1. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
- Author
-
Webman M, Mulki E, Roldan R, Arevalo O, Roberts JF, and Garcia-Godoy F
- Subjects
- Child, Child, Preschool, Compomers chemistry, Composite Resins chemistry, Crowns, Dental Amalgam chemistry, Dental Materials chemistry, Dental Restoration Failure statistics & numerical data, Dental Restoration, Permanent statistics & numerical data, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Molar diagnostic imaging, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Stainless Steel chemistry, Survival Analysis, Tooth, Deciduous diagnostic imaging, Treatment Outcome, Dental Restoration, Permanent classification, Glass Ionomer Cements chemistry, Molar pathology, Resin Cements chemistry, Tooth, Deciduous pathology
- Abstract
Objective: To determine the three-year survival rate of Class II resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), Vitremer, restorations in primary molars and to compare these results with measurements of survival of Class II restorations of standard restorative materials., Study Design: Data on Class II restorations placed in primary molars during a six-year period were collected through a chart review and radiographic evaluation in the office of a board-certified pediatric dentist. A radiograph showing that the restoration was intact was required at least 3 years after placement to qualify as successful. If no radiograph existed, the restoration was excluded. If the restoration was not found to be intact radiographically or was charted as having been replaced before three years it was recorded as a failure. The results of this study were then compared to other standard restorative materials using normalized annual failure rates., Results: Of the 1,231 Class II resinmodified glass-ionomer cement restorations placed over six years 427 met the inclusion criteria. There was a 97.42% survival rate for a 3-year period equivalent to an annual failure rate of 0.86%., Conclusions: A novel approach comparing materials showed that in this study Vitremer compared very favorably to previously published success rates of other standard restorative materials (amalgam, composite, stainless steel crown, compomer) and other RMGIC studies.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF