Search

[Display omitted] It was already clinically apparent 150 years ago that bacterial therapy could alleviate diseases. Recently, a burgeoning number of researchers have been using bacterial regimens filled with microbial therapeutic leads to diagnose and treat a wide range of disorders and diseases, including cancers, inflammatory diseases, metabolic disorders and viral infections. Some bacteria that were designed to have low toxicity and high efficiency in drug delivery have been used to treat diseases successfully, especially in tumor therapy in animal models or clinical trials, thanks to the progress of genetic engineering and synthetic bioengineering. Therefore, genetically engineered bacteria can serve as efficient drug delivery vehicles, carrying nucleic acids or genetic circuits that encode and regulate therapeutic payloads. In this review, we summarize the development and applications of this approach. Strategies for genetically modifying strains are described in detail, along with their objectives. We also describe some controlled strategies for drug delivery and release using these modified strains as carriers. Furthermore, we discuss treatment methods for various types of diseases using engineered bacteria. Tumors are discussed as the most representative example, and other diseases are also briefly described. Finally, we discuss the challenges and prospects of drug delivery systems based on these bacteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tongxinluo (TXL), consisting of 12 Chinese Materia Medica items catalogued in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, is commercially available in China, South Korea, and Russia. Hundreds of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on TXL in treating cardiovascular diseases were conducted and published in China. This study provides a comprehensive Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review with sensitivity and subgroup analyses to evaluate the evidence about whether TXL is more effective than isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in treating ischemic heart disease, particularly angina pectoris. Methods: RCTs published between 1996 and 2010 on TXL versus ISDN in treating angina pectoris for at least 4 weeks were retrieved from eight bibliographical databases (e.g., MEDLINE,® PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Library, and WanFang Data). The quality of RCTs was assessed with the Jadad scale. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall effects based on symptomatic and electrocardiographic (ECG) improvements. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted on the study characteristics of RCTs. Results: Twenty (20) RCTs with a total of 1936 participants were included after eligibility assessment. The Jadad score of all included studies was 2. The means of summary odds ratios (ORs) for comparing TXL and nitrates were 3.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.37-4.58) by symptoms ( n=20) and 2.38 (95% CI 1.846-3.09) by ECG ( n=18). There was a significant correlation of ORs between symptoms and ECG (ρ=0.77 and p=0.00026). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression found no significant difference in overall effects among all study characteristics except the years of publication ( p=0.0409). Conclusions: The meta-analysis of 20 eligible RCTs demonstrates moderate evidence that TXL is more effective than ISDN for treating angina pectoris. This result warrants further RCTs of multicenters/countries, larger sample sizes, and higher quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]