Search

Traditional cuff-based sphygmomanometers for measuring blood pressure can be uncomfortable and particularly unsuitable to use during sleep. A proposed alternative method uses dynamic changes in the pulse waveform over short intervals and replaces calibration with information from photoplethysmogram (PPG) morphology to provide a calibration-free approach using a single sensor. Results from 30 patients show a high correlation of 73.64% for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 77.72% for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between blood pressure estimated with the PPG morphology features and the calibration method. This suggests that the PPG morphology features could replace the calibration stage for a calibration-free method with similar accuracy. Applying the proposed methodology on 200 patients and testing on 25 new patients resulted in a mean error (ME) of −0.31 mmHg, a standard deviation of error (SDE) of 4.89 mmHg, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.32 mmHg for DBP and an ME of −4.02 mmHg, an SDE of 10.40 mmHg, and an MAE of 7.41 mmHg for SBP. These results support the potential for using a PPG signal for calibration-free cuffless blood pressure estimation and improving accuracy by adding information from cardiovascular dynamics to different methods in the cuffless blood pressure monitoring field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An important means for preventing and managing cardiovascular disease is the non-invasive estimation of blood pressure. There is particular interest in developing approaches that provide accurate cuffless and continuous estimation of this important vital sign. This paper proposes a method that uses dynamic changes of the pulse waveform over short time intervals and calibrates the system based on a mathematical model that relates reflective PTT (R-PTT) to blood pressure. An advantage of the method is that it only requires collecting the photoplethysmogram (PPG) using one optical sensor, in addition to initial non-invasive measurements of blood pressure that are used for calibration. This method was applied to data from 30 patients, resulting in a mean error (ME) of 0.59 mmHg, a standard deviation of error (SDE) of 7.07 mmHg, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.92 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and an ME of 2.52 mmHg, an SDE of 12.15 mmHg, and an MAE of 8.89 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP). These results demonstrate the possibility of using the PPG signal for the cuffless continuous estimation of blood pressure based on the analysis of calibrated changes in cardiovascular dynamics, possibly in conjunction with other methods that are currently being researched. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A variety of oscillometric algorithms have been recently proposed in the literature for estimation of blood pressure (BP). However, these algorithms possess specific strengths and weaknesses that should be taken into account before selecting the most appropriate one. In this paper, we propose a fusion method to exploit the advantages of the oscillometric algorithms and circumvent their limitations. The proposed fusion method is based on the computation of the weighted arithmetic mean of the oscillometric algorithms estimates, and the weights are obtained using a Bayesian approach by minimizing the mean square error. The proposed approach is used to fuse four different oscillometric blood pressure estimation algorithms. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated on a pilot dataset of 150 oscillometric recordings from 10 subjects. It is found that the mean error and standard deviation of error are reduced relative to the individual estimation algorithms by up to 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg in estimation of systolic pressure, respectively, and by up to 2 mmHg and 3 mmHg in estimation of diastolic pressure, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oscillometry is a popular technique for automatic estimation of blood pressure (BP). However, most of the oscillometric algorithms rely on empirical coefficients for systolic and diastolic pressure evaluation that may differ in various patient populations, rendering the technique unreliable. A promising complementary technique for automatic estimation of BP, based on the dependence of pulse transit time (PTT) on cuff pressure (CP) (PTT–CP mapping), has been proposed in the literature. However, a theoretical grounding for this technique and a nonparametric BP estimation approach are still missing. In this paper, we propose a novel coefficient-free BP estimation method based on PTT–CP dependence. PTT is mathematically modeled as a function of arterial lumen area under the cuff. It is then analytically shown that PTT–CP mappings computed from various points on the arterial pulses can be used to directly estimate systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure without empirical coefficients. Analytical results are cross-validated with a pilot investigation on ten healthy subjects where 150 simultaneous electrocardiogram and oscillometric BP recordings are analyzed. The results are encouraging whereby the mean absolute errors of the proposed method in estimating systolic and diastolic pressures are 5.31 and 4.51 mmHg, respectively, relative to the Food and Drug Administration approved Omron monitor. Our work thus shows promise toward providing robust and objective BP estimation in a variety of patients and monitoring situations. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper introduces a novel approach to estimate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure ratios (SBPR and DBPR) based on the maximum amplitude algorithm (MAA) using a Gaussian mixture regression (GMR). The relevant features, which clearly discriminate the SBPR and DBPR according to the targeted groups, are selected in a feature vector. The selected feature vector is then represented by the Gaussian mixture model. The SBPR and DBPR are subsequently obtained with the help of the GMR and then mapped back to SBP and DBP values that are more accurate than those obtained with the conventional MAA method. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Automated oscillometric blood pressure monitors are commonly used to measure blood pressure for many patients at home, office, and medical centers, and they have been actively studied recently. These devices usually provide a single blood pressure point and they are not able to indicate the uncertainty of the measured quantity. We propose a new technique using an ensemble-based recursive methodology to measure uncertainty for oscillometric blood pressure measurements. There are three stages we consider: the first stage is pre-learning to initialize good parameters using the bagging technique. In the second stage, we fine-tune the parameters using the ensemble-based recursive methodology that is used to accurately estimate blood pressure and then measure the uncertainty for the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the third stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement methods, such as the oscillometric method, estimate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) at two random instants in time and do not take into account the natural variability in BP. The standard for automated BP devices sets a maximum allowable system error of ±5 mmHg, even though natural BP variability often exceeds these limits. This paper proposes a new approach using simultaneous recordings of the oscillometric and continuous arterial pulse waveforms to augment the conventional noninvasive measurement by providing (1) the mean SBP and DBP over the measurement interval and the associated confidence intervals of the mean, (2) the standard deviation of SBP and DBP over the measurement interval, which indicates the degree of fluctuation in BP and (3) an indicator as to whether or not the oscillometric reading is an outlier. Recordings with healthy subjects demonstrate the potential utility of this approach to characterize BP, to detect outlier measurements, and that it does not suffer from bias relative to the conventional oscillometric method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices generally provide only singlepoint estimates for systolic and diastolic blood pressures and rarely provide confidence ranges for these estimates. A novel methodology to obtain confidence intervals (CIs) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) estimates from a single oscillometric blood pressure measurement is presented. Methods: The proposed methodology utilizes the multiple regression technique to fuse optimally a set of SBP and DBP estimates obtained through different algorithms. However, the set of SBP and DBP estimates is a small number to determine the CI of each individual subject. To address this issue, the weighted bootstrap approach based on the multiple regression technique was used to generate a pseudo sample set for the SBP and the DBP. In this paper, the multiple regression technique can estimate the best-fitting surface of an efficient function that relates the input sample set as an independent vector to the auscultatory nurse measurement as a dependent vector to estimate regression coefficients. Consequently, the coefficients are assigned to an eight-sample set obtained from the fusion of different algorithms as optimally weighted parameters. CIs are also estimated using the conventional methods on the set of fused SBP and DBP estimates for comparison purposes. Results: The proposed method was applied to an experimental dataset of 85 patients. The results indicated that the proposed approach provides better blood pressure estimates than the existing algorithms and, in addition, is able to provide CIs for a single measurement. Conclusions: The CIs derived from the proposed scheme are much smaller than those calculated by conventional methods except for the pseudo maximum amplitude-envelope algorithm for both the SBP and the DBP, probably because of the decrease in the standard deviation through the increase in the pseudo measurements using the weighted bootstrap method for each subject. The proposed methodology is likely the only one currently available that can provide CIs for single-sample blood pressure measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]