Search

This study aims at mapping and interpreting what is at stake in Lacanian psychoanalytic supervision. Using interview data of participants' personal accounts of supervision, the authors applied a thematic analysis to gain insight into what they believe are crucial components in these accounts of supervision. We interpret the data within the context of Lacan's text, 'Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power', in which he articulates his conceptualization of psychoanalytic treatment. His views on interpretation (tactics), transference (strategy), and lack‐of‐being (politics) as the three elements that structure the actions of the analyst, guided our data‐analysis. Participants indicate how their supervisor focuses on the symbolic dimension of speech, helping them avoid getting deceived by the dimension of the imaginary. During the supervision process, the supervisor does not respond from a master position, nor coach the supervisees. Supervisees develop their own style and framework for clinical work. Through discussing cases, supervisees learn to construct cases and focus on the singularity of the case, beyond structural diagnosis. Lastly, Lacanian supervisors only focus on the cases discussed, not on the person of the supervisee. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although Blatt's two-polarity model of depression has suggested that patients' interpersonal styles may shape countertransference phenomena in psychotherapy, empirical research on this topic has remained scarce. This article provides an in-depth study of countertransference processes in clinical work with dependent (anaclitic) depressed patients using a qualitative methodology. Thematic analysis of narrative material of psychodynamic therapists discussing patient cases during supervision (n = 7) resulted in four recurrent themes: "empathy, compassion, and support," "anxiety, feeling overwhelmed, and protection," "frustration, irritation, and confrontation," and "inadequacy, incompetence, and fatalism." We found that these countertransference processes mainly revolved around perceived adaptive and maladaptive aspects of patients' relational functioning. Regarding clinical practice, our study suggests that therapists can use countertransference to determine in which position they are maneuvered by patients, although we caution against the exclusive use of subjectively informed data as a benchmark in the diagnostic and treatment process. We conclude that further in-depth research on countertransference and personality styles is needed to identify pitfalls in the treatment of depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]