Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. To prevent severe infection, mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns with several vaccine types are currently underway. We report pathological and immunological findings in 8 patients who developed vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) after administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. We analyzed patient material using enzyme immune assays, flow cytometry and heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay and performed autopsies on two fatal cases. Eight patients (5 female, 3 male) with a median age of 41.5 years (range, 24 to 53) were referred to us with suspected thrombotic complications 6 to 20 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. All patients had thrombocytopenia at admission. Patients had a median platelet count of 46.5 x109/L (range, 8 to 92). Three had a fatal outcome and 5 were successfully treated. Autopsies showed arterial and venous thromboses in various organs and the occlusion of glomerular capillaries by hyaline thrombi. Sera from VITT patients contain high titer antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) (OD 2.59±0.64). PF4 antibodies in VITT patients induced significant increase in procoagulant markers (P-selectin and phosphatidylserine externalization) compared to healthy volunteers and healthy vaccinated volunteers. The generation of procoagulant platelets was PF4 and heparin dependent. We demonstrate the contribution of antibody-mediated platelet activation in the pathogenesis of VITT.

Background: Life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is treated with the alternative nonheparin anticoagulants argatroban, lepirudin, or danaparoid. Frequently, the pentasaccharide fondaparinux is used off-label., Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of the different anticoagulants for treating HIT., Methods: In a national, multicenter registry study, hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with HIT, an at least intermediate clinical HIT-risk (4Ts score ≥4 points), and received treatment with ≥1 dose of the aforementioned anticoagulants were included. Main outcome measures were the incidences of HIT-specific complications (thromboembolic venous/arterial events, amputations, recurrent/persistent thrombocytopenia, skin lesions) and bleedings., Results: Of 195 patients, 46 (23.6%), 4 (2.1%), 61 (31.3%), and 84 (43.1%) had been treated first-line with argatroban, lepirudin, danaparoid, and fondaparinux, respectively. The composite endpoint of HIT-specific complications (thromboembolic events, amputation, skin necrosis) occurred in 11.7% of patients treated with approved alternative anticoagulation and in 0.0% of fondaparinux-treated patients. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rates were 14.4% during approved alternative anticoagulation and 0.0% during fondaparinux treatment. Bleeding complications occurred in alternatively anticoagulated patients and in fondaparinux-treated patients in 6.3% and 4.8%, respectively. Post hoc analysis of clinical and laboratory features confirmed "true" HIT in at least 74 of 195 (38.0%) patients; 35 of 74 (47.3%) were treated with fondaparinux., Conclusions: Fondaparinux is effective and safe in suspected acute HIT; no HIT-specific complications occurred in the fondaparinux-treated patients, even among those with a high clinical HIT probability. Further data from randomized controlled trials are urgently needed because lepirudin was recalled from the market; danaparoid access has been limited and is not approved in the United States; and argatroban is contraindicated in patients with impaired liver function, and activated partial thromboplastin time confounding may interfere with monitoring. (Retrospective Registry of Patients With Acute Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Type II; NCT01304238)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thrombocytopenia after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been evaluated in several studies, but the pathomechanisms behind this phenomenon are not well described. Here, we assess the influence of TAVI on hemostasis-related biomarkers and their potential role in post-TAVI thrombocytopenia., Methods and Results: We assessed perioperative platelet counts in 307 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. Additionally, hemostasis-related biomarkers including thrombin-anti-thrombin complex (TAT), prothrombin activation fragment 1+2 (F1+2), plasmin-α₂-antiplasmin complex (PAP), and d-dimer were assessed in a subcohort of 35 patients. The course of these parameters was correlated with platelet counts and compared in patients with and without a relevant thrombocytopenia, i.e., a decline in platelet count of ≥50% compared to baseline. Levels of TAT (8.6±8.7μg/l), PAP (992±597μg/l), and d-dimer (1.43±1.66mg/l) were elevated above normal range before TAVI. TAT, F1+2, and d-dimer significantly increased after TAVI, and d-dimer as well as PAP remained elevated until day 7, indicating TAVI-induced increased thrombin formation associated with secondary fibrinolysis. Post-TAVI thrombocytopenia occurred in 17.9% of patients and was associated with a significantly higher incidence of post-TAVI complications, e.g. acute kidney injury and vascular complications. No impact of activated coagulation on thrombocytopenia was observed., Conclusions: TAVI induces an increase in hemostasis-related biomarkers, which persists until 1week after the procedure. The frequent finding of post-TAVI thrombocytopenia appears not to be linked to increased thrombin formation., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In life-threatening immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), treatment with an approved non-heparin anticoagulant is essential. However, off-label use with fondaparinux has been reported in the literature. The study aim was to collect data on "real-life" management of patients with suspected acute HIT regarding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies., Patients and Methods: In a national multi-centre registry study, patients with a 4T's HIT-probability score of ≥ 4 points and treatment with at least one dose of (A)rgatroban, (L)epirudin, (D)anaparoid, or (F)ondaparinux were retrospectively evaluated., Results: Of 195 patients, the 4T's scores were 4/5/6/7/8 points in 46 (23.6%)/50 (25.6%)/74 (38.0%)/13 (6.7%)/7 (3.6%) patients, respectively. During heparin therapy, 47 (24.1%) thromboembolic events, 5 (2.6%) skin lesions, 1 (0.5%) amputation, 24 (12.3%) Hb-relevant bleedings, and 2 (1.0%) fatalities occurred. A functional heparin-induced platelet activation assay was performed in 96.9%, a platelet factor 4/heparin-dependent enzyme immunoassay in 89.2%, a particle gel immunoassay in 12.3%, and a serotonin-release assay in none of the patients. Argatroban was used in 16.4%, lepirudin in 2.1%, danaparoid in 23.6%, fondaparinux in 40.0% of the patients; the sequential therapy strata were: AF (5.6%), DA (5.6%), DF (2.6%), DL (2.1%), ADF (1.5%), and DFL (0.5%)., Conclusions: The current diagnostic laboratory strategy for suspected HIT is mostly (>96%) based on the recommended 2-step strategy (immunoassay plus functional assay). However, there is a wide fondaparinux off-label use (up to 50.3%) for suspected HIT, even in those patients with a high clinical pretest probability. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for HIT-treatment require further evaluation., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a strong risk factor for the development of arterial and venous thromboembolic events. In patients clinically suspected for HIT, immediate cessation of heparin treatment and continuation of anticoagulant treatment using alternative anticoagulants is mandatory in order to minimize the risk of thrombotic events. Alternative anticoagulants that have been successfully used in HIT include the direct acting thrombin inhibitors hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban, and the heparinoid orgaran. In addition, there is growing evidence that the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux is usable for the treatment of HIT patients. This short review summarizes the strategies of alternate anticoagulant treatment in HIT patients and also describes long-term treatment of HIT patients.

Background: We prospectively investigated lepirudin for further parenteral anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)., Methods and Results: Patients with confirmed HIT (n=112) received lepirudin according to need for 2 to 10 days (longer if necessary): A1, treatment: 0.4 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by 0.15 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) intravenous infusion, n=65; A2, treatment in conjunction with thrombolysis: 0.2 mg/kg, followed by 0.10 mg. kg(-1). h(-1), n=4; and B, prophylaxis: 0.10 mg. kg(-1). h(-1), n=43. Outcomes from 95 eligible lepirudin-treated patients were compared with those of historical control patients (n=120). Complete laboratory response (activated partial thromboplastin time ratio >1.5 with /=1 outcome (cumulative incidence 30.9% versus 52.1%; relative risk [RR] 0.71; P=0.12, log-rank test). Bleeding events were more frequent in the lepirudin group than the historical control group (cumulative incidence at 35 days, 44.6% versus 27.2%; RR 2.57; P=0.0001, log-rank test). No difference was observed in bleeding events requiring transfusion (cumulative incidence at 35 days, 12.9% versus 9.1%; RR 1.66; P=0.23, log-rank test); no intracranial bleeding was observed in the lepirudin group., Conclusions: Lepirudin effectively prevents death, limb amputations, and new thromboembolic complications and has an acceptable safety profile in HIT patients. Treatment should be initiated as soon as possible if HIT is suspected.

Background: No data exist regarding the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the heparin-induced-platelet-activation (HIPA) test, the most widely used functional assay in Germany for the detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies., Methods: Nine laboratories used an identical protocol to test eight different sera with the HIPA test. Five laboratories also tested the sera with a platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin-complex ELISA. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium was assessed using 0.2 aFXa units instead of heparin in the HIPA test., Results: Two of nine laboratories had no discrepant HIPA test results. Four laboratories differed in one sample, one reported two discrepant results, and two laboratories reported more than two discrepant results. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium test results differed among laboratories. PF4/heparin ELISA results were identical in all five laboratories., Conclusion: The HIPA test requires strict quality control measures. Using both a sensitive functional assay (HIPA test) and a PF4/heparin ELISA will allow detection of antibodies directed to antigens other than PF4/heparin complexes as well as detection of IgM and IgA antibodies with PF4/heparin specificity.

Background: The immunological type of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most frequent drug-induced thrombocytopenia. This study evaluated the efficacy of recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin or lepirudin), a potent thrombin inhibitor, for anticoagulation in patients with confirmed HIT., Methods and Results: Eighty-two patients in this prospective, multicenter study received 1 of 4 intravenous r-hirudin regimens: A1, HIT patients with thrombosis (n=51), 0.4-mg/kg bolus and then 0.15 mg. kg-1. h-1; A2, HIT patients with thrombosis receiving thrombolysis (n=5), 0. 2-mg/kg bolus and then 0.1 mg. kg-1. h-1; B, HIT patients without thrombosis (n=18), 0.1 mg. kg-1. h-1; and C, during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (n=8), 0.25-mg/kg bolus and then 5-mg boluses as needed. Response criteria were increase in platelet count by >/=30% to >10(9)/L and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values 1.5 to 3.0 times baseline values achieved with a maximum of 2 dose increases. No placebo control was used for ethical reasons. Outcomes of a subset of r-hirudin-treated patients who met predefined inclusion criteria (n=71) were compared with those of a historical control group (n=120) for combined and individual incidences of death, amputations, new thromboembolic complications, and incidences of bleeding. Platelet counts increased rapidly in 88.7% of r-hirudin-treated patients with acute HIT. In regimens A1 and A2, the 25% and 75% quartiles of the aPTT were within the target range at all but 1 time point. The incidence of the combined end point (death, amputation, new thromboembolic complications) was significantly reduced in r-hirudin patients compared with historical control patients (P=0.014). During first selected treatment, the adjusted hazard ratio for r-hirudin patients versus historical control was 0.279 (95% CI, 0.112 to 0.699; P=0.003). Bleeding rates were similar in both groups., Conclusions: r-Hirudin treatment is associated with a rapid and sustained recovery of platelet counts, sufficient aPTT prolongations, and true clinical benefits for patients with HIT.

Sera of 34 patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia (HAT), giving a positive result in the serotonin release assay (SRA), were assessed in a platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin ELISA. Three sera revealing indeterminate results in the SRA and 10 control sera were also investigated. Both tests correlated closely (Kappa 0.742; p = 2.67 x 10(-7)), but one positive serum in the SRA was negative in the pF4/heparin ELISA. We have isolated the HAT antibodies by absorbtion and elution of HAT sera using endothelial cells (HUVEC). Eluates gave similar results as the sera in the PF4/heparin ELISA (Kappa 0.837, p = 9.26 x 10(-9)), and they also correlated very closely with the SRA (Kappa 0.888; p = 8.89 x 10(-10)). This demonstrates that HAT antibodies bind to the same epitope on platelets and on endothelial cells. High heparin concentrations released PF4 in a dose dependent manner from microtiter plates if PF4/heparin, but not if PF4 alone, was covalently linked. Concomitant to the release of PF4, binding of HAT antibodies to PF4/heparin decreased, as indicated by the median optical density (OD) values of OD 0.88 in the presence of buffer compared to OD 0.181 in the presence of 100 IU/ml heparin. The latter values were similar to those obtained when plates were coated with PF4 alone (median OD 0.203). Binding of three eluates was not inhibited by high heparin concentrations and they reacted also with PF4 alone. We conclude that multimolecular PF4/heparin complexes represent the major antigen in HAT. These multimolecular complexes might present several epitopes and form immune complexes after HAT antibody binding which activate platelets via the FcRII. In a few cases, PF4 alone can be recognized by the antibody. However, there is also evidence that other molecules might be involved in some patients.