Search

Rationale & Objective: Kidney supportive care (KSC) is a developing area in medicine that integrates the expertise of kidney and palliative care practitioners to improve symptoms and quality of life for people with advanced kidney disease. The intersection of the practical aspects of KSC (including care activities and clinical referrals) with palliative and end-of-life care (EOLC) are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to explore kidney disease clinicians' experiences of KSC, palliative care, and EOLC., Study Design: An exploratory qualitative study using semistructured focus groups., Setting & Participants: Kidney disease clinicians (18 physicians, 3 trainees, and 33 kidney disease nurses) from 5 public hospitals were recruited across Victoria, Australia., Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts., Results: The 2 overarching themes highlighted by clinicians were their perception that their health care systems insufficiently addressed the needs of people with advanced kidney disease, as well as their aspirations to develop KSC services to improve health care experiences. Three subthemes were identified related to limitations in health care systems: (1) variation in the clinical scope of KSC, (2) limited integration of palliative care, and (3) experiences of challenging and compromised provision of EOLC. The second theme described aspirations for future KSC services to be more inclusive, seamless, and collaborative across health care providers with capacity to respond to meet changing palliative care needs., Limitations: Findings may not be transferable to contexts outside of Victoria, Australia; data were collected in 2017-2018 and may not reflect current or future experiences., Conclusions: Kidney clinicians described systemic challenges and compromises in care experiences and the need for development of KSC services. They expressed that this development would require a consistent and systematic approach that integrates palliative care and embeds KSC as part of kidney health service delivery., (Copyright © 2022 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Renal supportive care (RSC) is an approach integrating nephrology and palliative care to improve quality of life for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). RSC practice varies across services; therefore, understanding clinicians' perspectives is important to the evolution and definition of RSC., Aim: To understand renal clinicians' views and experiences of RSC, palliative care and end-of-life care., Method: A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken across Australia and New Zealand between February and May 2018. Participants were asked about end-of-life care, RSC, palliative care and an ideal model of RSC., Results: Estimated response rate 13% included 382 clinicians; doctors (32%), nurses (68%); of whom 84% access specialist palliative care and 59% RSC. A lack of agreed treatment goals (86%) and late or rushed treatment decision making (85%) was associated with challenging end-of-life experiences. Variable concepts of RSC were described, with RSC being considered the same as: usual care for all CKD patients (40%), conservative (30%) or palliative care (22%). The term RSC was generally distinct from (77%) and more acceptable than palliative care (80%) with preferential RSC referral for symptoms (86% vs 69%, P < .01) and complex treatment decision making (82% vs 58%, P < .01). Aspirations for RSC included improving symptoms and quality of life (89%), with an ideal model comprising: symptom management (98%), improved nephrology and community service integration (96%) and clinician education (94%)., Conclusion: This study revealed challenges for renal clinicians in providing end-of-life care and variation of views and experiences of RSC. It represents opportunities to develop RSC aligned with clinician priorities to improve patient care., (© 2020 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Moral distress occurs when individuals are unable to act in accordance with what they believe to be ethically correct or just. It results from a discrepancy between a clinician's perception of "the right thing to do" and what is actually happening and is perpetuated by perceived constraints that limit the individual from speaking up or enacting change. Moral distress is reported by many clinicians in caring for patients with serious illness, including chronic kidney disease and kidney failure. If left unidentified, unexpressed, or unaddressed, moral distress may cause burnout, exhaustion, detachment, and ineffectiveness. At an extreme, moral distress may lead to a desire to abandon the speciality entirely. This article offers an international perspective on moral distress in nephrology in diverse contexts and health care systems. We examine and discuss the sociocultural factors that contribute to moral distress in nephrology and offer suggestions for interventions from individual provider, facility, and health care systems perspectives to reduce the impact of moral distress on nephrology providers., (Copyright © 2019 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Healthcare professionals have limited formal end-of-life care training despite the large proportion of hospital deaths. A retrospective review of 201 acute hospital deaths revealed 166 (82.6%) had documentation to suggest the patient was dying but this was performed late with a median time between documentation and death of 0.84 days. Furthermore, 132 (66%) patients received an intervention in the final 48 h of life. This highlights the need to improve the recognition and management of dying patients in acute hospitals., (© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)