Search

The present study investigated the incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation for late atrioventricular block (AVB) in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) who received ablation. The data from 3,442 patients with AVNRT who received ablation were analyzed. Those who developed late AVB (>1 month after ablation) and received a PPM were identified. The incidence of PPM implantation in 1,148 matched patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and in the whole population of Taiwan were compared. Of the patients with AVNRT receiving ablation (mean follow-up duration 128.3 ± 62.5 months), 15 (0.4%) received PPM implantation for late AVB (mean interval after catheter ablation 95.4 ± 55.0 months). Only age (odds ratio 1.05, p = 0.02) and transient AVB (odds ratio 8.55, p = 0.01) during the procedure were independently associated with PPM implantation for late AVB. The patients with AVNRT had a greater incidence of PPM implantation due to late AVB compared to the matched patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The annual incidence of PPM implantation for AVB was also greater in the patients with AVNRT than in the general population. In conclusion, the incidence of PPM implantation for late AVB in patients with AVNRT who received catheter ablation was low but still greater than that in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and the general population in Taiwan., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to investigate the impact of aging on electrophysiological characteristics in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT)., Methods and Results: The 2,111 patients who underwent an electrophysiological study and radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of AVNRT were enrolled. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to age (group 1: < 20 years; group 2: 20-39 years; group 3: 40-59 years; and group 4: ≥ 60 years). The gender distribution differed with age. The atrio-Hisian interval, and effective refractory periods (ERP) of the right atrium, ventricle, antegrade slow pathway, retrograde slow pathway and fast pathway, and tachycardia cycle length all increased with age. However, a paradoxical change in the fast pathway ERP was noted. The fast pathway ERP was significantly longer in group 2 than in other groups, and was associated with the largest tachycardia window. The response to catecholamines was similar between different age groups. Procedure time, radiation time, and complications did not differ. However, the number of RF impulses was higher in group 2 compared with other groups (7.6 ± 9.3, P=0.04), which might imply a differing complexity during the ablation., Conclusions: Paradoxical aging changes of AVN electrophysiological characteristics were associated with a different atrioventricular nodal conduction property and the number of RF impulses.

Introduction: The detailed electrophysiological characteristics of the gender differences associated with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have not been clarified. This study investigated the gender-related electrophysiological differences in a large series of patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation., Methods and Results: A total of 2,088 consecutive AVNRT patients (men/women 869/1,219) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the gender differences in their electrophysiological characteristics. Women had a significantly younger age of onset, higher incidence of multiple jumps, shorter AH interval, atrial effective refractory period (ERP), anterograde fast pathway ERP, anterograde slow pathway ERP, and retrograde slow pathway ERP, and longer ventricular ERP than men. The incidence of baseline ventriculoatrial dissociation was lower in women than in men. Women needed less isoproterenol/atropine to induce AVNRT. No gender differences in the radiation exposure time, procedure time, complication rate, acute success rate, or second procedure rate were noted. Both typical and atypical AVNRT were more predominant in women. In the patients with atypical AVNRT, there was no significant gender difference in incidence of baseline ventriculoatrial dissociation; however, the retrograde slow pathway ERP was significantly shorter in women than in men. Women of premenopausal age (≤50 years old) had a significantly higher incidence of anterograde multiple jumps and a retrograde jump phenomenon, and a shorter anterograde slow pathway ERP and retrograde slow pathway ERP than those of women over 50 years old., Conclusion: Gender differences in the anterograde and retrograde AV nodal electrophysiology were noted in the patients with AVNRT., (© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose of Review: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with regular supraventricular tachycardia. Selective radio frequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway has afforded an ideal method to treat most patients with AVNRT. However, there are still some controversies and recent developments concerning the ablation for patients with AVNRT. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the anatomy and physiology of the atrioventricular node and implications for the ablation of AVNRT., Recent Findings: The sequential ablation sites for slow pathway ablation are suggested as the isthmus between tricuspid annulus and coronary sinus ostium, the tricuspid edge of coronary sinus ostium by moving the ablation catheter tip slightly in and out of the coronary sinus, the septum lower than coronary sinus ostium, moving higher up on the half of Koch's triangle along the septum, one or two burns inside the first centimeter of the coronary sinus, left side of the septum., Summary: It is imperative to recognize the detailed anatomy and physiology of the atrioventricular node in every individual patient before the ablation of AVNRT.

Background: The occurrence of eccentric retrograde atrial activation has been demonstrated to be from 6 to 8% in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by several previous reports. However, most of those reports were limited by the absence of coronary sinus venography to confirm if the retrograde activation was truly left sided. The purposes of this study were to 1) determine the incidence of left sided retrograde atrial activation in our center, 2) determine the specific electrophysiologic characteristics of eccentric and concentric atrial activation and 3) determine the outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT with eccentric retrograde atrial activation., Methods: From November 2001 to July 2004, 290 consecutive patients with AVNRT who underwent an electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation were included. Group 1 consisted of AVNRT patients with eccentric retrograde atrial activation; group 2 consisted of AVNRT patients with concentric retrograde atrial activation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were then compared., Results: The incidence of AVNRT with eccentric retrograde activation confirmed by CS venography was 6.5%. There were more females and atypical AVNRT in patients with retrograde eccentric conduction. There was more VA block after ablation and tachycardia induction by right ventricular pacing/extrastimuli in eccentric rather than concentric retrograde atrial activation. A shorter antegrade fast functional refractory period of the AV node was demonstrated in the atypical eccentric group as compared to the atypical concentric group., Conclusion: This study demonstrated the different electrophysiologic characteristics between the AVNRT patients with eccentric and concentric retrograde atrial activation. Successful ablation sites were similar to the standard RA ablation sites in patients with retrograde eccentric conduction.

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia in adulthood. Although selective ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway can cure AVNRT, accidental AV block may occur. The details on the electrophysiologic characteristics, quantitative data on the voltage inside Koch's triangle, and the use of three-dimensional noncontact mapping to facilitate the catheter ablation of AVNRT associated with a high-risk for AV block or other arrhythmias have been limited., Methods and Results: Nine patients (M/F=5/4, 34+/-23 years, range 17-76) with clinically documented AVNRT were included. All patients had undergone previous sessions for slow AV nodal pathway ablation but they had failed, because of repetitive episodes of complete AV block during the RF energy applications. Further, one patient had a complex anatomy and 4 patients were associated with other tachycardias, respectively. The electrophysiologic studies revealed that 4 patients had the slow-fast, 4 the slow-intermediate and one the fast-intermediate form of AVNRT. Noncontact mapping demonstrated two types of antegrade AV nodal conduction, markedly differing sites of the earliest atrial activation during retrograde VA conduction, and a lower range of voltage within Koch's triangle. The lowest border of the retrograde conduction region was defined on the map, and the application of the RF energy was delivered below that border to prevent the occurrence of AV block. The distance between the successful ablation lesions and the lowest border of the retrograde conduction region was significantly shorter in the patients with the slow-intermediate form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form (5.5+/-3.4 vs. 15+/-7.6 mm; p<0.05). After the ablation procedure, either rapid pacing or extrastimulation could not induce any tachycardia, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up (10.3+/-5.4, 2 to 22 months)., Conclusions: Noncontact mapping could effectively demonstrate the antegrade and retrograde atrionodal conduction patterns, electrophysiologic characteristics of Koch's triangle, and guide the successful catheter ablation in difficult AVNRT cases.

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is well known to be one of the most common supraventricular tachycardias in childhood. However, information about the atypical forms of AVNRT in childhood is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics in pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT., Methods: One hundred and three pediatric patients with AVNRT were included (aged 8-18 years; 44 male, 59 female). There were 10 (9.7%) children with the atypical forms (group 1), 86 (83.4%) with the slow-fast form (group 2) and 7 (6.9%) with the fast-slow form of AVNRT (group 3). The electrophysiologic characteristics and results of the radiofrequency catheter ablation were compared among these 3 groups., Results: Group 2 patients were associated with an older age when compared with the other two groups. A significantly higher incidence of retrograde dual atrioventricular nodal pathways and a higher percentage of ventricular pacing- and extrastimulation-induced AVNRT were demonstrated in the children with the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The children with the atypical forms of AVNRT had a greater difference in the antegrade 1:1 conduction (100 +/- 73 vs. 52 +/- 41 vs. 35 +/- 26 ms, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the children with the slow-fast form of AVNRT had a greater difference in the retrograde 1:1 conduction (125 +/- 97 vs. 42 +/- 35 vs. 65 +/- 79 ms, p = 0.012)., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT had different electrophysiologic characteristics than those with the slow-fast or fast-slow forms of AVNRT. The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation were similar for all children with the slow-fast, fast-slow and atypical forms of AVNRT., ((c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation., Methods: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%)., Results: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.

Background: Previous studies in adults have shown a significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) after successful slow pathway ablation. However, information on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in children is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the different effects of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in pediatric AVNRT patients between those with and without dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways., Methods: From January 1992 to August 2004, a total 67 pediatric patients with AVNRT underwent an electrophysiologic study and RF catheter ablation at our institution. We compared the electrophysiologic characteristics between those obtained before and after ablation in the children with AVNRT with and without dual AV nodal pathways., Results: Dual AV nodal pathways were found in 37 (55%) of 67 children, including 36 (54%) with antegrade and 10 (15%) with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The antegrade and retrograde fast pathway ERPs in children with dual AV nodal pathways were both longer than the antegrade and retrograde ERPs in children without dual AV nodal pathways (300 +/- 68 vs 264 +/- 58 ms, P = 0.004; 415 +/- 70 vs 250 +/- 45 ms, P < 0.001) before ablation. In children with antegrade dual AV nodal pathways, the antegrade fast pathway ERP decreased from 300 +/- 68 ms to 258 +/- 62 ms (P = 0.008). The retrograde fast pathway ERP also decreased after successful ablation in the children with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways (415 +/- 70 vs. 358 +/- 72 ms, P = 0.026)., Conclusion: The dual AV nodal physiology could not be commonly demonstrated in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT. After a successful slow pathway ablation, the fast pathway ERP shortened significantly in the children with dual AV nodal pathways.

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is based on the concept of dual AV node pathways that are functionally and anatomically distinct. The bigger coronary sinus ostium (CSO) in patients with AVNRT compared to other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) may produce separation of atrial inputs into the AV node or create anisotropic conduction, thus giving rise to a different AV nodal physiology. Previous studies measuring the size of the CSO using CS angiography between patients with AVNRT and other SVTs showed conflicting results. Besides, no previous studies have compared the CS morphology of the different forms of AVNRT., Objectives: This study compares the size and morphology of the CS among patients with typical AVNRT, atypical AVNRT and accessory pathways mediated reentrant tachycardia (AVRT)., Methods: Ninety-six patients with clinically documented SVTs were divided into three groups. The diameter of the CS was measured in LAO projection during end ventricular systole (by choosing the last ventricular inward motion). The CSO as well as 5, 10 and 15 mm inside the CS were measured. CS morphology is defined as either wind-sock shape or tubular shape., Results: The size of the CS ostium was 13.58 +/- 3.98, 15.93 +/- 4.86 and 12.50 +/- 2.83 mm for the atypical AVNRT, typical AVNRT and AVRT, respectively (p = 0.03). There was significant difference in the size of the CS from the ostium until 15 mm into the CS between 1) typical AVNRT and AVRT, 2) typical AVNRT and atypical AVNRT. Typical and atypical AVNRT patients had more windsock morphology CS (13/32, 40.6% and 10/32, 31.2%) compared to AVRT which had only one (1/32, 3.1%) windsock morphology (p = 0.002)., Conclusion: The easier CS cannulation in patients with typical AVNRT could be due to a bigger CS size and to a more windsock morphology. The CS size and morphology may be a very important substrate of tachycardia in patients with AVNRT.

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be usually induced by atrial pacing or extrastimulation. However, it is less commonly induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation., Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with slow-fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation., Methods: The total population was 1497 patients associated with AVNRT. There were 1373 (91.7%) patients who had slow-fast form AVNRT included in our study. Group 1 (n = 45) could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation, and Group 2 (n = 1328) could be induced by only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were compared., Results: Group 1 patients had a significantly lower incidence of both antegrade and retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The pacing cycle length (CL) of the antegrade 1:1 fast pathway (FP) and antegrade ERP of the FP were both significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. Mean antegrade FRP of the fast and slow pathways were significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. The differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP were much longer in Group 2 patients., Conclusion: This study demonstrated the patients with slow-fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of dual AV nodal pathways and the different electrophysiologic characteristics (shorter pacing CL of the antegrade 1:1 FP, antegrade ERP of the FP and the differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP) from the other patients. The specific electrophysiologic characteristics in such patients could be the reason that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation.

Background: The significant role of bundle branch block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not clear. The purposes of this study were to study the effects of complete right bundle branch block (RBBB) on electrophysiological parameters during AVNRT and to define the significance of complete RBBB during AVNRT., Methods and Results: According to characteristics of electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm and AVNRT, 50 patients who underwent catheter ablation for slow-fast AVNRT were divided into three groups. Group I included 20 patients who had narrow QRS (< or = 110 ms) during sinus rhythm and AVNRT. Group II included 18 patients who had persistent RBBB (< or = 120 ms) during sinus rhythm and AVNRT. Group III included 12 patients who had narrow QRS during sinus rhythm, but they had narrow QRS and transient RBBB during AVNRT. The atrio-His (AH) interval (296+/-60 vs. 288+/-75 ms), His-ventricular (HV) interval (36+/-11 vs. 35+/-11 ms), His-atrial (HA) interval (72+/-24 vs. 71+/-28 ms), VA(HRA) interval (defined as the interval between the onset of ventricular depolarization and the onset of atrial activity of right high atrium; 34+/-24 vs. 37+/-25 ms), VA(CSO) interval (defined as the interval between the onset of ventricular depolarization and the onset of atrial activity of coronary sinus ostium; 13+/-28 vs. 26+/-23 ms) and tachycardia cycle length (TCL; 368+/-67 vs. 359+/-73 ms) during AVNRT were similar between group I and group II (all P > 0.05). In group III, the AH interval (255+/-81 vs. 246+/-83 ms), HV interval (44+/-5 vs. 42+/-11 ms), HA interval (66+/-19 vs. 70+/-15 ms), VA(HRA) interval (27+/-15 vs. 29+/-16 ms), VA(CSO) interval (23+/-25 vs. 21+/-25 ms) and TCL (322+/-76 vs. 316+/-77 ms) were not significantly different between AVNRT with narrow QRS and those with transient RBBB (all P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Persistent RBBB and transient RBBB have no significant effects on the electrophysiological parameters during AVNRT. These findings suggest that RBBB might not influence the conduction of lower common pathway or the circuit of AVNRT.

Background: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined., Methods: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed., Results: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.