Search

Background: Liver stiffness determined by transient elastography is correlated with hepatic fibrosis stage and has high accuracy for detecting severe fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. We evaluated the clinical value of baseline FibroScan values for the prediction of safety and efficacy of telaprevir-based therapy in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in the telaprevir Early Access Program HEP3002. Methods: 1,772 patients with HCV-1 and bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis were treated with telaprevir plus pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin (PR) for 12 weeks followed by PR alone, the total treatment duration depending on virological response and previous response type. Liver fibrosis stage was determined either by liver biopsy or by non-invasive markers. 1,282 patients (72%) had disease stage assessed by FibroScan; among those 46% were classified as Metavir F3 at baseline and 54% as F4. Results: Overall, 1,139 patients (64%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) by intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline FibroScan values were tested for association with SVR and the occurrence of adverse events. By univariate analysis, higher baseline FibroScan values were predictive of lower sustained virological response rates and treatment-related anemia. By multivariate analysis, FibroScan was no longer statistically significant as an independent predictor, but higher FibroScan values were correlated with the occurrence of infections and serious adverse events. Conclusions: FibroScan has a limited utility as a predictor of safety and efficacy in patients treated with telaprevir-based triple therapy. Nevertheless it can be used in association with other clinical and biological parameters to help determine patients who will benefit from the triple regiments. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims Predictors of response to treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin are well established. In these post-hoc analyses of the REALIZE study, we sought to identify predictors of response for telaprevir-based triple therapy. Methods Patients from the REALIZE study with baseline data for all predictors evaluated (including baseline disease characteristics and demographics, prior treatment response and baseline laboratory assessments) were included in the post-hoc analyses ( n = 465). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate factors predicting treatment outcomes. Results Sustained viral response ( SVR) rates were 86% in prior relapsers, 63% in prior partial responders and 32% in prior null-responders. In the final multivariate analysis, baseline factors predicting SVR were prior response to treatment [Odds ratio ( OR) = 2.80; 95% confidence interval ( CI), 2.13-3.69], low-density lipoprotein ( LDL) (≥2.6 mmol/L) ( OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.52-2.93), HCV genotype ( OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.93), and maximum alanine amino transferase and aspartate amino transferase ( OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97). Conclusions Prior response to peginterferon plus ribavirin treatment and LDL levels are the main independent predictive markers of response with telaprevir-based triple therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims There is little information regarding the extent to which difficult to cure patients with advanced liver fibrosis, due to hepatitis C virus genotype-1 (HCV-1) can successfully and safely be treated with triple therapy with telaprevir (TVR), pegylated interferon alpha (P) and ribavirin (R). In the TVR early access program HEP3002 we aimed to explore treatment safety and efficacy, and identify predictors of sustained virological response at week 24 (SVR24). Methods 1078 patients with bridging fibrosis (n = 552) or cirrhosis (n = 526) diagnosed by either liver biopsy or non-invasive markers, with compensated bone marrow (neutrophils >1500/mm 3 , Hb >12/13 g/dl) and liver function (Albumin >3.3 g/dl, Platelets >90,000/ml) received TVR PR for 12 weeks, followed by a PR tail according to label. Results Overall, 614 (57%) achieved SVR24 by intention-to-treat analysis. The SVR24 rate was 68% in 221 treatment naïve patients (62.8% F4), 72% in 356 prior relapsers (64.4% F4), 55% in 139 partial responders (53.2% F4), and 34% in 294 null responders (28.6% F4). The SVR24 rate to response-guided therapy (24 weeks treatment duration if undetectable viremia at weeks 4 and 12) was 84% in 222 naïve/relapser F3 patients. Independent predictors of response were: (A) F3 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% CI 1.31–2.00, p = 0.005), (B) subtype 1b (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.18–2.24, p = 0.0029), (C) alpha-fetoprotein <10 ng/ml (OR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.87–3.36, p <0.0001) and (D) any prior response other than null (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 2.40–4.52, p <0.0001). SVR24 rose for patients who had more of these predictive factors: 6/32 (19%) for none, 38/139 (27%) for 1, 129/260 (50%) for 2, 202/329 (61%) for 3, and 194/235 (83%) for 4 factors. Grade 2–4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) were experienced by 719 (67%) patients; 169 (16%) discontinued therapy for AE and 7 (0.6%) died during the PR tail. Conclusions Naïve and experienced patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis due to HCV-1 who have compensated bone marrow and liver function, can effectively and safely be treated by TVR triple therapy. Baseline predictors of outcome have been identified to optimize pre-treatment counselling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: For hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who have not responded to previous PegIFN/ribavirin treatment, it is unclear whether subsequent direct-acting antiviral therapy outcomes are better predicted by prior treatment response or by on-treatment response to a PegIFN/ribavirin lead-in. Methods: In REALIZE, treatment-experienced patients randomized to the lead-in telaprevir arm received 4weeks of PegIFN-α-2a (180μg/week) and ribavirin (1000–1200mg/day), then 12weeks of telaprevir (750mg every 8h) plus PegIFN-α-2a/ribavirin, followed by 32weeks of PegIFN-α-2a/ribavirin. This subanalysis only included patients in the lead-in telaprevir arm with available week 4 on-treatment response data (n =240). Results: After 4weeks of PegIFN/ribavirin, 90% of relapsers, 60% of partial responders, and 41% of null responders in the lead-in telaprevir arm had ⩾1log10 HCV RNA reduction. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates for telaprevir-treated patients with ⩾1 versus <1log10 HCV RNA reduction after the PegIFN/ribavirin lead-in were 94% versus 62% in relapsers, 59% versus 56% in partial responders and 54% versus 15% in null responders. Conclusions: In prior relapsers and partial responders there is no apparent benefit of assessing response after a PegIFN/ribavirin lead-in with the aim of guiding telaprevir-based treatment. For patients known to be prior null responders, on-treatment response after a 4-week PegIFN/ribavirin lead-in may provide clinically useful prognostic information. However, withholding telaprevir-containing therapy in uncategorised treatment-experienced patient populations (i.e., that could include prior relapsers or partial responders), using response after a PegIFN/ribavirin lead-in could potentially exclude some patients with a high chance of SVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]