1. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pulmonary nodules simulated in a dedicated porcine chest phantom.
- Author
-
Bonert M, Schneider M, Solyanik O, Hellbach K, Bondesson D, Gaass T, Thaens N, Ricke J, Benkert T, and Dinkel J
- Subjects
- Animals, Early Detection of Cancer, Humans, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods, Sensitivity and Specificity, Swine, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging instrumentation, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules diagnostic imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed instrumentation
- Abstract
Objective: CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules., Methods: Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules., Results: For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences., Conclusion: While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria., Competing Interests: Thomas Benkert is employed by Siemens Healthcare GmbH. We confirm that this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF