1. Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk factors reveals subtype heterogenicity in children with central venous catheters: a multicenter study from the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis consortium.
- Author
-
Jaffray J, Mosha M, Branchford B, Goldenberg NA, Silvey M, Croteau SE, Fargo JH, Cooper JD, Bakeer N, Stillings A, Krava E, Young G, and Amankwah EK
- Subjects
- Humans, Child, Risk Factors, Hospitals, Central Venous Catheters adverse effects, Venous Thromboembolism diagnosis, Venous Thromboembolism epidemiology, Venous Thromboembolism etiology, Thrombosis etiology, Catheterization, Central Venous adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Acutely ill and medically complex children frequently rely on central venous catheters (CVCs) to provide life-sustaining treatment. Unfortunately, catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a serious and common complication. Little is known why some with a CVC develop CRT and others develop venous thromboembolism unrelated to the CVC (non-CRT)., Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with CRT in children with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE)., Methods: This case-case study included participants in the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis Registry with HA-VTE and CVC aged 0 to 21 years from 8 US children's hospitals. Participants were excluded if they developed HA-VTE prior to CVC insertion or if the CVC insertion date was unknown. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between clinical factors and CRT status., Results: There were 1144 participants with HA-VTE who had a CVC. CRT developed in 833 participants, and 311 developed non-CRT. Multivariable analysis showed increased odds of CRT (compared with non-CRT) in participants with peripherally inserted central catheters (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 2.04-7.10; p < .001), CVCs inserted in the femoral vein (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.70-11.65; p = .002), multiple CVCs (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71; p < .001), and CVC malfunction (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.80-6.03; p < .001)., Conclusion: The findings of this study provide new insights on risk factor differences between CRT and non-CRT. Prevention efforts should be directed at modifying the type of CVC, insertion location, and/or number of CVCs placed, if possible, to decrease the incidence of CRT., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF