Search

This study aims to investigate the effect of iterative reconstruction (IR) on MDCT image quality and radiologists' ability to diagnose and grade blunt solid organ injuries. One hundred (100) patients without and 52 patients with solid organ injuries were scanned on a 64-slice MDCT scanner using reference 300 mAs, 120 kVp, and fixed 75 s delay. Raw data was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three levels of iterative reconstruction (Philips iDose levels 2, 4, and 6). Four emergency radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction parameters and original interpretation, independently reviewed each case, assessed image quality, and assigned injury grades. Each reader was then asked to determine if they thought that IR was used and, if so, what level. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between FBP and the various IR levels or effect on the detection and grading of solid organ injuries (p > 0.8). Images reconstructed using iDose level 2 were judged to have the best overall image quality (p < 0.01). The radiologists had high sensitivity in detecting if IR was used (80 %, 95 % CI 76-84 %). IR performed comparably to FBP with no effect on radiologist ability to accurately detect and grade blunt solid organ injuries.

Laparoscopic technique for excision of a kidney from a living donor has advantages over conventional open surgery, but operative visibility and surgical exposure are limited. Preoperative multisection computed tomography (CT) can provide necessary anatomic information in a minimally invasive procedure. A three-phase examination is suggested: (a) imaging from the top of the kidneys to the pubic symphysis with a section width of 2.5 mm and no contrast medium, (b) scanning of the kidneys and upper pelvis during the arterial phase of enhancement with a section width of 1.0 mm, and (c) scanning of the kidneys and upper retroperitoneum during the nephrographic phase of enhancement with a section width of 1.0 mm. Emphasis in this article is placed on analysis of the venous anatomy because most radiologists are unfamiliar with the anatomic variations. Conventional radiography of the abdomen and pelvis is performed after CT to evaluate the collecting system and ureters and to provide a lower total radiation dose than if CT were used. Of several postprocessing techniques that may be used, the authors prefer maximum intensity projection for arterial evaluation and multiplanar reformatting for venous evaluation.

Endovascular stent grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms is a new technique that may replace open surgery in selected cases. Pre-and postoperative angiography can be replaced by helical CT. This pictorial essay describes and illustrates the use of multislice helical CT where maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reformats play a central role in the evaluation.

Multisection computed tomography (CT) was introduced in 1992 with the advent of dual-section-capable scanners and was improved in 1998 following the development of quad-section technology. With a recent increase in gantry speed from one to two revolutions per second, multisection CT scanners are now up to eight times faster than conventional single-section helical CT scanners. The benefits of quad-section CT relative to single-section helical CT are considerable. They include improved temporal resolution, improved spatial resolution in the z axis, increased concentration of intravascular contrast material, decreased image noise, efficient x-ray tube use, and longer anatomic coverage. These factors substantially increase the diagnostic accuracy of the examination. The multisection CT technique has enabled faster and superior evaluation of patients across a wide spectrum of clinical indications. These include isotropic viewing, musculoskeletal applications, use of multiplanar reformation in special situations, CT myelography, long coverage and multiphase studies, CT angiography, cardiac scoring, evaluation of brain perfusion, imaging of large patients, evaluation of acute chest pain or dyspnea, virtual endoscopy, and thin-section scanning with retrospective image fusing. Multisection CT is superior to single-section helical CT for nearly all clinical applications.