Search

Objective: To test the hypothesis that IV thrombolysis (IVT) treatment before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is associated with better outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large artery occlusion (LAO) stroke, we examined a large real-world database, the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombectomy Register (SITS-ISTR)., Methods: We identified centers recording ≥10 consecutive patients in the SITS-ISTR, with at least 70% available modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months during 2014 to 2019. We defined LAO as intracranial internal carotid artery, first and second segment of middle cerebral artery, and first segment of anterior cerebral artery. Main outcomes were functional independence (mRS score 0-2) and death at 3 months and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) per modified SITS-Monitoring Study. We performed propensity score-matched (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: Of 6,350 patients from 42 centers, 3,944 (62.1%) received IVT. IVT + EVT-treated patients had less frequent atrial fibrillation, ongoing anticoagulation, previous stroke, heart failure, and prestroke disability. PSM analysis showed that IVT + EVT-treated patients had a higher rate of functional independence than patients treated with EVT alone (46.4% vs 40.3%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of death at 3 months (20.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.035). SICH rates (3.5% vs 3.0%, p = 0.42) were similar in both groups. Multivariate adjustment yielded results consistent with PSM., Conclusion: Pretreatment with IVT was associated with favorable outcomes in EVT-treated LAO stroke in the SITS-ISTR. These findings, while indicative of international routine clinical practice, are limited by observational design, unmeasured confounding, and possible residual confounding by indication., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that IVT before EVT increases the probability of functional independence at 3 months compared to EVT alone., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Early neurological deterioration (END) after stroke onset may predict severe outcomes. Estimated rates of END after intravenous thrombolysis among small patient samples have been reported up to 29.8%. We studied the incidence and factors associated with END among patients following intravenous thrombolysis., Methods: We analyzed SITS-International Stroke Thrombolysis registry patients with known outcomes enrolled in 2010 to 2017. END was defined as an increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 or death within 24 hours from baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. We determined the incidence of END and used logistic regression models to inspect its associated factors. We adjusted for variables found significant in univariate analyses ( P <0.05). Main outcomes were incidence of END, associated predictors of END, ordinal day-90 mRS, and day-90 mortality., Results: We excluded 53 539 patients and included 50 726 patients. The incidence of END was 3415/50 726 (6.7% [95% CI, 6.5%-7.0%]). Factors independently associated with END on multivariate analysis were intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 3.23 [95% CI, 2.96-3.54], P <0.001), large vessel disease (LVD) with carotid stenosis (OR, 2.97 [95% CI, 2.45-3.61], P <0.001), other LVD (OR, 2.41 [95% CI, 2.03-2.88], P <0.001), and ischemic stroke versus transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke mimics (OR, 16.14 [95% CI, 3.99-65.3], P <0.001). END was associated with worse outcome on ordinal mRS: adjusted OR 2.48 (95% CI, 2.39-2.57, P <0.001) by day-90 compared with no END. The adjusted OR for day-90 mortality was 9.70 (95% CI, 8.36-11.26, P <0.001)., Conclusions: The routinely observed rate of END reflected by real-world data is low, but END greatly increases risk of disability and mortality. Readily identifiable factors predict END and may help with understanding causal mechanisms to assist prevention of END.

Background and Purpose- Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) accounts for 5% to 19% of patients with acute stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis. We aimed to compare safety and outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis between patients with PCS and anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and incorporate the results in a meta-analysis. Methods- We included patients in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke Thrombolysis Registry 2013 to 2017 with computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiographic occlusion data. Outcomes were parenchymal hematoma, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) per SITS-MOST (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke Monitoring Study), ECASS II (Second European Co-operative Stroke Study) and NINDS (Neurological Disorders and Stroke definition), 3-month modified Rankin Scale score, and death. Adjustment for SICH risk factors (age, sex, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, blood pressure, glucose, and atrial fibrillation) and center was done using inverse probability treatment weighting, after which an average treatment effect (ATE) was calculated. Meta-analysis of 13 studies comparing outcomes in PCS versus ACS after intravenous thrombolysis was conducted. Results- Of 5146 patients, 753 had PCS (14.6%). Patients with PCS had lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: 7 (interquartile range, 4-13) versus 13 (7-18), P <0.001 and fewer cerebrovascular risk factors. In patients with PCS versus ACS, parenchymal hematoma occurred in 3.2% versus 7.9%, ATE (95% CI): -4.7% (-6.3% to 3.0%); SICH SITS-MOST in 0.6% versus 1.9%, ATE: -1.4% (-2.2% to -0.7%); SICH NINDS in 3.1% versus 7.8%, ATE: -3.0% (-6.3% to 0.3%); SICH ECASS II in 1.8% versus 5.4%, ATE: -2.3% (-5.3% to 0.7%). In PCS versus ACS, 3-month outcomes (70% data availability) were death 18.5% versus 20.5%, ATE: 6.0% (0.7%-11.4%); modified Rankin Scale score 0-1, 45.2% versus 37.5%, ATE: 1.7% (-6.6% to 3.2%); modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 61.3% versus 49.4%, ATE: 2.4% (3.1%-7.9%). Meta-analysis showed relative risk for SICH in PCS versus ACS being 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.75). Conclusions- The risk of bleeding complications after intravenous thrombolysis in PCS was half that of ACS, with similar functional outcomes and higher risk of death, acknowledging limitations of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for stroke severity or infarct size adjustment.

Background: Acute stroke due to supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Open craniotomy haematoma evacuation has not been found to have any benefit in large randomised trials. We assessed whether minimally invasive catheter evacuation followed by thrombolysis (MISTIE), with the aim of decreasing clot size to 15 mL or less, would improve functional outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage., Methods: MISTIE III was an open-label, blinded endpoint, phase 3 trial done at 78 hospitals in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and Asia. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with spontaneous, non-traumatic, supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage of 30 mL or more. We used a computer-generated number sequence with a block size of four or six to centrally randomise patients to image-guided MISTIE treatment (1·0 mg alteplase every 8 h for up to nine doses) or standard medical care. Primary outcome was good functional outcome, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 365 days, adjusted for group differences in prespecified baseline covariates (stability intracerebral haemorrhage size, age, Glasgow Coma Scale, stability intraventricular haemorrhage size, and clot location). Analysis of the primary efficacy outcome was done in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all eligible, randomly assigned patients who were exposed to treatment. All randomly assigned patients were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01827046., Findings: Between Dec 30, 2013, and Aug 15, 2017, 506 patients were randomly allocated: 255 (50%) to the MISTIE group and 251 (50%) to standard medical care. 499 patients (n=250 in the MISTIE group; n=249 in the standard medical care group) received treatment and were included in the mITT analysis set. The mITT primary adjusted efficacy analysis estimated that 45% of patients in the MISTIE group and 41% patients in the standard medical care group had achieved an mRS score of 0-3 at 365 days (adjusted risk difference 4% [95% CI -4 to 12]; p=0·33). Sensitivity analyses of 365-day mRS using generalised ordered logistic regression models adjusted for baseline variables showed that the estimated odds ratios comparing MISTIE with standard medical care for mRS scores higher than 5 versus 5 or less, higher than 4 versus 4 or less, higher than 3 versus 3 or less, and higher than 2 versus 2 or less were 0·60 (p=0·03), 0·84 (p=0·42), 0·87 (p=0·49), and 0·82 (p=0·44), respectively. At 7 days, two (1%) of 255 patients in the MISTIE group and ten (4%) of 251 patients in the standard medical care group had died (p=0·02) and at 30 days, 24 (9%) patients in the MISTIE group and 37 (15%) patients in the standard medical care group had died (p=0·07). The number of patients with symptomatic bleeding and brain bacterial infections was similar between the MISTIE and standard medical care groups (six [2%] of 255 patients vs three [1%] of 251 patients; p=0·33 for symptomatic bleeding; two [1%] of 255 patients vs 0 [0%] of 251 patients; p=0·16 for brain bacterial infections). At 30 days, 76 (30%) of 255 patients in the MISTIE group and 84 (33%) of 251 patients in the standard medical care group had one or more serious adverse event, and the difference in number of serious adverse events between the groups was statistically significant (p=0·012)., Interpretation: For moderate to large intracerebral haemorrhage, MISTIE did not improve the proportion of patients who achieved a good response 365 days after intracerebral haemorrhage. The procedure was safely adopted by our sample of surgeons., Funding: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Genentech., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Limited data exist on clot composition and detailed characteristics of arterial thrombi associated with large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Advances in endovascular thrombectomy and related imaging modalities have created a unique opportunity to analyze thrombi removed from cerebral arteries. Insights into thrombus composition, etiology, physical properties and neurovascular interactions may lead to future advancements in acute ischemic stroke treatment and improved clinical outcomes. Advances in imaging techniques may enhance clot characterization and inform therapeutic decision-making prior to treatment and reveal stroke etiology to guide secondary prevention. Current imaging techniques can provide some information about thrombi, but there remains much to evaluate about relationships that may exist among thrombus composition, occlusion characteristics and treatment outcomes. Improved pathophysiological characterization of clot types, their properties and how these properties change over time, together with clinical correlates from ongoing studies, may facilitate revascularization with thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Interdisciplinary approaches covering clinical, engineering and scientific aspects of thrombus research will be key to advancing the understanding of thrombi and improving acute ischemic stroke therapy. This consensus statement integrates recent research on clots and thrombi retrieved from cerebral arteries and provides a rationale for further analyses, including current opportunities and limitations.

Background and Purpose: Significance and management of blood pressure (BP) changes in acute stroke care are unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the impact of 24-hour BP variability (BPV) on outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis., Methods: From the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis registry, 28 976 patients with documented pre-treatment systolic BP at 2 and 24 hours were analyzed. The primary measure of BP variability was successive variability. Data were preprocessed using coarsened exact matching. We assessed early neurological improvement, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), and long-term functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 90 days) by binary and ordinal regression analyses., Results: Attempts to explain successive variation for analysis of BPV with patients characteristics at admission found systolic BP (5.5% variance) to be most influential, yet 92% of BPV variance remained unexplained. Independently from systolic BP, successive variation for analysis of BPV was associated with poor functional outcome mRS score of 0 to 2 (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.98), disadvantage across the shift of mRS (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), mortality (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), SICH SITS (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23), and SICH ECASS (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.40; ECASS [European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study 2]). Analyzing successive variation for analysis of BPV as a function of pre-treatment, systolic BP significantly improved the prediction of functional outcome (mRS score of 0-1, mRS score of 0-2, neurological improvement, mRS-shift: all P interaction <0.01). Excluding patients with atrial fibrillation in a sensitivity analysis gave consistent results overall., Conclusions: This study suggests the need for a more individual BP management accounting for pre-treatment BP and the acute BP course (ie, BPV) to achieve best possible outcome for the patient., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: We hypothesized that any sex-related difference in outcome poststroke is explained by other prognostic factors and that the response to intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) is equal in males and females after adjustment for such factors., Methods: We accessed an independent collection of randomized clinical trials-the VISTA (Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive). Data were preprocessed by selecting complete cases (n=8028) and matching females to males (coarsened exact matching, n=4575, 24.3% r-tPA). Outcome was assessed by the 7-point modified Rankin Scale (mRS) measured at 90 days after ischemic stroke. Relationship among variables was estimated by adjusted regression analysis., Results: In nonthrombolyzed patients, ordinal analysis of mRS adjusting for stroke- and sex-related prognostic factors suggested comparable outcomes for females and males (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.06). Females responded comparably to r-tPA as did males, irrespective of the outcome definition of mRS (ordinal: P Interaction =0.46, relative excess risk because of interaction=0). The number needed to treat was 6.8 and 11.2 for 1 female to achieve mRS score of 0 to 2 and 0 to 1, which was highly congruent with males. Analysis for a nonlinear variation of age-by-sex revealed a good outcome for females <45 years with significant disadvantage thereafter (mRS score of 0-2: P Interaction =0.004). No relationship between sex, r-tPA, and bleeding complications was evident., Conclusions: Functional outcome (mRS) without r-tPA was overall similar between the sexes, as was the response to r-tPA. Nonlinear sex-by-age interaction improved estimates of functional independence; this should be considered in sex-related studies in stroke., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) correlates with presence of large anterior vessel occlusion (LAVO). However, the application of the full NIHSS in the prehospital setting to select patients eligible for treatment with thrombectomy is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of simple clinical selection strategies., Methods: Data from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (January 2012-May 2014) were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with complete breakdown of NIHSS scores and documented vessel status were included. We assessed the association of prehospital stroke scales and NIHSS symptom profiles with LAVO (internal carotid artery, carotid-terminus or M1-segment of the middle cerebral artery)., Results: Among 3505 patients, 23.6% (n=827) had LAVO. Pathological finding on the NIHSS item best gaze was strongly associated with LAVO (adjusted odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 3.8-5.3). All 3 face-arm-speech-time test (FAST) items identified LAVO with high sensitivity. Addition of the item gaze to the original FAST score (G-FAST) or high scores on other simplified stroke scales increased specificity. The NIHSS symptom profiles representing total anterior syndromes showed a 10-fold increased likelihood for LAVO compared with a nonspecific clinical profile. If compared with an NIHSS threshold of ≥6, the prehospital stroke scales performed similarly or even better without losing sensitivity., Conclusions: Simple modification of the face-arm-speech-time score or evaluating the NIHSS symptom profile may help to stratify patients' risk of LAVO and to identify individuals who deserve rapid transfer to comprehensive stroke centers. Prospective validation in the prehospital setting is required., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Objective: To study the safety of off-label IV thrombolysis in patients with very severe stroke (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] scores >25) compared with severe stroke (NIHSS scores 15-25), where treatment is within European regulations., Methods: Data were analyzed from 57,247 patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving IV tissue plasminogen activator in 793 hospitals participating in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (2002-2013). Eight hundred sixty-eight patients (1.5%) had NIHSS scores >25 and 19,995 (34.9%) had NIHSS scores 15-25. Outcome measures were parenchymal hemorrhage, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality, and functional outcome., Results: Parenchymal hemorrhage occurred in 10.7% vs 11.0% (p = 0.79), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage per SITS-MOST (SITS-Monitoring Study) in 1.4% vs 2.5% (p = 0.052), death at 3 months in 50.4% vs 26.9% (p < 0.001), and functional independence at 3 months in 14.0% vs 29.0% (p < 0.001) of patients with NIHSS scores >25 and NIHSS scores 15-25, respectively. Multivariate adjustment did not change findings from univariate comparisons. Posterior circulation stroke was more common in patients with NIHSS scores >25 (36.2% vs 7.4%, p < 0.001), who were also more often obtunded or comatose on presentation (58.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.001). Of patients with NIHSS scores >25, 26.2% were treated >3 hours from symptom onset vs 14.5% with NIHSS scores of 15-25., Conclusions: Our data show no excess risk of cerebral hemorrhage in patients with NIHSS score >25 compared to score 15-25, suggesting that the European contraindication to IV tissue plasminogen activator treatment at NIHSS levels >25 may be unwarranted. Increased mortality and lower rates of functional independence in patients with NIHSS score >25 are explained by higher stroke severity, impaired consciousness on presentation due to posterior circulation ischemia, and longer treatment delays., (© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) item profiles that were recently proposed and validated may prove useful for clinical prognostication and research studies. We aimed to validate the NIHSS item profiles in hyper-acute stroke patients who received thrombolysis treatment (tissue-type plasminogen activator)., Methods: We applied the latent class analysis probabilities of the profile membership generated from the derivation study onto NIHSS data from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST). We separately considered NIHSS data collected within 3 hours and at ≈24 hours after stroke onset to obtain 2 sets of symptom groupings. The discrimination and calibration of both sets of symptom profiles were assessed from their association with outcomes. The outcome measures included modified Rankin Scale (mRS; using full distribution and dichotomized, mRS 0-1 or back to baseline) at day 90 and mortality by 90 days., Results: We obtained data for 6843 patients. Ordinal analysis of mRS showed odds of better outcome across the profiles, for each set of symptom profiles, adjusted for age, sex, and prestroke mRS. Dichotomized outcomes mirrored the ordinal findings. There were significant differences in prognostic discrimination ability for the dichotomized outcome measures between the 2 sets of symptom profiles, with the latter set (ie, 24-hour symptom profiles) performing better., Conclusions: The NIHSS item profiles are individually associated with functional outcome and mortality in acute stroke patients treated with tissue-type plasminogen activator. Considering profiles of NIHSS subscores rather than only the total score is informative for prognostication, particularly for assessments collected 24 hours after stroke onset., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Data are limited on optimal threshold for baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in predicting outcome after stroke thrombolysis (intravenous thrombolysis)., Aims: Finding thresholds for baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores that predict functional outcome and baseline vessel occlusion., Methods: We analyzed 44 331 patients with available modified Rankin Scale score at three-months and 11 632 patients with computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography documented vessel occlusion at baseline in the SITS-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. Main outcomes were functional independency (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at three-months and baseline vessel occlusion. We obtained area under the curves by receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculated multivariately adjusted odds ratio for the outcomes of interest based on baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores., Results: For functional independency, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores of 12 (area under the curve 0·775) and for baseline vessel occlusion, scores of 11 (area under the curve 0·678) were optimal threshold values. For functional independency, adjusted odds ratio decreased to 0·07 (95% CI 0·05-0·11), and for presence of baseline occlusion, aOR increased to 3·28 (95% CI 3·04-3·58) for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores 12 and 11, respectively, compared with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale thresholds decreased with time from stroke onset to imaging, with 2-3 points, respectively, if time to imaging exceeded three-hours., Conclusions: Ideally, all acute stroke patients should have immediate access to multimodal imaging. In reality these services are limited. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores of 11 and 12 were identified as markers of baseline vessel occlusion and functional independency after intravenous thrombolysis, respectively. These values are time dependent; therefore, a threshold of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 9 or 10 points may be considered in the prehospital selection of patients for immediate transfer to centers with multimodal imaging and availability of highly specialized treatments., (© 2015 World Stroke Organization.)

Background: To assess the differences across continental regions in terms of stroke imaging obtained for making acute revascularization therapy decisions, and to identify obstacles to participating in randomized trials involving multimodal imaging., Methods: STroke Imaging Repository (STIR) and Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA)-Imaging circulated an online survey through its website, through the websites of national professional societies from multiple countries as well as through email distribution lists from STIR and the above mentioned societies., Results: We received responses from 223 centers (2 from Africa, 38 from Asia, 10 from Australia, 101 from Europe, 4 from Middle East, 55 from North America, 13 from South America). In combination, the sites surveyed administered acute revascularization therapy to a total of 25,326 acute stroke patients in 2012. Seventy-three percent of these patients received intravenous (i.v.) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and 27%, endovascular therapy. Vascular imaging was routinely obtained in 79% (152/193) of sites for endovascular therapy decisions, and also as part of standard IV tPA treatment decisions at 46% (92/198) of sites. Modality, availability and use of acute vascular and perfusion imaging before revascularization varied substantially between geographical areas. The main obstacles to participate in randomized trials involving multimodal imaging included: mainly insufficient research support and staff (50%, 79/158) and infrequent use of multimodal imaging (27%, 43/158) ., Conclusion: There were significant variations among sites and geographical areas in terms of stroke imaging work-up used tomake decisions both for intravenous and endovascular revascularization. Clinical trials using advanced imaging as a selection tool for acute revascularization therapy should address the need for additional resources and technical support, and take into consideration the lack of routine use of such techniques in trial planning., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: None declared., (© 2015 World Stroke Organization.)

Background and Purpose: Shorter delays between symptom onset and treatment translate into better outcomes after ischemic stroke thrombolysis. There are considerable intercenter variations in treatment delivery. We analyzed the trends of door-to-needle times (DNTs) in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke registry between 2003 and 2011., Methods: We extracted from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke registry (n=45 079) year of treatment, center code, DNT, sex, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and comorbidity. For each center, the year they joined the registry and the annual volume of patients were determined (<5, 5-24, 25-49, 50-74, 75-99, and ≥100 patients/y)., Results: DNT was not available for 720 (1.6%) patients. The overall mean (SD) DNT was 73 (37) minutes with a median (interquartile range) of 67 (47-91) minutes. The DNT was 65 (46-90), 68 (50-92), and 72 (51-98) minutes for centers joined early (2003-2005), later (2006-2009), and recently (2009-2011), respectively. Center volume had more robust effect on DNT than year of treatment, and the shortest DNTs were seen in centers with volumes ≥100 patients/y. Earlier enrollment period was also associated with shorter delays., Conclusions: Centers that joined the registry earlier and those with high annual volume achieved shorter DNT than centers that joined later and low-volume centers. However, in most of the centers, DNT did not change much during the registry period. A multicenter project aiming to reduce DNT is warranted., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: There are concerns that systemic thrombolysis might not achieve clinically important outcome amongst chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Our aim was to investigate the relevance of CHF on the outcome of acute stroke patients who received thrombolysis., Methods: A non-randomized cohort analysis was conducted using data obtained from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. The association of outcome amongst CHF patients with thrombolysis treatment was described using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) distribution at day 90, stratified by the presence of atrial fibrillation. Dichotomized outcomes were considered as a secondary end-point., Results: 5677 patients were identified, of whom 2366 (41.7%) received thombolysis. Five hundred and three (8.9%) patients had CHF, of whom 209 (41.6%) received thrombolysis. The presence of CHF was associated with a negative impact on overall stroke outcome [odds ratio (OR) 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.87), P < 0.001]. However, thrombolysis treatment was associated with favourable functional outcome using ordinal mRS, irrespective of CHF status, after adjustment for age and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.04-2.01, P = 0.029) for CHF patients versus OR 1.50 (95% CI 1.36-1.66, P < 0.001) for non-CHF patients]. CHF patients had higher mortality at day 90 than non-CHF patients. There was no significant difference for recurrent stroke or symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage within 7 days of the initial stroke between CHF and thrombolysis groups., Conclusions: Chronic heart failure was associated with a worse outcome with or without thrombolysis. However, acute stroke patients who received thrombolysis had more favourable outcome regardless of CHF status, compared with their untreated peers. Our findings should reassure clinicians considering systemic thrombolysis treatment in hyperacute ischaemic stroke patients with CHF.

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is beneficial in, even very elderly, acute ischemic stroke patients. However, while the relation between treatment benefit and treatment delay (onset time to treatment) in patients younger than 80 years is well known, it is uncertain in the very elderly., Aims: This analysis aims at examining this relationship in the elderly, and to provide a comparison with the derived relationship in younger patients as a check of validity., Methods: We assessed the interaction between age, onset time to treatment, and thrombolysis exposure by analyzing the modified Rankin scale score distribution or mortality rate at 90 days, among patients registered in a trials archive. We established whether the effect of alteplase changes with onset time to treatment, by treating onset time to treatment as a continuum in a multivariate logistic regression model., Results: Data were available for 3063 patients, of whom 2341 were thrombolysed. Five hundred ninety-seven patients were aged >80, of whom 352 were thrombolysed. Among patients aged >80, no significant interaction of outcome with onset time to treatment was observed (P = 0·4650), but the estimated slope of the decay in benefit with onset time to treatment was comparable with that established for younger patients. Analyzing the entire dataset, there was an interaction between onset time to treatment and alteplase treatment (P = 0·0159), but neither between age and onset time to treatment (P = 0·7098) nor between age and alteplase treatment (P = 0·0755)., Conclusions: In this nonrandomized comparison, the relationship of benefit and safety with thrombolysis across onset time to treatment in very elderly stroke patients was comparable with that in their younger counterparts. Across the investigated time span of 3·5 h, we can safely treat with the same time window as we use for younger patients., (© 2014 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2014 World Stroke Organization.)

Background: The National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the European Co-operative Acute Stroke III trials enrolled a largely Caucasian population, but the results are often extrapolated onto non-Caucasians. A limited number of nonrandomized studies have proposed that non-Caucasian patients show differential response to tissue plasminogen activator., Aims And/or Hypothesis: We examined if non-Caucasian patients of mixed national origin within the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archives neuroprotection trials responded differently to tissue plasminogen activator compared with Caucasians., Methods: We matched patients within each race-subtype for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scales, and diabetes status, and excluded outliers. We tested for an interaction of race ethnicity with tissue plasminogen activator on predicting outcomes at α = 0·05. We compared 90-day ordinal outcome (modified Rankin Scale; primary analysis) and dichotomized outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-1; modified Rankin Scale 0-2; survival) within individual race ethnicity., Results: One thousand nine hundred forty-six thrombolysed patients (125 Blacks, 39 Asians, and 1821 Caucasians) were matched with 1946 non-thrombolysed patients in each race ethnicity group. Postmatching, there were no imbalances in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scales and age between the groups (P > 0·05). The interaction of tissue plasminogen activator with race ethnicity was nonsignificant in ordinal (P = 0·4) and in dichotomized outcome models (P > 0·05). Ordinal odds for improved outcomes were 1·5 for all patients (P < 0·05). Ordinal odds for Caucasians were 1·5 (P < 0·05); for Blacks, 2·1 (P < 0·05); and for Asians, 1·2 (P > 0·05; 1·6 after 1:2 matching with nonthrombolysed, because of small numbers). Dichotomized functional outcomes improved after thrombolysis overall, in Caucasians, in Blacks (modified Rankin Scale 0-2 only), and in Asians (after 1:2 matching; P > 0·05). Odds for survival were consistent across all groups., Conclusions: These results do not suggest a differential response to tissue plasminogen activator based on race ethnicity. Among Asians, data were particularly sparse, and results should be interpreted with caution., (© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization.)

Objective: Controversy surrounds the safety of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in ischemic stroke patients treated with warfarin. The European tPA license precludes its use in anticoagulated patients altogether. American guidelines accept IV tPA use with an international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.7. The influence of warfarin on symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), arterial recanalization, and long-term functional outcome in stroke thrombolysis remains unclear., Methods: We analyzed data from 45,074 patients treated with IV tPA enrolled in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. A total of 768 patients had baseline warfarin treatment with INR ≤ 1.7. Outcome measures were SICH, arterial recanalization, mortality, and functional independence at 3 months., Results: Patients on warfarin with INR ≤ 1.7 were older, had more comorbidities, and had more severe strokes compared to patients without warfarin. There were no significant differences between patients with and without warfarin in SICH rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72-2.11 per SITS-MOST; aOR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.82-1.70 per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II) after adjustment for age, stroke severity, and comorbidities. Neither did warfarin independently influence mortality (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83-1.35) or functional independence at 3 months (aOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.81-1.24). Arterial recanalization by computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography trended higher in warfarin patients (62% [37 of 59] vs 55% [776/1,475], p = 0.066). Recanalization approximated by disappearance at 22 to 36 hours of a baseline hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign was increased (63% [124 of 196] vs 55% [3,901 of 7,099], p = 0.022)., Interpretation: Warfarin treatment with INR ≤ 1.7 did not increase the risk for SICH or death, and had no impact on long-term functional outcome in patients treated with IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke., (© 2013 American Neurological Association.)

Importance: Pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolysis shows no statistically significant benefit beyond 4.5 hours, with the possible advantage perhaps offset by risk., Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients who were treated within 4.5 to 6 hours or within 3 to 4.5 hours of the onset of an ischemic stroke with the outcomes of patients who were treated within 3 hours in the SITS-ISTR., Design: An observational study based on SITS-ISTR data during the period from 2002 to 2011., Setting: Acute and emergency care., Participants: Of 29 618 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 283 (1.0%) were treated within 4.5 to 6 hours of onset, 4056 (13.7%) were within 3 to 4.5 hours of onset, and 25 279 (85.4%) were treated within 3 hours of onset, in compliance with other European Union approval criteria., Exposure: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase., Main Outcomes and Measures: Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) and mortality at 3 months and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). P values are based on comparisons between patients treated within 4.5 to 6 hours or within 3 to 4.5 hours of onset against patients treated within 3 hours of onset., Results: Results are presented as within 4.5 to 6 hour vs within 3 to 4.5 hours vs within 3 hours. Median time from stroke onset to treatment was 295 vs 210 minutes vs 138 minutes (P < .01), median age was 65 vs 67 vs 68 years (P < .01), and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9 vs 9 vs 12 (P < .01). Rate of functional independence was 61.3% (P = .40) vs 62.7% (P < .01) vs 58.4%; mortality rate was 11.8% (P = .99) vs 11.1% (P = .21) vs 11.8%; and rate of SICH was 2.6% (P = .17) vs 1.8% (P = .27) vs 1.5%. Multivariate analysis detected no significant difference in SICH (P > .05), mortality (P > .05), or independence (P > .05). Time from stroke onset to treatment as a continuous variable was significantly associated with higher rates of SICH and poor 3-month outcome after adjustment for age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score., Conclusions and Relevance: The treatment remains safe and effective for patients treated within 3 to 4.5 hours compared with patients treated within 3 hours. Our selected group of patients treated within 4.5 to 6 hours of stroke onset did not have worse outcomes than patients treated within 3 hours. An inevitable limitation of our observational study is the possible nonequivalence of the cohorts, particularly the 4.5- to 6-hour cohort relative to the other 2 cohorts.

Background and Purpose: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is approved for acute ischemic stroke, but its use is limited by numerous contraindications and warnings arising from trial selection criteria or expert opinions. We examined outcomes from alteplase-treated versus untreated patients, registered in a trials archive, according to presence or absence of specified contraindications and warnings., Methods: We analyzed 90-day modified Rankin Scale across the whole distribution of scores using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, with adjustment for age and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, followed by proportional odds logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds ratios for preferred outcome., Results: We used data from 9613 ischemic stroke patients of whom 2755 were treated with thrombolysis. Adjusted odds ratios showed a broad trend of more favorable 3-month outcome associated with alteplase treatment versus no treatment in various subgroups of patients with contraindications and warnings; for example, 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.70) in patients aged >80 (n=1805), 1.50 (95% CI, 1.03-2.18) in patients with combined history of prior stroke and diabetes mellitus (n=672), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.19-1.70) in patients on prior single antiplatelet agent (n=1626), 2.20 (95% CI, 1.12-4.32) in patients on oral anticoagulation, and International Normalized Ratio≤1.7 (n=157), 1.50 (95% CI, 1.15-1.97) in patients with baseline glucose >180 (n=879), and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.12-2.18) in patients with pretreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Score >22 (n=620)., Conclusions: This comprehensive retrospective analysis of various contraindications and warnings provides reassurance about benefits and risks of intravenous alteplase treatment in common clinical situations.

Background and Purpose: Pooled analyses show benefits of intravenous alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment for acute ischemic stroke up to 4.5 hours after onset despite marketing approval for up to 3 hours. However, the benefit from thrombolysis is critically time-dependent and if extending the time window reduces treatment urgency, this could reduce the population benefit from any extension., Methods: Based on 3830 UK patients registered between 2005 to 2010 in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (SITS-ISTR), a Monte Carlo simulation was used to model recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment up to 4·5 hours from onset and assess the impact (numbers surviving with little or no disability) from changes in hospital treatment times associated with this extended time window., Results: We observed a significant relation between time remaining to treat and time taken to treat in the UK SITS-ISTR data set after adjustment for censoring. Simulation showed that as this "deadline effect" increases, an extended treatment time window entails that an increasing number of patients are treated at a progressively lower absolute benefit to a point where the population benefit from extending the time window is entirely negated., Conclusions: Despite the benefit for individual patients treated up to 4.5 hours after onset, the population benefit may be reduced or lost altogether if extending the time window results in more patients being treated but at a lower absolute benefit. A universally applied reduction in hospital arrival to treatment times of 8 minutes would confer a population benefit as large as the time window extension.

Background and Purpose: Atrial fibrillation has been considered a risk factor for poor outcome from acute stroke and may influence response to thrombolysis, although supporting data are limited due to potential confounding with age and stroke severity., Method: We assessed the association of atrial fibrillation and thrombolysis exposure with the modified Rankin Scale score distribution at 90 days among patients registered in a trials archive. We used an age and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-adjusted Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to test significance (P) followed by proportional odds logistic regression analysis to estimate the ORs for improved modified Rankin Scale score., Results: Data were available for 7091 patients, of whom 3027 were thrombolyzed. A total of 1631 patients had a history of atrial fibrillation, of whom 639 were thrombolyzed. Among patients with atrial fibrillation, baseline severity was greater (median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 14 versus 12; P<0.001) and age was higher (mean age, 74.0 versus 66.5; P<0.001). An association of treatment with outcome was seen independently and was of similar magnitude within patients with atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.12-1.73; P<0.001) and without atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.69; P<0.001). No association of atrial fibrillation and overall stroke outcome could be found (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-1.03; P=0.409)., Conclusions: In this nonrandomized comparison, presence of atrial fibrillation had no independent impact on stroke outcome and compared with untreated comparators, the patients who received thrombolysis experienced an advantage in outcomes that was of equal magnitude whether in the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation.

Background: Patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) and prior stroke (PS) were excluded from European approval of alteplase in stroke. We examined the influence of DM and PS on the outcomes of patients who received thrombolytic therapy (T; data from Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register) compared to nonthrombolyzed controls (C; data from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive)., Methods: We selected ischemic stroke patients on whom we held data on age, baseline NIH Stroke Scale score (NIHSS), and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS). We compared the distribution of mRS between T and C by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and proportional odds logistic regression, after adjustment for age and baseline NIHSS, in patients with and without DM, PS, or the combination. We report odds ratios (OR) for improved distribution of mRS with 95% confidence interval (CI) and CMH p value., Results: Data were available for 29,500 patients: 5,411 (18.5%) had DM, 5,019 had PS (17.1%), and 1,141 (5.5%) had both. Adjusted mRS outcomes were better for T vs C among patients with DM (OR 1.45 [1.30-1.62], n = 5,354), PS (OR 1.55 [1.40-1.72], n = 4,986), or concomitant DM and PS (OR 1.23 [0.996-1.52], p = 0.05, n = 1,136), all CMH p < 0.0001. These are comparable to outcomes between T and C among patients with neither DM nor PS: OR = 1.53 (1.42-1.63), p < 0.0001, n = 19,339. There was no interaction on outcome between DM and PS with alteplase treatment (tissue plasminogen activator × DM × PS, p = 0.5). Age ≤80 years or >80 years did not influence our findings., Conclusions: Outcomes from thrombolysis are better than the controls among patients with DM, PS, or both. We find no statistical justification for the exclusion of these patients from receiving thrombolytic therapy.

Thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase is the primary therapy for acute ischemic stroke, and is approved in most countries. Early administration improves functional outcome though benefit and risk depend on the time elapsed between stroke onset and initiation of treatment. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated benefit from intravenous thrombolysis when initiated up to 4.5 hours after symptom onset, and pooled analysis of all trials indicates that the sooner that alteplase is given, the greater is the benefit. Treatment carries a risk of bleeding, with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) of around 3%. Initiating treatment after 4.5 hours increases mortality and reverses the risk-benefit balance. Baseline stroke severity, age, diabetes and concomitant stroke are associated with poorer outcome from acute stroke; but secondary analyses and controlled registry data suggest that intravenous alteplase remains effective in most subgroups. Intra-arterial thrombolysis has a less extensive evidence base and is mostly unapproved for acute stroke. Access to thrombolysis remains patchy and involves unacceptable delays: greater awareness of the benefits and time dependency are crucial., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: "Home time" (HT) refers to the number of days over the first 90 after stroke onset that a patient spends residing in their own home or a relative's home versus any institutional care. It is an accessible and objective parameter, free from subjective bias, with potential as an outcome measure in acute stroke trials. We sought to validate HT and assess treatment responsiveness using independent data., Methods: We estimated HT in the Stroke Acute Ischemic NXY Treatment (SAINT) I neuroprotection trial. We compared outcomes between thrombolyzed (T) and nonthrombolyzed comparators (C) using HT and the modified Rankin Scale. For our primary analysis, we adjusted for baseline covariates that significantly influence HT and in sensitivity analyses considered all variables that differed between groups at baseline. We report ordinal logistic regression and analysis of covariance with 95% CIs. We describe the relationship of HT with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and its components and with Day 90 modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index., Results: SAINT I included 1699 patients from 23 countries, of whom 28.7% received alteplase. HT correlated with age, baseline severity, alteplase use, side of ischemic lesion, presence of diabetes, and country of patient enrollment (each P<0.05). We found an association between use of alteplase with better adjusted outcomes by either measure (OR for extended HT, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.72; P=0.009; analysis of covariance P=0.007 with a 5.5-day advantage; OR for more favorable modified Rankin Scale, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.00; P<0.0001; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P=0.046). HT was significantly associated with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and each component of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale except level of consciousness, dysarthria, and ataxia. HT was significantly associated with Day 90 modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index., Conclusions: HT is a responsive measure for use in multinational acute stroke trials. Its inclusion as a complementary outcome is reasonable. We propose treatment effects are adjusted for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, side of stroke lesion, country of enrollment, and the presence of diabetes.

Background and Purpose: Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients aged > 80 years is not approved in some countries due to limited trial data in the very elderly. We compared outcomes between thrombolysed and nonthrombolysed (control) patients from neuroprotection trials to assess any influence of age on response. Method-Among patients with ischemic stroke of known age, pretreatment severity (baseline National Institutes of Health Scale Score), and 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale score; National Institutes of Health Scale score), we compared the distribution of modified Rankin score in thrombolysed patients with control subjects by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and then logistic regression after adjustment for age and baseline National Institutes of Health Scale score. We examined patients ≤ 80 and ≥ 81 years separately and then each age decile., Results: Rankin data were available for 5817 patients, 1585 thrombolysed and 4232 control subjects; 20.5% were aged > 80 years (mean ± SD, 85.1 ± 3.4 years). Baseline severity was higher among thrombolysed than control subjects (median National Institutes of Health Scale score 14 versus 13, P < 0.05). The distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores was better among thrombolysed patients (P < 0.0001; OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.54). The association occurred independently with similar magnitude among young (P < 0.0001; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.59) and elderly (P = 0.002; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.70) patients. ORs were consistent across all age deciles > 30 years; outcomes assessed by National Institutes of Health Scale score gave supporting significant findings, and dichotomized modified Rankin Scale score outcomes were also consistent., Conclusions: Outcome after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke was significantly better than in control subjects. Despite the expected poorer outcomes among elderly compared with young patients that is independent of any treatment effect, the association between thrombolysis treatment and improved outcome is maintained in the very elderly. Age alone should not be a barrier to treatment.

Objective: The use of alteplase in patients who have had a prior stroke and concomitant diabetes is not approved in Europe. To examine the influence of diabetes and prior stroke on outcomes, we compared data on thrombolysed patients with nonthrombolysed comparators., Research Design and Methods: We selected patients with ischemic stroke on whom we had data on age, pretreatment baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (b-NIHSS), and 90-day outcome measures (functional modified Rankin score [mRS]) and neurological measures [NIHSS]) in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. We compared outcomes between thrombolysed patients and nonthrombolysed comparators in those with and without diabetes, those who have had a prior stroke, or both and report findings using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and proportional odds logistic regression analyses. We report an age-adjusted and b-NIHSS-adjusted CMH P value and odds ratio (OR)., Results: Rankin data were available for 5,817 patients: 1,585 thrombolysed patients and 4,232 nonthrombolysed comparators. A total 1,334 (24.1%) patients had diabetes, 1,898 (33.7%) patients have had a prior stroke, and 491 (8%) patients had both. Diabetes and nondiabetes had equal b-NIHSS (median 13; P = 0.3), but patients who have had a prior stroke had higher b-NIHSS than patients who have not had a prior stroke (median 13 vs. 12; P < 0.0001). Functional outcomes were better for thrombolysed patients versus nonthrombolysed comparators among both nondiabetic (P < 0.0001; OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3-1.6]) and diabetic (P = 0.1; 1.3 [1.05-1.6 ]) subjects. Similarly, outcomes were better for thrombolysed patients versus nonthrombolysed comparators among who have not had a prior stroke (P < 0.0001; 1.4 [1.2-1.6 ]) and those who have (P = 0.02; 1.3 [1.04-1.6 ]). There was no interaction of diabetes and prior stroke with treatment (P = 0.8). Neurological outcomes were consistent with the mRS., Conclusions: Outcomes from thrombolysis are better among patients with diabetes and/or those who have had a prior stroke than in control subjects. Withholding thrombolytic treatment from otherwise-eligible patients may not be justified.

Background and Purpose: Baseline stroke severity predicts outcomes among thrombolysed patients. The baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) thresholds are sometimes used to select patients for thrombolysis, clinical trial enrollment, or both. Using data lodged with Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive, we compared adjusted outcomes between thrombolysed and nonthrombolysed patients enrolled in neuroprotection trials (1998-2007) to assess the influence of various levels of baseline NIHSS. Method-We assessed the association of treatment with outcome, measured across the modified Rankin scale score distribution, in patients categorized by baseline NIHSS in increments of 4. We used an age and baseline NIHSS adjusted Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test followed by proportional odds logistic regression analysis. We report the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P values and estimated odds ratios (OR) for improved modified Rankin scale score distribution with treatment for patients within each baseline NIHSS category., Results: Data were available for 5817 patients (1585 thrombolysed and 4232 nonthrombolysed). Baseline severity was greater among thrombolysed than nonthrombolysed (median baseline NIHSS, 14 vs 13; P < 0.05). An association of treatment with outcome was seen independently and was of similar magnitude within each of the baseline NIHSS categories 5 to 8 (P=0.04; OR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.6; N = 278/934 thrombolysed/nonthrombolysed), 9 to 12 (P = 0.01; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; N = 404/942), 13 to 16 (P < 0.05; OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1; N = 342/814), 17 to 20 (P < 0.05; OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1; N = 311/736), and 21 to 24 (P < 0.05; OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; N = 178/466). No association was observed within baseline NIHSS categories 1 to 4 (P = 0.8; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.3-4.4; N = 8/161) or ≥ 25 (P = 0.08; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.9; N = 64/179)., Conclusions: In this nonrandomized comparison, outcomes after thrombolysis were significantly better than in untreated comparators across baseline NIHSS 5 to 24. The significant association was lost only at extremes of baseline NIHSS when sample sizes were small and confidence limits were wide.

Objective: To determine the association between admission blood glucose and outcome in ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis., Design: A prospective, open, multinational, observational study., Setting: An ongoing Internet-based, academic-driven, interactive thrombolysis register., Patients: Between 2002 and 2007, 16 049 patients were recorded in the SITS-ISTR., Main Outcome Measure: Blood glucose was recorded at admission. Blood glucose was divided into the following categories: less than 80, 80-120 (reference range), 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, and greater than 200 mg/dL. Outcomes were mortality and independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 3 months and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale deterioration ≥4 points within 24 hours and type 2 parenchymal hemorrhage)., Results: In multivariable analysis, blood glucose as a continuous variable was independently associated with a higher mortality (P < .001), lower independence (P < .001), and an increased risk of SICH (P = .005). Blood glucose greater than 120 mg/dL as a categorical variable was associated with a significantly higher odds for mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.44; P = .004) and a lower odds for independence (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48-0.70; P < .001), and blood glucose from 181 to 200 mg/dL was associated with an increased risk of SICH (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.69-4.83; P < .001) compared with the reference level. The trends of associations between blood glucose and outcomes were similar in patients with diabetes (17%) or without such history, except for mortality (P = .23) and SICH (P = .06) in which the association was not statistically significant in patients with diabetes., Conclusions: Admission hyperglycemia was an independent predictor for poor outcome after stroke/thrombolysis, though SICH rates did not increase significantly until reaching 180 mg/dL. These results suggest that tight control of blood glucose may be indicated in the hyperacute phase following thrombolysis. Randomized trial data are needed.

Background: In September, 2008, the European Acute Stroke Study III (ECASS III) randomised trial and the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (SITS-ISTR) observational study reported the efficacy and safety of the extension of the time window for intravenous alteplase treatment from within 3 h to within 4.5 h after stroke onset. We aimed to assess the implementation of the wider time window, its effect on the admission-to-treatment time, and safety and functional outcome in patients recorded in SITS-ISTR., Methods: Patients treated according to the criteria of the European Summary of Product Characteristics, except for the time window, were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they were registered into SITS-ISTR before or after October, 2008. We measured admission-to-treatment time and rates of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, mortality, and functional independence at 3 months., Findings: 23 942 patients were included in SITS-ISTR between December, 2002, and February, 2010, of whom 2376 were treated 3-4.5 h after symptom onset. The proportion of patients treated within 3-4.5 h by the end of 2009 was three times higher than in the first three quarters of 2008 (282 of 1293 [22%] vs 67 of 1023 [7%]). The median admission-to-treatment time was 65 min both for patients registered before and after October, 2008 (p=0.94). 352 (2%) of 21 204 patients treated within 3 h and 52 (2%) of 2317 treated within 3-4.5 h of stroke had symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.97; p=0.02). 2287 (12%) of 18 583 patients who were treated within 3 h and 218 (12%) of 1817 who were treated within 3-4.5 h had died by the 3-month follow-up (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; p=0.005); 10 531 (57%) of 18 317 patients treated within 3 h of stroke and 1075 (60%) of 1784 who were treated within 3-4.5 h were functionally independent at 3 months (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.95; p=0.005)., Interpretation: Since October, 2008, thrombolysis within 3-4.5 h after stroke has been implemented rapidly, with a simultaneous increase in the number of patients treated within 3 h; admission-to-treatment time has not increased. Safety and functional outcomes are less favourable after 3 h, but the wider time window now offers an opportunity for treatment of those patients who cannot be treated earlier. Thrombolysis should be initiated within 4.5 h after onset of ischaemic stroke, although every effort should be made to treat patients as early as possible after symptom onset., Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer, the European Union Public Health Executive Authority, and Medical Training and Research (ALF) from Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Clinical benefit from thrombolysis is reduced as stroke onset to treatment time increases. The use of "mismatch" imaging to identify patients for delayed treatment has face validity and has been used in case series and clinical trials. We undertook a meta-analysis of relevant trials to examine whether present evidence supports delayed thrombolysis among patients selected according to mismatch criteria., Methods: We collated outcome data for patients who were enrolled after 3 hours of stroke onset in thrombolysis trials and had mismatch on pretreatment imaging. We selected the trials on the basis of a systematic search of the Web of Knowledge. We compared favorable outcome, reperfusion and/or recanalization, mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the thrombolyzed and nonthrombolyzed groups of patients and the probability of a favorable outcome among patients with successful reperfusion and clinical findings for 3 to 6 versus 6 to 9 hours from poststroke onset. Results are expressed as adjusted odds ratios (a-ORs) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was explored by test statistics for clinical heterogeneity, I(2) (inconsistency), and L'Abbé plot., Results: We identified articles describing the DIAS, DIAS II, DEDAS, DEFUSE, and EPITHET trials, giving a total of 502 mismatch patients thrombolyzed beyond 3 hours. The combined a-ORs for favorable outcomes were greater for patients who had successful reperfusion (a-OR=5.2; 95% CI, 3 to 9; I(2)=0%). Favorable clinical outcome was not significantly improved by thrombolysis (a-OR=1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.0; I(2)=20.9%). Odds for reperfusion/recanalization were increased among patients who received thrombolytic therapy (a-OR=3.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.8; I(2)=25.7%). The combined data showed a significant increase in mortality after thrombolysis (a-OR=2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.9; I(2)=0%), but this was not confirmed when we excluded data from desmoteplase doses that were abandoned in clinical development (a-OR=1.6; 95% CI, 0.7 to 3.7; I(2)=0%). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly increased after thrombolysis (a-OR=6.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 35.4; I(2)=0%) but not significant after exclusion of abandoned doses of desmoteplase (a-OR=5.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 31.8; I(2)=0%)., Conclusions: Delayed thrombolysis amongst patients selected according to mismatch imaging is associated with increased reperfusion/recanalization. Recanalization/reperfusion is associated with improved outcomes. However, delayed thrombolysis in mismatch patients was not confirmed to improve clinical outcome, although a useful clinical benefit remains possible. Thrombolysis carries a significant risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and possibly increased mortality. Criteria to diagnose mismatch are still evolving. Validation of the mismatch selection paradigm is required with a phase III trial. Pending these results, delayed treatment, even according to mismatch selection, cannot be recommended as part of routine care.

Background and Purpose: The optimal management of blood pressure (BP) in acute stroke remains unclear. For ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, current guidelines suggest pharmacological intervention if systolic BP exceeds 180 mm Hg. We determined retrospectively the association of BP and antihypertensive therapy with clinical outcomes after stroke thrombolysis., Methods: The SITS thrombolysis register prospectively recorded 11 080 treatments from 2002 to 2006. BP values were recorded at baseline, 2 hours, and 24 hours after thrombolysis. Outcomes were symptomatic (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score deterioration >or=4) intracerebral hemorrhage Type 2, mortality, and independence at (modified Rankin Score 0 to 2) 3 months. Patients were categorized by history of hypertension and antihypertensive therapy within 7 days after thrombolysis: Group 1, hypertensive treated with antihypertensives (n=5612); Group 2, hypertensive withholding antihypertensives (n=1573); Group 3, without history of hypertension treated with antihypertensives (n=995); and Group 4, without history of hypertension not treated with antihypertensives (n=2632). For 268 (2.4%) patients, these data were missing. Average systolic BP 2 to 24 hours after thrombolysis was categorized by 10-mm Hg intervals with 100 to 140 used as a reference., Results: In multivariable analysis, high systolic BP 2 to 24 hours after thrombolysis as a continuous variable was associated with worse outcome (P<0.001) and as a categorical variable had a linear association with symptomatic hemorrhage and a U-shaped association with mortality and independence with systolic BP 141 to 150 mm Hg associated with most favorable outcomes. OR (95% CI) from multivariable analysis showed no difference in symptomatic hemorrhage (1.09 [0.83 to 1.51]; P=0.58) and independence (1.03 [0.93 to 1.10]; P=0.80) but lower mortality (0.82 [0.73 to 0.92]; P=0.0007) for Group 1 compared with Group 4. Group 2 had a higher symptomatic hemorrhage (1.86 [1.34 to 2.68]; P=0.0004) and mortality (1.62 [1.41 to 1.85]; P<0.0001) and lower independence (0.89 [0.80 to 0.99]; P=0.04) compared with Group 4. Group 3 had similar results as Group 1., Conclusions: There is a strong association of high systolic BP after thrombolysis with poor outcome. Withholding antihypertensive therapy up to 7 days in patients with a history of hypertension was associated with worse outcome, whereas initiation of antihypertensive therapy in newly recognized moderate hypertension was associated with a favorable outcome.

Background and Purpose: The Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-MOnitoring STudy (SITS-MOST) unadjusted results demonstrated that intravenous alteplase is well tolerated and that the effects were comparable with those seen in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) when used in routine clinical practice within 3 hours of ischemic stroke onset. We aimed to identify outcome predictors and adjust the outcomes of the SITS-MOST to the baseline characteristics of RCTs., Methods: The study population was SITS-MOST (n=6483) and pooled RCTs (n=464) patients treated with intravenous alteplase within 3 hours of stroke onset. Multivariable, backward stepwise regression analyses (until Por=1 within 7 days with any hemorrhage (RCT definition), mortality, and independency as defined by modified Rankin Score of 0 to 2 at 3 months., Results: The adjusted proportion of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage for SITS-MOST was 8.5% (95% CI, 7.9 to 9.0) versus 8.6% (6.3 to 11.6) for pooled RCTs; mortality was 15.5% (14.7 to 16.2) versus 17.3% (14.1 to 21.1); and independency was 50.4% (49.6 to 51.2) versus 50.1% (44.5 to 54.7), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, older age, high blood glucose, high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and current infarction on imaging scans were related to poor outcome in all parameters. Systolic blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, and weight were additional predictors of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Current smokers had a lower rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Disability before current stroke (modified Rankin Score 2 to 5), diastolic blood pressure, antiplatelet other than aspirin, congestive heart failure, patients treated in new centers, and male sex were related to high mortality at 3 months., Conclusions: The adjusted outcomes from SITS-MOST were almost identical to those in relevant RCTs and reinforce the conclusion drawn previously in the unadjusted analysis. We identified several important outcome predictors to better identify patients suitable for thrombolysis.

Aim: To describe the United Kingdom (UK) experience with thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase (rt-PA) for stroke, as captured by the Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS) project., Methods: The multinational Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) was an observational study to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic therapy, when administered within the first 3 h after onset of ischaemic stroke. SITS-MOST was embedded within the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR), an internet-based, international monitoring registry for auditing the safety and efficacy of routine therapeutic use of thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. We performed an analysis of data contributed to SITS-MOST and SITS-ISTR from UK centres., Results: A total of 614 patients received thrombolysis for stroke between December 2002 and April 2006, 327 were registered to SITS-MOST and 287 to SITS-ISTR. Thirty-one centres treated patients in the UK, of which 23 registered patients in both SITS-MOST and SITS-ISTR and eight solely to SITS-ISTR. The median age from the UK SITS-MOST was identical to the non-UK SITS-MOST register: 68 years (IQR 59-75). The majority (96.1%) of patients from the UK were treated between 8.00 a.m. and 9.00 p.m., and only 18.4% were treated on weekend days, reflecting the difficulties of maintaining provision of a thrombolytic service out of hours. Median onset-to-treatment-time was 155 min (IQR 130-170 min) for the UK, compared to 140 min (IQR 114-165 min) for the non-UK SITS-MOST group (P < 0.001). UK SITS-MOST patients at baseline had more severe stroke in comparison with non-UK patients [median NIHSS 14.5 (IQR 9-19) vs. 12 (IQR 8-17) (P < 0.001)]. Forty-eight percent of UK patients achieved mRS of 0-2 (independence), compared to 55% of the non-UK SITS-MOST register. There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage rate in the UK compared with the non-UK SITS-MOST patients [2.5% (95% CI 1.3-4.8) vs. 1.7% (95% CI 1.4-2.0) P = 0.28]. In the multivariate analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in any outcome between UK and non-UK SITS-MOST patients., Conclusion: Thrombolytic therapy for stroke has been implemented successfully at a small number of UK stroke centres, with patchy provision throughout the country. The low frequency of treatment out with office hours suggests deficient infrastructure to support delivery. UK patients tended to be more severely affected at baseline and to be treated later. Outcomes are comparable to those seen at the non-UK SITS centres.

Objective: To present the preliminary experience of implementing intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in three UK stroke centres., Background: Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for ischaemic stroke received approval from UK regulatory authorities in April 2003. Since 1997, a small number of UK centres had used thrombolytic therapy in highly selected stroke patients. We present the early experience of that treatment in Glasgow and Newcastle., Design: Patients were selected and treated in accordance with the American Heart Association guidelines. Additionally, radiologic criteria employed in the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Studies were applied. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were measured on admission, and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) scores were assessed at 3 months for all patients with stroke treated prior to initiation of the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke monitoring program for implementation of thrombolysis in stroke in April 2001. Intracranial and systemic haemorrhagic complications were recorded., Results: 120 patients received thrombolytic treatment (approximately 1% of all admissions with presumed stroke). Mean age was 69 years (range 22-93) and initial median NIHSS score was 17 (range 3-31). In the two centres for which temporal data were available, the mean delay between symptom onset and treatment was 139 min (range 20-185). Sixteen episodes of cerebral haemorrhage or haemorrhagic transformation of any degree occurred, of which 5 (4%) were symptomatic. One patient deteriorated and died before repeat CT imaging could be performed. One non-fatal episode of systemic bleeding occurred. One patient was lost to follow-up. At 3 months, 31% of recipients had achieved good (MRS 0-1) outcome, 22% moderate (MRS 2-3) outcome and 21% (MRS 4-5) poor outcome. Twenty-one per cent died within 3 months of stroke. Observed frequency of bleeding complications and protocol violations (6%) was similar to those reported elsewhere., Conclusion: A small proportion of stroke patients received thrombolytic treatment. Patients treated were more severely affected than in other published European and North American series. Outcomes and complications were consistent with experience elsewhere., (2005 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Background and Purpose: Clinical trials of neuroprotective drugs have had limited success. We investigated whether selecting patients according to prognostic features would improve the statistical power of a trial to identify an efficacious treatment., Methods: Using placebo data from the Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) International and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) clinical trials, we developed and validated simple prognostic models for stroke trial end points: Barthel Index > or =95, modified Rankin Scale < or =1, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale < or =1, and Glasgow Outcome Scale=1. Using these models, we simulated 1000 clinical trials and estimated, under several hypothetical treatment effect patterns of neuroprotection, the effect on statistical power of including only patients with moderate prognosis. We calculated the number of patients that would have to be enrolled to maintain the statistical power achieved in selecting the whole trial population. Reanalysis of actual data from the NINDS rtPA trials confirmed the results independently., Results: Selecting patients with moderate prognosis (predicted probability of favorable outcome 0.2 to 0.8) enabled a sample size reduction, without loss of statistical power, of between 54.6% (51.3% to 57.6%) and 68.6% (66.0% to 71.1%), depending on the treatment effect pattern and outcome measure. These benefits were largely due to the exclusion of patients with poor prognosis., Conclusions: Targeting patients with potential to benefit enables a substantial sample size reduction without compromising statistical power or duration of recruitment. As part of a broader trial design strategy, informed use of prognostic data available acutely would help in identifying effective neuroprotective treatments.

Background and Purpose: Three major randomized controlled trials of streptokinase in acute ischemic stroke were curtailed because of safety concerns. The prospective Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke Pooling Project (TAS-PP) was established to examine the aggregate data to identify factors influencing the effect of streptokinase., Methods: Individual patient data from the Australian Streptokinase Trial (ASK), Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial-Europe (MAST-E), Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial-Italy (MAST-I), and Glasgow Trial (Glasgow) were pooled. Multivariate modeling determined the interaction between treatment effect and delay from symptom onset to treatment, predicted baseline risk, age, concomitant aspirin or heparin use, and the presence of early CT signs on the outcomes of 10-day death, death and disability, or death alone at 3 or 6 months., Results: Patients' records were pooled (total 1292 patients; streptokinase, n=653, no streptokinase n=639). The subgroup analysis of treatment effect according to delay from symptoms to inclusion shows only a trend toward a better treatment effect with shorter delay, which is not statistically significant for any outcome. Heavier patients in MAST-E may have had a lower (non significant) risk from the fixed dose of 1.5 million units of streptokinase. Concomitant aspirin increased the excess mortality rates in streptokinase-treated patients (17% without aspirin versus 91% with aspirin, P=0.005). The presence of early CT scan signs did not increase the detrimental effect of streptokinase., Conclusions: Few factors influenced the response to streptokinase. However, earlier administration, lower doses of streptokinase, and avoidance of concomitant aspirin should be considered if further streptokinase trials in acute stroke are planned.

The most widely studied thrombolytic drugs in stroke have been streptokinase (SK) and alteplase. The three large trials with streptokinase were terminated prematurely. The combined results reveal an early increased risk of cerebral haemorrhage and death, with no net benefit at final follow-up, even in subgroups. Some controversy persists, however. The dose may have been inappropriately high, very early treatment has not been fully tested, and concomitant use of aspirin or heparin may have contributed to the deleterious effect. Even so, there is no evidence to guide the choice of a lower dose, streptokinase predisposes to a prolonged anticoagulant effect, and is associated with hypotension which may offset any benefit. The four large alteplase trials in acute stroke were more encouraging. The NINDS study was clearly positive and supporting evidence comes from the two ECASS trials when subjected to meta-analysis. The trials have shown additional functional recovery in 0.6% of patients receiving SK within 6 h and in 7.6% with alteplase, at the expense of excess mortality of 1.1% for alteplase and 11.7% for SK. There was an absolute cerebral haemorrhage excess of 10.7% with SK and 8% for alteplase. If alteplase use is restricted to < 3 h from stroke onset, the NNT is 10.7 with no excess mortality; later treatment (3-6 h) gives an NNT of 26 and absolute mortality of 3.4%. Finally, early fibrinogen depletion with ancrod also appears to have beneficial effects when treatment is started within 3 h of stroke onset. Further trials are still required to establish, inter alia, the outer limit of the therapeutic window, to identify sub-groups of patients in whom clear benefit (or harm) exists and to establish appropriate management protocols for concomitant treatment. Thrombolysis with alteplase within 3 h of stroke onset may be considered for patients in whom haemorrhage and established infarction have been excluded. Trained assessment is essential, since there is an increased risk of haemorrhagic conversion that may be fatal. Patients considering thrombolytic treatment should appreciate that 1 in 10 patients have improved outcome, 1 in 20 suffer haemorrhagic conversion and 1 in 100 may die as a result of treatment. Treatment much later than 3 h from stroke onset in unselected patients is as likely to kill as to cure.

Background and Purpose: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is the most critical complication of thrombolytics in clinical trials in acute stroke. The aim of this study was to determine the rates and the predictors of HT in the Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial-Europe (MAST-E) study., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of MAST-E data designed to assess the safety and efficacy of streptokinase administered intravenously within 6 hours of stroke onset. HT included all intracerebral hemorrhages and symptomatic hemorrhages (SHT) associated with clinical worsening. The predictors of HT and SHT were determined using multivariate modeling., Results: Among the 310 patients included, 159 patients had HT and 37 SHT (97 and 33 in the streptokinase group and 62 and 4 in the placebo group, respectively). Patients with SHT had significantly more atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, no heparin use, streptokinase treatment, and early CT signs. In the multivariate analysis, HT was predicted by early CT signs and streptokinase treatment. SHT was predicted by diabetes mellitus, early CT signs, streptokinase treatment, and the interaction between streptokinase treatment and decreased level of consciousness. Among the streptokinase-treated patients, the same predictors remained., Conclusions: The relative risks of HT after streptokinase were in the same range in MAST-E as in other streptokinase and tPA trials. Early CT signs were strong predictors of both HT and SHT, stressing that these patients are at high risk of bleeding. In our study, the predictors of HT and SHT were similar to those of tPA trials in acute stroke.

Although stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, it is only relatively recently that a concerted effort has been made to develop acute treatments. Thrombolytics, such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), may benefit selected patients within 3 h of cerebral infarction. CUrrently, rt-PA is only licensed for use in the United States. Many potential strategies for neuroprotection exist and are currently under investigation. Because the mechanisms of neurotoxicity involve numerous interdependent processes, it may be that the interpretation of a single site in the cascade of events is insufficient to provide effective neuroprotection. Drugs acting at several sites in the neurotoxic cascade may be more effective, and the results of Phase III studies with the novel neoroprotectant lubeluzole are anticipated.