Search

Background/purpose: Use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) improves patient outcomes in preventing mother-to-child transmission (pMTCT) of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) in mothers with chronic HBV and high viral loads. Given the lack of data for tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in pMTCT, rates of early viral suppression with TAF and TDF were evaluated in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) participating in 2 randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 studies in chronic HBV., Methods: In a patient subset meeting WOCBP criteria and with baseline HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL, rates of viral suppression with TAF or TDF in achieving the target of HBV DNA <200,000 IU/mL at weeks 12 and 24 were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of failure to suppress HBV DNA to the target level., Results: In 275 of 1298 (21%) patients meeting WOCBP criteria with high viral load, 93% and 96% had HBV DNA <200,000 IU/mL at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Results for TAF (n = 194) vs TDF (n = 81) treatment were similar at weeks 12 and 24 (94% vs. 90% and 97% vs. 93%), respectively. High baseline HBV DNA level, genotype D infection, and prior interferon (week 24 only) were predictive of failure to achieve the target level. Both treatments were well tolerated with TAF showing less impact on renal and bone parameters., Conclusions: In WOCBP with high VL, no differences were found between TAF and TDF in reducing HBV DNA to levels associated with lower transmission risk. These data support ongoing studies of TAF for pMTCT., Competing Interests: Calvin Pan has received research grants from Gilead Sciences (Gilead) and Merck. He also serves as a consultant or advisor for Gilead, and speakers’ bureau for Gilead, Abbvie, and Intercept. Ting-Tsung Chang and Si Hyun Bae declare no conflicts of interest. Wai Kay Seto serves on the advisory boards of Gilead, Abbvie and CSL Behring, and is a speaker for Gilead, AbbVie and Mylan. Maurizia Brunetto has received research grants from AbbVie, BMS, MSD, has served on advisory Boards for AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen; Roche, and has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Gilead, MSD. Carla S. Coffin has served as an investigator or received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Arbutus Biopharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, has received educational grants from Merck, Gilead, Janssen, has served on advisory boards for Merck, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, has served on Clinical Trial and Publication Committee for Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, and has participated as a primary investigator in clinical trials for Gilead, Spring Bank, Transgene, and Janssen. The following authors are employees of Gilead Sciences and hold stock interest in the company: Susanna Tan, Shuyuan Mo, John Flaherty, and Anuj Gaggar. Mindie H. Nguyen has received research support from Gilead and Pfizer, has served on advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Novartis, Spring Bank, Janssen, Gilead, Eisai, Bayer. Exact Science, and LAM. Mustafa Kemal Çelen has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Alexander Thompson has received research support from Gilead, AbbVie, and Merck, and has served on advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Gilead, AbbVie, Merck, BMS, Eisai. Edward J. Gane has served as a consultant or advisor for Gilead, AbbVie, Roche, Janssen and at speakers’ bureaus for Gilead and AbbVie. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is one of the nucleotide analogs capable of inhibiting the reverse transcriptase (RT) activity of HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV). There is no known HBV resistance to TDF. However, detectable variation in duration of HBV persistence in patients on TDF therapy suggests the existence of genetic mechanisms of on-drug persistence that reduce TDF efficacy for some HBV strains without affording actual resistance. Here, the whole genome of intra-host HBV variants (N = 1,288) was sequenced from patients with rapid (RR, N = 5) and slow response (SR, N = 5) to TDF. Association of HBV genomic and protein polymorphic sites to RR and SR was assessed using phylogenetic analysis and Bayesian network methods. We show that, in difference to resistance to nucleotide analogs, which is mainly associated with few specific mutations in RT, the HBV on-TDF persistence is defined by genetic variations across the entire HBV genome. Analysis of the inferred 3D-structures indicates no difference in affinity of TDF binding by RT encoded by intra-host HBV variants that rapidly decline or persist in presence of TDF. This finding suggests that effectiveness of TDF recognition and binding does not contribute significantly to on-drug persistence. Differences in patterns of genetic associations to TDF response between HBV genotypes B and C and lack of a single pattern of mutations among intra-host variants sensitive to TDF indicate a complex genetic encoding of the trait. We hypothesize that there are many genetic mechanisms of on-drug persistence, which are differentially available to HBV strains. These pervasive mechanisms are insufficient to prevent viral inhibition completely but may contribute significantly to robustness of actual resistance. On-drug persistence may reduce the overall effectiveness of therapy and should be considered for development of more potent drugs.

Background: Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has been associated with renal toxicity or reductions in bone mineral density, or both, in some patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Tenofovir alafenamide is a tenofovir prodrug with high intrahepatic concentrations of active drug and reduced systemic tenofovir exposures compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. In patients with chronic HBV, tenofovir alafenamide has shown efficacy non-inferior to that of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with improved renal and bone safety. With this non-inferiority study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with HBV infection switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate who are virally suppressed., Methods: Patients with chronic HBV infection who had been receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for 48 weeks or more and who had HBV DNA less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for at least 12 weeks were recruited to this randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority study. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg once a day or to continue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once a day. The primary efficacy endpoint was loss of virological control, defined as the proportion of patients who received at least one dose of study drug who had HBV DNA of at least 20 IU/mL at week 48 by the modified US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm. Key safety endpoints were changes in hip and spine bone mineral density, estimated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault, and markers of bone turnover and renal tubular function. The study was powered for non-inferiority in efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with a 4% margin. Investigators and patients were unaware of treatment allocation and on-treatment results. This trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02979613., Findings: Participants in this study were enrolled between Dec 29, 2016, and Oct 20, 2017. 541 patients were screened and 490 patients were randomly assigned to switch to tenofovir alafenamide or to stay on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Two patients assigned to receive tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment; thus the full analysis set for efficacy and safety analyses consisted of 243 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 245 in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group. At week 48, one patient from each treatment group (both <1%) had HBV DNA of at least 20 IU/mL (difference in proportion 0·0%, 95% CI -1·9 to 2·0), thereby showing non-inferior efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Patients who received tenofovir alafenamide had significantly increased bone mineral density at hip (mean change 0·66% [SD 2·08] vs -0·51% [SD 1·91]; difference in least square means 1·17% [95% CI 0·80 to 1·54; p<0·0001]) and at spine (mean change 1·74% [3·46] vs -0·11% [3·13]; difference in least square means 1·85% [1·24 to 2·46; p<0·0001]), creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault relative to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (median change 0·94 mL/min [IQR -4·47 to 6·24] vs -2·74 mL/min [-7·89 to 1·88]; p <0·0001), and improved markers of bone turnover and tubular function at week 48. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (18 [7%] of 243 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 16 [7%] of 245 patients in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group) and nasopharyngitis (13 [5%] of 243 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 12 [5%] of 245 patients in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The incidence of grade 3 and above adverse events and serious adverse events was low and similar between groups. No viral resistance was observed in patients who qualified for viral sequencing., Interpretation: These findings suggest that tenofovir alafenamide can be substituted for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with HBV infection for improved safety without a loss of efficacy., Funding: Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety profiles of TDF treatment for up to 10 years in a well-described cohort of CHB patients., Methods: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and HBeAg-positive patients from two randomised, double-blind trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00117676 and NCT00116805) completed 48 weeks of randomised treatment with TDF or adefovir dipivoxil. A subset of these patients was then eligible to receive open-label TDF treatment for up to 10 years. At Year 10, patients were assessed for virological suppression, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalisation, serological response, safety and tolerability., Results: Of 641 randomised and treated patients, 585 (91%) entered the open-label extension phase with 203 (32%) patients completing Year 10 of the study. At Year 10, 118/118 (100%) of HBeAg-negative patients and 78/80 (98%) of HBeAg-positive patients with available data achieved hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 69 IU/mL, while 88/106 (83%) and 60/77 (78%) patients achieved ALT normalisation, respectively. Of the 23 patients with HBeAg status available at Year 10, 12 (52%) and six (27%) experienced HBeAg loss and seroconversion, respectively. No resistance to TDF was documented up to Year 10. In the period between Year 8 and Year 10, the safety profile of TDF was similar to previous reports, with few patients experiencing renal- or bone-related adverse events., Conclusions: Over 10 years, TDF had a favourable safety profile, was well tolerated, and resulted in continued maintenance of virological suppression with no documented resistance., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: One strategy to treat chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection could be to increase the functions of virus-specific T cells. We performed a multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GS-4774, a yeast-based therapeutic vaccine engineered to express HBV antigens, given with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to untreated patients with chronic HBV infection., Methods: We performed an open-label study at 34 sites in Canada, Italy, New Zealand, Romania, South Korea, and United States from July 2014 to August 2016. Adults who were positive for HB surface antigen (HBsAg) > 6 months and levels of HBV DNA ≥2000 IU/mL who had not received antiviral treatment for HBV within 3 months of screening were randomly assigned (1:2:2:2) to groups given oral TDF 300 mg daily alone (n = 27; controls) or with 2, 10, or 40 yeast units GS-4774 (n = 168), administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks until week 20 for a total of 6 doses. Blood samples were collected and analyzed and patients received regular physical examinations. Efficacy was measured by decrease in HBsAg from baseline to week 24. Specific responses to HBV (production of interferon gamma [IFNG], tumor necrosis factor [TNF], interleukin 2 [IL2], and degranulation) were measured in T cells derived from 12 HBeAg-negative patients with genotype D infections, after overnight or 10 days of stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with peptides from the entire HBV proteome. T-regulatory cells were analyzed for frequency and phenotype. Data from studies of immune cells were compared with data on reductions in HBsAg, HBV DNA, and alanine aminotransferase in blood samples from patients., Results: GS-4774 was safe and well tolerated but did not produce significant decreases in levels of HBsAg. Production of IFNG, TNF, and IL2 increased significantly at weeks 24 and 48, compared with baseline, in HBV-specific CD8+ T cells from patients given GS-4774 but not from controls. GS-4774 had greater effects on CD8+ than CD4+ T cells, which were not affected at all or very weakly by TDF with or without GS-4774. GS-4774 did not affect responses of T cells to other viruses tested. HBV core peptides induced the greatest production of IFNG by T cells following overnight stimulation, whereas HBV envelope antigens did not induce a response. Following 10 days of stimulation, production of IFNG and TNF increased with time of exposure to GS-4774; the greatest levels of responses were to HBV envelope antigens followed by core and polymerase peptides. We observed a correlation in patients given GS-4774 between increased T-cell functions and reductions in numbers of T-regulatory cells., Conclusions: In a phase 2 study of patients with chronic HBV infection given TDF with or without GS-4774, we found that vaccination can increase production of IFNG, TNF, and IL2 by CD8+ T cells exposed to antigenic peptides, with little effect on CD4+ T cells. Although GS-4774 did not reduce levels of HBsAg in patients, its strong immune stimulatory effect on CD8+ T cells might be used in combination with other antiviral agents to boost the antivirus immune response. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02174276., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Effective and well tolerated nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment exists for patients with chronic hepatitis B, although treatment is generally anticipated to be life-long, with concomitant costs and treatment-related side-effects. We aimed to characterise the outcomes of patients with persistent viral suppression who discontinued nucleotide analogue use after extended treatment., Methods: The primary objective of this prespecified analysis was to evaluate the safety of stopping long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in patients enrolled in two (completed) randomised controlled studies, GS-US-174-0102 (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00117676) and GS-US-174-0103 (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00116805). In those studies, patients who had completed 8 years or more of nucleotide analogue treatment, were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA concentration of less than 29 IU/mL, and were unwilling or unable to continue therapy were required by protocol to enter a 24-week treatment-free follow-up (TFFU) phase. We present data for patients in the TFFU phase who were assessed at baseline and monitored every 4 weeks for changes in qualitative serum HBsAg, HBV DNA, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations in addition to standard safety assessments., Findings: Of 124 patients who entered the TFFU phase, 54 (44%) patients did not complete 24 weeks of follow-up (median 12 weeks; IQR 0-20). Overall, 32 (26%) patients reported an adverse event. Serious adverse events occurred in five (4%) patients, including elevated ALT concentrations in two patients, hepatic flare in two patients, and increased lipase in one patient. 38 (31%) of patients had grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormalities, the majority of which were ALT elevations (36 patients). Of the 106 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients who entered the TFFU phase, 63 (59%) were followed for 24 weeks. HBsAg loss was observed in five (5%) of the 106 HBeAg-negative patients who entered the TFFU phase, and 37 (35%) had both HBV DNA concentrations of less than 2000 IU/mL and ALT concentrations less than the ULN at TFFU week 24. 18 HBeAg-positive patients entered the TFFU phase, of whom seven (39%) were followed up for 24 weeks. Of these seven patients, none had HBsAg loss or HBV DNA of less than 2000 IU/mL and one (14%) had an ALT less than the ULN at week 24., Interpretation: Within 24 weeks of stopping 8 years or more of nucleotide analogue therapy almost a third of patients experienced a grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormality. Although few patients achieved HBsAg loss, a subgroup of HBeAg-negative patients can achieve a low-replicative state within a short duration of follow-up., Funding: Gilead Sciences, Inc., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has shown equivalent efficacy and improved safety profiles for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). However, limited data are available for its resistance profiles. In two clinical trials, 1,298 hepatitis E antigen-positive and -negative patients with CHB were randomized 2:1 and treated with TAF ( n = 866) or TDF ( n = 432). Baseline nucleos(t)ide analog resistance substitutions in HBV polymerase/reverse transcriptase (Pol/RT) were assessed using INNO-LiPA Multi-DR v2/v3. Resistance surveillance was conducted for patients with viremia (HBV DNA ≥ 69IU/ml) by HBV Pol/RT sequencing at week 96 or at discontinuation. In vitro phenotypic analysis was performed for patients with conserved site substitutions or virologic breakthrough while adherent to the study drug. At baseline, the majority of patients harbored virus with wild-type Pol/RT (89.2%), with 10.8% harboring resistance associated mutations. A similar percentage of patients in the TAF or TDF groups qualified for sequence analysis through week 96 (TAF, 11.1%; TDF, 10.9%). Of these, a small percentage of patients experienced virologic breakthrough (TAF, 2.8%; TDF, 3.2%) that was often associated with drug nonadherence (TAF, 30%; TDF, 50%). Across treatment groups, 132 patients qualified for sequence analysis through week 96, with nearly half having no sequence changes from baseline (43.2%). Most sequence changes occurred at polymorphic positions, and no isolates showed a reduction in susceptibility in vitro After 96 weeks, the proportion of patients achieving virus suppression (HBV DNA < 69 IU/ml) was similar across treatment groups, and no substitutions associated with resistance to TAF or TDF were detected. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT01940471 and NCT01940341.)., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Background & Aims: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a new prodrug of tenofovir developed to treat patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection at a lower dose than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) through more efficient delivery of tenofovir to hepatocytes. In 48-week results from two ongoing, double-blind, randomized phase III trials, TAF was non-inferior to TDF in efficacy with improved renal and bone safety. We report 96-week outcomes for both trials., Methods: In two international trials, patients with chronic HBV infection were randomized 2:1 to receive 25 mg TAF or 300 mg TDF in a double-blinded fashion. One study enrolled HBeAg-positive patients and the other HBeAg-negative patients. We assessed efficacy in each study, and safety in the pooled population., Results: At week 96, the differences in the rates of viral suppression were similar in HBeAg-positive patients receiving TAF and TDF (73% vs. 75%, respectively, adjusted difference -2.2% (95% CI -8.3 to 3.9%; p = 0.47), and in HBeAg-negative patients receiving TAF and TDF (90% vs. 91%, respectively, adjusted difference -0.6% (95% CI -7.0 to 5.8%; p = 0.84). In both studies the proportions of patients with alanine aminotransferase above the upper limit of normal at baseline, who had normal alanine aminotransferase at week 96 of treatment, were significantly higher in patients receiving TAF than in those receiving TDF. In the pooled safety population, patients receiving TAF had significantly smaller decreases in bone mineral density than those receiving TDF in the hip (mean % change -0.33% vs. -2.51%; p <0.001) and lumbar spine (mean % change -0.75% vs. -2.57%; p <0.001), as well as a significantly smaller median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault method (-1.2 vs. -4.8 mg/dl; p <0.001)., Conclusion: In patients with HBV infection, TAF remained as effective as TDF, with continued improved renal and bone safety, two years after the initiation of treatment. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01940471 and NCT01940341., Lay Summary: At week 96 of two ongoing studies comparing the efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients, TAF continues to be as effective as TDF with continued improved renal and bone safety. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01940471 and NCT01940341., (Copyright © 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss are important clinical outcomes for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with antiviral therapy. To date, there have been few studies that have evaluated viral sequence markers predicting serological response to nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment., Design: We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) and quantitative HBV serology (HBeAg and HBsAg) to identify viral sequence markers associated with serological response to long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy among HBeAg-positive patients. In the GS-US-174-0103 study, approximately half the patients seroconverted to anti-HBe by week 192 and 11% of patients exhibited HBsAg loss, the closest outcome to functional cure. The frequency of HBV variants that have previously been associated with HBV clinical outcomes was evaluated. HBV viral diversity in baseline sequences generated by NGS was calculated using Shannon entropy., Results: NGS analysis of HBV sequences from 157 patients infected with genotypes A to D showed the frequency of variants in the basal core promoter (BCP) and precore (PC) regions varied by genotype and that these mutations were associated with the absence of HBsAg loss. This was the case even when mutations were present at frequencies below the threshold of detection by population sequencing. Increased viral diversity across the HBV genome as determined by NGS was also associated with reduced likelihood of HBsAg loss., Conclusion: Patients with detectable BCP and/or PC variants and higher viral diversity have a lower probability of HBsAg loss during long-term NA therapy. Strategies to achieve functional cure of HBV infection through combination therapy should consider using NGS to stratify patients according to BCP/PC sequence. Consideration should also be given to earlier initiation of therapy prior to the emergence of BCP/PC variants., Trial Registration Number: NCT00116805; Post result., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Background: Tenofovir alafenamide is a novel prodrug formulated to deliver the active metabolite to target cells more efficiently than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at a lower dose, thereby reducing systemic exposure. In patients with HIV, tenofovir alafenamide was as efficacious as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, with reduced bone and renal toxic effects. We compared the efficacy and safety of the two drugs in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a non-inferiority study., Methods: We did this ongoing double-blind, non-inferiority study in 161 outpatient centres in 19 countries. Patients with chronic HBV infection who were positive for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide or 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with matching placebo. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size six) stratified by plasma HBV DNA concentration and previous treatment experience. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL at week 48 in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug using a missing-equals-failed approach. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was 10%. Key prespecified safety endpoints were bone and renal parameters at week 48. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01940471., Findings: Of the 1473 patients screened from Sept 11, 2013, to Dec 20, 2014, 875 eligible patients were randomly assigned and 873 received treatment (581 with tenofovir alafenamide and 292 with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). 371 (64%) patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL at week 48, which was non-inferior to the 195 (67%) of patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate who had HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL (adjusted difference -3·6% [95% CI -9·8 to 2·6]; p=0·25). Patients given tenofovir alafenamide had a significantly smaller decrease in bone mineral density at hip (mean change -0·10% [95% CI -0·29 to 0·09] vs -1·72% [-2·02 to -1·41]; adjusted difference 1·62 [1·27 to 1·96]; p<0·0001) and at spine (mean change -0·42% [-0·66 to -0·17] vs -2·29% [-2·67 to -1·92]; adjusted difference 1·88 [1·44 to 2·31]; p<0·0001) as well as smaller mean increases in serum creatinine at week 48 (0·01 mg/dL [0·00-0·02] vs 0·03 mg/dL [0·02-0·04]; p=0·02). The most common adverse events overall were upper respiratory tract infection (51 [9%] of 581 patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide vs 22 [8%] of 292 patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate), nasopharyngitis (56 [10%] vs 16 [5%]), and headache (42 [7%] vs 22 [8%]). 22 (4%) patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide and 12 (4%) patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate experienced serious adverse events, none of which was deemed by the investigator to be related to study treatment. 187 (32%) of 581 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 96 (33%) of 292 patients in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group had grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities, the most common of which were elevations in ALT (62 [11%] of 577 patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide and 36 [13%] of 288 patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) and AST (20 [3%] of 577 patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide and 19 [7%] of 288 patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate)., Interpretation: In patients with HBeAg-positive HBV infection, tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and had improved bone and renal effects. Longer term follow-up is needed to better understand the clinical impact of these changes., Funding: Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The novel prodrug tenofovir alafenamide delivers the nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir to target cells more efficiently at a lower dose than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, thereby reducing systemic exposure. We compared the efficacy and safety of the two drugs in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a non-inferiority study., Methods: In this ongoing randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority study in 105 centres in 17 countries, patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV were randomly assigned (2:1) by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size six), stratified by plasma HBV DNA concentration and previous treatment status, to receive once-daily oral doses of tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, each with matching placebo. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection (with plasma HBV DNA concentrations of >20 000 IU/mL), serum alanine aminotransferase concentrations of greater than 60 U/L in men or greater than 38 U/L in women and at no more than ten times the upper limit of normal, and estimated creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min (by the Cockcroft-Gault method). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who had HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL at week 48 in those who received at least one dose of study drug; the study was powered to show non-inferiority with a 10% efficacy margin of tenofovir alafenamide compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Bone and renal safety, and key secondary safety endpoints were assessed sequentially. The study will be conducted for a total of 3 years as a double-blind comparison to assess the longer term response to treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01940341., Findings: Between Sept 12, 2013, and Oct 31, 2014, 426 patients were randomly assigned (285 assigned to tenofovir alafenamide and 141 assigned to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; one patient assigned to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate did not receive the treatment. 268 (94%) of 285 patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL at week 48 versus 130 (93%) of 140 patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (difference 1·8% [95% CI -3·6 to 7·2]; p=0·47), which demonstrates non-inferiority. Patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had significantly smaller mean percentage declines in bone mineral density than those receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (hip -0·29% [95% CI -0·55 to -0·03] vs -2·16% [-2·53 to -1·79], adjusted percentage difference 1·87% [95% CI 1·42 to 2·32; p<0·0001]; spine -0·88% [-1·22 to -0·54] vs -2·51% [-3·09 to -1·94], adjusted percentage difference 1·64% [95% CI 1·01 to 2·27]; p<0·0001). At week 48, mean change in serum creatinine was small in both groups (tenofovir alafenamide 0·01 mg/dL [95% CI 0·00 to 0·02] vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 0·02 mg/dL [0·00 to 0·04], adjusted percentage difference -0·01 mg/dL [95% CI -0·03 to 0·01]; p=0·32), but patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide had a smaller reduction in creatinine clearance (median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate -1·8 mL/min [IQR -7·8 to 6·0] vs -4·8 mL/min [-12·0 to 3·0]; p=0·004). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity in the two treatment groups. The most common adverse events overall were headache (tenofovir alafenamide 40 [14%] patients vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 14 [10%] patients), nasopharyngitis (30 [11%] vs 15 [11%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (35 [12%] vs ten [7%]). 14 (5%) patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide and nine (6%) patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate had serious adverse events, none of which was deemed by investigators to be related to study treatment; one patient in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group died, but this was not deemed to be related to study treatment., Interpretation: In patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV, the efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to that of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and had improved bone and renal effects. Longer term follow-up is needed to better understand the clinical impact of these changes., Funding: Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Summary: Background: Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are the first‐line treatment agents for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Recently, whether the degree to which the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be reduced by ETV vs TDF has been debated. We compared the incidence of HCC among treatment‐naïve patients receiving TDF vs ETV in the United States. Methods: From a large administrative medical claims database of commercially insured patients, we identified 166,933 adults with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B and a minimum of 12 months of prior enrolment, of whom 3934 and 6127 initiated ETV and TDF respectively. Fine‐Gray hazard regression models incorporating treatment propensity scores (PS) were used to estimate the risk of HCC incidence associated with TDF vs ETV; variables considered for adjustment included demographic characteristics, concomitant medication use and baseline comorbidities, as well as competing events including liver transplantation and medication changes. Results: After PS weighting, the TDF and ETV groups were well‐matched. During the follow‐up, 90 patients developed HCC, including 50 receiving ETV and 40 receiving TDF, giving rise to crude incidence rates of 0.62 per 100 person‐years (PY) and 0.30 per 100 PY respectively. In PS‐weighted, multivariable analysis, TDF was associated with a subdistribution hazard ratio for HCC of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.89) compared to ETV. Results were similar when patients ≥40 years and men and women were analysed separately. Conclusion: Among commercially insured, treatment‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B in the United States, treatment with TDF was associated with significantly lower risk of HCC than ETV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Most patients with cirrhosis induced by chronic HBV infection experience fibrosis regression after long‐term antiviral treatment, while some remain cirrhotic. Fibrosis regression is associated with lower odds of developing hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, but mechanisms impacting differential fibrosis regression between individuals are unclear. We asked whether soluble molecules, including serum microRNAs, could serve as biomarkers of fibrosis regression. Methods: We analysed cryopreserved sera from clinical trials in which cirrhotic HBV‐infected patients (baseline Ishak fibrosis score of 5‐6) received 240 weeks of nucleotide analogue treatment. Liver biopsies at week 240 in these trials showed 71/96 patients (74%) had fibrosis regression (Ishak ≤ 4) while 25/96 (26%) remained cirrhotic (Ishak 5‐6). We quantified inflammatory markers (CXCL10, soluble CD163) and miRNAs (n = 179) from serum at baseline, week 48 and week 240 of treatment in a sub‐cohort of patients with (n = 14) or without (n = 14) fibrosis regression. Results: CXCL10, sCD163 and miRNAs previously associated with HBV replication and inflammation decreased during treatment but did not differ based on fibrosis regression. Two miRNAs (miR‐421 and miR‐454‐3p) had lower baseline expression in patients with subsequent fibrosis regression. In all, 27 miRNAs differed at week 240 and had higher expression in patients with fibrosis regression (eg miR‐199a‐3p, miR‐423‐3p, miR‐142‐3p, miR‐let‐7d‐5p). Several miRNAs (miR‐141‐3p, let‐7d‐5p) that correlated with regression have previously been implicated in the pathophysiology of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. Conclusions: In cirrhotic patients with chronic HBV infection treated with antiviral therapy, serum miRNAs have differential expression based on fibrosis regression, suggesting potential utility as biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares during NA therapy are uncommon but occur. Evaluation of ALT flares during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy is important as new immunomodulatory therapies for hepatitis B virus (HBV) are developed. We evaluated the association between ALT flares and HBsAg loss during long‐term therapy for genotype A CHB. Methods: This analysis included genotype A subjects from a phase III study of tenofovir vs adefovir in HBeAg‐positive HBV. ALT flare was defined as (i) a rise in ALT >2x ULN from normal ALT levels; or (ii) a rise in ALT >2x baseline ALT level. HBsAg response at week 384 was recorded as one of HBsAg loss vs HBsAg decline (≥1 log10 IU/mL decline) vs non‐response. The primary analysis evaluated the association between ALT flare and HBsAg response. Results: 54 subjects were included. 23/54 (43%) subjects experienced an on‐treatment ALT flare. 45% achieved an HBsAg reduction ≥1 log10 IU/mL, and of these 67% achieved HBsAg loss at a median of 102 weeks [IQR: 64‐156]. Flare was associated with HBsAg decline vs non‐response (67% vs 23%, P = .002), and were more common in subjects who achieved HBsAg loss vs non‐response (56% vs 23%), P = .049). There was a median delay of 56 weeks [IQR: 40‐80] between a flare and HBsAg loss. Conclusion: In genotype A subjects undergoing long‐term NA therapy, ALT flares predict for HBsAg response. The delay between ALT flare and HBsAg loss has implications for clinical trial design for early phase development of immunomodulatory strategies aiming for HBsAg loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Herein, the predicted atomic structures of five representative sequence variants of the reverse transcriptase protein (RT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), sampled from patients with rapid or slow response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment, have been examined to identify structural variations between them in order to assess structural and functional properties of HBV-RT variants associated with the differential responses to TDF treatment. Results: We utilized a hybrid computational approach to model the atomistic structures of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/dATP and HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/TFV-DP (tenofovir diphosphate) complexes with the native hybrid DNA-RNA substrate in place. Multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/dATP complexes revealed strong coupling of the natural nucleotide substrate, dATP, to the active site of the RT, and the differential involvement of the two putative magnesium cations (Mg2+) at the active site, whereby one Mg2+ directly bridges the interaction between dATP and HBV-RT and the other serves as a coordinator to maintain an optimal configuration of the active site. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) calculated in MD simulations of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/TFV-DP complexes indicate no differential binding affinity between TFV-DP and HBV-RT variants identified in patients with slow or rapid response to TDF treatment. Conclusion: The predicted atomic structures accurately represent functional states of HBV-RT. The equivalent interaction between TFV-DP and each examined HBV-RT variants suggests that binding affinity of TFV-DP to HBV-RT is not associated with delayed viral clearance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a recommended first-line therapy for both naïve and experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), although reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hypophosphatemia, hyperphosphaturia and Fanconi syndrome have been reported in some patients. Entecavir (ETV) could be considered as a rescue therapy for TDF-treated patients developing renal dysfunction, though patients with prior history of treatment with lamivudine (LAM) can develop ETV resistance strains, which can lead to potentially severe hepatitis flares. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a new prodrug of tenofovir, has recently been developed to improve the renal and bone safety profile compared to TDF, while maintaining the same virologic efficacy. The recently published 48-week phase III TAF registration studies confirmed the superior safety profile. Here we describe a case of a 75-year-old woman with HBV mono-infection and compensated cirrhosis who developed ETV resistant strains and grade 3 chronic kidney disease after many years of LAM and adefovir (ADV) treatment and a TDF-induced Fanconi syndrome. The administration of 25 mg/day of TAF, granted as part of a compassionate use program, rapidly suppressed viral replication to undetectable levels without worsening renal function or side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims In a study of 266 chronic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, 23 experienced hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss with up to 5 years of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment. HBsAg kinetics in patients with and without HBsAg loss and predictors of HBsAg loss were evaluated. Methods HBsAg levels were quantified every 12 weeks. A multivariable regression analysis, involving prespecified baseline characteristics and on-treatment response parameters, was performed; a stepwise procedure identified independent predictors of HBsAg loss. Results Among patients with HBsAg loss, 14 (61%), 1 (4%), 0 and 7 (30%) were genotypes A through D, respectively; 1 (4%) was genotype F. HBsAg loss was preceded by viral suppression (HBV DNA <29 IU/ml; n = 23) and HBeAg loss (n = 19). Among treated patients the strongest independent predictors of HBsAg loss were Caucasian race with genotype A/D and ⩽4 years of infection (HR = 14.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7–43.4; p <0.0001) and an HBsAg decline of ⩾1 log 10 IU/ml at week 24 (HR = 13.7, 95% CI 5.6–33.7; p <0.0001). Among TDF-treated patients, a reduction in HBsAg level of ⩾1-log 10 by week 12 or 24 had a positive predictive value of 35%–45%, respectively, and a negative predictive value of 94%–97%, respectively. Conclusions HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive patients receiving TDF involves a chronology of virologic and serologic responses; patients with HBV genotypes A or D and a rapid early decline in HBsAg are more likely to lose HBsAg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]