Search

Uveal melanoma represents a rare and aggressive subtype of melanoma with limited treatment options and poor prognosis, especially in the metastatic setting. Tebentafusp, a bispecific fusion protein, offers a promising therapeutic approach by targeting gp100, an antigen highly expressed in uveal melanoma cells, and redirecting T cell-mediated cytotoxicity towards tumor cells. This review provides an overview of the preclinical and clinical data on tebentafusp in the management of metastatic uveal melanoma. We summarize the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and ongoing research efforts surrounding this innovative immunotherapy. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the ability of tebentafusp to induce potent and specific anti-tumor immune responses against gp100-expressing uveal melanoma cells. Clinical trials have shown encouraging results, with tebentafusp exhibiting meaningful clinical activity in a subset of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Importantly, tebentafusp has also demonstrated a manageable safety profile. By specifically targeting tumor cells expressing gp100, tebentafusp offers a promising therapeutic avenue for individuals with metastatic uveal melanoma, meeting a significant clinical need in this context. Continued clinical trials will provide additional insights into the impact of tebentafusp on treatment-resistant metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Furthermore, we are exploring the potential of T cell engagers directed against the cancer testis antigen PRAME, which could have widespread utility in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma as well as other PRAME-expressing malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Tebentafusp has recently been approved for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). We performed a retrospective, multicenter study to analyze the outcomes and safety of tebentafusp therapy in 78 patients with mUM. Patients treated with tebentafusp had a median PFS of 3 months (95% CI 2.7 to 3.3) and a median OS of 22 months (95% CI 10.6 to 33.4). In contrast to a published Phase 3 study, our cohort had a higher rate of patients with elevated LDH (65.4% vs. 35.7%) and included patients with prior systemic and local ablative therapies. In patients treated with tebentafusp following ICI, there was a trend for a longer median OS (28 months, 95% CI 26.9 to 29.1) compared to the inverse treatment sequence (24 months, 95% CI 13.0 to 35.0, p = 0.257). The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytokine release syndrome in 71.2% of patients, which was managed with antipyretic drugs (66.1%), intravenous fluids (28.6%) and systemic corticosteroids or tocilizumab (5.4%), and skin toxicity in 53.8%, which was managed with topical corticosteroids (38.1%) or antihistamines (45.2%). Background: Tebentafusp has recently been approved for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) after proving to have survival benefits in a first-line setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the outcomes and safety of tebentafusp therapy in 78 patients with mUM. Results: Patients treated with tebentafusp had a median PFS of 3 months (95% CI 2.7 to 3.3) and a median OS of 22 months (95% CI 10.6 to 33.4). In contrast to a published Phase 3 study, our cohort had a higher rate of patients with elevated LDH (65.4% vs. 35.7%) and included patients with prior systemic and local ablative therapies. In patients treated with tebentafusp following ICI, there was a trend for a longer median OS (28 months, 95% CI 26.9 to 29.1) compared to the inverse treatment sequence (24 months, 95% CI 13.0 to 35.0, p = 0.257). The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytokine release syndrome in 71.2% and skin toxicity in 53.8% of patients. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in one patient. Conclusions: Data from this real-life cohort showed a median PFS/OS similar to published Phase 3 trial data. Treatment with ICI followed by tebentafusp may result in longer PFS/OS compared to the inverse treatment sequence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review provides insight into the role of engineered T-cell receptors (TCRs) in immunotherapy. Novel approaches have been developed to boost anticancer immune system, including targeting new antigens, manufacturing new engineered or modified TCRs, and creating a safety switch for endo-suicide genes. In order to re-activate T cells against tumors, immune-mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer (ImmTAC) have been developed as a novel class of manufactured molecules which are bispecific and recognize both cancer and T cells. The TCRs target special antigens such as NY-ESO-1, AHNAKS2580F or ERBB2H473Y to boost the efficacy of anticancer immunotherapy. The safety of genetically modified T cells is very important. Therefore, this review discusses pros and cons of different approaches, such as ImmTAC, Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK), and inducible caspase-9 in cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trials related to TCR-T cell therapy and monoclonal antibodies designed for overcoming immunosuppression, and recent advances made in understanding how TCRs are additionally examined. New approaches that can better detect antigens and drive an effective T cell response are discussed as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐modified T cells can induce durable remissions in patients with refractory B‐lymphoid cancers. By contrast, results applying CAR‐modified T cells to solid malignancies have been comparatively modest. Alternative strategies to redirect T cell specificity and cytolytic function are therefore necessary if ACT is to serve a greater role in human cancer treatments. T cell receptors (TCRs) are antigen recognition structures physiologically expressed by all T cells that have complementary, and in some cases superior, properties to CARs. Unlike CARs, TCRs confer recognition to epitopes derived from proteins residing within any subcellular compartment, including the membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. This enables TCRs to detect a broad universe of targets, such as neoantigens, cancer germline antigens, and viral oncoproteins. Moreover, because TCRs have evolved to efficiently detect and amplify antigenic signals, these receptors respond to epitope densities many fold smaller than required for CAR‐signaling. Herein, we summarize recent clinical data demonstrating that TCR‐based immunotherapies can mediate regression of solid malignancies, including immune‐checkpoint inhibitor refractory cancers. These trials simultaneously highlight emerging mechanisms of TCR resistance. We conclude by discussing how TCR‐based immunotherapies can achieve broader dissemination through innovations in cell manufacturing and non‐viral genome integration techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Recently, bi‐functional molecules that can redirect immune effectors to tumour cells have emerged as potentially robust mediators of tumour regression in clinical trials. Two modalities in particular, bi‐specific antibodies for T‐cell redirection and activation (BiTe) and immune‐mobilizing monoclonal T‐cell receptors against cancer (ImmTAC), are being evaluated in efficacy studies as ‘off‐the‐shelf’ reagents. Optimal therapy will require an understanding and means to address regulatory mechanisms of limiting efficacy. In light of this, we evaluated the impact of induced regulatory T (iTreg) cells on the efficacy of tumour cell killing redirected by ImmTAC and demonstrated down‐regulation of T‐cell proliferation and expression of CD25, CD107a, Granzyme B and Perforin by ImmTAC‐redirected T cells. Significant recovery of ImmTAC potency, however, could be achieved when combined with an anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody. Furthermore, we found that among lung cancer patients failing to respond to ImmTAC therapy, there was a significantly higher fraction of Treg cells in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of lung cancer patients than in healthy donors. These results provide in vitro evidence for an iTreg cell‐mediated immunosuppression of ImmTAC‐redirected T‐cell responses. Whilst immune checkpoint blockade can reverse the Treg cell suppression, it forms a rational basis for a combination of the blockade with ImmTAC in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The success of immune system-based cancer therapies depends on a broad immune response engaging a range of effector cells and mechanisms. Immune mobilizing monoclonal T cell receptors ( TCRs) against cancer (Imm TAC™ molecules: fusion proteins consisting of a soluble, affinity enhanced TCR and an anti- CD3 scFv antibody) were previously shown to redirect CD8+ and CD4+ T cells against tumours. Here we present evidence that IMCgp100 (Imm TAC recognizing a peptide derived from the melanoma-specific protein, gp100, presented by HLA-A*0201) efficiently redirects and activates effector and memory cells from both CD8+ and CD4+ repertoires. Using isolated subpopulations of T cells, we find that both terminally differentiated and effector memory CD8+ T cells redirected by IMCgp100 are potent killers of melanoma cells. Furthermore, CD4+ effector memory T cells elicit potent cytotoxic activity leading to melanoma cell killing upon redirection by IMCgp100. The majority of T cell subsets belonging to both the CD8+ and CD4+ repertoires secrete key pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumour necrosis factor- α, interferon- γ, interleukin-6) and chemokines (macrophage inflammatory protein-1 α- β, interferon- γ-inducible protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1). At an individual cell level, IMCgp100-redirected T cells display a polyfunctional phenotype, which is a hallmark of a potent anti-cancer response. This study demonstrates that IMCgp100 induces broad immune responses that extend beyond the induction of CD8+ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. These findings are of particular importance because IMCgp100 is currently undergoing clinical trials as a single agent or in combination with check point inhibitors for patients with malignant melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]