Search

Background: Many studies have assessed the effect of music on driving. However, their results are very scattered and contradictory. Therefore, this systematic review is conducted to determine the effect of music on driving performance and drivers' physiological and psychological indicators. Methods: Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched until July 2023. A manual search in Google Scholar for gray literature was conducted. The Simulation Research Rubric (SRR) tool was used to assess the reporting quality of the studies. Stata software (StataCorp, version 16) was used to perform a meta-analysis. Results: A total of 2650 records were identified. The findings of 19 studies were analyzed. Most of them were carried out in high-income countries (HICs) using simulators. The most frequently used music style was classic rock. The meta-analysis results indicated that music with high and medium volume increases the average driving speed, and music with low volume decreases it. Although music in every mood reduces the average reaction time, it positively reduces response delay and increases coherence. Music with high volume decreases the heart rate, but music with medium and low volume increases it. Listening to music increases the level of arousal and mental load. Conclusion: It was concluded that, in some indicators, listening to music has adverse effects on driving. However, in many indicators, music has a positive impact on improving driving safety. It is better to choose appropriate music for different driving conditions and to train the drivers about it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ventilator-associated events (VAEs) are one of the main sources of concern in critically ill patients due to the high frequency and mortality. We conducted this analysis to compare the effects of open endotracheal suctioning system with closed one on the incidences of VAEs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and hand searching bibliographies of retrieved articles. The search was confined to randomized controlled trials with human adults comparing closed tracheal suction systems (CTSS) vs open tracheal suction systems (OTSS) in prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Full-text articles were used in order to extract the data. Data extraction was only started after completing the quality assessment. Results: The search resulted in 59 publications. Among them, 10 were identified as eligible for meta-analysis. There was a significant increase in incidence of VAP when using OTSS compared to CTSS, so that OCSS increased the incidence of VAP by 57% (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.063-2.32, p = 0.02). Discussion: Our results showed that using CTSS can significantly decrease VAP development compared to OTSS. This conclusion does not yet mean the routine use of CTSS as a standard VAP prevention measure for all patients since individual patient's disease and cost are other factors that should be in mind when determining the choice of the suctioning system. High-quality trials with a larger sample size are highly recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]