Search

The effects of postnatal amitraz exposure on physical and behavioral parameters were studied in Wistar rats, whose lactating dams received the pesticide (10 mg/kg) orally on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 and 19 of lactation; control dams received distilled water (1 ml/kg) on the same days. A total of 18 different litters (9 of them control and 9 experimental) born after a 21-day gestation were used. The results showed that the median effective time (ET50) for fur development, eye opening, testis descent and onset of the startle response were increased in rats postnatally exposed to amitraz (2.7, 15.1, 21.6 and 15.3 days, respectively) compared to those of the control pups (1.8, 14.0, 19.9 and 12.9 days, respectively). The ages of incisor eruption, total unfolding of the external ears, vaginal and ear opening and the time taken to perform the grasping hindlimb reflex were not affected by amitraz exposure. Pups from dams treated with amitraz during lactation took more time (in seconds) to perform the surface righting reflex on postnatal days (PND) 3 (25.0 +/- 2.0), 4 (12.3 +/- 1.2) and 5 (8.7 +/- 0.9) in relation to controls (10.6 +/- 1.2; 4.5 +/- 0.6 and 3.4 +/- 0.4, respectively); the climbing response was not changed by amitraz. Postnatal amitraz exposure increased spontaneous motor activity of male and female pups in the open-field on PND 16 (140 +/- 11) and 17 (124 +/- 12), and 16 (104 +/- 9), 17 (137 +/- 9) and 18 (106 +/- 8), respectively. Data on spontaneous motor activity of the control male and female pups were 59 +/- 11 and 69 +/- 10 for days 16 and 17 and 49 +/- 9, 48 +/- 7 and 56 +/- 7 for days 16, 17 and 18, respectively. Some qualitative differences were also observed in spontaneous motor behavior; thus, raising the head, shoulder and pelvis matured one or two days later in the amitraz-treated offspring. Postnatal amitraz exposure did not change locomotion and rearing frequencies or immobility time in the open-field on PND 30, 60 and 90. The present findings indicate that postnatal exposure to amitraz caused transient developmental and behavioral changes in the exposed offspring and suggest that further investigation of the potential health risk of amitraz exposure to developing human and animal offsprings may be warranted.

The effects of prenatal amitraz exposure on physical and behavioral parameters of rats were studied. Pregnant rats were orally gavaged with amitraz (20 mg/Kg) or with distilled water (1.0 ml/Kg) on Days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, and 19 of pregnancy. After birth, cross-fostering was performed thus generating the following groups: control pups nursed by control dams (CC); control pups nursed by treated dams (CE); treated pups nursed by treated dams (EE) and treated pups nursed by control dams (EC). Results show that compared to pups of Group CC, groups prenatally exposed to amitraz (EC and EE) showed decreased age of vaginal opening. Group EE also showed earlier fur development and a delay in incisor eruption compared to Group CC. The ages of pinna detachment, eye and ear opening, testes descent, and reflex development (surface righting and startle) were not affected by amitraz exposure. Offspring of group CE also showed earlier fur development. Rats of group EE had higher locomotor activity and rearing frequency and shorter immobility time compared to the rats of group CC when observed in an open-field 30 days after birth but not 60 and 90 days. No significant differences were found in open-field behaviors among the CC, CE, and EC groups. The present findings indicate that prenatal exposure to amitraz caused transient developmental and behavioral changes in the exposed rat offspring and suggest that further investigation of the potential health risk of amitraz exposure to developing human offspring may be warranted.

The effects of amitraz, a formamidine derivative, on motor function were studied in rats. Behavioural and neurochemical studies were performed. Results show that amitraz was able: 1) to decrease locomotion and rearing frequencies of rats and to increase their immobility time in an open-field; 2) to displace to the left the control dose-response curve constructed to apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior; 3) to potentiate both pentobarbital sleeping time and amphetamine effects on open-field behaviour of rats and 4) to increase not only the whole brain levels of noradrenaline but also the striatal levels of dopamine. In relation to control animals, the pesticide also induced 5) a decrease in the striatal levels of homovanillic acid, 6) pesticide effects on open-field behaviour of rats were not antagonized by yohimbine administration, and 7) metoclopramide administration on amitraz pretreated rats antagonized not only amphetamine effects on open-field behaviour, but also apomorphine-induced stereotypy. These results are discussed in the light of the actions of amitraz on biogenic amines. It is suggested that the pesticide effects on motor function are consequences of the inhibitory effects on MAO activity, most probably through the increases produced on catecholamine levels within the central nervous system.

Acute oral administration of the pesticide amitraz at the doses of 60 and 100 mg/kg (N = 10 per group) significantly decreased the rearing frequency of rats observed in an open field to 8 +/- 8 and 5 +/- 5, respectively, when compared to 28 +/- 5 for control rats treated with vehicle only. The same doses of amitraz (N = 10 per group) increased duration of immobility to 80 +/- 50 and 113 +/- 64 s, respectively, when compared to 113 +/- 64 s for the controls. Acute oral administration of amitraz (20, 60 or 100 mg/kg, N = 10 per group) significantly increased the convulsive threshold dose of rats for strychnine, picrotoxin and pentylenetetrazole. Amitraz administered ip to mice at the doses of 20, 60 and 100 mg/kg (N = 10 per group) significantly increased sleeping time in a dose-dependent manner to 96 +/- 26, 120 +/- 29 and 198 +/- 58 min, respectively, when compared to 45 +/- 15 min for control mice treated with vehicle only. These results indicate that amitraz produces a depressant effect on the central nervous system.