Search

Background: Fulvestrant 500 mg has been an option for endocrine therapy for advanced or recurrent breast cancer after prior endocrine treatment since November 2011 in Japan. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of fulvestrant 500 mg in clinical settings. Methods: This was a multicenter, both prospective and retrospective, observational study of 132 postmenopausal women (median age 66) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had been treated with fulvestrant. Information from medical records was retrospectively obtained from 9 hospitals (Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group: SBCCSG) in Saitama prefecture, Japan, from October 2012 to April 2014. The primary end point was time to treatment failure (TTF). The secondary end points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AE) (CTCAE ver. 4). The choice of subsequent therapy after fulvestrant was also evaluated. Results: The median TTF was 6.1 months. Median OS was 28.5 months (the starting date was the first day of fulvestrant). ORR was 12.9% and CBR was 45.5%. The most common AEs were injection site reactions (9.1%). The rate of grade 3 AE was only 2.3% (3/132). The number of patients who underwent subsequent therapy after fulvestrant were 54 (55.7%) receiving chemotherapy, 42 (43.3%) receiving non-fulvestrant endocrine therapy, and 1 (1%) receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) + endocrine therapy (ET). Conclusion: Fulvestrant 500 mg is an effective and safe treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer after prior endocrine treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of replacing standard intravenous therapy (taxane) with oral S-1 therapy for first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment.Methods: This cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from a randomized phase III trial (SELECT BC). As cost-effectiveness was a secondary endpoint of the SELECT BC trial, some of the randomized patients participated in an EQ-5D survey (N = 391) and health economic survey (N = 146). The EQ-5D responses, claims, and prescription data were collected for as long as possible until death. The expected quality-adjusted life years (QALY) obtained from each treatment were calculated using patient-level EQ-5D data, and the expected cost was calculated using patient-level claim data. The analysis was performed from the perspective of public healthcare payers.Results: The estimated EQ-5D least-square means and 95% CI up to 48 months were 0.764 (95% CI, 0.741-0.782) and 0.742 (95% CI, 0.720-0.764) in the S-1 and taxane arms, respectively. The expected QALY was 2.11 for the S-1 arm and 2.04 for the taxane arm, with expected costs of JPY 5.13 million (USD 46,600) and JPY 5.56 million (USD 50,500), respectively. These results show that S-1 is cost-saving. According to probabilistic sensitivity analysis, S-1 was dominant with a probability of 63%. When the willingness to pay (WTP) value was JPY 5 million (USD 45,500) per QALY, the probability of being cost-effective was 92%.Conclusions: Our results show that the introduction of oral S-1 therapy for metastatic breast cancer is highly likely to be cost-effective.Trial Registration: UMIN CTR C000000416 . Registered on May 10, 2006. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Combined therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel (BP regimen) as a first-line treatment has proven highly effective with good tolerance for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of the BP regimen for Japanese patients with MBC in real-world clinical settings. Methods: From June 2012 through May 2014, we recruited 94 patients at 10 medical institutions. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Objective response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0-Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Results: Nighty patients with MBC (mean 58 years, range: 34-80 years) were enrolled, and 60 (66.6%) and 52 (57.7%) had undergone prior chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment and treatment for MBC, respectively. Median TTF was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-8.3 months), and median OS was 15.4 months (95% CI, 12.0-18.9 months). The overall response rate was 67.8% (95% CI: 57.1-77.2%). A total of 28 patients (31.1%) required a dose reduction of paclitaxel. Forty-five, 42, and 3 patients received the initial doses of 90, 80, and 60 mg/m², respectively. Among patients who received the initial doses of 90 mg/m², 13 patients (28.9%) unexpectedly required a dose reduction of ≥20 mg/m². The BP regimen was discontinued for 66 (73.3%) of the 90 patients, 52 (57.7%) of whom experienced "disease progression." Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs developed in 51 patients (56.6%), with leukopenia and neutropenia in 16 patients (17.8%) and 21 patients (23.3%), respectively. Grade 3 nonhematologic AEs developed in 8 patients (8.9%), with the most common nonhematologic AE of peripheral neuropathy in 4 patients (4.4%). No Grade 4 nonhematologic AEs developed. Peripheral neuropathy [56 patients (62.2%)], nail discoloration [53 patients (58.9%)], and fatigue [51 patients (56.7%)] were the most predominant AEs--the known AEs of paclitaxel. Conclusions: The BP regimen was active and well tolerated in the real-world clinical settings. As many as 28.9% of patients who received the initial dose of 90 mg/m² required a dose reduction of paclitaxel by 20 mg/m². Therefore, there is a need to find a therapeutic regimen that is less likely to result in dose reductions for patients with MBC who undergo a BP regimen using the initial paclitaxel dose of 90 mg/m². [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Evidence of eribulin therapy for metastatic breast cancer ( MBC) in clinical practice is not well documented. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of eribulin in 29 MBC patients from 2011 to 2016 at Fukuoka University Hospital. Results The median patient age, number of courses, total dose, and relative dose intensity were as follows: 65 years, five courses, 8.6 mg/m2, and 75%, respectively. One patient achieved a complete response, ( CR) six a partial response ( PR), eight stable disease ( SD) and 14 patients exhibited progressive disease. The objective response rate ( ORR: CR + PR) was 24.1%, and the clinical benefit rate ( CBR: CR + PR + SD) was 51.7%. The median progression-free survival was 90 days (95% confidence interval [ CI] 67-126) and median overall survival was 264 days (95% CI 198-357). In patients who previously received 2-4 regimens, the ORR was 28.5% and the CBR was 57.1%. In patients who received 5-12 regimens, the ORR was 20% and the CBR was 45%. Chemotherapy was administered to 20 patients (69%) after eribulin administration, and the median overall survival rate of cases that achieved greater than a PR was 1088 days. The most frequent treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (55.2%), and febrile neutropenia (20.1%). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 13.8% of patients, but was not exacerbated even if present before treatment. Conclusion Eribulin is effective for MBC patients who have received multiple chemotherapies. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia may develop after heavy prior therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A dose escalation study of biweekly irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with capecitabine was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Methods: Escalating doses of CPT-11 (80-120 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 15. Capecitabine was administered at a fixed dose of 1,657 mg/m2/day for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days of rest. We treated 3-6 patients at a particular dose level until the MTD was determined. Results: Twenty patients were treated. The MTD was determined to be 100 mg/m2, as 3 of 6 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities, grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia, photophobia, fatigue and diarrhea. The RD for the phase II study was thus determined to be 90 mg/m2. The response rate was 41.7%. Conclusions: Combination therapy with CPT-11 and capecitabine was well tolerated with a promising response rate for MBC that had been treated previously with anthracyclines and taxanes. A multi-center phase II study is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy with pharmacokinetic assessment. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]