Search

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common disease that is more prevalent in older people. Surgical intervention is a safe treatment of choice. However, the recurrence rate is relatively high and the outcome is not always satisfactory among surgically treated patients. It is believed that aberrant angiogenesis and intracapsular inflammation contribute to the development of CSDH. Atorvastatin is reported to promote angiogenesis and suppress inflammation. We have recently shown that atorvastatin is effective to non-surgically reduce and eliminate CSDH with minimal side effects. Here, we report a clinical research trial protocol that is designed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of atorvastatin on CSDH.Methods/design: We have designed a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial for evaluating the efficacy of oral atorvastatin in reducing CSDH. We have so far recruited 96 patients with CT-confirmed or MRI-confirmed CSDHs from 16 medical centers in China. These patients were originally recruited for the Oriental Neurosurgical Evidence-based Study Team (ONET) study. After informed consent is provided, patients are randomized to receive either atorvastatin (oral 20 mg/night for 8 weeks) or placebo (dextrin for 8 weeks); and followed for 16 weeks after the treatment. The primary outcome is the change in hematoma volume at the end of 8-week treatment. Secondary outcomes include: changes in 1) the hematoma volume at the 4(th), 12(th), and 24(th) weeks; 2) Markwalder's Grading Scale and Glasgow Coma Scale (MGS-GCS); 3) Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) and 4) Activities of Daily Life-the Barthel Index scale (ADL-BI). Safety will be assessed during the study by monitoring adverse events, laboratory tests, electrocardiography (ECG), measurements of vital signs (temperature, pulse, and blood pressure) and body weight.Discussion: Results of this trial will provide critical information regarding whether atorvastatin is an effective and safe alternative to surgical treatment of CSDH.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier--NCT02024373 The date of trial registration: 7 August 2013. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Repeat gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is considered to be an effective treatment for refractory or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Aims: The purpose of this report was to demonstrate the relationship between the outcome of repeat GKRS and prior operative procedures on patients with recurrent or refractory TN. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 34 patients with refractory or recurrent TN who had undergone repeat GKRS; 21 patients had undergone other types of procedures, 11 of whom had undergone more than three such procedures prior to radiosurgery. The maximum dose of the repeat procedure was between 60 and 75 Gy. The mean follow-up time was 21.6 months. Statistical Analysis Used: The log-rank test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the data. Results: Excellent pain relief was achieved in 14 patients (41.2%) after repeat GKRS, while a successful outcome occurred in 29 of 34 patients (85.3%). Better pain relief occurred in the patients who did not have a prior procedure or who had undergone fewer than three prior procedures (P = 0.042). Twenty-four of 25 patients (96.0%) who had recurrent pain had a successful operation and five of nine patients (55.6%) who did not have significant relief of pain after the first procedure had a successful operation. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Only four patients had mild complications. Conclusion: It is more likely to relieve pain in patients with recurrent or refractory TN who did not have a prior procedure or who had fewer than three procedures before undergoing their first GKRS. Moreover, it seems that patients who had a good response following the initial GKRS had better results after a repeat procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]