Search

Background: Considering enterococci as an emerging important cause of nosocomial infections, and antibiotic resistance by Enterococcus as a major obstacle for treatment, determination of the prevalence of various Enterococcus species and their antibiotic resistance pattern among urinary isolates is very crucial and need of the hour. The present study tried to identify the burden of urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by Enterococcus species and analyze the current antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the uropathogenic isolates and evaluate the risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study included all clinico-microbiologically diagnosed cases of admitted UTI cases. Hospital records were analyzed for the clinical background of the UTI cases, and urine sample was collected and processed for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: Out of the 372 urine samples, Enterococcus spp. was identified in 13.44% of isolates as the causal uropathogen. Enterococcus faecalis was the predominant species identified, followed by Enterococcus faecium. Cases were mostly observed in clinical settings of sepsis followed by pyelonephritis and cystitis. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile showed that resistance was most frequently observed with norfloxacin followed by levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, and high-level gentamicin. Linezolid showed maximum sensitivity, followed by vancomycin, nitrofurantoin, and others. Conclusion: The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterococcus species is of particular concern in terms of antibiotic therapy. Speciation along with routine culture and sensitivity is essential to gather knowledge about the available antibiotics in MDR uropathogenic Enterococcus species, particularly oral choices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Granulomatous disorders of the skin are commonly encountered and pose a diagnostic challenge due to its diverse etiology with several histological patterns. Granulomatous diseases of skin comprise a large family sharing the common histological finding as of granuloma formation. The various histological types of granulomas can be identified on the basis of the constituent cells and other changes within the granulomas. However, significant overlap exists in histopathological findings of different granulomatous reactions. Thus, morphology alone is seldom specific and cannot be used as a diagnostic tool for the identification of specific diseases. A keen understanding of the manifestations, workup, and subsequent treatment of both infectious and noninfectious cutaneous granulomatous lesion is essential for every practicing clinician and dermatopathologist. Materials and Methods: A 2-year retrospective study involved all the skin biopsies. Detailed clinical and histopathological features were analyzed and were categorized according to the type of granuloma. Special stains were used in few cases for diagnostic purposes. Cases were reviewed and analyzed. Results: In histopathological subtyping, tuberculoid granuloma was the most common type and the most common etiology was leprosy. Others were cutaneous tuberculosis, foreign body granulomas, fungal lesions, cutaneous leishmaniasis, and granuloma annulare. Conclusion: Histopathology when combined with special stain can serve as a gold standard investigation for diagnosis, categorization, and clinicopathological correlation in such cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Besides unparalleled benefits, highly active antiretroviral therapy is also associated with wide range of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which hinders treatment adherence. The present study was thus designed to monitor and explore the pattern of occurrence of ADRs to various antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens in a tertiary care ART setup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational clinical study was carried out in the outpatient setting of nodal ART center of Eastern India. A total of 610 patients on various ART regimens were studied for suspected ADRs over 12 months. Adverse event history, medication history, and other relevant details were captured. Causality and severity of each reported ADR were duly assessed. RESULTS: 32.45% patients of total study participants presented with a total of 330 ADRs. Patients from zidovudine-based regimens presented with majority of ADRs such as anemia (up to 36%), central nervous system (CNS), and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Tenofovir-based regimens were, however, found to be mildly safer. The combination with Efavirenz was associated with majorly CNS side effects while that of nevirapine was associated with rash and pigmentation of nails. Atazanavir boosted second-line regimens were notably associated with increased serum lipid levels followed by other GI and CNS adverse effects. Increased liver enzymes were found in atazanavir-based second-line ART. CONCLUSION: The study enables to obtain information on the incidence and pattern of ADRs associated with various antiretroviral regimens, thereby reducing its occurrence and protecting the patient population from avoidable harm. Need of intensive monitoring for ADRs in ARTs thus seems to be a mandate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]