly monitored and treated setting have more severe disease than men. This is demonstrated by worse scores for women in both subjective and objective disease activity measures, in addition to women less often reaching the treatment target. Notably, being overweight is associated with higher disease activity in women, but not men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives We aimed to investigate the disease activity and overall disease burden of (subgroups of) patients with PsA using the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) in an already tightly monitored cohort. Methods This is a cross-sectional study evaluating data from the first visit of 855 PsA patients after implementation of the PASDAS in our tightly monitored cohort [e.g. DAS 28 (DAS28) was provided as an anchor]. Differences in clinical outcomes between subgroups of patients using established cut-offs for disease activity status [i.e. very low (VLDA), low (LDA), moderate (MDA), and high disease activity (HDA)] were examined. Results Based on the PASDAS, 53.1% of patients were in VLDA/LDA. 29.5% of patients had ≥1 swollen joint, 20.6% had ≥1 enthesitis index point and 3.0% had active dactylitis. Based on DAS28, 77.5% of the patients were in VLDA/LDA. Patients reaching both DAS28 VLDA/LDA status and PASDAS VLDA/LDA status [ N  = 445 (52.0%)] were compared with patients reaching only DAS28 VLDA/LDA status [ N  = 218 (25.5%)]. For these latter patients, significantly worse scores on separate parameters were found in measures used for PASDAS/DAS28 calculation (e.g. swollen and tender joint count and patient's visual analogue scale global disease activity) as well as other disease measures (e.g. function and inflammatory back pain). This result remained, even when the stricter VLDA cut-off was used for the DAS28. Conclusion PASDAS implementation uncovered relevant residual disease activity in a quarter of patients previously assessed as being in DAS28 VLDA/LDA, underscoring the potential value of PASDAS measurements in PsA clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]