Search

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO). A vital factor that might influence MT outcomes is the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). A few clinical trials in this domain thus far have not yielded consistent outcomes. We conducted this meta-analysis to synthesize collective evidence in this regard., Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines were followed, and we performed a comprehensive literature search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL). For outcomes constituting continuous data, the mean difference (MD) and its standard deviation (SD) were pooled. For outcomes constituting dichotomous data, the frequency of events and the total number of patients were pooled as the risk ratio (RR)., Results: Seven clinical trials with a total of 2317 patients are included in this meta-analysis. Six trials are randomized, and one trial was nonrandomized. No significant differences were found between MT plus IVT and MT alone in successful recanalization (RR 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.92 to 1.17], P = 0.53), 90-day functional independence (RR 1.03, 95% CI [0.90 to 1.19], P = 0.65), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (RR 1.22, 95% CI [0.84 to 1.75], P = 0.30), or mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI [0.76 to 1.18], P = 0.61)., Conclusion: The current evidence does not favor either MT plus IVT or MT alone for LVO except for the procedural time. More trials are needed in this regard, and certain factors should be considered when comparing the two approaches., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Recent studies indicate endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) as a safe, effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large ischemic regions. Our study updates an ongoing living systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of EVT to medical management only., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing EVT to medical management in AIS patients with large ischemic areas. Using fixed-effect models, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare functional independence, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) between EVT and standard medical management. We evaluated bias risk with the Cochrane tool and graded the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach., Results: Of 1363 new citations, we included six RCTs with a total of 1876 patients. We found low-certainty evidence of improved functional independence (risk difference [RD] 29.9%, 95% CI 17.2% to 46.9%), increase in sICH (RD 2.6%, 95% CI 0.3% to 6.4%), and a non-significant decrease in mortality (RD -1.8%, 95% CI -3.9% to 0.6%) for AIS patients with large infarcts who underwent EVT compared to medical management only., Conclusion: Our revised meta-analysis suggests low-certainty evidence that there is improved functional independence, a non-significant decrease in mortality, and an increase in sICH among AIS patients with large infarcts who undergo EVT compared to those receiving medical management alone., Systematic Review Protocol Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023398742)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors reported no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Although > 70% of patients in the trials assessing EVT for AIS-LVO had successful recanalization, only a third ultimately achieved favorable outcomes. A "no-reflow" phenomenon due to distal microcirculation disruption might contribute to such suboptimal outcomes. Combining intra-arterial (IA) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and EVT to reduce the distal microthrombi burden was investigated in a few studies. We present a pooled-data meta-analysis of the existing evidence of this combinatorial treatment., Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. We aimed to include all original studies investigating EVT plus IA tPA in AIS-LVO patients. Using R software, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed-effects model was adopted to evaluate pooled data., Results: Five studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Successful recanalization was comparable between the IA tPA and control groups at 82.9% and 82.32% respectively. The 90-day functional independence was similar between both groups (OR= 1.25; 95% CI= 0.92-1.70; P= 0.154). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was also comparable between both groups (OR= 0.66; 95% CI= 0.34-1.26; P= 0.304)., Conclusion: Our current meta-analysis does not show significant differences between EVT alone and EVT plus IA tPA in terms of functional independence or sICH. However, with the limited number of studies and included patients, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to further investigate the benefits and safety of combined EVT and IA tPA., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The Authors declare that they did not receive any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)