Search

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the fiber-tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model., Methods: Four lasers were tested at 60 W using a 600-µm bare-ended fiber: a continuous wave (cw) thulium fiber laser (TFL), a super pulsed (SP) TFL, a Ho:YAG laser, and a blue diode laser (BDL). All tissue samples were mounted on a motorized XY-translation stage. The fiber-tissue distance was changed within a range from 0to 6 mm. Ten incisions were made with each laser at each distance. Afterwards, the tissue samples were sliced with a microtome for lactate dehydrogenase staining to determine zones of thermal damage., Results: In contact mode, the largest incision depth was found for the cw TFL (1.7 ± 0.1 mm) compared to the SP TFL (1.0 ± 0.1 mm), BDL (0.9 ± 0.1 mm) and HoYAG laser (1.1 ± 0.1 mm), respectively. With regard to the coagulative properties, the SP TFL and the Ho:YAG laser showed comparable coagulation depths with 0.7 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. At 2 mm fiber-tissue distance, the Ho:YAG laser was the only laser that vaporized tissue (incision depth: 0.2 ± 0.1 mm). The BDL was the only laser that caused coagulation at a distance of 3-5 mm., Conclusion: Our results support the clinical observation that cw TFL must be defocused for best coagulation, while the coagulation depth of the SP TFL remains nearly constant within the range of 0-3 mm. Increasing the distance of the laser fiber to the tissue up to 5 mm did not cause significant differences with regard to coagulation depth using the BDL.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thulium-fiber laser (TFL) in laser lithotripsy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)., Methods: Patients with stones < 30 mm were prospectively recruited to undergo PCNL using TFL "FiberLase" (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia). Stone size, stone density, operative time, and "laser on" time (LOT) were recorded. Study included only cases managed with fragmentation. Stone-free rate and residual fragments were determined on postoperative computer tomography. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo grade. Stone retropulsion and endoscopic visibility were assessed based on surgeons' feedback using a questionnaire., Results: A total of 120 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 52 (± 1.8) years; of these 77 (56%) were males. Mean stone size was 12.5 (± 8.8) mm with a mean density of 1019 (± 375) HU. Mean operative time was 23.4 (± 17.9) min and mean LOT was 5.0 (± 5.7) min. Most used settings were of 0.8 J/25-30 W/31-38 Hz (fragmentation). The mean total energy for stone ablation was 3.6 (± 4.3) kJ. Overall stone-free rate was 85%. The overall complication rate was 17%. Surgeons reported stone retropulsion that interfered with surgery in 2 (1.7%) cases insignificant retropulsion was noted in 16 (10.8%) cases. Poor visualization was reported in three (2.5%) cases and minor difficulties with visibility in four (3.3%) cases., Conclusions: TFL is a safe and effective modality for lithotripsy during PCNL and results in minimal retropulsion.

Purpose: To evaluate the ablation capacity using two Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) in a porcine kidney model., Methods: All tissue samples were mounted on a motorized stage for a precise speed of cutting. A continuous wave (cw) TFL and a super pulsed (SP) TFL were used at power settings of 60 and 120 W with 200 and 600 µm laser fibers. After lactate dehydrogenase staining, histological evaluation was performed to measure the vaporization volume (VV), ablation depth (AD), thermo-mechanical damage zones (TMZ), coagulation zones (CZ) and the carbonization grade (CG)., Results: At 120 W, no significant differences were seen between 200 and 600 µm fibers utilizing the cw TFL regarding VV (24.6 vs. 28.2 mm 3 /s), AD (5.6 vs. 5.7 mm), TMZ (0 vs. 0 mm 2 ) and CZ (18.1 vs. 12.3 mm 2 ). Using the SP TFL, no significant differences between both fiber diameters with regard to VV (4 vs. 6.2 mm 3 /s), AD (2.7 vs. 3.4 mm), TMZ (1 vs. 2.6 mm 2 ) and CZ (3.1 vs. 2.2 mm 2 ) at 120 W were found, respectively. However, the VV of the cw TFL at 60 W was significantly less compared to 120 W using 200 and 600 µm fibers, respectively, whereas the SP TFL did not show significant differences between 60 and 120 W with regard to VV. SP TFL showed a consistently lower CG compared to cw TFL., Conclusions: This experiment suggests that there is no significant difference using 200 or 600 µm laser fibers in cw or SP TFLs. However, the cw TFL produces a coagulation zone three to five times larger than the SP TFL regardless of the fiber diameter.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a novel thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with smaller glands (<80 cc)., Methods: A total of 51 patients underwent thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate, and 52 patients underwent monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. All patients were assessed preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score-quality of life). Preoperative prostate volumes and prostate-specific antigen levels were comparable (P = 0.543 and P = 0.078, respectively). The complications were graded according to the Clavien classification., Results: Mean surgery time was longer in the thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate group (46.6 ± 10.2 vs 39.9 ± 8.6 min, P < 0.001), while catheterization and hospital stay were greater in the transurethral resection of the prostate group (P < 0.001). At 12 months, there were no differences in functional outcomes (International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow rate). Despite comparable prostate volumes at 12 months (P = 0.864), the prostate-specific antigen level in the thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate group (0.5 ± 0.5 ng/mL) was lower than in the transurethral resection of the prostate group (1.1 ± 1.0 ng/mL; P < 0.001). Hemoglobin and serum sodium decrease was lower in the thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate group (1.01 ± 0.4 g/dL and 1.1 ± 1.1 mmol/L) than in the transurethral resection of the prostate group (1.8 ± 0.8 g/dL and 4.1 ± 1.1 mmol/L; P < 0.001). Urinary incontinence rates at 12 months were comparable (P = 0.316)., Conclusions: Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate with novel thulium fiber laser in patients with smaller prostate glands (<80 cc) is comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate in voiding parameters improvement and complication rates. At the same time, the technique allows for a more substantial prostate-specific antigen decrease, indicating more complete removal of adenoma., (© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objectives: Various techniques can be used for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP): removal of all nodes as a single unit (en bloc) or a step-by-step removal of adenomatous nodes (two- and three-lobe techniques). The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of en bloc and two-lobe techniques for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP)., Methods: Retrospective assessment included patients with bladder outlet obstruction (IPSS > 20, Qmax < 10) secondary to BPH treated from January 2013 to December 2018. All the patients were assessed prior to surgery, as well as at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery., Results: The data of 1115 patients who underwent HoLEP or ThuFLEP were analyzed. Two techniques were used: en bloc (406 patients) and two-lobe (709 patients). Mean prostate volumes were comparable between groups. Mean surgery times (68.8 ± 30.6 min vs 67.4 ± 30.1 min; p = 0.604) and enucleation rates (1.9 ± 0.74 g/min vs 1.9 ± 0.69 g/min; p = 0.217) were also comparable. Morcellation rate was lower in en bloc patients with prostate > 150 cc (2.8 ± 1.1 g/min vs 3.7 ± 2.3 g/min; p < 0.001). At 6 months, no differences in functional outcomes (IPSS, PVR, Qmax and QoL) were found., Conclusions: Outcomes and complication rates of en bloc and two-lobe EEP techniques were comparable. En bloc technique was found to have less favorable outcomes in morcellation rate for prostates > 150 cc. The choice of the technique should depend on surgeon's preferences.

Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered to be the standard treatment for patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) ≤80 mL. However, up to 14.7% of the patients require secondary TURP due to recurrent BPO. The aim of our study was to describe specific features of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) in patients with recurrent BPO after previous prostate surgery., Materials and Methods: A total of 768 consecutive patients from our prospective collected database were retrospectively reviewed and divided into 4 groups: group A (489 patients) and group C (253 patients) underwent primary HoLEP and ThuLEP treatment, while group B (17 patients) and D (9 patients) included patients with recurrent BPO who were treated with HoLEP and ThuLEP, respectively., Results: There were no significant differences in preoperative parameters between the groups at primary (A and C) and secondary (B and D) treatment except their age. At 6-month follow-up, voiding parameters and symptom scores showed statistically significant improvements compared to baseline without differences between the groups. The mean operative time was comparable between the groups and did not differ significantly (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: Laser enucleation for the treatment of recurrent BPO is feasible and seems to be a safe and effective procedure., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: The aims of the study: (1) to compare the Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser (SP TFL) and the holmium: yttrium–aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) lasers in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS); (2) to compare the efficacy of SP TFL laser fibers of different diameters (150 μm and 200 μm). Methods: A prospective randomized single-blinded trial was conducted. Patients with stones from 10 to 20 mm were randomly assigned RIRS in three groups: (1) SP TFL (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) with fiber diameter of 150 μm; (2) SP TFL with 200-μm fiber; and (3) Ho:YAG (Lumenis, USA) with 200-μm fiber. Results: Ninety-six patients with kidney stones were randomized to undergo RIRS with SP TFL using a 150-μm fiber (34 patients) and a 200-μm fiber (32 patients) and RIRS with Ho:YAG (30 patients). The median laser on time (LOT) in the 200-μm SP TFL group was 9.2 (6.2–14.6) min, in 150-μm SP TFL—11.4 (7.7–14.9) min (p = 0.390), in Ho:YAG—14.1 (10.8–18.1) min (p = 0.021). The total energy consumed in 200-μm SP TFL was 8.4 (5.8–15.2) kJ; 150-μm SP TFL − 10.8 (7.3–13.5) kJ (p = 0.626) and in Ho:YAG—15.2 (11.1–25.3) kJ (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Irrespective of the density, RIRS with SP TFL laser has proven to be both a safe and effective procedure. Whilst the introduction of smaller fibers may have the potential to reduce the duration of surgery, SP TFL results in a reduction in the LOT and total energy for stone ablation in RIRS compared with Ho:YAG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare Holmium laser with MOSES technology (MoLEP) and Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) in terms of surgical and functional outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent either procedure in five centers (January 2020–January 2022). Exclusion criteria: previous urethral/prostatic surgery, radiotherapy, concomitant surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to adjust for the bias inherent to the different characteristics at baseline. Differences between procedures were estimated using Firth Penalized Likelihood regression for International prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QL), maximum flow rate (Qmax). Results: PSM retrieved 118 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were similar except for PSA and number of men on indwelling catheter (higher in MoLEP group). Median surgical time was significantly longer in the MoLEP group despite the enucleation and morcellation times being similar. Median catheter dwelling time and postoperative length of stay were similar. Most of the early complications were Clavien ≤ 2 grade. There were only two Clavien grade 3 complications (one for each group), one grade 4 in MoLEP group. Rate and type of early and persistent incontinence (> 3 months) were similar. At 12-month, proportion of patients reaching a decrease (Δ) of IPSS ≥ 18 from baseline was significantly larger in MoLEP group, with no significant difference in ΔQmax > 12 ml/sec and ΔQL ≥ -3. Conclusion: MoLEP and ThuFLEP were safe and efficacious procedures with similar short-term operative and functional outcomes. At 1-year, MoLEP patients had a sustained reduction of IPPS score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of our study was to estimate the long-term efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP). Materials and Methods: We analyzed patients who underwent ThuFLEP due to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Both the pre- and perioperative data as well as the follow-up data for 3 years were evaluated: prostate volume, postvoid residual (PVR), maximum flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), prostate-specific antigen level, and the complication rate. Intraoperative data relating to the weight of resected tissue, the duration of surgery, catheterization, and data on hospital stays were also collected. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess whether older patients (>65 years) or those with larger glands (>80 cc) are prone to increased complication risks. Results: A total of 1328 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.9 ± 7.5 years. Mean prostate volume was 86.9 ± 41.9 (20–330) cc. All the functional parameters (IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax) significantly improved after surgery (p < 0.05) and showed durable improvement up to 3 years of follow-up. The frequency of late complications was as follows: stress urinary incontinence—1.2%; urethral stricture—1.1%; and bladder neck contracture—0.9%. Subgroup analyses revealed increased urinary tract infection frequency in older patients (3.5% vs 0.8%, p = 0.003) as well as higher rate of stress urinary incontinence (0.4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.002) and higher rate of clot retention (11.3% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001) in those with larger glands. Conclusions: Irrespective of the patient's age and prostate volume, ThuFLEP represents an effective and durable technique of endoscopic enucleation characterized by a low incidence of complications after 3 years of follow-up. In the hands of an experienced surgeon, ThuFLEP can rightly be a promising alternative to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of LUTS associated with BPO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The objective of this study was to present our clinical experience of using the thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Methods: A prospective clinical study performed after the IRB approval (Sechenov University, Russia). Patients with stones <30 mm were treated with SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) through a 200-μm-diameter fiber. Stone size, density, the duration of the operation, and laser on time (LOT) were measured. Based on the surgeon's feedback, retropulsion and intraoperative visibility were also assessed (Likert scale). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed with a low-dose CT scan 90 days after the operation. Results: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 153 patients (mean age 54 ± 2.8 years) underwent RIRS with SP TFL (mean stone density 1,020 ± 382 HU). Median stone volume was 279.6 (139.4–615.8) mm3. Median LOT was 2.8 (IQR 1.6–6.6) min with median total energy for stone ablation 4.0 (IQR 2.1–7.17) kJ, median ablation speed was 1.7 (1.0–2.8) mm3/s, median ablation efficacy was 13.3 (7.3–20.9) J/mm3, and energy consumption was 170.3 (59.7–743.3) J/s. Overall, the SFR (at 3 months) was 89%. The overall complication rate was 8.4%. Retropulsion was present in 23 (15.1%) patients. Visibility was estimated as optimal in most patients, with poor visibility reported in only 13 (8.5%) patients. Conclusion: The SP TFL is a safe and efficient tool in lithotripsy, irrespective of the stone type and density. Retropulsion is minimal and visibility is maintained with SP TFL. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are needed to ensure optimal comparison with conventional holmium:YAG lithotripsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of this study was to assess the ablation, coagulation, and carbonization characteristics of the holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser and thulium fiber lasers (TFL). The Ho:YAG laser (100 W av.power), the quasi-continuous (QCW) TFL (120 W av.power), and the SuperPulsed (SP) TFL (50 W av.power) were compared on a non-frozen porcine kidney. To control the cutting speed (2 or 5 mm/s), an XY translation stage was used. The Ho:YAG was tested using E = 1.5 J and Pav = 40 W or Pav = 70 W settings. The TFL was tested using E = 1.5 J and Pav = 30 W or Pav = 60 W settings. After ex vivo incision, histological analysis was performed in order to estimate thermal damage. At 40 W, the Ho:YAG displayed a shallower cutting at 2 and 5 mm/s (1.1 ± 0.2 mm and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, respectively) with virtually zero coagulation. While at 70 W, the minimal coagulation depth measured 0.1 ± 0.1 mm. The incisions demonstrated zero carbonization. Both the QCW and SP TFL did show effective cutting at all speeds (2.1 ± 0.2 mm and 1.3 ± 0.2 mm, respectively, at 30 W) with prominent coagulation (0.6 ± 0.1 mm and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, respectively, at 70 W) and carbonization. Our study introduced the TFL as a novel efficient alternative for soft tissue surgery to the Ho:YAG laser. The SP TFL offers a Ho:YAG-like incision, while QCW TFL allows for fast, deep, and precise cutting with increased carbonization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the thermal effects, stone retropulsion and ablation rate of SuperPulse Thulium-fiber laser (SP TFL) with two different surgical fibers of 200 and 150 μm in diameter. Methods: SP TFL (NTO IRE-Polus, Fryazino, Russia) performance with 200 and 150 μm fibers (NTO IRE-Polus, Fryazino, Russia) was evaluated. Before each test, the laser fiber was cleaved, and the power measurement was taken to verify the actual laser output power. To compare the laser fibers in well-controlled environments, a number of setups were used to assess retropulsion, ablation efficacy, fiber burnback, energy transmission, and safety. Results: Power measurements performed before each test revealed a 4.7% power drop for a 200 μm fiber SP TFL (14.3 ± 0.5 W) and 7.3% power drop for a 150 μm fiber SP TFL (13.9 ± 0.5 W) versus the nominally indicated power (15.0 W). Retropulsion with the TFL was minimal and comparable between fibers. We found no clinically relevant temperature differences between SP TFL with either 200 or 150 μm fibers. The ablation efficacy tended to be comparable under most parameters. Yet, we did observe a decreased diameter of residual fragments after the ablation with a 150 μm fiber. Conclusion: The smaller fiber (150 μm) is not inferior to 200 μm fiber in terms of fiber burnback, retropulsion, safety, and ablation rate. Moreover, it has the potential to decrease the diameter of fragments during lithotripsy, which may facilitate dusting during RIRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The aim of this article was to compare retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) efficacy and safety with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser (SP TFL) for stones 20 mm and larger. Material and methods Patients with large kidney stones (20 mm and larger) were recruited to undergo PCNL or RIRS with SP TFL lithotripsy. Both groups were comparable in terms of stone size and density, operation time, laser-on time (LOT), stone-free rate, residual fragments and complication rate. Stone retropulsion and visibility were assessed based on the surgeon's feedback using Likert scales. Results A total of 14 and 56 patients were included in the RIRS and PCNL groups, respectively. The mean stone density was 833.8 ±298.3 HU in the RIRS group and 882.3 ±408.5 HU in the PCNL group (p = 0.072). The median LOT was 11.7 (10.0-15.5) min for RIRS and 10.0 (6.0-12.1) min for PCNL (p = 0.207). The median total energy for stone ablation was 13.8 (11.8-25.0) kJ for RIRS and 12.0 (7.0-20.1) kJ for PCNL (p = 0.508). The median ablation speed was 3.9 (3.9-5.7) mm³/sec for RIRS and 5.0 (4.6-11.3) mm³/sec for PCNL (p = 0.085). We found a significant correlation between retropulsion and the type of surgery performed: with higher retropulsion in the PCNL (r = 0.298 with p = 0.012). The stone-free rate at 3-months was 85.7% in RIRS and 89.3% in PCNL (p = 0.505). Conclusions SP TFL is a safe and effective modality for lithotripsy for both, RIRS and PCNL, achieving minimal retropulsion and good visibility. No discrepancies in procedure duration, complications, or LOT were identified between the different modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the standard and higher frequency regimens for superpulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods: A prospective study of patients with renal calculi of 10–30 mm was performed. For RIRS, we used the SP TFL (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) and a 9.5F flexible ureteroscope with 270° deflection and 3.6F working channel. Retropulsion and visibility were assessed based on the surgeon's feedback using three-point Likert scales. The stone-free rate was assessed at 3 months with CT. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 56 years, mean stone density of 880 ± 381 HU, mean stone size of 16.5 ± 6.8 mm, and median stone volume of 883 (interquartile range 606–1664) mm3. Both ablation efficacy and speed were higher in the 200-Hz mode (2.7 J/mm3vs 3.8 J/mm3 and 5.5 mm3/second vs 8.0 mm3/second, respectively); moreover, the higher frequency correlated with increased ablation speed (r = −0.21, p = 0.019). However, both increased energy and frequency did not lead to increase of laser-on time or intraoperative complication rates. Conclusions: SP TFL is able to effectively disintegrate stones during RIRS with minimal complication rates. The use of higher frequency regimens showed higher efficacy and ablation speed and was not associated with increased complication rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To test the characteristics of a hybrid laser (combination of a thulium and blue diode laser) vs thulium and Ho:YAG lasers regarding soft tissue ablation. Methods: Tissue samples of fresh nonfrozen porcine kidneys were used to compare the three lasers. A motorized translation XY stage with a fixed fiber holder to control the speed of cutting (2 and 5 mm/s) was used. Five incisions with each laser were performed. Lactate dehydrogenase staining of the embedded specimens was performed to determine incision depth, zones of vaporization, coagulation zone, carbonization grade, and thermomechanical damage of the coagulated tissue. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results: The hybrid laser demonstrated the highest vaporization speed (34.4 ± 0.1mm3/s) and coagulation zones (10 ± 0.1mm2) at a drag speed of 5mm/s among the investigated lasers. It showed a two to three times larger coagulation zone compared with the Ho:YAG laser (4 ± 0.1mm2). The continuous wave thulium fiber laser (cwTFL) showed a significantly higher grade of carbonized tissue compared with the hybrid and Ho:YAG lasers. Conclusions: The hybrid laser showed deeper incisions and a faster vaporization speed compared with the cwTFL and the Ho:YAG laser. It might be an effective tool to combine the advantages of both lasers to effectively vaporize soft tissue with excellent coagulative properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has been recognized as a viable treatment modality for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and functional outcomes of three different techniques of EEP, including monopolar enucleation (MEP), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). Methods: The study consisted of a retrospective comparison of pre- and postoperative parameters in men undergoing three types of EEP: MEP, HoLEP, and ThuLEP. Functional parameters were evaluated before and 6 months after surgery, which included the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate, postvoid residual volume, prostate volume, and sodium levels of all patients. Results: A total of 551 men with the mean age of 67.1 years were included in the study. Of these, MEP was performed on 95 patients, HoLEP was performed on 254 patients, and ThuLEP on 202 patients. The mean mass of morcellated tissue obtained during the three techniques did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Mean procedure times of ThuLEP and HoLEP were shorter than MEP demonstrating 72, 76, and 86 minutes, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean catheterization time following laser EEPs was shorter than MEP as shown by 1.3, 1.3, and 3.8 days, respectively (p < 0.01). Hospital stay times of HoLEP and ThuLEP were shorter than MEP demonstrated by 3.3, 3.4, and 6.9 days, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients after MEP had significant decrease in postoperative hemoglobin and sodium levels. All the groups showed statistically significant improvement in the aforementioned parameters following treatment. Conclusions: Both techniques of laser enucleation proved to be efficacious in the management of BPH. MEP of the prostate seems to be a highly promising addition to the list of enucleation techniques and was determined to be an effective and acceptable procedure, despite a higher complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG). Curr Opin Urol. 2020; 30: 1. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000695 4 Taratkin M. Temperature changes during laser lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser and novel Tm-fiber laser: a comparative in-vitro study. Re.: Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs. high-power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG). [Extracted from the article]

Background: The impact of number of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate techniques (holmium laser enucleation - HoLEP for example) on erectile function have already been investigated. However, the thulium-fiber laser, in this setting remains unstudied. In this study, we compared sexual function outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or thulium-fiber laser enucleation (ThuFLEP).Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transurethral resection and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for BPH; inclusion criteria was the presence of infravesical obstruction (IPSS > 20, Qmax < 10 mL/s). Erectile function (EF) was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) both prior to endoscopic examination, and six months after.Results: A total of 469 patients with BPH were included in the study; of these, 211 underwent to ThuFLEP, and 258 TURP. Preoperative IIEF-5 in TURP and ThuFLEP groups were 11.7 (±4.5) and 11.1 (±5.0), respectively (p = 0.17). At six month the IIEF-5 score was unchanged (p = 0.26 and p = 0.08) and comparable in both groups (p = 0.49). However, mean IIEF-5 score shown significant increase of 0.72 in ThuFLEP group, comparing to decrease of 0.24 in TURP patients (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Both TURP and ThuFLEP are effective modalities in the management of infravesical obstruction due to BPH. At six months follow-up after surgery, both techniques lead to comparable IIEF-5 score. However, our results demonstrated that the ThuFLEP is more likely to preserve the erectile function leading to increase of IIEF-5 at six months in contrast to TURP which lead to slight drop in IIEF-5 score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]