Search

Although digital subtraction angiography (DAS) remains the gold standard for neurovascular imaging, the number of diagnoses made on the basis of less invasive cross-sectional imaging techniques (CT and MR angiography) is increasing. The present article provides important technical principles of CT and MR angiography, followed by an analysis of the diagnostic possibilities and limitations of vascular cross-sectional imaging. The particular importance of post-processing of vascular cross-sectional datasets is also discussed. Using the typical clinical diagnostic work-up of extra- and intracranial vascular diseases as a basis, the article explains how a suitable examination technique and protocol is chosen and which limitations need to be borne in mind. After taking at look at the technical advances expected in the future (3-Tesla MRA, dual-energy CTA, post-processing workflow in PACS), the remaining indications for diagnostic DSA will be presented and explained.

Purpose: To evaluate the sensitivity of 16-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and to determine whether multidetector CT angiography provides sufficient diagnostic information to guide endovascular treatment, with combined imaging and clinical data as the reference standard., Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Eighty-seven patients clinically suspected of having subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent multidetector CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Aneurysm detection with multidetector CT angiography and DSA was analyzed on a per-patient and a per-aneurysm basis. For each aneurysm deemed ruptured on multidetector CT angiograms, the same multidetector CT angiography data set was used to determine whether the aneurysm was suitable for endovascular coil placement or whether a neurosurgical procedure was preferable. Criteria were based on neck width in relation to aneurysm size and the presence of vessels originating from the aneurysm. Results were compared with actual treatment that had been performed in each aneurysm after full diagnostic work-up, including DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for aneurysm presence were determined., Results: The reference standard revealed 84 aneurysms in 63 patients. Multidetector CT angiography was used to correctly identify 62 of 63 patients with 80 of 84 aneurysms and to correctly rule out aneurysms in 24 patients. DSA was used to correctly identify 62 of 63 patients with 79 of 84 aneurysms and to correctly rule out aneurysms in 23 patients. Per patient, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, for presence of aneurysm(s) were 98%, 100%, 100%, and 96% for multidetector CT angiography and 98%, 100%, 98%, and 96% for DSA. Per aneurysm, the possibility of coil embolization was correctly assessed with multidetector CT angiography in 69 (93%) of 74 target aneurysms for acute occlusive treatment., Conclusion: Multidetector CT angiography offers high diagnostic accuracy-equivalent to that of DSA-in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Also, the possibility of coil embolization can be reliably determined with multidetector CT angiography.

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is still considered the gold standard for most applications in neurovascular imaging. However, with the ongoing development of cross-sectional imaging modalities DSA is increasingly being replaced by less invasive methods. This contribution describes the diagnostic value and the increasing potential of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. The main role of CTA is in the diagnosis and therapy planning of ruptured aneurysms; in contrast, MRA plays an increasingly important role in the screening for asymptomatic aneurysms (especially in cases of familial subarachnoid hemorrhage) and in the follow-up after endovascular therapy with coils and/or intracranial stents. Technical issues concerning examination technique are covered here as well as an approach to advanced postprocessing of the image data. Furthermore, a brief outlook on the impact of new developments (MRA with parallel imaging and at 3.0 T) is given.

We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided into two groups: group A with reduced radiation exposure (tube current 50 mA, CT dose index CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) and group B with standard radiation exposure (tube current > or =100 mA, CTDIFDA > or =1.66 mGy). Image quality was assessed using a four-part scale ('excellent', 'good', 'sufficient', 'poor') on visual image impression and visibility of 32 anatomical details. Five experienced radiologists read the CT scans independently who were blinded to the examination parameters. Differences in ranked data were evaluated with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. No difference between groups A and B was observed in visual image impression. Detail visibility was significantly lower in group A, but the differences were limited to right upper quadrant structures (portal vein, common bile duct, pancreatic head, adrenals) and to arterial branches. Significant differences in visibility rated as 'poor' were only found for the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries; all other structures showed no difference between groups A and B. A protocol with reduced radiation exposure (50 mA, CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) allowed the demonstration of most anatomic structures in abdominal spiral CT in young children. For the precise demonstration of small details (e.g. structures of the right upper quadrant), a protocol with standard radiation exposure (> or =100 mAs) was superior.