Search

We tested the hypothesis that circulating CXCL10 and IL-6 in donor after brain death provide independent additional predictors of graft outcome. From January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2012 all donors after brain death managed by the NITp (n = 1100) were prospectively included in this study. CXCL10 and IL-6 were measured on serum collected for the crossmatch at the beginning of the observation period. Graft outcome in recipients who received kidney (n = 1325, follow-up 4.9 years), liver (n = 815, follow-up 4.3 years) and heart (n = 272, follow-up 5 years) was evaluated. Both CXCL-10 and IL-6 showed increased concentration in donors after brain death. The intensive care unit stay, the hemodynamic instability, the cause of death, the presence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and the presence of ongoing infection resulted as significant determinants of IL-6 and CXCL10 donor concentrations. Both cytokines resulted as independent predictors of Immediate Graft Function. Donor IL-6 or CXCL10 were associated with graft failure after liver transplant, and acted as predictors of recipient survival after kidney, liver and heart transplantation. Serum donor IL-6 and CXCL10 concentration can provide independent incremental prediction of graft outcome among recipients followed according to standard clinical practice.

Background: The shortage of available organs, has increasingly prompted the use of elderly donors, with a consequent growth of possible risk factors. In this context the risk of donor-recipient transmission of infectious or neoplastic pathologies may be considered as a major issue; in each case for each organ potentially available, acceptable quality must be provided and unacceptable risks must be avoided., Methods: We are presenting here the process of risk management followed by the Italian centers. In 2001, the Italian National Transplant Centre created a national commission of experts, with the mission of defining guidelines for the evaluation process of the potential organ donor. As a supplement to these measures, the Italian National Transplant Centre has supported transplant network health workers through ad hoc developed information tools and an expert task force (second opinion) for evaluation of doubtful cases., Results: Starting from the date of guidelines application and second opinion start up, 9519 potential cadaveric donors were reported in Italy. Of these, 1611 presented a neoplastic or infectious risk. Over this period, 4861 donors were used for transplantation, equal to 48.5% of reported donors. Among the 1611 donors, who had been diagnosed at risk, 674 were neoplastic-disease affected donors and 937 infection-disease affected donors., Conclusions: At the European level, several new activities have been recently implemented to increase organ safety. In Italy, new guidelines and actions to ensure organ safety have been implemented. The evaluation of the impact of these actions will be performed in the near future.

Limited access to scarce resources, such as organs for transplantation, has increasingly prompted the use of elderly donors, with a consequent growth of possible risk factors linked to their particular features. Acceptable organ quality must therefore be guaranteed, without exposing recipients to unacceptable risks. For this reason, a set of guidelines for assessing donor suitability has been drawn up. This document standardizes the operative steps in the donor evaluation process and provides precise instructions for center staff. A pool of experts is available round the clock to offer advice on doubtful clinical cases. Such measures have allowed more effective use of available donors for transplantation.

The increase in the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation (OLT) has forced the use of cadaveric donors (CD) with suboptimal characteristics. Of these, donor age is perhaps the most investigated parameter. Although excellent outcomes were observed for OLT using CD aged over 60 years, the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) Group found an increased risk by using CD of more than 55 years. The Italian National Transplant Center has recently assumed that CD age more than 60 years is a potential risk factor for OLT. In this study, a single-center analysis was performed by stratifying CD by three age cut-offs (< or =55 or >55, < or =60 or >60, and < or =65 or >65 years) to evaluate effects on OLT outcome. Although no significant difference in 6-month and 1-year patient or graft survival occurred after stratification for each donor age cut-off, a better survival was observed with OLT performed using livers procured from CD >55 years. A significant increase in cold ischemia time (CIT) was observed among OLT performed with grafts procured from CD < or =55 and < or =65 years (P = .007), and there was an inverse correlation between overall CIT and donor age (R = -0.300; P = .0022). However, no impact on 1-year patient survival was observed by introducing CIT in univariate logistic regression models as well as donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient age ratio, donor/recipient sex mismatch, ELTR diagnostic categories, and UNOS status. The results of this study suggest the suitability of CD of more than 55 years for OLT and the need to further investigate the cut-off value for CIT-related risk.

The increasing number of clinical indications for liver transplantation has forced physicians to use livers procured from elderly cadaveric donors to expand the graft pool. However, the degree of ischemia/reperfusion damage in elderly livers remains poorly investigated. In this study, the outcomes of livers procured from a group (I) of young donors (n=12; 38 +/- 12 years; range: 21-58) were compared with a group (II) from elderly donors (n=7; 68 +/- 7 years; range: 62-84) for changes in reduced glutathione, the main hepatic free radical scavenger. Reduced and oxidized glutathione were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography in liver biopsies performed just before cold ischemia and during early reperfusion. A significant decrease in reduced glutathione was observed at the time of reperfusion in both groups I (P=.0195) and II (P=.002). Before cold ischemia and during early reperfusion, no differences between young versus elderly donors were noted in the oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio, in conventional graft function markers or in liver-related hemostatic parameters. Comparable glutathione contents were measured at the time of early reperfusion in livers obtained from young and elderly cadaveric donors, suggesting that livers procured from elderly donors might be adequately protected against ischemia/reperfusion damage.

Current Italian statutes concern the safety of organ donors. The law of April 1, 1999 (no. 91), established the fundamental principles for a new structure for organ transplants in Italy and, therefore, for the quality of transplanted organs. The Ministry of Health decree of February 8, 2002, defined organ conditions that preclude the utilization of an organ and identified conditions for suitability of non-optimal organs for some types of transplants or for some recipients. Guidelines from the National Transplant Center establish risk levels, criteria for absolute exclusion, and standard procedures for the evaluation of donor risk and organ suitability for transplant. This article also examines the levels of responsibility of various professionals involved in the harvesting-transplant process.

Expert-opinion elicitation (EOE) is a heuristic process for gathering evidence and data or answering questions on issues/problems of concern. The Delphi method (DM) is the most frequent technique used to obtain structured elicitation of expert opinions. It has been increasingly applied in medicine to produce guidelines and to evaluate the appropriateness of diagnostic procedures. In this study, a DM has been used as structured EOE process to assess the appropriateness and clinical priority of a data set-based informative system in the context of the Liguria-Trento Transplant Network (LTTN) Project, funded by Italian Ministry of Health. The original data set was obtained by using an interdisciplinary pool of regional experts (n = 60). This data set held 1506 items stratified in 21 categories at various surgical phases (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and transplantation types (liver, kidney, and kidney/pancreas) in adult and pediatric recipients. Some categories included cadaveric donor management, organ allocation, and acute liver failure. In the second DM round, the data set was subjected to a panel of extraregional, independent experts (n = 9) to assess scores ranging from 1 to 9 on each item, based on increasing appropriateness/priority, according to RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. The overall agreement between experts was 95.88%, whereas disagreement and uncertainty were 0.13% and 3.98%, respectively. A major uncertainty occurred for the data set concerning the multiorgan cadaveric donor, for liver transplantation, and for kidney transplantation in adult recipients. The use of a structured EOE process may represent an effective strategy to define the appropriateness and prioritization criteria of a large data set in the field of solid organ transplantation.