Search

Purpose: Report clinical and radiological long-term follow-up (FU) outcome of bone impaction grafting (BIG) and anti-protrusio cage (APC) technique in hip revision surgery. Materials and methods: We analysed data on complications, as well as the clinical and radiological outcome of patients treated using this technique at our institution. We evaluated the acetabular bone stock renovation, acetabular component stability and its radiological migration. The clinical parameters considered were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Results: Forty hips, with a mean 14.3-year FU, were included. This technique showed good clinical long-term results in an elderly and low-demanding population (mean age at surgery 71.4 ± 12.1 years). The radiological results were not as good as clinical results: 67.5% of cases had a radiographic evidence of resorption of less than 1/3 of the bone graft; 27.5% had a resorption ranging from 1/3 and ½ of the graft, and 5% had more than ½ of the graft. Paprosky type III B reported worse results in terms of graft resorption and a greater migration of the APC (p < 0.001). The survival rate was 95% and a 2.5% rate of septic failure was recorded. Conclusion: Impaction grafting with femoral head and APC is an effective technique for treating high-grade acetabular defects. APC reconstructs the hip centre of rotation, avoiding loading forces on the underlying bone graft that can be correctly integrated. At long-term FU, satisfactory clinical results, not strictly correlated to radiological signs of integration, were observed; Paprosky type III B reported worse results in terms of graft resorption and a greater migration of the APC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are rising worldwide, as the functional request of patients who undergo this procedure. The trabeculae oriented pattern (TOP) is a modern cup, which follows the philosophy of the tissue sparing surgery (TSS). Focusing on clinical and radiological results and complications, the authors aim to highlight the outcomes of the TOP at a long-term follow-up (FU). Methods: A retrospective analysis was completed on THA performed with the TOP cup between 1997 and 2015. Five hundred and eighty-eight patients sustained surgery, for a total of 662 cup implanted. Four hundred and sixty patients (524 hips) were examined. Mean FU was 12 ± 4.9 years (range 5–22). Clinical (HHS, OHS and VAS) and radiological data were obtained. Every complication, reoperation or revision was recorded and analyzed. Results: Clinical evaluation revealed a HHS of 87.1 ± 13.8 an OHS of 41.3 ± 5.4, and a VAS of 1.2 ± 1.1. Acetabular osteolysis was observed in 53 hips. Overall survival rate of the cup was 90.5% (50 revisions), the main causes of cup substitution being aseptic loosening (AL) of the cup combined with the stem (26), of the cup only (13 cases) and periprosthetic joint infection (7 cases). Conclusion: TOP cup has demonstrated a good overall survivorship at a long-term FU, even compared with other coated cups, providing excellent clinical result with low rate of complications. Its association with a neck sparing stem permits a physiologic load transmission, reducing the stress shielding effect that could cause early implant mobilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]