Search

Dual-energy CT (DECT) material decomposition techniques may better detect edema within cerebral infarcts than conventional non-contrast CT (NCCT). This study compared if Virtual Ischemia Maps (VIM) derived from non-contrast DECT of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) are superior to NCCT for ischemic core estimation, compared against reference-standard DWI-MRI. Only patients whose baseline ischemic core was most likely to remain stable on follow-up MRI were included, defined as those with excellent post-thrombectomy revascularization or no perfusion mismatch. Twenty-four consecutive AIS-LVO patients with baseline non-contrast DECT, CT perfusion (CTP), and DWI-MRI were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was agreement between volumetric manually segmented VIM, NCCT, and automatically segmented CTP estimates of the ischemic core relative to manually segmented DWI volumes. Volume agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and comparison of CT to DWI volume ratios. DWI volumes were better approximated by VIM than NCCT (VIM/DWI ratio 0.68 ± 0.35 vs. NCCT/DWI ratio 0.34 ± 0.35; P < 0.001) or CTP (CTP/DWI ratio 0.45 ± 0.67; P < 0.001), and VIM best correlated with DWI (r VIM  = 0.90; r NCCT  = 0.75; r CTP  = 0.77; P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analyses indicated significantly greater agreement between DWI and VIM than NCCT core volumes (mean bias 0.60 [95%AI 0.39-0.82] vs. 0.20 [95%AI 0.11-0.30]). We conclude that DECT VIM estimates the ischemic core in AIS-LVO patients more accurately than NCCT.

Objective: We compared 40- to 70-keV virtual monoenergetic to conventional computed tomography (CT) perfusion reconstructions with respect to quality of perfusion maps., Methods: Conventional CT perfusion (CTP) images were acquired at 80 kVp in 25 patients, and 40- to 70-keV images were acquired with a dual-layer CT at 120 kVp in 25 patients. First, time-attenuation-curve contrast-to-noise ratio was assessed. Second, the perfusion maps of both groups were qualitatively analyzed by observers. Last, the monoenergetic reconstruction with the highest quality was compared with the clinical standard 80-kVp CTP acquisitions., Results: Contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly better for 40 to 60 keV as compared with 70 keV and conventional images (P < 0.001). Visually, the difference between the blood volume maps among reconstructions was minimal. The 50-keV perfusion maps had the highest quality compared with the other monoenergetic and conventional maps (P < 0.002)., Conclusions: The quality of 50-keV CTP images is superior to the quality of conventional 80- and 120-kVp images., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The limited axial coverage of many computed tomography (CT) scanners poses a high risk on false negative findings in cerebral CT-perfusion (CTP) imaging. Axial coverage may be increased by moving the table back and forth during image acquisition. However, this method often increases the acquisition interval between CT frames, which may influence the CTP analysis. In this study, we evaluated the influence of different acquisition intervals on quantitative perfusion maps and infarct volumes by analyzing patient data with three CTP analysis methods., Methods: CT-perfusion data from 25 patients with ischemic stroke were used for this study. The acquisition interval was synthetically reduced from 1 to 5 s before calculating perfusion values, which included cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT). The color scaling of the perfusion was scaled such that the mean perfusion value had the same color-coding as the mean perfusion in the 1 s reference. Also, infarct core and penumbra volumes (summary map) were calculated using default thresholds of CBV and relative MTT (rMTT). The original, 1 s acquisition interval scan served as the reference standard. A commercial block-circulant singular value decomposition (bSVD) based method (ISP; Philips Healthcare), a non-commercial bSVD method, and a non-linear regression (NLR) model-based method were evaluated., Results: Cerebral blood volume values generated with bSVD and NLR were not significantly different from the reference standard, while ISP showed significant differences for acquisition intervals of 3 and 4 s. MTT and CBF values generated with bSVD and ISP were significantly different for all acquisition intervals, whereas NLR did not show any significant differences. Calibrated perfusion maps were able to distinguish healthy from infarcted tissue up to an acquisition interval of 5 s for all methods. The infarct core volumes were significantly different for acquisition intervals of 2 (NLR) and 3 s (bSVD and ISP) or greater. For the penumbra volumes, NLR showed no significant differences, while bSVD and ISP showed significant differences for the 5 s interval and for all intervals, respectively. Visual inspection of the summary maps indicated minor differences between the reference standard and acquisition intervals of 4 s or less (ISP) and 5 s or less (bSVD and NLR)., Conclusion: Altering the acquisition interval may introduce a bias in the perfusion parameters. Calibration of the visualization of the perfusion maps with increasing acquisition intervals allowed distinction between healthy and infarcted tissue. Infarct volumes based on relative MTT can be influenced by the acquisition interval, but visual inspection of the summary maps indicated minor differences between the reference standard and acquisition intervals up to 4 (ISP) and 5 s (bSVD and NLR). Taken together, axial coverage can be increased by prolonging the acquisition interval up to 5 s depending on the perfusion analysis., (© 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: To assess the radiation dose associated with always-on dual-energy acquisitions in clinical practice over a broad range of clinical protocols using a dual-layer detector CT (DLCT; IQon spectral CT, Philips Healthcare) as compared to an otherwise technically equivalent single-layer detector CT (SLCT; Brilliance iCT, Philips healthcare)., Materials and Methods: Dose-length-product data for consecutive examinations over a six-month period acquired with DLCT were retrospectively collected and compared to consecutive examinations from an SLCT. Imaging protocols were optimized for diagnostic image quality for each system prior to data collection. Dose reports of CT protocols that were used at least 50 times on both systems were collected. After exclusion of statistical outliers, protocols were evaluated with regard to reported dose levels., Results: In total, 4536 dose reports for DLCT and 5783 reports for SLCT were collected. All DLCT examinations were acquired at 120 kVp, enabling dual-energy analysis. With SLCT, 79% of examinations were acquired at 120 kVp, and 21% at 100/80 kVp. Protocols for 15 indications were used more than 50 times on both scanners. For seven protocols there was no significant difference between the two scanners (p > 0.05), whereas seven protocols were acquired with higher dose levels on SLCT compared to the DLCT (p < 0.03). For one protocol, the DLCT dose was significantly higher (p < 0.005) compared to the SLCT., Conclusion: Dual-layer detector CT enables acquisition of dual-energy information over a broad range of clinical indications without increasing radiation dose when compared to a conventional single-layer detector CT., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Spectral CT using a dual layer detector offers the possibility of retrospectively introducing spectral information to conventional CT images. In theory, the dual-layer technology should not come with a dose or image quality penalty for conventional images. In this study, we evaluate the influence of a dual-layer detector (IQon Spectral CT, Philips Healthcare) on the image quality of conventional CT images, by comparing these images with those of a conventional but otherwise technically comparable single-layer CT scanner (Brilliance iCT, Philips Healthcare), by means of phantom experiments., Methods: For both CT scanners, conventional CT images were acquired using four adult scanning protocols: (a) body helical, (b) body axial, (c) head helical, and (d) head axial. A CATPHAN 600 phantom was scanned to conduct an assessment of image quality metrics at equivalent (CTDI) dose levels. Noise was characterized by means of noise power spectra (NPS) and standard deviation (SD) of a uniform region, and spatial resolution was evaluated with modulation transfer functions (MTF) of a tungsten wire. In addition, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image uniformity, CT number linearity, slice thickness, slice spacing, and spatial linearity were measured and evaluated. Additional measurements of CNR, resolution and noise were performed in two larger phantoms., Results: The resolution levels at 50%, 10%, and 5% MTF of the iCT and IQon showed small, but significant differences up to 0.25 lp/cm for body scans, and up to 0.2 lp/cm for head scans in favor of the IQon. The iCT and IQon showed perfect CT linearity for body scans, but for head scans both scanners showed an underestimation of the CT numbers of materials with a high opacity. Slice thickness was slightly overestimated for both scanners. Slice spacing was comparable and reconstructed correctly. In addition, spatial linearity was excellent for both scanners, with a maximum error of 0.11 mm. CNR was higher on the IQon compared to the iCT for both normal and larger phantoms with differences up to 0.51. Spatial resolution did not change with phantom size, but noise levels increased significantly. For head scans, IQon had a noise level that was significantly lower than the iCT, on the other hand IQon showed noise levels significantly higher than the iCT for body scans. Still, these differences were well within the specified range of performance of iCT scanners., Conclusions: At equivalent dose levels, this study showed similar quality of conventional images acquired on iCT and IQon for medium-sized phantoms and slightly degraded image quality for (very) large phantoms at lower tube voltages on the IQon. Accordingly, it may be concluded that the introduction of a dual-layer detector neither compromises image quality of conventional images nor increases radiation dose for normal-sized patients, and slightly degrades dose efficiency for large patients at 120 kVp and lower tube voltages., (© 2018 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)