Search

Background: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) after prior endocardial catheter ablation(s) presents challenges in the setting of prior cardiac surgery where percutaneous epicardial access may not be feasible., Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation in direct surgical epicardial access procedures., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial VT ablation cases. Surgical cases using cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation were analyzed and outcomes were compared., Results: Between 2009 and 2022, 43 patients underwent either a cryothermal (n = 17) or a radiofrequency (n = 26) hybrid epicardial ablation procedure with direct surgical access. Both groups were similarly matched for age, sex, etiology of VT, and comorbidities with a high burden of refractory VT despite previous endocardial and/or percutaneous epicardial ablation procedures. The surgical access site was lateral thoracotomy (76.5%) in the cryothermal ablation group compared with lateral thoracotomy (42.3%) and subxiphoid approach (38.5%) in the radiofrequency group, with the remainder in both groups performed via median sternotomy. The ablation time was significantly shorter in those undergoing cryothermal ablation vs radiofrequency ablation (11.54 ± 15.5 minutes vs 48.48 ± 23.6 minutes; P < .001). There were no complications in the cryothermal ablation group compared with 6 patients with complications in the radiofrequency group. Recurrent VT episodes and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups., Conclusion: Hybrid surgical VT ablation with cryothermal or radiofrequency energy demonstrated similar efficacy outcomes. Cryothermal ablation was more efficient and safer than radiofrequency in a surgical setting and should be considered when surgical access is required., (Copyright © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clinical relevance and prognostic implications of ventricular parasystole are unknown., Objectives: This study sought to assess the prevalence of ventricular parasystole in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and ventricular parasystole's association with ventricular arrhythmias and conduction system abnormalities., Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent ICD interrogation at a single center between June 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020, and reviewed all available ICD and electrocardiogram data. This study identified patients with ventricular parasystole and compared the prevalence of ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT), and new conduction system abnormalities in those with ≥5 years of intrinsic QRS-complex electrocardiograms to those without parasystole., Results: This study included 374 patients (age 57 ± 21 years, 72% male, 45% nonischemic, 32% ischemic cardiomyopathy), of which, 104 (28%) had VT only, 39 (10%) VF only, and 10 (3%) both VT/VF. Ventricular parasystole was identified in 33 patients (9%); parasystolic foci were predominantly from the His-Purkinje system. Compared with those without parasystole, patients with parasystole had a significantly higher rate of VF (36% vs 11%; P < 0.01), but not VT (42% vs 29%; P = 0.12). Patients with parasystole, compared with those without parasystole, had a higher prevalence of new conduction abnormalities, particularly progressive intraventricular conduction delay (11 of 18 [61%] vs 12 of 83 [14%]; P < 0.01) and new right bundle branch block (4 of 18 [22%] vs 1 of 83 [1%]; P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Ventricular parasystole was strongly associated with new conduction system abnormalities and VF in patients who have cardiomyopathy with ICDs, suggesting a potential link between VF and His-Purkinje damage in this patient population., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Bradfield and Dr Shivkumar are supported by National Institutes of Health grant OT2OD028201. Dr Do has received research funding and speaker fees from Medtronic Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Initial studies have reported excellent safety and efficacy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT)., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of eight consecutive patients who underwent SBRT for refractory, scar-related VT. The anatomic target for radioablation was defined based on surface 12-lead ECG VT morphology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and electroanatomic mapping data when available. The target volume treated and the prescribed radiation dose (15-25 Gy) was based on the combined clinical assessment of the cardiac electrophysiologist and radiation oncologist. Ventricular arrhythmias, radiation-related outcomes, and adverse events were monitored at follow-up., Results: Eight patients underwent nine SBRT sessions. All patients were male with an average age of 75 ± 7.3 years and mean ejection fraction of 21 ± 7%. SBRT was performed with delivery of an average of 22.2 ± 3.6 Gy in a single session with a procedure time of 18.2 ± 6.0 min. All but one session was performed on an inpatient basis. No acute complications occurred. During a median follow-up of 7.8 months (IQR 4.8, 9.9), ICD therapies decreased from median 69.5 (43.5, 115.8) pre-SBRT to 13.3 (IQR 7.7, 35.8) post-SBRT (p = 0.036). There were three patient deaths in the follow-up period, unrelated to SBRT. Apparent clinical benefit occurred 33% of the time after SBRT., Conclusions: The patients experienced overall reduction in VT burden following SBRT, though not with the immediate effect seen in other patient series. Further studies (basic, translational, and clinical) are essential to determine the benefit of SBRT and if so, the optimal protocols and patient selection., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) has been used as a bailout strategy for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). Risk of VT recurrence in patients with scar-related monomorphic VT referred for CSD and the extent to which CSD can modify this risk is unknown. We aimed to quantify arrhythmia recurrence risk and impact of CSD in this population. Methods and Results Adjusted competing risk time to event models were developed to adjust for risk of VT recurrence and sustained VT/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks after VT ablation based on patient comorbidities at the time of VT ablation. Adjusted VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock recurrence rates were estimated for the subgroup who subsequently required CSD after ablation. The expected adjusted recurrence rates were then compared with the observed rates after CSD. Data from 381 patients with scar-mediated monomorphic VT who underwent VT ablation were analyzed, excluding patients with polymorphic VT. Sixty eight patients underwent CSD for recurrent VT. CSD reduced the expected adjusted VT recurrence rate by 36% (expected rate of 5.61 versus observed rate of 3.58 per 100 person-months, P =0.01) and the sustained VT/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock rates by 34% (expected rate of 4.34 versus observed 2.85 per 100 person-months, P =0.03). The median number of sustained VT/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in the year before versus the year after CSD was reduced by 90% (10 versus 1, P <0.0001). Conclusions Patients referred for CSD for refractory scar-mediated monomorphic VT are at a higher risk of VT recurrence after ablation as compared with those not requiring CSD, mostly because of their cardiac comorbidities. CSD significantly reduced both the expected risk of recurrences and VT burden.

Introduction: Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) is utilized for the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in structural heart disease when refractory to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or when patient/VT characteristics are not conducive to RFA., Methods: We studied consecutive patients who underwent CSD at our institution from 2009 to 2018 with VT requiring repeat RFA post-CSD. Patient demographics, VT/procedural characteristics, and outcomes were assessed., Results: Ninety-six patients had CSD, 16 patients underwent RFA for VT post-CSD. There were 15 male and 1 female patients with mean age of 54.2 ± 13.2 years. Fourteen patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy. A mean of 2.0 ± 0.8 RFAs for VT was unsuccessful before the patient undergoing CSD. The median time between CSD and RFA was 104 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 15-241). The clinical VT cycle length was significantly increased after CSD both spontaneously on ECG and/or ICD interrogation (355 ± 73 ms pre-CSD vs. 422 ± 94 ms post-CSD, p = .001) and intraprocedurally (406 ± 86 ms pre-CSD vs. 457 ± 88 ms post-CSD, p = .03). Two patients had polymorphic and 14 had monomorphic VT (MMVT) pre-CSD, and all patients had MMVT post-CSD. The proportion of mappable, hemodynamically stable VTs increased from 35% during pre-CSD RFA to 58% during post-CSD RFA (p = .038). At median follow-up of 413 days (IQR = 43-1840) after RFA, eight patients had no further VT., Conclusion: RFA for recurrent MMVT post-CSD is a reasonable treatment option with intermediate-term clinical success in 50% of patients. Clinical VT cycle length was significantly increased after CSD with associated improvement in mappable, hemodynamically tolerated VT during RFA., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Autonomic modulation is finding an increasing role in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Renal denervation (RDN) has been described as a treatment modality for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) in case series., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RDN as an adjunctive therapy to cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) for ablation refractory VT., Methods: Patients who underwent RDN after radiofrequency ablation and CSD procedures at our center from 2012 to 2019 were evaluated., Results: Ten patients underwent RDN after CSD (9 bilateral and 1 left-sided only) with a median follow-up of 23 months. The mean age was 59.9 ± 10.4 years, and 9/10 (90%) were men. All had cardiomyopathy with a mean ejection fraction of 33% ± 11% (20% ischemic). Four (40%) underwent CSD during the same hospitalization as that for RDN. Patients who underwent RDN as adjunctive therapy to CSD had a decrease in all implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies (shocks + antitachycardia pacing [ATP]) from 29.5 ± 25.2 to 7.1 ± 10.1 comparing 6 months pre-RDN to 6 months post-RDN (P = .028). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks were significantly decreased from 7.0 ± 6.1 to 1.7 ± 2.5 comparing 6 months pre-RDN to 6 months post-RDN (P = .026). This benefit was driven by a decrease in therapies for 6 patients who had a staged procedure, not performed during the same hospitalization (28.5 ± 24.3 to 1.0 ± 1.2; P = .043)., Conclusion: RDN demonstrates the potential benefit when VT recurs after radiofrequency ablation and CSD. The benefit is seen in patients who undergo a staged procedure. The need for acute RDN after CSD portends a poor prognosis., (Copyright © 2019 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is limited experience of surgical epicardial access in the contemporary era of ventricular tachycardia ablation after cardiac surgery., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe our institutional experience with surgical epicardial access and the influence of surgical approach and compare outcomes with those of a propensity-matched percutaneous epicardial access control group., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation cases from a single center. Surgical cases were propensity-matched to percutaneous epicardial ablation controls and short-term and long-term outcomes were compared., Results: Between 2004 and 2016, 38 patients underwent 40 surgical epicardial access procedures (subxiphoid, n = 22; thoracotomy, n = 18). The commonest indication was prior coronary artery bypass grafting (45%), valve surgery (22%), or ventricular assist device (VAD) (10%). The mean procedure time was 444 minutes (standard deviation, 107 minutes). Mapped epicardial geometry area was 149 cm 2 (interquartile range 182 cm 2 ), which comprised 36% of the mapped epicardial geometric area of a percutaneous control group. Subxiphoid access gave preferential access to the inferior and inferolateral left ventricular segments and was less frequently able to access the anterior, anterolateral, and apical segments compared with a thoracotomy approach. When compared with results from a propensity-matched percutaneous-access group, short-term outcomes, complication rates, and 1-year survival free from a combined end point of VT recurrence, death, or transplantation were not statistically different., Conclusions: Surgical epicardial access after cardiac surgery for ablation of VT in patients with careful preprocedure evaluation can be performed with acceptable safety with no statistical difference in long-term outcomes compared with a propensity-matched percutaneous epicardial cohort. The region of left ventricular epicardium that can be mapped is limited compared with that of percutaneous cases and is determined by the surgical approach., (Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pericardial adhesions can prevent epicardial access and restrict catheter movement during mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The incidence of adhesions in patients without prior cardiac surgery or clinically evident pericarditis is not known., Objective: To describe the incidence of pericardial adhesions and explore their impact in patients without prior cardiac surgery or pericarditis., Methods: A retrospective search of our ablation database containing patients who underwent epicardial ablation for VT was undertaken. Adhesions were diagnosed with routine contrast pericardiography after pericardial entry. Demographics and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with and without adhesions., Results: Between 2004 and 2016, successful epicardial entry was achieved in 188 of 192 attempts (98%). In 155 first-time epicardial access attempts, pericardial adhesions were diagnosed in 13 (8%). When comparing baseline demographics, there was no significant difference. However, adhesions tended to occur more frequently with severe renal impairment (2% of patients without adhesions vs 15% of patients with adhesions, P = .07). No patient with a structurally normal heart had adhesions present. Adhesions were associated with limited epicardial mapping (3% of patients without adhesions vs 85% of patients with adhesions, P < .001) and lower short-term procedural success (68% of patients without adhesions vs 46% of patients with adhesions, P = .02), but complication rates were similar. The presence of adhesions did not translate into lower VT-free survival (P = .64) or freedom from a combined end point of VT recurrence, death, or transplant at 1 year (P = .93)., Conclusion: Adhesions may be unexpectedly encountered in patients without prior cardiac surgery or pericarditis. When present, they can limit mapping and may be associated with lower short-term success. Larger studies are required to determine their impact on long-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Novel therapies aimed at modulating the autonomic nervous system, including thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), have been shown in small case series to be beneficial in treating medically refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm. However, it is not clear when these options should be considered. We reviewed a multicenter experience with TEA in the management of VT storm to determine its optimal therapeutic use., Methods and Results: Data for 11 patients in whom TEA was instituted for VT storm between July 2005 and March 2016 were reviewed to determine the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and role in management. The clinical presentation was incessant VT in 7 (64%), with polymorphic VT in 3 (27%) and monomorphic VT in 8 (73%). The underlying conditions were nonischemic cardiomyopathy in 5 (45%), ischemic cardiomyopathy in 3 (27%), and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Brugada syndrome, and cardiac lipoma in 1 (9%) each. Five (45%) had a complete and 1 (9%) had a partial response to TEA; 4 of the complete responders had incessant VT. All 4 patients with a documented response to deep sedation demonstrated a complete response to TEA., Conclusions: More than half of the patients with VT storm in our series responded to TEA. TEA may be effective and should be considered as a therapeutic option in patients with VT storm, especially incessant VT, who are refractory to initial management. Improvement in VT burden with deep sedation may suggest that sympathoexcitation plays a key role in perpetuating VT and predict a positive response to TEA., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Introduction: The safety of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with laminated left ventricular (LV) thrombus has not been examined., Methods: Patients with laminated LV thrombus on transthoracic echocardiogram who underwent scar-mediated VT ablation at two centers from 2010 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had failed medical therapy. Acute procedural outcomes, complications, and clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed., Results: Eight patients (four ischemic, four nonischemic cardiomyopathy) underwent VT ablation in the presence of laminated intracavitary thrombus. Six out of eight (75%) had electrical storm (ES). The mapping and ablation approach was LV endocardial-only in three patients, epicardial-only in two, combined epicardial-RV endocardial in two, and combined epicardial-LV endocardial in one. Major complication (ischemic stroke) occurred in one patient 9 days post-procedure. There was no procedural mortality. Complete acute procedural success (noninducibility of any VT after ablation) was achieved in five (63%), and partial success (ablation of only clinical VT) in an additional three (37%). At 1 year, freedom from VT and survival were achieved in six (75%) and seven (88%) patients, respectively., Conclusion: Initial data suggest that ablation of VT in the presence of intracavitary thrombus is feasible, is associated with a similar success rate to historical studies in patients without thrombus, and has an acceptable risk of complications given the high-risk nature of patients with ES. Further data are needed; however, the presence of a laminated thrombus should not necessarily preclude ablation in patients who have failed medical therapy for VT in whom ablation is otherwise indicated., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: It is not known whether the most delayed late potentials are functionally most specific for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits., Methods and Results: Isochronal late activation maps were constructed to display ventricular activation during sinus rhythm over 8 isochrones. Analysis was performed at successful VT termination sites and prospectively tested. Thirty-three patients with 47 scar-related VTs where a critical site was demonstrated by termination of VT during ablation were retrospectively analyzed. In those who underwent mapping of multiple surfaces, 90% of critical sites were on the surface that contained the latest late potential. However, only 11% of critical sites were localized to the latest isochrone (87.5%-100%) of ventricular activation. The median percentage of latest activation at critical sites was 78% at a distance from the latest isochrone of 18 mm. Sites critical to reentry were harbored in regions with slow conduction velocity, where 3 isochrones were present within a 1-cm radius. Ten consecutive patients underwent ablation prospectively guided by isochronal late activation maps, targeting concentric isochrones outside of the latest isochrone. Elimination of the targeted VT was achieved in 90%. Termination of VT was achieved in 6 patients at a mean ventricular activation percentage of 78%, with only 1 requiring ablation in the latest isochrone., Conclusions: Late potentials identified in the latest isochrone of activation during sinus rhythm are infrequently correlated with successful ablation sites for VT. The targeting of slow conduction regions propagating into the latest zone of activation may be a novel and promising strategy for substrate modification., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Ablation has become an important option for treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The influence of procedure duration on outcomes remains unexamined., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of procedure duration on outcomes and complications over an 8-year period, Methods: Patients referred for scar-mediated VT ablation from 2004 to 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Procedure duration was defined as the time from the insertion of catheters through the femoral vein to the time of their withdrawal. Procedure duration was analyzed in relationship with baseline and intraoperative covariates, acute procedural outcomes, complications, and 6-month clinical outcomes., Results: One hundred forty-eight patients underwent VT ablation with mean procedure duration of 5.7 ± 1.8 hours. VT recurrence and survival at 6 months were 46% and 82%, respectively, and were not associated with procedure duration. Hospital mortality increased with intraoperative intraaortic balloon pump insertion (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 13.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.35-79.94, P = .004) and was improved with successful ablation of the clinical VT as a procedural end-point (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% Cl 0.03-0.54, P = .005). The association between procedure duration and hospital mortality remained after adjusting for significant baseline variables (adjusted OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.14-2.68, P = .0098) and intraoperative variables (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.12-2.29, P = .0104)., Conclusion: Hospital mortality was significantly increased by unsuccessful clinical VT ablation as a procedural end-point and intraoperative intraaortic balloon pump insertion. However, after adjusting for significant baseline and intraoperative covariates, procedure duration still was associated with increased hospital mortality. Procedure duration had no impact on VT recurrence and survival at 6 months., (Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Epicardial mapping and ablation is increasingly being performed for the treatment of complex arrhythmias. Right ventricular (RV) puncture remains the most common complication, with damage to surrounding non-cardiac structures also a concern. We describe the standard techniques used in our lab essential for safe epicardial access, as well as a novel technique incorporating electroanatomic mapping (EAM) guidance. In a series of 8 patients referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation, an RV endocardial voltage map was created using EAM systems. EAM images were fused with preprocedure CT scans when available. A 17G Tuohy needle was integrated with the EAM system by attaching the needle to sterile electrode clamps. EAM location points were used in conjunction with standard access techniques until epicardial access was obtained. Epicardial access was successfully obtained in 8/8 (100%) patients. Successful access without RV puncture was achieved in 7/8 (88%) cases. This proof of concept study demonstrates that EAM systems can be used as an adjunct to standard access techniques to visualize and facilitate pericardial access., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

We review the pharmacologic, interventional and device programming treatment options for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators who present with acute heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Unlabelled: Ultra High-Density Multipolar Mapping With Double Ventricular Access. , Background: Analogous to the use of circular loop catheters to guide ablation around the pulmonary veins, it may be advantageous to use a multipolar catheter in the ventricle for rapid mapping and to guide ablation. We describe a technique using double access into the left ventricle for multipolar electroanatomic mapping and ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia (VT)., Methods: Double access into the left ventricle was obtained via transseptal technique. Endocardial mapping was performed via the first transseptal sheath using a steerable duodecapolar catheter. Higher density mapping was performed in areas of dense scar (<0.5 mV) and border zone (0.5-1.5 mV). All late potentials (LPs) observed on the 20 poles were tagged and pacemapping was performed at these sites for comparison with the clinical or induced VT 12-lead template. If VT was hemodynamically tolerated, entrainment mapping was attempted at sites demonstrating diastolic activity. Ablation was performed through the second transseptal sheath with an open-irrigated catheter at target sites identified by LPs, pacemapping, and/or entrainment on the duodecapolar catheter., Results: Seventeen patients (88% ischemic cardiomyopathy) underwent electroanatomic mapping and ablation with double transseptal access. The mean number of endocardial mapping points was 819 ± 357 with an average mapping time of 31 ± 7 minutes. The mean number of VTs induced was 2.8 ± 1.6, mean cycle length 418 ms ± 101. LPs were seen in all patients during endocardial mapping with the duodecapolar catheter. Good (56%) and perfect (44%) pacemaps were seen in all patients when performed. Concealed entrainment, guided by the earliest diastolic activity seen on the duodecapolar catheter, was demonstrated in 4 patients (24%). Acute success was achieved in 94% of patients with complete success in 47% and partial success in 47%. The intermediate success rate (free of VT recurrence) was 69%, with an average follow-up of 8 ± 3 months., Conclusion: Mapping and ablation of scar-mediated VT using a multipolar catheter results in ultra high-density delineation of the left ventricular substrate. A novel double ventricular access strategy has the potential to facilitate identification of LPs, pacemapping, and entrainment mapping., (© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Prior chest surgery limits the ability to obtain epicardial access in patients referred for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT)., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the utility of different surgical approaches to access the epicardium for VT ablation., Methods: Clinical data of 14 patients with drug-refractory VT who underwent hybrid surgical epicardial access for catheter mapping and ablation in the electrophysiology lab were reviewed. Baseline patient and procedural characteristics including access, exposure, mapping techniques, and ablation were analyzed., Results: Of a total of 14 patients (age 63.2 ± 10.3 years), 11 had a subxiphoid window performed, and three patients underwent limited anterior thoracotomy to access the epicardium. The indication for surgical access was prior cardiac surgery (n = 12), previous failed epicardial access (n = 1), and ablation in close proximity to the coronary arteries and phrenic nerve (n = 1). Mapping in patients with subxiphoid surgical access was limited to the inferior and diaphragmatic surface of the heart extending posteriorly to the basal lateral wall. With limited anterior thoracotomy, access to the apex, anterior, and mid to apical anterolateral walls was obtained. In these regions, adhesions were more severe and repeat entry into the epicardial region at a different intercostal level was needed in two of three patients., Conclusion: Surgical access with subxiphoid window and limited anterior thoracotomy in the electrophysiology lab is feasible and safe. The surgical approach can be tailored to the region of interest in the ventricle to be mapped and ablated., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Reducing sympathetic output to the heart from the neuraxis can protect against ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) in the management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structural heart disease., Methods and Results: Clinical data of 14 patients (25 to 75 years old, mean+/-SD of 54.2+/-16.6 years; 13 men) who underwent TEA, LCSD, or both to control ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medical therapy and catheter ablation were reviewed. Twelve patients were in VT storm, and 2 experienced recurrent VT despite maximal medical therapy and catheter ablation procedures. The total number of therapies per patient before either procedure ranged from 5 to 202 (median of 24; 25th and 75th percentile, 5 and 56). Eight patients underwent TEA, and 9 underwent LCSD (3 patients had both procedures). No major procedural complications occurred. After initiation of TEA, 6 patients had a large (> or =80%) decrease in VT burden. After LCSD, 3 patients had no further VT, 2 had recurrent VT that either resolved within 24 hours or responded to catheter ablation, and 4 continued to have recurrent VT. Nine of 14 patients survived to hospital discharge (2 TEA alone, 3 TEA/LCSD combined, and 4 LCSD alone), 1 of the TEA alone patients underwent an urgent cardiac transplantation., Conclusions: Initiation of TEA and LCSD in patients with refractory VT was associated with a subsequent decrease in arrhythmia burden in 6 (75%) of 8 patients (68% confidence interval 51% to 91%) and 5 (56%) of 9 patients (68% confidence interval 34% to 75%), respectively. These data suggest that TEA and LCSD may be effective additions to the management of refractory ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease when other treatment modalities have failed or may serve as a bridge to more definitive therapy.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics and prevalence of late potentials (LP) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) etiologies and evaluate their value as targets for catheter ablation., Background: LP are frequently found in post-myocardial infarction scars and are useful ablation targets. The relative prevalence and characteristics of LP in patients with NICM is not well understood., Methods: Thirty-three patients with structural heart disease (NICM, n = 16; ICM, n = 17) referred for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia were studied. Electroanatomic mapping was performed endocardially (n = 33) and epicardially (n = 19). The LP were defined as low voltage electrograms (<1.5 mV) with onset after the QRS interval. Very late potentials (vLP) were defined as electrograms with onset >100 ms after the QRS., Results: We sampled an average of 564 +/- 449 points and 726 +/- 483 points in the left ventricle endocardium and epicardium, respectively. Mean total low voltage area in patients with ICM was 101 +/- 55 cm(2) and 56 +/- 33 cm(2), endocardial and epicardial, respectively, compared with NICM of 55 +/- 41 cm(2) and 53 +/- 28 cm(2), respectively. Within the total low voltage area, vLP were observed more frequently in ICM than in NICM in endocardium (4.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.0003) and epicardium (4.3% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.035). An LP-targeted ablation strategy was effective in ICM patients (82% nonrecurrence at 12 +/- 10 months of follow-up), whereas NICM patients had less favorable outcomes (50% at 15 +/- 13 months of follow-up)., Conclusions: The contribution of scar to the electrophysiological abnormalities targeted for ablation of unstable ventricular tachycardia differs between ICM and NICM. An approach incorporating LP ablation and pace-mapping had limited success in patients with NICM compared with ICM, and alternative ablation strategies should be considered., (Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Percutaneous pericardial access, epicardial mapping, and ablation have been used successfully for catheter ablation procedures., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of closed-chest direct epicardial ultrasound imaging for aiding cardiac catheter ablation procedures., Methods: An intracardiac ultrasound catheter was used for closed-chest epicardial imaging of the heart in 10 patients undergoing percutaneous epicardial access for catheter ablation. All patients underwent concomitant intracardiac echocardiography and preprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. Using a double-wire technique, two sheaths were placed in the pericardium, and a phased-array ultrasound catheter was manipulated within the pericardial sinuses for imaging., Results: Multiple images from varying angles were obtained for catheter navigation. Notably, image stability was excellent, and structures such as the left atrial appendage were seen in great detail. No complications resulting from use of the ultrasound catheter in the pericardium occurred, and no restriction of movement due to the presence of the additional catheter in the pericardial space was observed. Wall motion was correlated to voltage maps in five patients and showed that areas of scars correlated with wall-motion abnormalities. Normal wall-motion score correlated to sensed signals of 4.2 +/- 0.3 mV (normal myocardium >1.5 mV), and scores >1 correlated to areas with signals <0.5 mV in that territory)., Conclusion: Intrapericardial imaging using an ultrasound catheter is feasible and safe and has the potential to provide additional valuable information for complex ablation procedures.

Introduction: Thermal damage to coronary arteries during catheter ablation has been previously reported. Coronary artery damage during LV outflow tract ventricular tachycardia is well recognized. However, the relationship of the coronary arteries to the RV outflow tract during catheter ablation has not been delineated. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between the RV outflow tract and the coronary arteries utilizing arteriography, echocardiography, CT angiography, and gross anatomic pathology., Methods: The relationship of the coronaries to the RV outflow tract was analyzed in three patients groups: Group 1: patients (n = 10) undergoing RV outflow tract ventricular tachycardia; Group 2: patients (n = 50) undergoing CT coronary angiography; Group 3: patients (n = 4) undergoing echocardiography during open heart surgery and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (n = 5)., Results: Group 1: The left main coronary artery was found to be 3.8 +/- 1.2 mm from the right ventricular outflow tract in patients undergoing ablation. Group 2: The minimum distance between the left main, left anterior descending, and right coronary artery to the RV outflow tract endocardial wall were 4.1 +/- 1.9 mm, 2.0 +/- 0.6 mm, and 4.3 +/- 1.9 mm (average +/- SD) respectively. Group 3: During open heart surgery using echocardiography, the minimum distance between the left main and the right coronary artery to the RV outflow tract were 3.4 +/- 0.35 mm and 2.0 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively. The distance between the let main coronary artery and the RVOT by ICE was 3.8 +/- 0.45 mm., Conclusions: The major coronary arteries lie in close proximity of the RVOT, and their anatomic course should be taken into consideration during ablation of ventricular tachycardias arising from the RV outflow tract.

Failure to detect ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is a rare but serious problem. We report a case of failure to detect an episode of induced ventricular tachycardia by a dual chamber ICD, due to abbreviation of ventricular detection window secondary to programmed pacing parameters and a rate-smoothing algorithm. In this patient, the intradevice interaction was corrected by programming rate-smoothing off. This report highlights the potentially lethal consequences of critical timing relationships among the pacing function, arrhythmia detection, and the characteristics of the arrhythmia when using a modern dual chamber ICD. Physicians responsible for patients with ICDs must be aware of such interactions.