Search

Background and Purpose: To compare safety and efficacy of bridging approach with intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in patients with acute anterior strokes and proximal occlusions., Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with ischemic anterior strokes admitted within a 4 h 30 min window in two different centers were included. The first center performed IV therapy (alteplase 0.6 mg/kg) during 30 min and, in absence of clinical improvement, mechanical thrombectomy with flow restoration using a Solitaire stent (StS); the second carried out IV thrombolysis (alteplase 0.9 mg/kg) alone. Only T, M1 or M2 occlusions present on CT angiography were considered. Endpoints were clinical outcome and mortality at 3 months., Results: There were 63 patients in the bridging and 163 in the IV group. No significant differences regarding baseline characteristics were observed. At 3 months, 46% (n = 29) of the patients treated in the combined and 23% (n = 38) of those treated in the IV group had a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0-1 (P < 0.001). A statistical significant difference was observed for all sites of occlusion. In a logistic regression model, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and bridging therapy were independent predictors of good outcome (respectively, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0018). Symptomatic hemorrhage was documented in 6.3% vs 3.7% in the bridging and in the IV group, respectively (P = 0.32). There was no difference in mortality., Conclusions: Our results suggest that patients treated with a bridging approach were more likely to have minimal or no deficit at all at 3 months as compared to the IV treated group., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for stroke seems to be beneficial independent of the underlying etiology. Recent observations raised concern that IVT might cause harm in patients with strokes attributable to small artery occlusion (SAO)., Objective: The safety of IVT in SAO-patients is addressed in this study., Methods: We used the Swiss IVT databank to compare outcome and complications of IVT-treated SAO-patients with IVT-treated patients with other etiologies (non-SAO-patients). Main outcome and complication measures were independence (modified Rankin scale 0.8). Fatal ICH occurred in 3.3% of the non-SAO-patients but none amongst SAO-patients. Ischaemic stroke within 3 months after IVT reoccurred in 1.5% of SAO-patients and in 2.3% of non-SAO-patients (P = 0.68)., Conclusion: IVT-treated SAO-patients died less often and reached independence more often than IVT-treated non-SAO-patients. However, the variable 'SAO' was a dependent rather than an independent outcome predictor. The absence of an excess in ICH indicates that IVT seems not to be harmful in SAO-patients.

Background and Purpose: Determine feasibility and safety of intravenous (IV) versus combined (IV-IA [intra-arterial]) thrombolysis guided by transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD)., Methods: Thirty-three patients eligible for IV thrombolysis, within 3 hours of onset of symptoms, with occlusion in middle cerebral artery territory (TCCD monitoring, thrombolysis in brain ischemia [TIBI] flow grade [0-3]), underwent IV thrombolysis (tissue plasminogen activator, 0.9 mg/kg). In case of recanalization (modification of TIBI score > or =1) after 30 minutes IV thrombolysis was continued over 1 hour; otherwise, it was discontinued, with subsequent IA thrombolysis. Recanalization was determined by TIBI (TCCD) and angiographically by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades. Clinical outcome measures were assessed at baseline, 24 hours (NIHSS) and 3 months (modified Rankin Scale)., Results: In the IV group, 10/17 patients (59%) with complete or partial recanalization after 30 minutes had a favorable outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2). TIBI flow grades 3 to 5 after 30 minutes of IV thrombolysis predicted a good prognosis compared with TIBI grades 1 to 2 (P<0.05). In the combined IV/IA therapy group (no recanalization after 30 minutes), 9/16 patients (56%) had a favorable outcome at 3 months. One symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in each group., Conclusions: Combined IV-IA versus IV thrombolysis guided by TCCD was feasible and safe. Recanalization after 30 minutes of IV thrombolysis led to a favorable outcome in 59% of the patients, provided TIBI flow grades were of 3 to 5. In the absence of early recanalization during IV thrombolysis, there was clinical benefit to proceed to IA therapy for a significative proportion of patients (56%).

This databank-based, multicenter study compared all stroke patients with IV tissue plasminogen activator aged > or = 80 years (n = 38) and those < 80 years old (n = 287). Three-month mortality was higher in older patients. Favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale < or = 1) and intracranial hemorrhage (asymptomatic/symptomatic/fatal) were similarly frequent in both groups. Logistic regression showed that stroke severity, time to thrombolysis, glucose level, and history of coronary heart disease independently predicted outcome, whereas age did not.