Search

BACKGROUND:Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) disproportionately impacts patients of color and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. Similar disparities in HIV were reduced through a World Health Organization-endorsed Care Continuum strategy targeting "retention in care," defined as having at least two annual visits or viral load lab tests. Using similar definitions, this study aimed to examine predictors of lupus retention in care, to develop an SLE Care Continuum and inform interventions to reduce disparities. We hypothesized that Black patients and those residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods would have lower retention in care. METHODS:Abstractors manually validated 545 potential adult cases with SLE codes in 2013-2014 using 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2012 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria. We identified 397 SLE patients who met ACR or SLICC criteria for definite lupus, had at least one baseline rheumatology visit, and were alive through 2015. Retention in care was defined as having two ambulatory rheumatology visits or SLE labs (e.g., complement tests) during the outcome year 2015, analogous to HIV retention definitions. Explanatory variables included age, sex, race, ethnicity, smoking status, neighborhood area deprivation index (ADI), number of SLE criteria, and nephritis. We used multivariable logistic regression to test our hypothesis and model predictors of SLE retention in care. RESULTS:Among 397 SLE patients, 91% were female, 56% White, 39% Black, and 5% Hispanic. Notably, 51% of Black versus 5% of White SLE patients resided in the most disadvantaged ADI neighborhood quartile. Overall, 60% met visit-defined retention and 27% met complement lab-defined retention in 2015. Retention was 59% lower for patients in the most disadvantaged neighborhood quartile (adjusted OR 0.41, CI 0.18, 0.93). No statistical difference was seen based on age, sex, race, or ethnicity. More SLE criteria and non-smoking predicted greater retention. CONCLUSIONS:Disadvantaged neighborhood residence was the strongest factor predicting poor SLE retention in care. Future interventions could geo-target disadvantaged neighborhoods and design retention programs with vulnerable populations to improve retention in care and reduce SLE outcome disparities.

This article explores the issue of medication nonadherence in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a serious autoimmune disease. Many patients struggle to commit to long-term treatment, leading to high rates of discontinuation and increased health risks. The article presents a study that tested a clinician-led intervention to improve medication adherence in SLE patients, which proved to be effective. However, the article acknowledges the need for further research and adaptation to make the intervention more widely applicable. The text also emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment goals and addressing barriers to adherence, particularly for patients with language barriers or limited health literacy. Overall, the article provides a promising approach to improving medication adherence in SLE, but more evaluation is needed across diverse populations and clinics. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: In systemic lupus erythematosus, poor disease outcomes occur in young adults, patients identifying as Black or Hispanic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. These identities and social factors differentially shape care access and quality that contribute to lupus health disparities in the US. Thus, our objective was to measure markers of care access and quality, including rheumatology visits (longitudinal care retention) and lupus-specific serology testing, by race and ethnicity, neighborhood disadvantage, and geographic context. Methods: This cohort study used a geo-linked 20% national sample of young adult Medicare beneficiaries (ages 18–35) with lupus-coded encounters and a 1-year assessment period. Retention in lupus care required a rheumatology visit in each 6-month period, and serology testing required ≥1 complement or dsDNA antibody test within the year. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit for visit-based retention and serology testing to determine associations with race and ethnicity, neighborhood disadvantage, and geography. Results: Among 1,036 young adults with lupus, 39% saw a rheumatologist every 6 months and 28% had serology testing. White beneficiaries from the least disadvantaged quintile of neighborhoods had higher visit-based retention than other beneficiaries (64% vs 30%–60%). Serology testing decreased with increasing neighborhood disadvantage quintile (aOR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71, 0.90) and in the Midwest (aOR 0.46; 0.30, 0.71). Conclusion: Disparities in care, measured by rheumatology visits and serology testing, exist by neighborhood disadvantage, race and ethnicity, and region among young adults with lupus, despite uniform Medicare coverage. Findings support evaluating lupus care quality measures and their impact on US lupus outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: As part of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–funded American College of Rheumatology (ACR) initiative, we sought to develop quality measures related to Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) use for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical care. Methods: An expert workgroup composed of physician, patient, and researcher representatives convened to identify patient‐reported outcome (PRO) domains of greatest importance to people with SLE. A patient advisory panel separately ranked domains. PROMs assessing priority domains were identified through structured literature review, and detailed psychometric reviews were conducted for each PROM. In a Delphi process, the expert workgroup rated PROMs on content validity, psychometric quality, feasibility of implementation, and importance for guiding patient self‐management. The patient advisory panel reviewed PROMs in parallel and contributed to the final recommendations. Results: Among relevant PRO domains, the workgroup and patient partners ranked depression, physical function, pain, cognition, and fatigue as high‐priority domains. The workgroup recommended at least once yearly measurement for (1) assessment of depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire or Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression scales; (2) assessment of physical function using PROMIS physical function scales or the Multi‐Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire; and (3) optional assessments of fatigue and cognition. Pain scales evaluated were not found to be sufficiently superior to what is already assessed in most SLE clinic visits. Conclusion: Expert workgroup members and patient partners recommend that clinicians assess depression and physical function at least once yearly in all people with SLE. Additional PROMs addressing cognition and fatigue can also be assessed. Next steps are to incorporate PROM‐based quality measures into the ACR The Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Recent data show that lower hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) doses are associated with a two‐ to six‐fold higher risk of lupus flares. Thus, establishing an effective reference range of HCQ blood levels with upper and lower bounds for efficacy may support individualizing HCQ dosing to prevent flares. Methods: HCQ levels in whole blood and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) were measured during the baseline visit and again during a standard of care routine follow‐up visit. Active cross‐sectional lupus at baseline was defined as SLEDAI ≥6; a within subject flare was defined as a subsequent three‐point increase in SLEDAI with clinical symptoms requiring therapy change. We examined associations between active lupus and HCQ blood levels at baseline and flares and HCQ levels during 6 to 12–month routine lupus follow‐up visits using mixed regression analysis. Results: Among 158 baseline patient visits, 19% had active lupus. Odds of active lupus were 71% lower in patients with levels within a 750 to 1,200 ng/mL range (adjusted odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.96). Using convenience sampling strategy during a pandemic, we longitudinally followed 42 patients. Among those patients, 17% flared during their follow‐up visit. Maintaining HCQ levels within 750 to 1,200 ng/mL reduced the odds of a flare by 26% over a nine‐month median follow‐up. Conclusion: An effective reference range of HCQ blood levels, 750 to 1,200 ng/mL, was associated with 71% lower odds of active lupus, and maintaining levels within this range reduced odds of flares by 26%. These findings could guide clinicians to individualize HCQ doses to maintain HCQ levels within this range to maximize efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to develop readily measurable digital quality measure statements for clinical care in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a multistep process guided by consensus methods. Methods: Using a modified Delphi process, an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) workgroup of SLE experts reviewed all North American and European guidelines from 2000 to 2020 on treatment, monitoring, and phenotyping of patients with lupus. Workgroup members extracted quality constructs from guidelines, rated these by importance and feasibility, and generated evidence‐based quality measure statements. The ACR Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) Registry was queried for measurement data availability. In 3 consecutive Delphi sessions, a multidisciplinary Delphi panel voted on the importance and feasibility of each statement. Proposed measures with consensus on feasibility and importance were ranked to identify the top 3 measures. Results: Review of guidelines and distillation of 57 quality constructs resulted in 15 quality measure statements. Among these, 5 met high consensus for importance and feasibility, including 2 on treatment and 3 on laboratory monitoring measures. The 3 highest‐ranked statements were recommended for further measure specification as SLE digital quality measures: 1) hydroxychloroquine use, 2) limiting glucocorticoid use >7.5 mg/day to <6 months, and 3) end‐organ monitoring of kidney function and urine protein excretion at least every 6 months. Conclusion: The Delphi process selected 3 quality measures for SLE care on hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoid reduction, and kidney monitoring. Next, measures will undergo specification and validity testing in RISE and US rheumatology practices as the foundation for national implementation and use in quality improvement programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-cell activation, is an FDA-approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, objectives of this meta-analysis were to examine: a) the efficacy of belimumab; b) time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. Clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users vs. non-users was summarized in a random effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio for each consecutive 4-week observation interval to trend clinical response time in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab.Results: Among 747 screened studies, 14 studies were included. Pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to non-users (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.74, I2 0%). Clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81, I2 0%), with a sustained clinical response through one year.Conclusion: Findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, they inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects Black people 2 to 3 times more frequently than non-Black people and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. In total, 4 studies with predominantly non-Black SLE cohorts highlighted that cardiovascular disease (CVD) is no longer primarily a late complication of SLE. This study assessed the timing and predictors of incident CVD in a predominantly Black population-based SLE cohort. Methods. Incident SLE cases from the population-based Georgia Lupus Registry were validated as having a CVD event through review of medical records and matching with the Georgia Hospital Discharge Database and the National Death Index. The surveillance period for an incident CVD event spanned a 15-year period, starting from 2 years prior to SLE diagnosis. Results. Among 336 people with SLE, 253 (75%) were Black and 56 (17%) had an incident CVD event. The frequency of CVD events peaked in years 2 and 11 after SLE diagnosis. There was a 7-fold higher risk of incident CVD over the entire 15-year period; this risk was 19-fold higher in the first 12 years in Black people as compared to non-Black people with SLE. Black people with SLE (P < 0.001) and those with discoid rash (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.1) had a higher risk of incident CVD events. Conclusion. The frequency of incident CVD events peaked in years 2 and 11 after SLE diagnosis. Being Black or having a discoid rash were strong predictors of an incident CVD event. Surveillance for CVD and preventive interventions, directed particularly toward Black people with recent SLE diagnoses, are needed to reduce racial disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite the pivotal role that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plays in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), less than 50% of patients take HCQ as prescribed. Measurement of HCQ blood levels can help clinicians distinguish nonadherence versus lack of efficacy of HCQ. Our objective was to systematically review publications and perform a meta-analysis to examine the correlation between HCQ levels and 1) nonadherence and 2) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores, in SLE.Methods: A comprehensive search was performed. We included observational and interventional studies that measured HCQ levels and assessed adherence or SLEDAI scores in adults with SLE. Forest plots compared pooled estimates of correlations between HCQ levels and reported nonadherence or SLEDAI scores.Results: Among 604 studies screened, 17 were reviewed. We found 3-times higher odds of reported nonadherence in patients with low HCQ levels (odds ratio 2.95 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.63, 5.35], P < 0.001). The mean SLEDAI score was 3.14 points higher in groups with below-threshold HCQ levels on a priori analysis (δ = 3.14 [95% CI -0.05, 6.23], P = 0.053), and 1.4 points higher in groups with HCQ levels of <500 ng/ml (δ = 1.42 [95% CI 0.07, 2.76], P = 0.039). Among 1,223 patients, those with HCQ levels ≥750 ng/ml had a 58% lower risk of active disease, and their SLEDAI score was 3.2 points lower.Conclusion: We found a strong association between low HCQ levels and reported nonadherence. Our results suggest that HCQ levels of ≥750 ng/ml might be a potential therapeutic target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the impact of cumulative smoking in pack-years on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cutaneous manifestations and damage. Methods: Our cohort study included 632 adult SLE patients at an academic center, meeting 1997 ACR or 2012 SLICC classification criteria. Outcomes were: (1) cutaneous SLICC Damage Index (SDI), (2) ACR and SLICC criteria. Smoking exposure was defined as low (<5 pack-years), medium (5-10), and high (>10), compared to non-smokers. Analysis used multivariable logistic regression to calculate odds ratios and confidence intervals (OR, (95% CI)). Results: Among 632 SLE patients, mean age 42±14, 91% were female, 82% White, and 40% were ever smokers. Black patients were more likely to have smoked (51% vs. 41% White, 11% Other). Chronic SLICC and SDI cutaneous criteria showed linear pack-year trends, meeting significance with high smoking exposure (OR 2.2, (1.2, 4.2); OR 4.2, (1.9, 9.2)). Those with medium exposure were more likely to meet acute SLICC cutaneous criteria (OR 2.3, (1.1, 5.1)). Low exposure predicted any cutaneous SLICC and ACR criteria (OR 3.7, (1.3, 10.6); OR 2.0 (1.03, 3.8)). Patients of color had more chronic SLICC cutaneous criteria (Other Race OR 3.6 (1.6, 8.1)) and SDI skin damage (Black OR 2.6 (1.1, 5.9)) even controlling for smoking exposure. Conclusions: Smoking was an independent risk factor for cutaneous SLE. High pack-year exposure and non-White race increased chronic skin manifestations and SDI damage. Findings suggested a dose relationship between smoking and cutaneous SLE damage, making cessation messaging important to potentially improve outcomes and reduce some disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is accelerated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis (LN). Despite the literature suggesting that renal arteriosclerosis predicts CVD in other glomerulonephritis diseases, arteriosclerosis grading and reporting might be particularly overlooked in LN biopsies. Our objective was to examine the burden of renal arteriosclerosis in LN and to assess whether arteriosclerosis is underreported in LN biopsies. Methods: We identified all patients with LN undergoing kidney biopsy between 1994 and 2017 at an academic center. We interpreted LN biopsy reports to classify the Banff categories of absent, mild, moderate, or severe renal arteriosclerosis. The prevalence of renal arteriosclerosis was compared with the prevalence published for age‐matched healthy peers, and predictors of arteriosclerosis were examined. We overread biopsies for Banff renal arteriosclerosis grading and compared to pathology reports. Results: Among 189 incident patients with LN, renal arteriosclerosis prevalence was 2 decades earlier compared to their healthy peers, affecting 40% of patients ages 31–39 years with LN compared to 44% of healthy peers ages 50–59 years. A multivariable analysis showed a 3‐fold higher odds of renal arteriosclerosis in patients ages ≥30 years with LN. LN chronicity on biopsy results predicted a 4‐fold higher odds of renal arteriosclerosis. The overreads determined that 50% of standard LN biopsy reports missed reporting the presence or absence of renal arteriosclerosis. Conclusion: Renal arteriosclerosis is accelerated by 2 decades in patients with LN compared to their healthy peers and is overlooked by pathologists in half of the routine biopsy reports. We propose incorporating Banff renal arteriosclerosis grading in all LN biopsy reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]