Search

Levels of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were measured in plasma of healthy controls (HC, n = 30) and patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, n = 123), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA, n = 61), Takayasu's arteritis (TAK, n = 58), and giant cell arteritis (GCA, n = 68), at times of remission or activity and correlated with levels of the platelet-derived thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1). Levels of NETs were elevated during active disease in patients with GPA (p < 0.0001), MPA (p = 0.0038), TAK (p < 0.0001), and GCA (p < 0.0001), and in remission for GPA, p < 0.0001, MPA, p = 0.005, TAK, p = 0.03, and GCA, p = 0.0009. All cohorts demonstrated impaired NET degradation. Patients with GPA (p = 0.0045) and MPA (p = 0.005) had anti-NET IgG antibodies. Patients with TAK had anti-histone antibodies (p < 0.01), correlating with presence of NETs. Levels of TSP-1 were increased in all patients with vasculitis, and associated with NET formation. NET formation is a common process in vasculitides. Targeting NET formation or degradation could be potential therapeutic approaches for vasculitides., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Michailidou received Advisory Board fees from ChemoCentryx. Dr. Khalidi received clinical trial support from BMS, Sanofi and Abbvie, travel support from Astra Zeneca, and Advisory Board fee from Roche. Dr. Koening served on the advisory board for Chemocentryx and Genentech. Dr. Specks reports receiving funds for the following activities: Consulting: AstraZeneca, ChemoCentryx. Research Support: AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, InflaRx. Dr. Sreih works at Bristol-Myers Squibb and owns Astra Zeneca and Alexion Stocks. Dr. Warrington received clinical trial support from Eli Lilly and Kiniksa. Dr. Monach received consulting fees from Kiniksa, Celgene/BMC, and ChemoCentryx. Dr. Merkel reports receiving funds for the following activities: Consulting and Research Support: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Takeda. Consulting only: CSL Behring, Dynacure, EMDSerono, Janssen, Kiniksa, Kyverna, Magenta, MiroBio, Neutrolis, Novartis, Pfizer, Sparrow, Talaris. Royalties: UpToDate. Dr. Lood received research funding from Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Redd Pharma, Amytryx, and Eli Lilly., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies have provided evidence of a close link between specific microbiota and inflammatory disorders. While the vessel wall microbiota has been recently described in large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and controls, the blood microbiome in these diseases has not been previously reported (LVV). We aimed to analyse the blood microbiome profile of LVV patients (Takayasu's arteritis [TAK], giant cell arteritis [GCA]) and healthy blood donors (HD). We studied the blood samples of 13 patients with TAK (20 samples), 9 patients with GCA (11 samples) and 15 HD patients. We assessed the blood microbiome profile by sequencing the 16S rDNA blood bacterial DNA. We used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with linear discriminant effect size measurement (LEfSe) to investigate the differences in the blood microbiome profile between TAK and GCA patients. An increase in the levels of Clostridia, Cytophagia and Deltaproteobacteria and a decrease in Bacilli at the class level were found in TAK patients compared with HD patients (LDA > 2, p < 0.05). Active TAK patients had significantly lower levels of Staphylococcus compared with inactive TAK patients. Samples of GCA patients had an increased abundance of Rhodococcus and an unidentified member of the Cytophagaceae family. Microbiota of TAK compared with GCA patients was found to show higher levels of Candidatus Aquiluna and Cloacibacterium (LDA > 2; p < 0.05). Differences highlighted in the blood microbiome were also associated with a shift of bacterial predicted metabolic functions in TAK in comparison with HD. Similar results were also found in patients with active versus inactive TAK. In conclusion, patients with TAK were found to present a specific blood microbiome profile in comparison with healthy donors and GCA subjects. Significant changes in the blood microbiome profiles of TAK patients were associated with specific metabolic functions.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a granulomatous systemic vasculitis of large- and medium-sized arteries that affects the elderly. In recent years, advances in diagnostic imaging have revealed a greater degree of large vessel involvement than previously recognized, distinguishing classical cranial- from large vessel (LV)- GCA. GCA often co-occurs with the poorly understood inflammatory arthritis/bursitis condition polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and has overlapping features with other non-infectious granulomatous vasculitides that affect the aorta, namely Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) and the more recently described clinically isolated aortitis (CIA). Here, we review the literature focused on the immunopathology of GCA on the background of the three settings in which comparisons are informative: LV and cranial variants of GCA; PMR and GCA; the three granulomatous vasculitides (GCA, TAK, and CIA). We discuss overlapping and unique features between these conditions across clinical presentation, epidemiology, imaging, and conventional histology. We propose a model of GCA where abnormally activated circulating cells, especially monocytes and CD4 + T cells, enter arteries after an unknown stimulus and cooperate to destroy it and review the evidence for how this mechanistically occurs in active disease and improves with treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Robinette, Rao and Monach.)

Objectives: To analyse the current evidence for the management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) to inform the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations., Methods: Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) dealing with diagnosis/monitoring and treatment strategies for LVV, respectively, were performed. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 31 December 2017. Evidence on imaging was excluded as recently published in dedicated EULAR recommendations. This paper focuses on the data relevant to giant cell arteritis (GCA)., Results: We identified 287 eligible articles (122 studies focused on diagnosis/monitoring, 165 on treatment). The implementation of a fast-track approach to diagnosis significantly lowers the risk of permanent visual loss compared with historical cohorts (level of evidence, LoE 2b). Reliable diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for GCA are still not available (LoE 3b).The SLR confirms the efficacy of prompt initiation of glucocorticoids (GC). There is no high-quality evidence on the most appropriate starting dose, route of administration, tapering and duration of GC (LoE 4). Patients with GCA are at increased risk of dose-dependent GC-related adverse events (LoE 3b). The addition of methotrexate or tocilizumab reduces relapse rates and GC requirements (LoE 1b). There is no consistent evidence that initiating antiplatelet agents at diagnosis would prevent future ischaemic events (LoE 2a). There is little evidence to guide monitoring of patients with GCA., Conclusions: Results from two SLRs identified novel evidence on the management of GCA to guide the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations on the management of LVV., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis are autoimmune vasculitides that cause aneurysm formation and tissue infarction. Extravascular inflammation consists of an intense acute phase response. Deeper understanding of pathogenic events in the vessel wall has highlighted the loss of tissue protective mechanisms, the intrusion of immune cells into "forbidden territory", and the autonomy of self-renewing vasculitic infiltrates. Adventitial vasa vasora critically control vessel wall access and drive differentiation of tissue-invasive T cells. Selected T cells establish tissue residency and build autonomous, self-sufficient inflammatory lesions. Pathogenic effector T cells intrude and survive due to failed immune checkpoint inhibition. Vasculitis-sustaining T cells and macrophages provide a broad portfolio of effector functions, involving heterogeneous populations of pro-inflammatory T cells and diverse macrophage subsets that ultimately induce wall capillarization and intimal hyperplasia. Redirecting diagnostic and therapeutic strategies from control of extravascular inflammatory markers to suppression of vascular inflammation will improve disease management., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

A lack of absolute correlation between systemic inflammation parameters and ongoing vascular disease activity is an important problem in some patients with large vessel vasculitis, especially Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Systemic and vascular wall inflammation in TAK are obviously interrelated, but sometimes they may act independently. There are clear discrepancies between these two types of inflammation, including cytokine patterns and responses to treatment. Vascular and systemic inflammation may also be discordant in two subgroups of giant cell arteritis. The first subgroup is mainly characterized by severe systemic inflammation mostly associated with IL-6-driven immunity, while in the second subgroup there is less systemic inflammation but prominent neuro-ophthalmic ischaemic complications characterized mostly by IFN-γ-mediated effects. Although no definite boundaries exist, it may be suggested that the IL-6/Th17/IL-17 pathway primarily drives systemic inflammation while the IL-12/Th1/IFN-γ pathway dominates in vascular wall inflammation both in TAK and giant cell arteritis. Immunosuppressive treatment of TAK (especially corticosteroids) initially suppresses systemic inflammation, while longer treatment duration is required for the suppression of vascular inflammation. Therefore, evaluating only the systemic inflammation may be misleading. Vascular wall inflammation is currently evaluated using expensive imaging methods, which are not feasible for repetitive use. Although pentraxin-3 is superior to erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP, we need more reliable biomarkers to reflect vascular wall inflammation in patients with TAK.