Search

Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT) measured by the handheld lipid layer examination instrument., Methods: 108 patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study and divided into two groups: patients with dry eye (n = 57) categorized by the presence of dry eye symptoms obtained by Schein Questionnaire and minimally-one objective dry eye sign (tear film break-up time <10 s or corneal, conjunctival and lid margin fluorescein staining), and healthy subjects (n = 51)., Results: Dry eye subjects had significantly shorter NIBUT than healthy subjects (6 s vs 20 s, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that shorter NIBUT values were excellent indicators of dry eye disease (p < 0.001), with consistency and no significant difference between measurements, even after standardizing the results for age and sex. NIBUT cut-off point to distinguish dry eye from healthy subjects was 12 s (sensitivity 90.2 %, specificity 88.5 %, PPV 92.5 %, NPV 85.2 %, LR +7.82, LR- 0.11, DOR 70.92, DE 89.6 %). Good, but lower accuracy was observed at cut-off value of 10 s (sensitivity 87.8 %, specificity 88.5 %, PPV 92.3 %, NPV 82.1 %, LR+ 7.61, LR- 0.14, DOR 55.2, DE 88.1 %). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.944 classified NIBUT as a diagnostic test with very high accuracy., Conclusion: This study showed a high diagnostic accuracy of NIBUT measured by the handheld lipid layer examination instrument. This simple, reliable, objective and available instrument might regularly take place in routine, standard dry eye diagnostic and can be used by almost every eye specialist., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose : To determine the feasibility of non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using the Handheld tear lipid layer thickness assessment instrument and compare it with the standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test and other dry eye tests. Subjects and methods : 108 subjects were enrolled, 56 with and 52 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to determine the severity of dry eye symptoms. Ocular signs were assessed by NIBUT, TBUT, lipid layer thickness (LLT), lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF), conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal staining. Results : Median NIBUT and TBUT, and other clinical test values significantly differed among the dry eye symptoms group and control group. NIBUT yielded the most significant difference between the groups (NIBUT: 7 sec vs. 17.5 sec, p < .001, Z = 5.94; TBUT: 5 sec vs. 10 sec, p < .001, Z = 4.38; LLT: p = .007; LIPCOF: p < .001, conjunctival hyperemia: p < .047, corneal staining: p < .010). Spearman's test showed a significant correlation between NIBUT and TBUT ( p < .001), NIBUT and LLT ( p = .001), NIBUT and LIPCOF ( p = .019), NIBUT and conjunctival hyperemia ( p = .002), and NIBUT and corneal staining ( p = .012) in the dry eye symptoms group. NIBUT did not significantly differ among the three measurements in both groups of patients ( p = .061, p = .096), while TBUT values did in the control group ( p < .001). Short NIBUT values were the main predictors and indicators of dry eye complaints (AOR = 0.87, p < .001), superior to TBUT (AOR = 0.88, p = .008) and other tests even after adjustment for age and gender. Conclusion : NIBUT measured by Handheld instrument is a simple, accessible, practical, and, most of all, reproducible and objective method that might allow NIBUT assessment on a regular basis.

The aim was to determine feasibility and reliability of noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument, and to compare it with standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test. Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 with and 19 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to assess dry eye symptoms. During examination, three NIBUT measurements were performed on each eye using handheld instrument, followed by three TBUT measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity and logistic regression analysis were generated. Median NIBUT values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group than in control group in all three measurements (9, 8 and 8 s vs . 21, 22 and 21 s; p<0.001). TBUT values showed no significant difference between the groups in the first measurement (p=0.053), but the values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group in second and third measurements (p=0.020). The cutoff value to distinguish patients with symptoms of dry eye from control group was 12 seconds for NIBUT and 8 seconds for TBUT, with NIBUT having significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive predictive value. NIBUT, measured by handheld lipid layer examination instrument, was superior to TBUT in detecting dry eye.

Aim of the study is to determine connection between pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome and symptoms and signs of ocular surface disease. Tear film break-up time test, Schirmer II test and assessment of lid parallel conjunctival folds were performed in 40 PEX syndrome patients and 40 controls. All data was statistically analyzed. Results show statistically significant difference in every component between groups, most prominent in tear film break up time test. We have concluded that patients with PEX syndrome have higher predisposition of tear function disorders and that both components of dry eye syndrome are present in PEX syndrome.