Search

The intermolecular complexes formed between imidazol-2-ylidene and its heavy-atom analogues C2H4N2X: (X = C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) and YH3F (Y = Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) have been optimized at the MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level. C2H4N2X: have two electron-rich moieties, one of which is the lone pair on the X atom and the other is the 6π-electron system. Three types of binding modes (type-A, type-B and type-C) can be distinguished for C2H4N2X: according to the locations of YH3F. The type-A and type-B complexes can be located for C2H4N2C:···YH3F system, and the Eint values of the type-A complexes are much larger than those of the type-B complexes. The type-A, type-B and type-C complexes can be located for the other four systems, and the Eint values of these complexes go in the order type-B > type-C > type-A. The binding strength of the type-A complexes becomes weaker, and that of the type-B and type-C complexes becomes stronger with the increase of the X atomic number for C2H4N2X:···YH3F system, which can be clarified by the MEP maps of C2H4N2X:. The NBO, AIM and SAPT analysis was employed to explore the nature of the interactions in these complexes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Methods: The intermolecular interactions between the heavy-atom analogues of acetylene T2H2 (T = Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) and HCN have been investigated by theoretical calculations at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level. Results: The global energy minimum of T2H2 is the butterfly structure A, and another energy minimum is the planar structure B. Both structures A and B exhibit the dual behavior when binding with HCN. The various hydrogen bond (HB), dihydrogen bond (DB) and tetrel bond (TB) complexes can be found according to the MEP maps of T2H2. One TB and three HB complexes formed between structure A and HCN can be located for Si2H2 and Ge2H2. One TB, two HB and one DB complexes formed between structure A and HCN can be located for Sn2H2 and Pb2H2. Four TB and one HB complexes formed between structure B and HCN can be located for all the T2H2. The geometries and binding strengths of the complexes are compared and analyzed. Conclusions: The interactions in these complexes are generally weak, and the interaction energies of these complexes range from −0.53 to −8.23 kcal/mol. The interaction energies of the TB complexes are larger than those of the corresponding HB and DB complexes for structure A···HCN systems. The relative binding strength of the four TB complexes exhibits different order for different structure B···HCN systems, which is consistent with the MEP maps of the isolated monomers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The binary and ternary complexes composed of GeH3F, AsH2F and ring compounds (benzene, borazine and cyclopentadienyl anion) have been studied by theoretical calculations to understand the interplay between the tetrel bond and pnicogen bond interactions. The bonding strength of intermolecular interactions in these complexes is analyzed by means of atoms in molecules (AIM), natural bond orbital (NBO) and noncovalent interaction (NCI) index methods. The binary tetrel-bonded and pnicogen-bonded complexes can be classified as an n-type or π-type complex according to the orbital interactions involved in the complexes. Three binding modes can be distinguished according to the interplay between interactions for the ternary complexes. The binding mode A is characterized by the interplay between π-type tetrel bond and n-type pnicogen bond; binding mode B is characterized by the interplay between π-type pnicogen bond and n-type tetrel bond, and binding mode C is characterized by the interplay between π-type tetrel bond and π-type pnicogen bond. The binding modes A and B exhibit the synergistic interplay effect, while the antagonistic effect is reflected in mode C. The synergistic effect in binding modes A and B is stronger than antagonistic effect in mode C, and the synergistic effect in binding mode B is stronger than that in mode A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]